Home » 22 Years Ago, Subaru Made A Stick-Shift Turbo Forester That Could Outrun A 350Z

22 Years Ago, Subaru Made A Stick-Shift Turbo Forester That Could Outrun A 350Z

Subaru Forester 2003 Turbo Ts2
ADVERTISEMENT

I love a good sleeper, a car that looks like regular traffic until the driver stomps on the loud pedal and rushes off into the distance. Something that lets you blend in while giving you the thrill you need. From V8 Volvos to twin-turbocharged Lincolns, the undercover performance car is a thing of beauty, and several of us agree that the Subaru Forester 2.5XT is one of the all-time greats. While it wasn’t the first or last time Subaru added boost to its RAV4 competitor, the recipe is timeless: take the adorkable Forester crossover and give it one dynamo of an engine.

The two-liter EJ205 flat-four in the WRX didn’t quite have enough grunt, and the EJ257 from the incoming U.S.-market WRX STI was overkill. The solution? Start with a 2.5-liter flat-four with variable valve timing and forged pistons, then bolt on a relatively small Mitsubishi TD04 turbocharger churning out 11.6 psi of boost for fast response and good peak power. The result was the EJ255, a boosted flat-four with a broad power band. While a horsepower peak of 210 didn’t hit until 5,600 RPM, the 235 lb.-ft. apex of the torque curve was achieved at a sensible 3,600 rpm.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

As this was still the early 2000s, the EJ255 in the Forester 2.5XT came attached to either an optional four-speed automatic or a standard five-speed manual transmission, with the all-wheel-drive system featuring a viscous limited-slip rear differential. The result wasn’t just one of the quickest SUVs you could buy, it was one of the quickest new cars you could buy for under $26,000.

When Car And Driver put one through the wringer, it sprinted from zero-to-60 mph in 5.3 seconds. That’s more than a second-and-a-half quicker than a period Porsche Cayenne S, a tenth quicker than a Nissan 350Z, two tenths quicker than a Ford Mustang GT, and on the level with a Mercedes-Benz CLK 55 AMG cabriolet.

Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Photo credit: Subaru

Granted, the procedure to coax such a serious zero-to-60 mph time out of the Forester XT wasn’t exactly kind. As with most fast, force-fed all-wheel-drive cars, it essentially involves building boost with a series of escalating revs, then dumping the clutch at redline and holding on. A spectacular repair bill was just as likely as a spectacular zero-to-60 mph time, but even without drivetrain-destroying ridiculousness, the Forester 2.5XT posted a wholly respectable five-to-60 mph time of 6.3 seconds, identical to that of a drop-top 350Z.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of equal importance, while the Forester 2.5XT wouldn’t stick with a 350Z in the twisties, it also wouldn’t fall to pieces when a curvy road sign appeared. This thing’s Impreza-based underpinnings helped a ton, as Car And Driver wrote:

The rest of the XT running gear–the alloy wheels and the Yokohama Geolandar G900 all-weather tires overlaid on the Subie’s independent front and rear strut suspension–generated more smiles. The high-profile tires are made for cutting through snow and yuck and shedding water, but that doesn’t mean the XT won’t corner on them with considerable verve, turning all four of them with equal grunt. Blasting across scenic Route 3 in New York through rain and fog, we felt as secure as George W. in the Oval Office. We didn’t care for the too-much-slack brake-pedal action at first, but we got used to it.

Oh, and did I mention that the Forester 2.5XT was still insanely practical? We’re talking 32 cu.-ft. of cargo space with the rear seats up and 64 cu.-ft. of room with them down, dashboard cubbies capable of storing both flotsam and jetsam, two sunglass holders, and clips in the driver’s sun visor for storing cards and a pen. Sport? Check. Utility? Check. Vehicle? Sure looks like it. Not bad for $25,520 in 2003 money. Of course, improvements rolled in as the years rolled along. Horsepower climbed to 230 for 2006 before falling to 224 for 2007, a broader range of equipment levels became available, and the 2007 to 2008 Forester Sports XT added a sweet body kit. Still, the fundamentals remained the same: Surprising pace in a practical an unassuming package.

Silver 2004 Forester Xt Autotrader
Photo credit: Autotrader seller

Of course, since there really isn’t anything quite like the 2004 to 2008 Forester 2.5XT, stick-shift examples don’t come up for sale super often, and those who are selling often know what they have. Here’s a 2004 model up for sale in Illinois for $10,995 with 132,575 miles on the clock. That’s a lot of money for a 21-year-old crossover, but at least it looks reasonably tidy.

White Xt Autotrader
Photo credit: Autotrader seller

Likewise, here’s a 2006 Forester 2.5XT Limited up for sale in Georgia for a strong $14,995. Alright, it’s a Southern car with a more reasonable 114,000 miles on the clock and a clean vehicle history report, but man. Talk about resale value for an almost two-decade-old family car.

Black Subaru Forester Xt Cars And Bids
Photo credit: Cars & Bids

However, if you’re willing to wait it out and put up with a few modifications, you can find a row-your-own Forester 2.5XT for less than $10,000. This 2004 model sold on Cars & Bids back in July for $8,100, and while it is modified and has an astounding 227,200 miles on the clock, the underbody’s pretty clean.

ADVERTISEMENT
rear three quarters
Photo credit: Subaru

Part of the reason values remain so stubbornly high is that the first Forester 2.5XT occupies a real niche. Subsequent models just got heavier and less involving before Subaru eventually dropped the idea of a turbocharged Forester altogether, while nobody else took up the mantle of the stick-shift, hilariously fast compact crossover. Still, if that old Forester in the staging lane next to you has a hood scoop, watch out. That sucker’s gonna be quick.

Top graphic image: Subaru

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JKcycletramp
Member
JKcycletramp
32 minutes ago

My mom had a 2006 Forester XT (with an automatic). I then kept it for a dozen years. In 2009, it appeared in a print Subaru add, a shot of it camping outside Yosemite. When I needed to part with it, I gave it to a trusted friend, it’s too important to sell. When he could no longer use it, I placed it with another trusted friend who has caught up some minor maintenance. We refer to ourselves as The Brotherhood Of The Traveling Forester. It’s understood that we take care of the car on behalf of my mom.

Pat Rich
Pat Rich
1 hour ago

I had one of them. A 2005 (the last year of the 4.44 ratio final drive, after that they were considerably slower). I sold it because:

  1. it seemed to always need something – it was going through sway bar bushings like tic-tacs, CV’s were short lived, etc.
  2. I wanted an actual off-road vehicle
  3. I needed something that could tow a camp trailer
  4. I know that Turbo EJ engines are pretty troublesome after 100,000 miles.
  5. I was so sick of buying premium fuel

Twas a fun winter car though https://youtu.be/A5lVQZCTPbY
And I certainly got the utility use out of it. Camping, light duty towing, cargo (lots and lots of camera stuff) and family duties.

Things I liked

great midrange, decent transmission, pretty good handling, very comfortable, very versatile.

Things I hated

Cheap interior (always a new squeak), absolutely NO power below 3000 rpm especially at altitude (at ski resorts you had to really rev the nuts off it to get it to hill start), fragile feeling (very light weight parts) 19 mpg highway, 17mpg in town…on premium fuel. Not a canyon carver, but certainly not an off-roader.

All in – a good car for its time, and something I wish we still had (a manual, fun small crossover) but otherwise…meh.

Mostly Harmless
Mostly Harmless
1 hour ago

I had one for a few years and loved it. Black, 5 speed. I ended up lowering it a bit (too much) and swapping in the turbo and intercooler from an sti. Also had a cat back exhaust on it to enjoy the boxer rumble. Kind of wish I still had that around, though if I was doing it again I’d skip lowering it and go for more long travel rally style suspension build.

Mgb2
Mgb2
2 hours ago

Thomas, you mistakenly call the 255 a 257 as you’re describing the engines.

They are sufficient fun that I still have my ’04 example, though at this point, the interior feels much older than it is because Subaru wasn’t spending much on interiors then. And the window gussets will forever be terrible. At least it’s not one of those interiors where all of the plastic has become sticky.

Xt6wagon
Xt6wagon
3 hours ago

Import a sti and enjoy the 6spd.

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
3 hours ago

Thomas, don’t forget the special edition Forester STI models.

Forester STI Spec M https://www.sti.jp/en/completecar/heritage/cardetail/2001/forester/

Forester tS https://www.sti.jp/en/completecar/heritage/cardetail/2010/forester-ts/

If looking for a Spec M outside of Japan, there’s one in Toronto: https://www.autotrader.ca/a/subaru/forester/vaughan/ontario/5_65840550_20120831152358230/

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
3 hours ago

Yeah, it could even outrun its own head gaskets, CV axles and wheel bearings 😛

Cameron Huntsucker
Member
Cameron Huntsucker
4 hours ago

I still love these, especially the 2004-2005. When my mother was in the market for her first new car, I fought tooth and nail to get her in a 2008 XT. She thought it too small, hmmmmed and hawwwed for a year and ended up in new-gen 2010 non-turbo Forester, so freaking slow but a nice car. (it now has 17k miles)

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
3 hours ago

Oh man, 2010! If only she could’ve put it off *another* year, she would’ve gotten the good engine with a timing chain and no more head gasket problems LOL

GreatFallsGreen
Member
GreatFallsGreen
1 hour ago
Reply to  Dogisbadob

Those early FB engines tended to have oil consumption issues though didn’t they?

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
38 minutes ago

They got new blocks under warranty, so any original early FB that didn’t get a new block won’t have that problem.

Huja Shaw
Huja Shaw
4 hours ago

*chef’s kiss*

That late second gen was the pinnacle of Forester design. I had one in the Premium trim with those XT wheels.

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x