Last week, Autoweek laid off four of its six full-time employees. The long-running automotive and racing publication, which switched from publishing a print magazine to a purely digital brand in 2019, received a lot of coverage for the decision, which left editor Natalie Neff and west coast editor Mark Vaughn as the only staffers responsible for shepherding the 72-year-old brand moving forward.
With such a reduction in workforce, it’s likely Autoweek won’t be the same as it was before. But Vaughn wants everyone to know that the publication isn’t literally dead.
You can read what Vaughn said below and come to your conclusion about how alive or dead the publication really is.
What Happened Here?
On August 26, social media began buzzing with rumors of Autoweek’s demise. After some reporting, I found out that four staffers—executive editor Tom Murphy, motorsports editor Myke Pryson, associate editor Jay Ramey, and associate editor Wesley Wren—were quietly laid off by Autoweek’s parent company, Hearst Autos. The car media juggernaut also owns Car and Driver, Road & Track, and MotorTrend. This’ll be important later.
In addition to the layoffs, a Hearst representative told me on background that Autoweek “will join the MotorTrend family of brands.” What that means isn’t exactly clear. In addition to MotorTrend itself, the MotorTrend Group consists of brands like Hot Rod, Roadkill, and Automobile—brands that exist in a vague middleground between truly dead and mostly dead.
When asked to clarify, Vaughn could only speculate on how the hierarchy has shifted.
“I’ve heard that, but I don’t know what that means,” he told me over the phone. “This is speculation on my part—Natalie is the editor of Autoweek, and she has to report to somebody, and I think, in corporate jargon, she is [now] reporting to Ed Loh.” (Ed Loh is the head of editorial for MotorTrend.)
“But it’s not like Ed Loh has been calling, saying, ‘Do more stories on Pontiac.'”
Vaughn went on to confirm there’s been no indication from the higher-ups to adjust Autoweek’s coverage, at least that he’s heard.
So How Will Autoweek Operate Going Forward?
Vaughn insists Autoweek will continue to provide world-class racing coverage. The publication relies on “maybe eight to 10” freelancers to chase stories down and recap weekend events, according to him. Following the layoffs, Vaughn says those freelancers will continue to provide the same services—no more, no less.
Importantly, he says Autoweek isn’t going to replace its laid-off staffers, who covered things car news and reviews during the week, with more freelancers.
“We have not increased the number of freelancers, and we have not put out a call for more freelancers or anything like that,” Vaughn says. “As far as I know—and I’m not the editor—I think that we seem to be happy with the freelancers that we have.”

Source: Mark Vaughn
As a result, he admits readers might see a shift in news coverage going forward.
“As you know, we cover news. That’s where you might notice a difference,” Vaughn told me. “Wesley Wren and Jay Ramey were writing news stories. They were two of the editors who were let go. So their take on world events, their voice, won’t be there.
“However, we are also part of the Hearst empire, and as such, we have access to any news story we want from Car and Driver and Road & Track, and we have put some of those [on the website].” (Having worked at Road & Track in the past, I can confirm the syndication of online news stories between the three brands is a common practice.)
With four fewer people on staff and the freelancer plan reportedly not changing, the ratio of full-timers to freelancers at Autoweek will see a big shift. Vaughn isn’t worried about the publication’s voice fading, however.
“I don’t see [Autoweek’s voice] changing,” he told me. “I’m still writing the way I write, and Natalie’s writing, I mean, she’s writing more now, certainly. But I hope that whatever the voice is or was, it shouldn’t change.”
As of this writing, Autoweek.com continues to publish stories. In a perfect world, it’ll stay that way forever.






Fuckery. Plain and simple. Car and Driver is a print pamphlet, Road and Track a myth. Automobile used to be an alternative. Autoweek a fever dream. Online sites tend not to have the budgets for shenanigans. All those magazines flush with ad revenue did, back then. The shenanigans exist still, but different. Things change.
Is Sniff Petrol still active?
Edit: No it is not.
Everyone knows Hearst sucks.
Though they make good shifters.
Darn, this makes me sad. I freelanced for AutoWeek back in the ‘90s, when they covered racing, car news, reviews, and antique / classic cars. I loved the variety.
Of course, I also remember the good ol’ days when Car & Driver was hilarious, and Automobile was art. Now everything feels homogenized. Grateful to Autopian for keeping eclectic automotive writing going.
Not sure how 2 employees can produce anything of value. As a once great publication that has imploded while the Autopian succeeds it is probably going to be eaten and become a subset of the corporation just like the print media succomed
I heard that Autoweek ate Pop Rocks and then drank a Coke and their stomach exploded and they died.
I’m the one who started that rumor about Mikey
Perhaps you know of my work with Richard Gere.
This story makes me think of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfOW9QrLs0o
As a diehard Car and Driver fan in my teens during the late 70s and early 80s it just feels weird for me to think that Road & Track and Motor Trend are operated by the same people. You simply couldn’t get through a full issue of C/D without some sort of Road & Track or Motor Trend wisecrack. That may have been a malaise era for cars but I sure loved the writing.
They used to call R&T staffers “tweed caps”.
AutoEveryOtherWeek has been dead for years.
It is as dead as voting rights, free market capitalism, and functional democracy.
Man: Here’s one-
Cart-master: Ninepence.
Autoweek: I’m not dead!
Cart-master: (suprised) What?
Man: Nothing! Here’s your ninepence….
Autoweek: I’m not dead!
Cart-master: ‘Ere! ‘E says ‘e’s not dead!
Man: Yes he is.
Autoweek: I’m not!
Cart-master: ‘E isn’t?
Man: Well… he will be soon– he’s very ill…
Autoweek: I’m getting better!
Man: No you’re not, you’ll be stone dead in a moment.
Cart-master: I can’t take ‘im like that! It’s against regulations!
Autoweek: I don’t want to go on the cart….
Man: Oh, don’t be such a baby.
Cart-master: I can’t take ‘im….
Autoweek: I feel fine!
Man: Well, do us a favor…
Cart-master: I can’t!
Man: Can you hang around a couple of minutes? He won’t be long…
Cart-master: No, gotta get to Robinson’s, they lost nine today.
Man: Well, when’s your next round?
Cart-master: Thursday.
Autoweek: I think I’ll go for a walk….
Man: You’re not fooling anyone, you know–
Bring out your dead!
Is the publication’s current structure an Auto-nomous Collective? Or a self-perpetuating Auto-cracy?
I didn’t vote for them.
I had the same thought!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfOW9QrLs0o
Props for the Python and unfortunately comedy of this generation is being attacked by the open minded genre.
It’s not really. Comedy is comedy.
Good Comedy will always step over the line, and it still does.
There is no George Carlin anymore, but neither was Carlin by the end (he was a lot more stepping over the line, but a lot less funny). There are some seedlings that could almost get there. We’ll see. If Austin becomes the NYC / Comey Store of the 80s we may see greatness.
We also run the risk of comedians who know each other being declared a terrorist organization. I guess we’ll see.
customer ‘Ello, I wish to register a complaint.
(The Hearst does not respond.)
customer ‘Ello, Miss?
Hearst: What do you mean “miss”?
customer (pause)I’m sorry, I have a cold. I wish to make a complaint!
Hearst: We’re closin’ for lunch.
customer Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this brand what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.
Hearst: Oh yes, the, uh, the Autoweek…What’s,uh…What’s wrong with it?
customer I’ll tell you what’s wrong with it, my lad. ‘E’s dead, that’s what’s wrong with it!
Hearst: No, no, ‘e’s uh,…he’s resting.
customer Look, matey, I know a dead brand when I see one, and I’m looking at one right now.
Hearst: No no he’s not dead, he’s, he’s restin’! Remarkable bird, the Autoweek, idn’it, ay? Beautiful font!
customer The font don’t enter into it. It’s stone dead.
customer Um…now look…now look, mate, I’ve definitely ‘ad enough of this. That brand is definitely deceased, and when I purchased it not ‘alf an hour ago, you assured me that its total lack of content was due to it bein’ tired and shagged out following a prolonged outage.
Hearst: Well, he’s…he’s, ah…probably pining for the Fords.
customer PININ’ for the FORDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?, look, why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got ‘im home?
Hearst: The Autoweek prefers keepin’ on it’s back! Remarkable magazine, id’nit, squire? Lovely font!
Ahem… it’s kippin’ not keepin’. Kippin’ as in ‘avin’ a kip. Kip means “sleep”, a “quick kip” is a nap
customer “VOOM”?!? Mate, this brand wouldn’t “voom” if you put four million volts through it! it’s bleedin’ demised!
Hearst: No no! it’s pining!
customer ‘It’s not pinin’! it’s passed on! This brand is no more! It has ceased to be! it’s expired and gone to meet its maker! It’s a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! If you hadn’t pasted its header onto recycled articles it’d be pushing up the daisies! Its metabolic processes are now ‘istory! It’s off the twig! It’s kicked the bucket, it’s shuffled off ‘is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin’ choir invisible!! THIS IS AN EX-brand!!
Oh, well done. C(s)OTD quality.
r/unexpectedMontyPython at its best, congrats 05LGT, outstanding!
Nobody expects the SPANISH INQUISITION! Our chief weapon is surprise.