Who’s ready for some open-air fun up in the high country? For your viewing enjoyment today, I have found two tiny convertibles from the Rocky Mountains. They’re both nice bright colors, and in what might be a first here, they’re both just under one liter of displacement.
One of yesterday’s cars had a tiny engine too, but it didn’t do it any good. Uniqueness and a manual gearbox wasn’t nearly enough to pull votes for the Daihatsu Charade. Kermit the Frog’s Ford ZX2 beat it by a country mile. I guess being both cheaper and in better condition made up for its slushbox.


I have to agree. If the prices were equal, and the Charade didn’t need tires right away, I might feel different; I do like small hatchbacks with stickshifts. But I had a regular Escort with an automatic for years, and it was fine. I wouldn’t mind this one with an automatic and more power.
“Welcome To Colorful Colorado,” a large friendly sign announces when you enter the state. And they’re not kidding. Between the wildflowers, the forests, and even the rocks themselves in some places, the big rectangular state is anything but boring. Well, except for the eastern third; that drive down Interstate 76 from Ogallala, Nebraska to Denver gets pretty tedious. Today’s cars add even more variety to the palette, and offer plenty of outward visibility to let you enjoy the sights. Let’s check them out.
1973 Fiat 850 Spider – $3,750

Engine/drivetrain: 903 cc OHV inline-4, four-speed manual, RWD
Location: Denver, CO
Odometer reading: 86,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives, but needs brake work
There’s a fact about project cars that non-car-people don’t know: they’re never finished. Nope, not even that 100-point restored Hemi Cuda gleaming on the auction block. There’s always something to do on an old car. Most of us never get to that flawless Mecum status anyway; we make do with some rust spots and dents, and live with minor mechanical problems for years. That doesn’t make the car any less fun, or the owner any less proud, or having to sell a car before you’re done with it any less difficult. The seller of this little green Fiat has done a lot to it already, but life has gotten in the way, and now it’s time for a new steward to carry on the work.

Fiat revolutionized automobile design with the front-wheel-drive 128, but before that, its small cars were rear-engined and rear-wheel-drive. The 850 range consisted of a two-door sedan, a small van, a fastback coupe, and this two-seat convertible Spider. Looking at all four side-by-side, you’d never guess they shared the same underpinnings; they look completely different. 1973 was the final year of production, and only the Spider was still available. It’s powered by a 903 cc pushrod four-cylinder, mounted longitudinally behind the rear axle. It only makes 47 horsepower, but the Spider weighs 500 pounds less than an NA Mazda Miata, so it doesn’t need much. The seller has gone through the fuel system and tuned it up, and it runs just fine. It also has new tires. However, trailering it home is recommended, because it still needs new brakes.

The interior is a mixed bag; the door panels look nice, but the seats have covers on them, and I imagine they need reupholstering. The dash top is cracked in several places, but a new dash is included – probably bought years ago, just waiting for the time to take it all apart and replace it. It has an aftermarket-looking hard top on it, and comes with the soft top frame, but it sounds like the fabric is MIA. Both seat upholstery kits and top fabric kits are available to fix it up.

Outside, it’s colorful, and has a lot of stripes. As befitting an Italian car, the color scheme echoes the tricolore Italian flag. The stripes and lettering on the doors are confusing; I’m not sure why they’re only on the doors, and don’t carry over onto the fenders. It looks a little strange. The whole thing could use repainting anyway; the green paint is blotchy, like it’s been touched up over the years. And yes, it does have a little rust, but if you’re scared of rust, don’t buy an old Fiat.
1993 Geo Metro LSi Convertible – $3,500

Engine/drivetrain: 993 cc OHC inline-3, five-speed manual, FWD
Location: Lone Tree, CO
Odometer reading: 102,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Of all the great cars of the early 1990s, the one I never expected to still be in demand thirty years later is the Geo Metro. This little Suzuki-built three-cylinder wonder just won’t fade from relevance. I guess it makes sense, in a way: it’s tough, easy to fix, and fun to drive, as long as you aren’t in a hurry. The vast majority of them are hatchbacks, of course, but for a couple of years, this convertible version was available. You lost the back seat and most of the cargo space, but gained a whole lot of headroom.

The Metro’s engine is a study in minimalism: three cylinders, one overhead camshaft, throttle-body fuel injection, and a total lack of pretense. It also has a really distinctive exhaust note that makes it sound more powerful than it is. You could get a Metro with a three-speed automatic, but trust me, you don’t want one. This one has the standard five-speed manual, which is the only sane choice. It just had its head gasket replaced, and a new clutch was installed at the same time, It runs great, according to the seller, but is hard to start sometimes; it sounds to me like the fuel pump might be a little weak.

It has a couple of minor upgrades inside, including a nice wooden shift knob and a steering wheel from a Suzuki Swift GT. It also has the post-facelift dashboard, which is much nicer than the earlier version. It all looks to be in pretty good shape, though there’s no telling what’s lurking under that dash cover.

The minor improvements continue outside, with taillights and wheels from a Swift as well, probably the same one. Upgrading your car with a few bits from a fancier model in the junkyard is a time-honored cheap car tradition. The paint isn’t great, and there are some dents and dings, but it’s rust-free.
With safety regulations the way they are these days, it’s unlikely we’ll ever see small, lightweight convertibles like these for sale again. And I think that’s a shame; I really like them. These both have the potential to be a lot of fun. All you have to do is decide which end you want to carry the engine.
I’ll take the Fiat. It’s worth it for those beautiful bumpers alone.
I go Metro for several reasons.
1. I already have a Fiat spider that I am neglecting and while if they were pets having two to hang out might help that doesn’t apply here.
2. The cost of a replacement roof and interior add up to the price of the Fiat or more.
3. Manual beats standard and low maintenance beats high maintenance
Sounds like you need to sell it and pay your delinquent Verizon bill
““Welcome To Colorful Colorado,” a large friendly sign announces when you enter the state. And they’re not kidding. Between the wildflowers, the forests, and even the rocks themselves in some places, the big rectangular state is anything but boring. Well, except for the eastern third; that drive down Interstate 76 from Ogallala, Nebraska to Denver gets pretty tedious.”
Obligatory:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qlt4vwS0wsg
1973 Fiat 850 Spider: Engine/drivetrain: 903 cc OHV 47hp inline-4, four-speed manual, RWD
Hmm. Anyone got a spare Hayabusa laying around?
The Fiat is awful and I need it.
My Dad bought one of these back in the 80s for pennies and used it as a farm car to drive across the fields and down to the lake cabin on the back of the property. Those stories have given me a soft spot for battered little Fiat convertibles.
I’d never paint it. The paint scheme is truly horrifying, bound to infuriate at least a few people, and I think it is perfect.
I would prefer the 90s teal color over the magenta, but I’ll be Metro-tized.
That Fiat looks like a blast to drive and a lot of fun looking. It will be fun to fix up and enjoy. Geo Metros suck and this one is ugly and flimsy
Heart says Fiat, head says Metro, which will need a new ragtop but seems very drivable once that fuel pump issue’s fixed.
Still, I loved the 850’s video, and hearing that wonderful little ride chugging past.
The Metro is a better car, and it’s in a cooler color. So I voted for the Metro roadster.
I could be wrong, but almost anything would be move nimble than the Metro. Fiat
I always wanted to buy a Metro convertible, lift it and put those huge 6′ tall tires on it. I would call it “Big Toe”.
More than a few noted the proportions of the 850 Spider don’t look right. That’s because it’s pictured with the hardtop. Remove that, and it looks a lot more streamlined and sexy with the soft top.
I would have said both, but for me any car repainted a non-original color, is a show-stopper. So the Metro convertible is out.
That is 100% its original color. Geo had awesome color options.
The engine compartment is still the original red.
They did paint the air cleaner to match the exterior, though. Looking closely, the driver’s side door front gap looks rather janky.
I agree with you, though. Geo did use some terrific colors, perfect for the 90’s.
I owned a 1996 geo metro at one time… those cars are alot of fun to toss around. That gets my vote.
Honestly, the crummy three-door with the automatic, which I rented in 1993, was surprisingly fun as well. Always had a soft spot for them ever since.
Mine was a 3-door as well… it had the five-speed and the fuel-injected 1 liter 3-cyl. Think it made all of like 54 horsepower. But it weighed next to nothing.
I actually want a Fiat 850, so this is an easy choice for me. The model in question isn’t perfect, but if you don’t think it would be a fun car we probably wouldn’t get along… I guess I would say the same about the Metro. There are no losers today.
Fun fact, this town would have been named Twin Trees if a time traveler from 1985 hadn’t run one of them over with his DeLorean.
Metro for me since it’s not a project car and the Fiat is. Also the proportions of the Fiat look off to me. On top of that, the pictures of the Fiat clearly show that rust is an issue.
This is a hard no on both, but I went with Fiat 100% because I could not let my eyes be seared by the color of that Geo.
Voted FIAT, and regret it now that I have watched the video on the Marketplace listing.
Neither today…
And I assume everyone is who voted for the Metro did so just to be funny.
Of the over 70 cars I’ve owned, I had a ’72 850 Spider the longest at 12 years. After I installed a new carburetor from Bayless, I only had one mechanical issue when the accelerator cable broke. I moved from CT to Buffalo for a while and decided to take the back roads all the way. Spent the night in Cooperstown and had lunch the next day at Brock Yates’ restaurant in Wyoming.
It was a great car to drive across the border to Niagara On The Lake, Ontario. Rust and a divorce put an end to my ownership.
Great car.
I’d hear a lot of “you got one of those?” if I got either of these, but in a much better tone of voice with the FIAT.
I’m going with the Fiat but Abarth.
Cram a modern 500 drivetrain into the back?
Fix it again, Tony, I’m going for a drive this weekend!
Metro.If need to fix it I’m sure I can find the parts quickly and for a relatively fair price.That color is another story though.
The color’s the best part!
As long as you have a lead on Suzuki Parts, you’re good to go.
You spell…. nevermind
When I give up on the Fiat, it will be easier to sell to some
unsuspecting suckernice person who has the same delusions that old convertibles are as painless as a modern car to own.The Metro – unless we have some sort of 2008 delusion again where spiking gas prices made them hugely more valuable – will likely not be as easy to unload when I’m tired of it.
Gas prices will spike again. There will always be some foreign war or some untimely natural disaster disrupting the oil supply.
But but but EVs if everyone buys EVs then the demand for dinosaur power will disappear and we will get it for like nothing
Always is. Happens again and again. People don’t learn from their mistakes and fix the problem long term.
Today’s low gas prices are higher than the high gas prices of the 70s.