I love a good sleeper, a car that looks like regular traffic until the driver stomps on the loud pedal and rushes off into the distance. Something that lets you blend in while giving you the thrill you need. From V8 Volvos to twin-turbocharged Lincolns, the undercover performance car is a thing of beauty, and several of us agree that the Subaru Forester 2.5XT is one of the all-time greats. While it wasn’t the first or last time Subaru added boost to its RAV4 competitor, the recipe is timeless: take the adorkable Forester crossover and give it one dynamo of an engine.
The two-liter EJ205 flat-four in the WRX didn’t quite have enough grunt, and the EJ257 from the incoming U.S.-market WRX STI was overkill. The solution? Start with a 2.5-liter flat-four with variable valve timing and forged pistons, then bolt on a relatively small Mitsubishi TD04 turbocharger churning out 11.6 psi of boost for fast response and good peak power. The result was the EJ255, a boosted flat-four with a broad power band. While a horsepower peak of 210 didn’t hit until 5,600 RPM, the 235 lb.-ft. apex of the torque curve was achieved at a sensible 3,600 rpm.
As this was still the early 2000s, the EJ255 in the Forester 2.5XT came attached to either an optional four-speed automatic or a standard five-speed manual transmission, with the all-wheel-drive system featuring a viscous limited-slip rear differential. The result wasn’t just one of the quickest SUVs you could buy, it was one of the quickest new cars you could buy for under $26,000.
When Car And Driver put one through the wringer, it sprinted from zero-to-60 mph in 5.3 seconds. That’s more than a second-and-a-half quicker than a period Porsche Cayenne S, a tenth quicker than a Nissan 350Z, two tenths quicker than a Ford Mustang GT, and on the level with a Mercedes-Benz CLK 55 AMG cabriolet.

Granted, the procedure to coax such a serious zero-to-60 mph time out of the Forester XT wasn’t exactly kind. As with most fast, force-fed all-wheel-drive cars, it essentially involves building boost with a series of escalating revs, then dumping the clutch at redline and holding on. A spectacular repair bill was just as likely as a spectacular zero-to-60 mph time, but even without drivetrain-destroying ridiculousness, the Forester 2.5XT posted a wholly respectable five-to-60 mph time of 6.3 seconds, identical to that of a drop-top 350Z.
Of equal importance, while the Forester 2.5XT wouldn’t stick with a 350Z in the twisties, it also wouldn’t fall to pieces when a curvy road sign appeared. This thing’s Impreza-based underpinnings helped a ton, as Car And Driver wrote:
The rest of the XT running gear–the alloy wheels and the Yokohama Geolandar G900 all-weather tires overlaid on the Subie’s independent front and rear strut suspension–generated more smiles. The high-profile tires are made for cutting through snow and yuck and shedding water, but that doesn’t mean the XT won’t corner on them with considerable verve, turning all four of them with equal grunt. Blasting across scenic Route 3 in New York through rain and fog, we felt as secure as George W. in the Oval Office. We didn’t care for the too-much-slack brake-pedal action at first, but we got used to it.
Oh, and did I mention that the Forester 2.5XT was still insanely practical? We’re talking 32 cu.-ft. of cargo space with the rear seats up and 64 cu.-ft. of room with them down, dashboard cubbies capable of storing both flotsam and jetsam, two sunglass holders, and clips in the driver’s sun visor for storing cards and a pen. Sport? Check. Utility? Check. Vehicle? Sure looks like it. Not bad for $25,520 in 2003 money. Of course, improvements rolled in as the years rolled along. Horsepower climbed to 230 for 2006 before falling to 224 for 2007, a broader range of equipment levels became available, and the 2007 to 2008 Forester Sports XT added a sweet body kit. Still, the fundamentals remained the same: Surprising pace in a practical an unassuming package.

Of course, since there really isn’t anything quite like the 2004 to 2008 Forester 2.5XT, stick-shift examples don’t come up for sale super often, and those who are selling often know what they have. Here’s a 2004 model up for sale in Illinois for $10,995 with 132,575 miles on the clock. That’s a lot of money for a 21-year-old crossover, but at least it looks reasonably tidy.

Likewise, here’s a 2006 Forester 2.5XT Limited up for sale in Georgia for a strong $14,995. Alright, it’s a Southern car with a more reasonable 114,000 miles on the clock and a clean vehicle history report, but man. Talk about resale value for an almost two-decade-old family car.

However, if you’re willing to wait it out and put up with a few modifications, you can find a row-your-own Forester 2.5XT for less than $10,000. This 2004 model sold on Cars & Bids back in July for $8,100, and while it is modified and has an astounding 227,200 miles on the clock, the underbody’s pretty clean.

Part of the reason values remain so stubbornly high is that the first Forester 2.5XT occupies a real niche. Subsequent models just got heavier and less involving before Subaru eventually dropped the idea of a turbocharged Forester altogether, while nobody else took up the mantle of the stick-shift, hilariously fast compact crossover. Still, if that old Forester in the staging lane next to you has a hood scoop, watch out. That sucker’s gonna be quick.
Top graphic image: Subaru






If you want the Holy Grail of this model, in 07 you could get it with a proper manual, the turbo engine, and in WORLD RALLY BLUE! Talk about a rare car. I found a forum post stating that only 345 in total were produced in that color and engine/trans combination. I used to see a non-turbo world rally blue Forester around Indy, but I’ve never seen one of the coveted XT’s in the flesh.
Just look at it! Glorious!
https://bringatrailer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2007_subaru_forester-xt_dsc00615-38146.jpg
Subsequent models just got heavier and
less involvingsix inches taller…That’s a nice recap of a fun car. However, none of the EJ255 or EJ257 had forged pistons from the factory. Not even the STi S209 – it was announced with forged pistons but they reverted to hypereutectic cast aluminum before production started.
I had one of these, though mine was an automatic. One of my favorite cars. It started to eat turbos and then spun a main bearing. First and last subaru unless I find a BRAT.
IIRC, the autos had a variable FR torque split but the manuals was 50-50 all the time.
My sister had one as well, and it ate two turbos in about 6 months. That was the end of her Subaru life. She also couldn’t afford a vehicle for another 6+ months while paying off the repair bills.
The Forester XT was such an unexpectedly cool drop by Subaru. I seriously considered one of these when they came out over the Outback I purchased. Kinda regret it even though I likely wouldn’t still have it.
These were cool
Almost bought one with a 4EAT back in the day.. I thought it was kind of a dog. Though, it was a used example and I’m pretty sure the seller was a drunk. So who knows.
Either way, certainly the best looking Forester.
I think those earlyish Foresters are the best looking of the bunch: Japanese station wagons with fender blisters. A primer-grey one used to park in the lot at the Burbank Fry’s (RIP) and I’d lust for it every time I saw it. I don’t doubt the new hybrid Forester is a better car (my pal’s wife just got one… it’s fine) in every way other than looks.
Yeah these suckers have held value shockingly well. Always appreciated the sleeper.
My wife has a 2010 Forester XT, which I love dearly. Here in the U.S. they only came in automatic flavor, but it’s a stout transmission, and still a lot of fun to rip around in. I’ve owned multiple turbo Subarus, and the EJ255’s are a little more finicky than the EJ205 and 257, but reliable if cared for and maintained religiously.
Fun fact, the EJ255 in the 03-05 FXT’s uses the STi EJ257 block.
A buddy spent years trying to find a nice one of these for his wife. He was not successful.
The automatics are readily available, but manuals are like hens teeth. Rust is also an issue for snow belt cars.
So these are ultra rare, and you would really have to be a Forrester enthusiast to be willing to pay a large premium over an STi for one of these.
A very cool and special Subie though.
One of my best friends has a Java black 5-speed 04 FXT. Took him over three years to find the thing, and he had to fly across the country for it. They’re certainly rare!
I’ve been driving a Forester S-Edition for several years now, which the Forester tS is based upon. Same EJ255 as the normal XTs, but tuned to 260hp and paired with the 5EAT transmission from the flat-6 cars. It’s seriously quick in stock form, and with some handling mods it comfortably keeps up with sportier cars in the twisties. The 5EAT even rev matches when you downshift!
One of the sensors in my 5EAT went bad though 🙁 Can’t find a specialist shop around me so I just drive it in limp mode for now……
I had a last month White MY06 XT that had an STI 257 engine in it, the 5EAT auto, every stick on extra from headlight protectors, mats, guards etc as a run out of the last few pre face lift release.
With a few select tweaks of the engine, same turbo with modified housing and compressor wheel, Silicon intake, sti intercooler, Swift lower springs, KYB adjustable shocks, whiteline bars, then a tune of engine and gearbox settings, it was a fantastic real world driving 40-140kp/h sleeper in an SUV body!
Reliable, needed more input service wise than a Camry but not fragile. The manuals are fragile, a tuned 5EAT is a fantastic launcher!
I only sold that car because eldest son was getting his learners and he’d have killed us in it.
Thanks I’ll keep my V70r
My neighbors had a beautiful 5M V70R. I wish I had known they were going to trade it on a used Lexus NX. But also, they had moved to the PNW from Nebraska, so who knows what tin worms were at work underneath.
There is a local maid service that uses a V70R as their work vehicle and I want to hire them just for their excellent taste.
I had a silver 2004 XT that I bought for my wife when we had a kid. Wanted quick and fun that could haul a porta crib and a crap ton of toys halfway across America. It did all of those things in spades. I loved that thing. Sold it to a friend in 2010 when we were given a hand me down Honda to save some gas money during the recession. Would have loved to buy it back but friend was definitely not selling. Smart friend.
I so badly want to get excited about a manual boosted wagon. But this foresters always looked so gawky. I just can’t get into it.
My Volvo turbo 750 wagon was a hoot to drive. Especially if you tightened tge boost nut a little. .
The best part was the thing was ticket proof. Once I passed a Camaro doing 92 mph, and a state trouper suddenly appeared out of the bushes and gave the Camaro driver a ticket.
The Washington State Patrol had a couple of unmarked Turbo Volvo Wagons they used to intercept road ragers and egregious speeders. Along with other innocuous looking unmarked cars.
Used to be one got nervous with a Crown Vic in the rearview mirror. Now it’s Ford Explorers.
My mom had a 2006 Forester XT (with an automatic). I then kept it for a dozen years. In 2009, it appeared in a print Subaru add, a shot of it camping outside Yosemite. When I needed to part with it, I gave it to a trusted friend, it’s too important to sell. When he could no longer use it, I placed it with another trusted friend who has caught up some minor maintenance. We refer to ourselves as The Brotherhood Of The Traveling Forester. It’s understood that we take care of the car on behalf of my mom.
I had one of them. A 2005 (the last year of the 4.44 ratio final drive, after that they were considerably slower). I sold it because:
Twas a fun winter car though https://youtu.be/A5lVQZCTPbY
And I certainly got the utility use out of it. Camping, light duty towing, cargo (lots and lots of camera stuff) and family duties.
Things I liked
great midrange, decent transmission, pretty good handling, very comfortable, very versatile.
Things I hated
Cheap interior (always a new squeak), absolutely NO power below 3000 rpm especially at altitude (at ski resorts you had to really rev the nuts off it to get it to hill start), fragile feeling (very light weight parts) 19 mpg highway, 17mpg in town…on premium fuel. Not a canyon carver, but certainly not an off-roader.
All in – a good car for its time, and something I wish we still had (a manual, fun small crossover) but otherwise…meh.
I had one for a few years and loved it. Black, 5 speed. I ended up lowering it a bit (too much) and swapping in the turbo and intercooler from an sti. Also had a cat back exhaust on it to enjoy the boxer rumble. Kind of wish I still had that around, though if I was doing it again I’d skip lowering it and go for more long travel rally style suspension build.
Thomas, you mistakenly call the 255 a 257 as you’re describing the engines.
They are sufficient fun that I still have my ’04 example, though at this point, the interior feels much older than it is because Subaru wasn’t spending much on interiors then. And the window gussets will forever be terrible. At least it’s not one of those interiors where all of the plastic has become sticky.
Import a sti and enjoy the 6spd.
Until rod knock arrives….
Thomas, don’t forget the special edition Forester STI models.
Forester STI Spec M https://www.sti.jp/en/completecar/heritage/cardetail/2001/forester/
Forester tS https://www.sti.jp/en/completecar/heritage/cardetail/2010/forester-ts/
If looking for a Spec M outside of Japan, there’s one in Toronto: https://www.autotrader.ca/a/subaru/forester/vaughan/ontario/5_65840550_20120831152358230/
Yeah, it could even outrun its own head gaskets, CV axles and wheel bearings 😛
It was the NAs that blew gaskets, the fix was to put the turbo MLS gaskets on.
With tunes though, all bets are off. Bad tunes (Tatrix and a road tune) killed so many Subies.
A lot of these engines were murdered by the filter in the banjo bolt clogging up and starving the turbo of oil. Knew more than a few guys that lost their EJ255’s that way back when I was heavily into the Subaru scene a decade ago.
There is a delete kit.. I too know people who had the engine grenade from this.
Correct! I deleted it on my wife’s XT. Bit of a ticking time on your hands if you don’t delete that screen.
I still love these, especially the 2004-2005. When my mother was in the market for her first new car, I fought tooth and nail to get her in a 2008 XT. She thought it too small, hmmmmed and hawwwed for a year and ended up in new-gen 2010 non-turbo Forester, so freaking slow but a nice car. (it now has 17k miles)
Oh man, 2010! If only she could’ve put it off *another* year, she would’ve gotten the good engine with a timing chain and no more head gasket problems LOL
Those early FB engines tended to have oil consumption issues though didn’t they?
They got new blocks under warranty, so any original early FB that didn’t get a new block won’t have that problem.
*chef’s kiss*
That late second gen was the pinnacle of Forester design. I had one in the Premium trim with those XT wheels.
Truly peak Forester and also probably peak Subaru.