This week, we’ve been looking at the class of 2005 in cars, and we’re going to finish it out by blowing the budget to smithereens. Today’s cars are both just about the same price now, but one of them is much cheaper than it was new, while the other is considerably more expensive. Which one is a better deal will be up to you.
Yesterday, we looked at a couple of boxy wagony things that have become legends over the past two decades, and are both still sought-after today. Everybody had a story about one of these or the other, and I do always enjoy hearing them. From the comments, I expected it to be a fair fight, but the Honda Element just blew all four normal-opening doors right off the Scion xB.
I’m not so sure that’s the right call. All things being equal, if the choice is between an Element and an xB, I’ll take the Element. But between these two examples, I think I’d feel better about the xB. I didn’t do my due diligence about that Element; it appears that the interior photos were stolen from another ad. It seemed a little hinky, with the mismatched door sills, but I let it slide, and I shouldn’t have. If the seller of the Element is stealing photos from other ads, what other fast ones are they trying to pull? In this case, I think the sketchy SE 82nd Ave dealership in Portland is actually the more honest seller. Scary thought.

Generally speaking, unless you’re talking about rare classics, cars depreciate from the day you drive them off the lot. Never look up the blue book value of a car you just bought new; it’s a number you really don’t want to see. And it just gets worse as time goes on. But sometimes, rarity and desirability can combine to raise a car’s value before it reaches classic status, so it ends up costing significantly more used than it ever did new. Is it worth it? Well, that’s up to the buyer; you can consult all the price guides you want, but in the end, a car is worth exactly what someone is willing to pay for it on the day it sells, and not a penny more or less.
One of today’s cars is a high-end luxury car, and as you may expect, its value has dropped like a rock, and hasn’t yet bottomed out. The other is a very rare version of a common vehicle in excellent condition and with low mileage. Somehow, their prices have crossed paths, and either one will set you back $40,000, give or take. Let’s take a look.
2005 Bentley Continental GT – $42,500

Engine/drivetrain: Twin-turbocharged 6.0-liter DOHC W12, six-speed automatic, AWD
Location: Oakland Hills, CA
Odometer reading: 40,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
The story of Bentley, as is the story of so many British car marques, is one of a long tradition of very cool cars set against a backdrop of mergers, acquisitions, bankruptcies, fights over trademarks, and eventual watering-down by a new corporate owner. This Continental GT can trace its lineage back a hundred years, to the heady days of Brooklands and the Blue Train Races, but mechanically, it has a lot in common with an Audi.

High-performance Bentleys have always had some pretty bonkers engines, from the enormous and sometimes supercharged inline sixes of the 1920s, to the turbocharged Rolls-Royce V8s of the 1980s and ’90s. But new corporate owner Volkswagen brought its own special sauce to the Bentley recipe in the form of its W12 engine, here sporting twin turbochargers and putting out 552 horsepower. It’s an engine no sane person would devise, but that makes it kinda perfect for a car like this. Power is important, yes, but having that power delivered with a bit of panache and flair is crucial. The W12 drives all four wheels through a six-speed ZF automatic with “Tiptronic” manual shifting capability. It runs and drives great, and has “no mechanical issues,” according to the seller.

If you hate the blandness and sameness of modern car interiors, the solution is to buy a Bentley. Look at this glorious cockpit. It’s all real leather and real wood, of course, and all done by hand. The seller says the headliner has just been redone; apparently, droopy headliners are a common problem with these cars. The window regulators are new, too, and everything else works well.

There’s no mistaking the styling of this car for anything else, and that’s kind of the point, too. Why bother buying a Bentley if everyone doesn’t know it’s a Bentley? The two-tone job is a partial wrap; the silver is vinyl, and the darker gray is the paint color. It’s removable if you don’t like it, but I think it looks good.
2005 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon Sahara Edition – $39,975

Engine/drivetrain: 4.0-liter OHV inline 6, four-speed automatic, 4WD
Location: Mesa, AZ
Odometer reading: 65,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
What’s cooler than a Jeep? More Jeep! Stretching the wheelbase of the old CJ-7 to create the CJ-8 Scrambler made it way cooler, and I’m not just saying that as someone who learned to drive in one. The Scrambler only lasted a few years in the early 1980s, but in 2004 Jeep did it again, with the LJ Wrangler Unlimited, a TJ Wrangler with an extra foot and a half of Jeepy goodness. The Unlimited only lasted for three model years, and in 2005 Jeep produced the special “Sahara Edition” as a tie-in with the action adventure movie Sahara, which I think I’ve seen but I can’t really remember. Only 1,000 Sahara Edition Wrangler Unlimiteds were built; this is number 968.

As rare as this special edition Jeep might be, its mechanicals are tried-and-true: the old AMC 4.0 liter inline six, a Chrysler four-speed automatic, and on-demand four-wheel-drive. Since the Sahara Edition is also a Rubicon model, it includes all the off-road goodies that go along with that badge, like lockable diffs, a 4:1 low range in the transfer case, and bigger wheels and tires. This one has only 65,000 miles on it, and hasn’t seen much, if any, off-road action. It runs and drives just fine, and I think the biggest problem would be refraining from treating it like a Jeep and ruining its value.

There is a distinct lack of good interior photos in this ad; this is about as good as it gets. There is another photo showing the upholstery under that towel on the seat, and it’s in beautiful shape. Another photo shows a crack in the plastic of one door panel, but the rest of the interior looks showroom new. It has some aftermarket power-retractable running boards, but the seller says there’s an issue with the passenger side one.

It’s near-perfect outside too, and the seller says it has always been garaged. I suppose that’s good for keeping the value up, but in my opinion, Jeeps were never meant to be collectors’ items – no matter how rare. This thing shouldn’t have reached 20 years old in this condition; it should have dings and scrapes and another hundred thousand miles on the odometer. It should be festooned with stickers from national parks and tourist traps. It’s one of a thousand special edition models from a movie no one remembers, so who cares about its collectibility? Someone please buy this thing and give it the hard-knock life it deserves.
According to Edmunds, the Bentley sold new for about $155,000, and the Jeep for around $28,000. One has lost more than a hundred and ten grand in value, and the other has gained about ten. But which one is the better deal at its new price? You’ve got all weekend to think about it. See you back here on Monday!









I don’t want a Bentley for $40k; this seems like a case of “cheap ultra-luxury car will ultimately be very expensive.”
But I do want some of whatever that Jeep seller is smoking. I don’t care how rare that ultimately anodyne combination of trims and colors and whatever was; $40 large for a 20 year-old Jeep is straight bonkers.
This: https://helena.craigslist.org/cto/d/helena-2006-jeep-wrangler-unlimited-lj/7885792703.html
The correct choice is neither. Maybe the Bentley if you’re a gambler with fairly deep pockets.
The Jeep is nice and probably reliable but that price is nuts. On the other hand, the Bentley just sounds like it’ll have all the problems of an old British car and an old German car combined, which sounds very expensive to me, so I voted Jeep as it’s less likely to leave me stranded and broke.
Jeep fan here: I voted for the Bentley. It’s way more vehicle for the price, and special edition Jeeps are about as rare as non-special edition ones (=not very). Love that Sahara, but it’s not mint enough to ask that price.
That jeep can in no possible way be worth that much.
it looks great,but if you can’t get a Jeep dirty and use it I don’t see the point.
I am not a big fan of the design of that Bentley,but they look ok I guess and would be a great weekend trip car.
I am not familiar enough with these to know how reliable they are,but it should be good enough for occasional use.
Oh god, no freaking way on either of these. The Jeep is at best a $20,000 vehicle, and I have zero interest in an automatic in a Jeep. I’ve seen several better deals on well maintained manual Jeeps just in my neighborhood in the last year.
On the other hand, I wouldn’t take that Bentley unless you paid ME $40,000 to cover the inevitable expensive repairs. And it’s as ugly as a iguana’s ass.
Coming in late, I thought that choosing the Bentley might put me in the minority. For the life of me, I don’t know why, but I’ve always liked the looks of those things. Even if I only get 5K miles a year out of it (while I spend the rest of the year saving up for repairs), it would be a glorious 5k. The Jeep is a WTF sort of car. There is no reason for it.
Okay, I’m going to assume this is a fantasy where I’ve been handed $40k and told I must buy one of these. Otherwise, no way either way.
But if I gotta… Jeep. I love the unkillable 4.0 and can fix anything myself with easily-affordable and available parts.
Sure, the Bentley is cool but the tech is going to be a nightmare to maintain. British reliability combined with Piech-era complexity and serviceability? Yech. Unless our fantasy scenario also includes a $100k slush fund for repairs.
Sign me up for that stately Bently! I don’t care if I’ll need to take out a 4th mortgage on my house to pay for some part as simple as the air filter! It is beautiful!!!!
The real answer is neither, of course, but if I had the money to maintain the Bentley, hands-down, no-question, winner winner chicken dinner.
You’re out of your mind if you think I’d pay 40k for an 05 Wrangler. Give me the Bentley all day any day
Hell, with the Stellantis liquidation sales going on, you could probably score a brand new Wrangler for that price! For an additional measly 1 grand, they’ll even give it that angry mad kitty facia Applica!
Neither.
But since it’s imaginary $$ I picked the Bentley.
If the Jeep had under 30K miles and was a minty-ish manual, a solid argument could be made for $35K. It would likely never be worth less. The 60K automatic in the ad is a silly price.
Overpaying for a Jeep to only low mileage mall crawling or sinfully decidant luxury? Sorry that Jeep is like putting in a swimming pool just to look at it on a hot day. That Bentley is a great massage and a happy ending from an aging once beautiful but still not bad masseuse.
Now the only problem with the Bentley is that wrap combo. It looks great but if I am wrapping half the car I’m wrapping the bottom half to protect it from chips from rocks, tar, and roadkill. Unless he is hiding something.
No. Just no.
The only way I could drop that much money on a Jeep is if it were brand new with a warranty, but the sort of things I would specifically buy a Jeep for I would not want to spend that kind of money.
Give me the Bentley and the tissues for the first repair bill.
you could probably buy a new one with warranty for that price. The Jeep dealer by me is still hawking new 23-24 models that have yet to be titled.
LJ Rubicon’s are rare, and as such do command a premium. But 40k? This is crack pipe pricing.
Well, this was pretty easy…Bentley!
V12 for the win…I’ll cruise in luxury and style. It has low miles, been taken care of and work done to it. I’d manual swap it just for the hell of it (if possible) and then get rid of the boring color exterior by starting over and painting it blue.
The Wrangler is just too expensive for a Jeep…I like it but if I’m getting a Jeep, I’m going full DT and getting a rusted out beater so I don’t have to worry about denting it or whatever off road. I’d be too worried about that w/ this fancy Jeep…they need to just decide to keep it forever and just do what it was made for:
DRIVE IT OFF ROAD!
$40k for a 20-year old Jeep is the most hilarious joke I’ve heard in along time.
The Bentley, obviously. The only way a 20-year-old Jeep sells for 40 grand is if it a) has 30 grand in cash in the glove compartment and b) is in pristine condition, neither of which seems to be true about this one.
C’mon it ain’t worth $40k but it’s worth more than $10k in that condition
$11k?
This is a neither day for me. I’d like to drive the Bentley once, but I wouldn’t want to own it.
Bentley for me. It’s reasonably priced for a Bentley and I would have it as a lightly used weekend car. And it’s way more special than any Jeep will ever be.
That Jeep is just grossly overpriced and has the wrong transmission.
I agree I’d get the Bentley drive it until it breaks than remove the interior put it in my house because it is much nicer than any furniture I own.
This Jeep is the ultimate “I know what I got” vehicle. Good luck with that. Bentley all the way.
I mean, both are terrible deals. However, the Jeep has a chance of appreciating as a collector item. But yeah, don’t buy either.