In the year 2026, it feels as if there is always “a video.” Whether it’s regarding some breaking news, a plane crash, an explosion, or some other newsworthy event, someone or something is always recording from some angle. Just 20 years ago, you’d be lucky to see a real-time recording of any sort of relevant happenings in the world. Now, it’s weird if there isn’t a clip circling online showing exactly what happened.
This phenomenon, of course, extends to the car world. Previously, news of a car crash could only be proven through the aftermath photos from drivers or first responders. Now, though, thanks to the mass adoption of onboard cameras, doorbell cameras, and smartphones, it feels as if every noteworthy crash I hear about has a video attached to it, showing what actually happened.
Sometimes, these videos can have far-reaching consequences for those involved. Take this video of a Miata getting struck by what appears to be an out-of-control BMW M2 on a twisty road, which has since gone viral, spawning numerous reposts, thousands of comments, and even its own meme. It’s proof that in today’s modern world, if you appear to drive like a dick, it’s not just the law you have to worry about, it’s the entire internet.
The State Of The World Means Nothing Is Private
These days, if I step outside my home, I assume I’m on camera the entire time, no matter what. While that might sound a little paranoid, I don’t think it’s an unreasonable attitude to have, considering I live in New York City.
I live in an apartment building, and there are two people with Ring cameras mounted next to their doors on my floor. I walk outside, and there are security cameras on nearly every corner. Peek inside the windshield of the cab driving by me, and there is a dashcam mounted to the glass. Every person I walk by holds a camera in their hand, built into their phone. Hell, I even own a pair of sunglasses that has a camera mounted in the frame.

All of this constant recording wouldn’t be so worrying if the internet didn’t exist. But because any snippet of video can be shared with billions of people almost instantly, there’s always the idea that my image can be spread widely and alter my reputation forever. Even something as simple as a recording of me slipping on some black ice and falling on my ass could have lasting effects if it looks goofy enough on camera. Just ask anyone who’s been immortalized through a meme.
This mass adoption of camera usage and subsequent proliferation of clips on the internet relates to cars in a few ways. Those of us who have been on the internet for a long time are deeply familiar with the rise in popularity of Russian dashcam videos in the 2000s. But as stuff like dashcams, GoPros, and other kinds of small, portable recording devices get cheaper and simpler to use, it’s become easy for anyone to record their on-road travels and, if they see something, share that footage on the internet.

Anyone who’s been on the web knows that places like social media greatly encourage sharing media. Instagram and TikTok culture have emboldened people to do crazy things in front of a camera for likes, clout, and, if you have enough success, real, actual revenue. These types of rewards push people to create dangerous situations, not strictly because they want to, but also because they know the algorithm will reward the risk.
The rise of street takeovers, where people do donuts in public intersections and blow up cars as crowds of people watch and film with their phones, is a great example of this. And did you really drift that turn at the Angeles Crest turnout if it wasn’t caught on camera? Even if you didn’t, and totaled your car trying, that’s even more clicks in the bag—so long as your friend was recording.
This is all to say that now, in 2026, we have a landscape of car culture that is constantly pointing cameras in every direction. Whether that’s to catch the next Mustang crash at the local Cars & Coffee, or to record your daily commute in case someone rear-ends you, or to film a fun scenic drive in your sports car from the driver’s point of view, you should just assume that when you’re driving, your actions are being filmed. And if you do something wrong, it could have far greater effects than you think.
Always Assume There’s A Camera
That brings me to this crash between an ND-generation Mazda MX-5 Miata and a newer BMW M2. In this case, it wasn’t a dashcam that captured the incident, but a camera mounted to the head of the person driving the Miata. The video, published by user Kev_rofroy to the Miata Subreddit earlier this week, shows the Miata cruising through a twisty back road—in northern Georgia, according to a description—when it comes upon a tight left-hander.
As the Miata approaches the corner, a G87-generation BMW M2 materializes in frame already at the apex, before appearing to understeer into the opposing lane, where the Miata is now located. The nose of the M2 smacks into the side of the Miata, before rolling off the road and into an embankment.
Had there been no footage of the collision, it’s very likely no one outside of the two drivers’ close circles and social media followers would’ve ever heard about this crash. But because there was a crystal clear video that was shared online, the incident immediately went viral.
Since its posting on Sunday, the original clip has racked up tens of thousands of upvotes on Reddit. On YouTube, it has accumulated over 80,000 views across various reposts. The incident gained even more traction when another Miata Subreddit user, RazvanPaun, turned the crash into a meme the following day, which has since been shared widely across social media. It shows a drawing of an M2 understeering into the opposing lane of a road, with text above reading, “POV: the last thing you see after deciding to take your Miata on a scenic canyon drive:”
Apologies for the bad editing, I didn’t want to use AI
by
u/RazvanPaun in
Miata
Internet sleuths were quickly able to identify the driver of the M2 as the same person who operates the g87_angel Instagram account. Photos published to the account show what appear to be the same car from the incident, while story posts, which have since expired but were screenshotted by Reddit users, show the car resting against a tree in an embankment, with a red Miata in the background.
Comment
by
u/SuperReleasio64 from discussionin
Miata
Another expired Instagram story from g87_angel, which was also preserved on Reddit, shows the above meme with the text “Love y’all thanks for the fan art ❤️❤️” overlaid underneath. While it’s impossible to truly know what they meant by this, I feel like there’s a strong scent of sarcasm here where remorse should probably lie instead.
Apparently the M2 owner has seen the meme. Everyone boo him!
by
u/SuperReleasio64 in
Miata
Users have been quick to pile on accusations and insults in the comment section of g87_angel’s most recent Instagram post, with many comments receiving tens of thousands of likes and dozens of replies. Here are some of the most popular examples:

This is likely the most attention this user has ever received online, and it’s all almost universally negative. Moreover, it’s just a tiny portion of the criticism. Factor in all the views, comments, reposts, shares, and DMs stemming from the reaction videos and meme pages across the vast corner of the internet dedicated to cars, and you have thousands upon thousands of people roasting this M2 driver into oblivion.
Online Car Culture Takes No Prisoners
Most will assume it was driver error that caused the crash. Judging by the footage, it looks as if the driver misjudged their speed and/or the tightness of the corner, and attempted to correct themselves back into their lane as the oncoming Miata appeared. But by then it was too late, and the two cars collided. By my estimation, the M2 probably would’ve gotten away from the mistake by cutting the double-yellow lines if the Miata weren’t there.
I don’t want to come to any conclusions, though, since we don’t know the full story. Though unlikely, it’s possible that an equipment failure caused the M2 to cross the double-yellow lines and hit the Miata (g87_angel did not respond to a request for comment when I reached out via Instagram DM, and the Miata driver declined to comment when reached via Reddit DM).

The average internet commenter has the nuance of a hamster, so the people commenting on the above post probably aren’t thinking about the long-term impact of this driver’s mistake (if that was the cause). I’m not saying the driver of this M2 shouldn’t be judged for their actions, obviously. If it really was driver error, they should be called out for it. People who overdrive their vehicles on public roads this blatantly have no place in car culture.
Previously, the driver of that M2 would’ve only had to live with their mistake on their own (and probably deal with some big insurance hikes). But now, thanks to this video, they have to live with the fact that their actions and their car are the butt of a joke that’ll likely live on in Miata circles for years to come.
Maybe that’s a good thing. If drivers are subjected to the digital panopticon, where they think that they are being monitored for any wrongdoing at all times, they’d probably drive more conservatively than if they thought they were truly alone. If I assumed I was being watched on a back road by an entity that could immediately ruin my reputation, I would definitely be moving differently—not because I drive recklessly, but because I don’t want to be perceived as anything other than a proper, polite road-goer. If every driver went about their day from this perspective, there’d probably be safer roads.

No matter what you think about this, cameras aren’t going away any time soon. In fact, as more and more cars get built-in dashcams from the factory, the number of recording devices on the road is only set to grow from here. What’s clear after this whole debacle is that if you drive like a dick and cause harm, you might not just be held responsible by the law and insurance adjusters, but also entire swaths of car culture. Is social policing like this the right path forward? It’s tough to tell. But it’s certainly where we’re headed.
Top graphic images: Reddit









What’s the difference between a porcupine and a BMW?
The pricks are on the inside!
Old one, but very appropriate.
I feel like if it were really an unfortunate equipment failure, he would have immediately said something about it to try to absolve himself. Usually people look to blame anything or anyone but themselves. When they can’t do that, because they know it was their own damn fault, then they do shit like this guy did, like “haha thanks for the fan art lolololol”. BMW driver is most likely 100% at fault here due to his own poor driving skills.
I’ve never used social media, and I refrain from commenting on videos on Youtube. However, the BMW driver deserves all the ire and sass directed at him. He’s responsible for the damage to his own car, and to the Miata, the driver of which was on his own side of the road. It’s great that no one was killed of course, but people who drive crazy on public roads, as if it’s their own private racetrack and nobody else could possibly be affected by their actions, P me the H off.
“ Online Car Culture Takes No Prisoners”
Duly noted.
it is not a stereo type if backed by results
This is the important bit here. Not only did he fuck up, he doubled down on the fuck up. Given how rampant that kind of behavior is in society right now, I have no problem with people calling him out mercilessly.
Of course, this comes on the heels of seeing a video about a study where they found people’s brains are wired to prefer negative feedback over no feedback, so in some ways the cruelest punishment for this douchenozzle would have been to ignore him.
Looks to me that those tires were a couple of psi off :\
[golf clap]
The fronts were probably 0.5 psi low.
For the record, in many countries, using dashcams is severely restricted by law. You can’t be just filming the road ahead of you for the fun of it with faces and plates in full view, much less publish such material on the Internet.
For better or worse, in the US and many other countries, people don’t get an expectation of privacy when in public spaces. So, dashcams, etc. are allowed.
It’s interesting to me that there are places where you can be on a public street, and yet still have an expectation of privacy.
“I didn’t give you permission to film me!!!” Ma’am this is a Wendy’s...
The thing is: there are lots of cameras here to. But only the authorities are allowed to use cameras in public; citizens and private enterprises are not.
No offence to you and Im not one to be cheerleading for cameras in public but only the authorities having cameras? That’s bad policy. Public/business cameras help solve crimes, even on this very website we have used private cameras to identify cars used in crimes. Dash cams also good for at fault car crashes.
Are people not allowed to film on their phone if something is happening?
“If something is happening” is the key concept here.
So you are allowed to start filming if let’s say a chicken is crossing the street. But if the cops disagree and say you are “filming the public” they can arrest you?
The way dash cams work here is that they store the video stream for a short period of time, and only if it detects a possible accident (for example a sharp deceleration), it will store the video permanently. Possibly you can press a button, too; I don’t know, I don’t have a dash cam.
Your assertion lacks citation as well as being semi-contradictory to itself. First, you start your assertion with “in many countries” which seems to acknowledge that laws surrounding the use of dash cams and publication of videos derived from such vary by nation. However, you then make an absolute statement saying that “you can’t just be filming the road ahead of you”.
As others have stated here, there is no expectation of privacy, as an example, in the United States on public roads. You can absolutely publish video taken on a public street in the United States. (To cite a well known example, see the many, many videos of the truck decapitating train trestle…)
Please be more specific about the jurisdictions you’re referring to and/or cite statutes before you make these absolute statements.
It should be clear from the context that the assertion “you can’t just be filming the road ahead of you” does not mean that you cannot under any circumstances film the read ahead of you anywhere on the planet. Obviously, you can in Russia, or we would not have been treated to so many bizarre dash cam videos from that country. But for example in the EU, you can’t do that without taking the privacy of others into account. The word “just” does a lot of heavy lifting here.
Social media rewards bad people/behavior.
“panopticon”
Came here to mention that. Good use of vocab, and our present situation. It’s also the reason I quit my insurance job. They tracked every metric and action you did.
> The average internet commenter has the nuance of a hamster
HEY EFF YOU BRAIN WTF U KNOW ABOUT TEH INTERNET
Edit: forgot 1!!1!!1!1!1! and “lmao”
COTD material
Is Miata guy wearing a helmet cam?
According to the article, yes.
I don’t think so, I think wearing a helmet in a street car is actually illegal. Probably a go-pro on a strap of some kind.
“… wearing a helmet in a street car is actually illegal.” WTF, really? Even if you’re driving a tube-framed but street legal race car? Is this the law in all 50 states?
Illinois Vehicle Code mentions helmets only twice, in the same section, where it specifies that operators of motorcycles and mopeds may use helmets equipped with radio communication devices/intercoms. Otherwise there doesn’t appear to be a prohibition on drivers of any type of vehicle wearing a helmet (and also no helmet requirement for motorcyclists, something that surprised when I first moved here).
Another surprise from my quick read-through: backseat passengers in taxis aren’t required to wear seatbelts here. Huh.
If you didn’t do anything wrong or illegal, and your conscience is clear, then who cares about public judgement.
In this particular case though, the BMW is clearly in the wrong.
It’s both in the wrong and in the ravine.
The “Danica Patrick” comment made me lol
Seemed like low-key misogyny to me.
It probably was, yeah. But also she was a race car driver prone to crashes, so there’s some validity to it.
I know nothing of racing, so I believe you on that fact. But that they chose a woman and not a man prone to crashes (I’m sure there’s one, right?) when men outnumber men in top level racing is ringing some alarm bells for me.
Plenty of men known for crashes, but everyone knows who she is, even if its just from the bikini shoots. If he had compared the BMW driver to Pastor Maldonado, it probably would have been lost on most people. But Danica?
Really? I mean she’s kinda known for two things; exploiting her heteronormative good looks in commercials and crashing. Hard to tell if BMW guy was wearing a bikini so…
“These days, if I step outside my home, I assume I’m on camera the entire time, no matter what.”
Welcome to the Fishbowl.
I’d say the same to g87_angel if any transit agency still had New Looks in service, but I guess it’s more like Welcome to the Gillig.
Probably thought it didn’t have enough power, too.