Home » Can You Believe There Are Two Of Them? 1982 Nissan Sentra vs 1983 Nissan Sentra

Can You Believe There Are Two Of Them? 1982 Nissan Sentra vs 1983 Nissan Sentra

Sbsd 3 19 2026

When you think of race cars, a first-generation Nissan Sentra might not be the last car you would think of, but it’s pretty far down the list. That’s why I was surprised to find not one, but two race-prepared Sentras for sale, on opposite sides of the country, for about the same price. Sometimes the car choices just fall into my lap.

None of you were very happy with me for yesterday’s choices, but if you don’t scrape the bottom of the barrel once in a while, you don’t appreciate the better stuff. Grudgingly, you gave the rusty, high-mileage Mitsubishi Lancer the win, but I don’t expect to see any of you driving around in it any time soon.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I disagree. I’m going to take the Accent for my choice. Yeah, it looks like hell, and the damage is all the result of one person’s bad driving, but that one person can also tell you everything that has happened to that car since day one. I’d rather offer them $1,500 for that than give some scummy dealership a grand more for a car they probably paid $400 for.

Screenshot From 2026 03 18 17 44 06

Race cars come in all shapes and sizes. You name it, somebody has put it on a track. I’ve seen a race-prepared Morris Minor, watched a Plymouth Reliant make a twelve-second pass down a dragstrip, and witnessed the hilarity of a Rolls-Royce Corniche autocrossing. (Remember the dancing hippos in Fantasia? Like that, only less graceful.) At the moment, amazingly, there are two unlikely old race cars for sale – both early Nissan Sentras. Let’s see which one you’d rather hoon around a race track.

1982 Nissan Sentra SE – $6,950

649741966 4271146433214335 1329647890588818658 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Engine/drivetrain: 1.5-liter OHC inline 4, five-speed manual, FWD

Location: Tallmadge, OH

Odometer reading: 11,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

In 1982, the Nissan name was new in the US; prior to that, its cars were sold under the Datsun nameplate. The Sentra was the second car to carry the Nissan name here; the larger Stanza was the first. What we have here is one of the very first Sentras, an early preproduction car that was used in an endurance race series sponsored by Playboy magazine and Escort radar detectors. I don’t think it has ever been registered for street use; it has only 11,000 miles on its odometer, all from racing.

649743724 4271135903215388 434831912550930054 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

The engine in these early Sentras isn’t exactly racy: it’s a 1.5-liter four-cylinder with a little two-barrel carburetor. It makes all of 67 horsepower, delivered to the front wheels through a five-speed manual. This car weighs less than 2,000 pounds, so it’s not as sluggish as you might think. It runs and drives great, according to the seller, but I don’t know if it could be driven on the street. I guess it depends on your state laws and whether or not it has a title. Race cars often don’t.

650815320 4271135826548729 4309913652965229817 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

There’s a lot of original Sentra left inside; the door panels, carpet, dashboard, and even the rear seats and cargo cover are still intact. The driver’s seat has been replaced by a racing seat, and there’s a full roll cage installed, but otherwise it’s not far from stock. Strangely, the speedometer needle has also been removed. Is that a requirement for a race car? Are you not allowed to know how fast you’re going?

649275600 4271135746548737 5516963227411722750 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

I never would have thought a Sentra hatchback with racing numbers and sponsor decals would look so cool, but here it is. It’s probably one of the cleanest ’82 Sentras left, by virtue of never having seen road use. It would almost be a shame to drive it on the road after all this time, but it would also be a ton of fun to roll up to a car gathering in it.

1983 Nissan Sentra – $6,250

00s0s Ftpzcsy8dui 0ci0ln 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Engine/drivetrain: 2.0-liter DOHC inline 4, five-speed manual, FWD

Location: Silverton, OR

Odometer reading: unknown

Operational status: Runs and drives well

Most amateur race cars don’t start out as new cars, of course. I imagine this ’83 Sentra started out as someone’s grocery-getter, and only after a long life of daily service was it converted into the racing machine you see here. It’s no grocery-getter now, unless by “groceries” you mean snacks from the track’s concession stand.

00p0p 60uwzcopuqs 0ci0ln 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

This car looks like it was built for a “Prepared” or “Modified” class, or something that allows engine swaps as long as the new engine comes from the same manufacturer. This Sentra is powered by a Nissan SR20DE four-cylinder engine that probably makes twice the horsepower of the stock engine. It has a five-speed manual gearbox with a limited-slip differential. The seller says it is “very quick” and “handles amazing.” I believe it.

00f0f 8dv5z5hxgbt 0ci0ln 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

This one is a lot more gutted inside than the other car. It has only one seat, no carpet or door panels, and not much of the dashboard either. I don’t think you could put this one back on the street without finding a donor Sentra and putting a lot of stuff back. But if you have the ability to trailer it to tracks or autocross events, it could be a lot of fun.

00303 Fafgwgifjkg 0ci0ln 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Outside, it wears the livery of a famous Datsun race car, and it looks pretty good. It has a few dings and scuffs, but hardly anything worth worrying about, and there’s no rust on it. I don’t think a car will pass a race inspection with any rust on it, except maybe Lemons.

Used race cars have a limited audience, I know, but finding two examples of such an unlikely race machine was just too good an opportunity to pass up. So just imagine you were going to try your hand at racing. Which one of these looks like a better starting point? Or, if you really have no interest in racing, which one would you try to put back on the street?

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
63 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
EXP_Scarred
Member
EXP_Scarred
2 days ago

I want the ’83 with the (probable) SE-R drivetrain, in honor of my ’91 SE-R.

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
2 days ago

I’m surprised how close the vote is. Neither of these seem like they are practical to even think about using daily.

I do like the looks of the hatchback. I’d get rid of the Escort and Playboy decals ASAP. Something about having the words Playboy and Escort adjacent to each other seems, well, unseemly. And those cool Cibies up front.

But if I am going to have to trailer it around, I’d rather have the ersatz BRE and its twin-cam.

The truth is it would take me a while to get in and out past the rollbars on either one.

Comet_65cali
Comet_65cali
2 days ago

Went with the BRE and SR20DE swap. I feel at least transmission/engine parts will be easy to find.

Now if only the other car was a Stanza in Powder Blue…mostly.

Lotsofchops
Member
Lotsofchops
3 days ago

When I cast my vote, it showed exact 50/50 split. I could go for either, but the ’83 is speaking my language more.

Tbird
Member
Tbird
3 days ago

Playboy ESCORT FTW!!!

SoCoFoMoCo
Member
SoCoFoMoCo
3 days ago

Gotta be the BRE with the engine transplant. I once owned a 1983 Sentra Wagon, and it was absurdly slow. Worse yet—especially if you’re racing or just beating on it—the transmission is made of glass and doesn’t stand up well to abuse. They did not have an input shaft support, so the entire weight of the input shaft was borne by the front main shaft bearing. The bearing must have been too small, because it would desentigrate on a fairly regular basis. I think I replaced mine like four or five times. Hopefully, it comes with a stockpile of bearings. I can only imagine that they’re rather hard to find these days!

Bleeder
Member
Bleeder
4 days ago

I voted for the ’82 because I think it is interesting because it was built specifically for a racing series.
I do wonder, however, why a spec racing vehicle still has the weight of the extra seats and conveniences?
Now that I look more closely at the interior, is that bungee’d-down yellow container in the passenger footwell a water jug or a good-enuff fuel tank?

Kuruza
Member
Kuruza
3 days ago
Reply to  Bleeder

Looks like an insulated water jug. There’s a small hose behind it, so it might be for a Cool Shirt or similar cooling garment.

Tallestdwarf
Tallestdwarf
3 days ago
Reply to  Bleeder

Maybe it’s a portable urinal for endurance racing?

Slow Joe Crow
Slow Joe Crow
4 days ago

I live in Oregon so getting a trailer to Silverton is easy, and I like the BRE tribute

Gubbin
Member
Gubbin
4 days ago

I’ll take the ’83 as a ready-to-run starter racer. I’ll bet that you could even plate it in Oregon since it’s not in a DEQ region and wouldn’t need a VIN inspection to title it.

MATTinMKE
Member
MATTinMKE
4 days ago

Both. But if I have to choose, I’m going hatchback.

Griznant
Member
Griznant
4 days ago

My second car was a light blue ’85 Sentra four-door, stick. Gutless, but you could abuse it and it just took it. The SR20 would fix the biggest problem with that car so I’m going that route today.

Y2Keith
Member
Y2Keith
4 days ago

I think the originality and pedigree of the ’82 make it the more interesting choice. Sure, you’ll spend a lot of time on track days explaining to the unwashed masses why the “Playboy Escort” logos are on there, but you gotta admit, it’s a helluva conversation starter.

Manwich Sandwich
Member
Manwich Sandwich
4 days ago

I’ll go for the 82. It’s not completely stripped so it won’t be as unpleasant to use on the road. Plus I like the look of the hatchback body style

And who wouldn’t want a ‘Playboy Escort’?

Gen3 Volt
Member
Gen3 Volt
3 days ago

who wouldn’t want a ‘Playboy Escort’?

[raises hand] TBH, that turned me off even as I envied its general fit and finish.

I can’t get past the stories about Hef needing his harem to inject his, um, thing in order to get something approaching tumescence in his latter years. Gross old man, gross old enterprise, FTG.

RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
Member
RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
4 days ago

I’ll take the 82; it looks better and I may just take it back to stock. Although I’d rather have that cool blue high top van in the pic of the 83…so I could…”live in a van, DOWN BY THE RIVER!”

I don't hate manual transmissions
Member
I don't hate manual transmissions
4 days ago

In today’s exciting installment of Racecar Regret…

As for today’s SBSD: Nope. No need, no desire and no interest. It’s not worth wasting garage space on either of these, so not playing today. Sorry.

63
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x