The Testarossa name is making a triumphant return. Ferrari on Tuesday took the wraps off the replacement for its SF90 supercar, opting to revive the legendary nameplate that inspired an entire generation of enthusiasts. Now called the 849 Testarossa, the car uses an updated version of its predecessor’s hybridized, twin-turbo V8 powertrain. There’s more power and more aero, which, according to Ferrari, means lower lap times around a race track.
When you think Testarossa, you probably think of the now-iconic flat-12-powered flagship of the 1980s. But the primary inspiration for the title, Ferrari says, is to pay tribute to the 500 TR, a four-cylinder race car built in 1956 to take on Maserati. The TR stood for Testa Rossa, the color of the camshaft covers used on the car’s engine. Either way, we’re hyped.


The 849 Testarossa’s name is not the coolest thing about it, though. All you have to do is look at it to understand.
It Looks Freakin’ Awesome

Ferrari’s current design scheme has more than a few critics, but I really can’t see why. The 12Cilindri looks amazing, and the F80, the company’s new big-boy flagship, is a box-flare-fender bundle of joy. This car’s fascia very clearly takes design cues from both, albeit with some incredibly cool bumperettes on either corner, similar to that one-off rally-ready Porsche 911 Reimagined by Singer. There’s also an extra flick on the splitter, which Ferrari says is responsible for 10 percent of the front end’s downforce alone.
The rear is even more interesting. Ferrari calls those two little winglets a “twin-tail architecture” inspired by the 512 S, a prototype racing car that made its first appearance in the late 1960s. It also reminds me of the FXX K and, more recently, the SF90 XX Stradale, both of which also used similar setups. What you don’t see in the photos is the active rear wing, which sits between the two winglets, and can raise or lower in less than a second, according to Ferrari.
The Italian supercar maker is particularly proud of the 849 Testarossa’s redesigned underfloor. It has three pairs of vortex generators (that’s six total, I used a calculator), responsible for finding a 20-percent increase in downforce compared to the SF90. Another 15 percent comes from a reworking of the air coming from the front of the car, and that new diffuser.
Wait, No 12-Cylinder? Is This Even A Real Testarossa?

The last Ferrari to wear a Testarossa badge had a naturally aspirated flat 12 and a five-speed manual transmission. The 849 Testarossa has neither of those things. But I wouldn’t count it out just yet. Under the skin, you’ll find a newly updated version of the three-motor, V8-powered drivetrain in the SF90 Stradale. If you’re keeping track of the latest and greatest Ferraris, that’s two more cylinders than even the F80, which uses a V6.
Ferrari makes it clear this V8 isn’t entirely new, but going by the laundry list of new parts it lists, I kinda have a hard time believing them. There’s a new block, new cylinder heads, new turbochargers, new intake plenums, new exhaust manifolds, and a new valvetrain system. It’s more apt here to point out what’s not new than what is. It makes 818 horsepower all on its own, without help from the hybrid motors. That’s nearly as much as the 12Clindri’s 6.5-liter V12.
Ferrari credits the increased size of the turbos and the bigger-diameter exhaust ducts for the extra power. The company is also quick to point out the engine weighs about the same as it did before, thanks to titanium fasteners and lighter-weight camshafts. Those exhaust manifolds are also now made from Inconel, which is great at containing heat—though Ferrari says it’s employing the material to improve performance and sound.

Then there are the hybrid motors. As before, there are two up front—one for each front wheel—and another sandwiched between the engine and the eight-speed dual-clutch transmission. Ferrari claims that, combined, the three motors produce a total of 220 horsepower (total max output for the whole system is 1036 horsepower). The system has been reworked to bring more comfort, better torque vectoring up front, and deliver a better transition between full electric and hybrid power.
Most importantly, the regenerative braking has been recalibrated in the 849 Testarossa to improve pedal feel, which was one of my main complaints when I drove the SF90. The motors are also more efficient than before, though Ferrari’s estimated EV-only range of 15 miles from the 7.45-kWh battery is the same as before.
What Else Has Been Changed Here?

The 849’s interior has been totally redone to give the driver a perceived higher level of importance—something I assume all Ferrari owners desire. The new dash has virtually all of the controls and vents facing towards the driver’s seat, with a new center console that splits the two occupants with a diagonal trim piece, similar to the C8 Corvette (though not nearly as drastic).
Thankfully, the 849 keeps my favorite part about Ferrari interiors, the gated-shifter-themed gear selector. Here it’s positioned high up in a flowing-like state, unlocking the lower console for things like a cupholder and a place to put your phone. Also, there are real buttons on the steering wheel instead of horrific touch-capactive D-pads. Thank goodness.
The rest of the interior is typical Ferrari. Bucket seats, steering wheel-mounted turn signal buttons, gigantic paddle shifters, and a right-side display for your passenger to stare at as you break seven laws at once while merging onto the highway.
Ok, But Will It Drive Better?

Sure sounds like it. Ferrari says it used the SF90 as a starting point, with the goal of improving five specific categories: lateral and longitudinal acceleration, gear changes, braking, and sound. Here’s how engineers tackled each category:
Lateral acceleration was optimised by working on the suspension geometry and management of the electronic vehicle dynamics controls to provide a faster response to steering wheel inputs and improving the mechanical grip of the rear axle. Longitudinal acceleration benefits from a quicker response to the accelerator pedal and the increase in maximum power available.
The gearshift strategy has been refined to provide a more progressive feel and reduce actuation times. Braking efficiency has been improved, as has pedal feel and travel, thanks to the introduction of the ABS Evo developed for the SF90 XX Stradale. The sound has been calibrated to accurately replicate accelerator response in terms of quality through the rev range.

The company also uses what it calls the Ferrari Integrated Vehicle Estimator (FIVE) digital system, which, among other things, can simulate a ghost of the car it’s mated to in real time.
The FIVE system represents a significant evolution in dynamic controls. It is an estimation system capable of creating a digital twin that replicates the behaviour of the car in real time, based on a simplified mathematical model powered by real measurements (acceleration, 6D sensor).
FIVE accurately estimates performance characteristics that cannot be directly measured, such as speed (with a margin of error of less than 1 km/h) and yaw angle (margin of less than 1°) of the vehicle, improving traction control, electronic differential management and e4WD system delivery. These estimates feed into all vehicle dynamics controls, making the response more precise and repeatable.
Silly name, sure. But also cool as hell.

There’s no telling how much the 849 Testarossa will cost—Ferrari is famous for withholding such information when it launches a car. The outgoing SF90 Spider started at nearly $600,000, so I’d estimate MSRP will be somewhere around there—chump change, as far as the average Ferrari buyer is concerned. If you’re already on the company’s nice list, you can put your order in now.
Top graphic image: Ferrari
Oh look, another outlandishly expensive supercar that will barely ever be driven.
I believe Autopian should get one for Adrian, so he can slap a New Mondial badge on it and probably be banned to ever put his hands in a new Ferrari again.
And based on its look alone, is not even a way to compensate from the Rodius…
I’ll be the odd one out, because I don’t hate the design. For me it is reminiscent of the 80’s style without outright copying it. Also, it doesn’t look like a constipated catfish, which is a huge plus on my book.
Well, that’s exactly the issue here, at least for me: it tries to have an 80’s vibe, but will not do it completely. Upfront: 80’s, no question about it, and isolated, it is not that bad. The rest, 80’s? Not so much. The front doesn’t talk with rest.
I mean, imagine you walking around the car: if you start at its back, you don’t expect that front, and vice-versa.
Maybe it will look better in black.
I guess I can see what you mean, but have to say, it doesn’t bother me. But now for some reason the black thing on the great wheel arch looks like a telephone receiver and I can’t unsee it.
I’ll admit, the design is too busy. I like it, but I’m leaning towards considering it a guilty pleasure 🙂
Ferrari has been making ugly cars for the last 25 years but this is a step in the right direction. The front spoiler is badly integrated and the black accents are used to break up the design so that you can’t see how bloated it is as a whole.
This reminds me of a Daytona far more than a Testarossa.
It’s been a very long time since I thought a Ferrari was truly pretty but this is not acceptable.
I was never much of a fan of the Magnum PI era Testarossas, so I was all ready to like this one a lot more. Gotta say, I’m disappointed. It’s not too bad looking from the side and the rear 3/4, but it looks pretty awful from the front and especially the rear. Too much going on – it’s a hot mess. Count me as another who’s curious to hear Adrian’s take on it.
But yeah, if someone wants to give me one, I’ll suffer being seen in it.
Maybe there is a body kit to disguise it as a Fiero?
OK, good one.
Eh, it’s unobtainium for most, but that’s not the problem. It is ugly, and that choice of blue interior is something.
Adrian? PAGING ADRIAN. ADRIAN PLEASE COME TO THE COURTESY WHITE DESIGN MEGAPHONE.
It looks awkward from most angles. This one is not a winner. That rear vertical black stripe leads to a hunchback looking quarter panel. It just looks a bit too disjointed and overcooked.
I guess I haven’t been paying attention, but when did Ferrari start having ugly vegetable slicer wheels?
It’s reminding me of something
https://morethanvacuums.com/shop/dirt-devil-vacuum-cleaner-featherlite-corded-bagged-upright-vacuum/
How DARE you impugn the Featherlite Corded Bagged Upright by associating it with this miscarriage of design! The Featherlite is a paragon of graceful execution by comparison.
Well form follows function, and hey, they both suck, so there you go.
Yeah, it’s got a tough Mies van der Rohe to hoe, although it looks like an exceptionally ugly Gehry.
I like the F80 more, not even close. It looks more like an evolution of that instead of standing on its own.
I used to have an electric razor that looked like this car.
I generally like most Ferrari’s design but this one is not doing it for me. Fortunately I’ll probably never see one in real life so no worries there, haha!
It’s pretty, but it’s not a Testarossa – go take a look at one of those and then come back here. One’s got soul, the other one is this thing.
I’m not sure exactly why this is true, but I think it might have something to do with how (relatively) anonymous the design is. The classic Testarossa was unmistakable for anything else on the road; as good looking as this is, it looks pretty much like any other luxury exotic out there right now.
I don’t think the design language that I feel works really well with the F80 worked out too well here, tho the rear looks cool. I just don’t understand its place in the lineup. The SF-90 was like an interim halo car until the F80 came along, and the XX version is already really close performance-wise so why does this exist? Just something for people that think a 296 is “entry level?” Wild.
It looks like a body kit for a corvette
If they send me one I’ll give it a shot, but I’m not making any promises.
That has got to be the ugliest car ever built. First there was the Pacer, which narrowly beat out the Gremlin. Many years passed, then the new Leaf eclipsed it and allowed to Pacer to be finally laid to rest. Then the Leaf was let off the hook almost immediately by something so ugly that no future ugly can outdo it – the 849 Testarossa.
We can only hope that no one actually drives this abomination and that it is locked away forever, out of the sight of young children.
Do you remember Gumpert Apollo by any chance?
The Gumpert Apollo looks vastly better. And it looks like there is some reason behind its looks.
The cYbErJuNkTrUcK would like a word…(ugliest AND worst vehicle EVER made)
Looks like a more homely looking Ferrari 12Cillindri that came out a few months ago. It is getting a lot of hate, but I am sure it looks a lot better in person. Not my favorite design, but I wouldn’t kick it out of bed.
This thing looks like the designers thought “I like the look of the Kia K5…what if we…”
What if…bear with me here, what if…they made a car that was good looking?
this “testarossa” misses to badly it makes the new “countach” look like a countach.
Mr. Silvestro and I clearly like different things.
Barf.
Barf. Barf. Barf.
Can’t wait for the 250 GTO to come back as a V-Twin with five electric motors.