Home » For Just Three Years, Americans Could Buy A Small Diesel Jaguar Sport Sedan

For Just Three Years, Americans Could Buy A Small Diesel Jaguar Sport Sedan

Jaguar Xe Diesel Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

It’s 2025 and diesel passenger cars are as good as dead in America. Right now, nobody offers a diesel-powered vehicle that isn’t some sort of SUV or pickup truck, but it wasn’t always like this. Even after the great diesel scandal of the 2010s broke, a whole host of compression-ignition machines burst on the scene to relatively little fanfare. One of the more obscure offerings to be sold here was the Jaguar XE 20d.

Out of all the manufacturers that could’ve launched a diesel sports sedan in America in the late-2010s, Jaguar probably isn’t the one you’d expect. On the one hand, Mercedes-Benz never sold a modern diesel C-Class in America, which feels like a missed opportunity. On the other hand, there’s a good chance everyone forgot that the Chevrolet Cruze diesel existed, so the XE 20d slipping under the radar isn’t unprecedented.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Still, here’s a premium compact diesel sedan that isn’t a BMW or an Audi, and that deserves a bit of retrospective. Especially since Jaguar doesn’t really have any new cars right now. Instead, it’s gearing up for an all-electric future. Shall we hop in the time machine for a minute?

The Aluminum Baby

Jaguar Xf 2009
Photo credit: Jaguar

If you’ve been around for a minute, you’ll know that Jaguar’s electric pivot isn’t the first big change the brand’s seen in the 21st century. Although the marque started the millennium with two scoops of old-fashioned heritage influence, by the end of the 2000s, it had taken a turn towards modernity. The 2007 XK was the starting point, but the first-generation XF was a real salvo. It had climate controls reminiscent of a Motorola Razr, a rotary gear knob that sat flush with the console until you turned the car on, and just a hint of soft blue lighting. Very cool. The 2010 XJ was another big step towards revitalization, and with stability seemingly assured for the near-term, Jaguar geared up to take on the Germans.

Jaguar Xtype 2.5
Photo credit: Jaguar

We all know the F-Type had a huge cultural impact when it launched, but it was merely the first step in a new top-to-bottom lineup. When you’re going to compete with BMW and Mercedes-Benz, you’ll need more than a sports car and two big sedans. You’ll need a small sedan too. While Jaguar tried this before with the X-Type, that car’s transverse Ford-based underpinnings meant it never quite measured up to rear-wheel-drive rivals. This time, Jaguar wouldn’t make the same mistake.

ADVERTISEMENT
Jaguar Xe S
Photo credit: Jaguar

The new baby Jag was called the XE, and it was unlike anything else in the segment. While the Germans were building their compact sports sedans out of steel, Jaguar went with bonded and riveted aluminum, scaling down technology previously introduced in the XJ sedan of the mid-2000s. Indeed, Jaguar’s three-liter supercharged V6 was also downloaded from larger models, with up to 380 horsepower in XE S trim. Mind you, the V6 was thirsty, so Jaguar also offered Americans something the brand never brought stateside before: A diesel engine.

Midnight Oil

Jaguar Xe Diesel 2
Photo credit: Jaguar

Indeed, coinciding with the XE’s delayed arrival in America, and in a post-Dieselgate landscape, Jaguar decided the time was right to offer diesel passenger cars on this side of the Atlantic. The Ingenium two-liter turbodiesel inline-four used electrohydraulic variable valve timing technology originally developed by Fiat to crank out 180 horsepower and 318 lb.-ft. of torque. That’s the same horsepower as the BMW 328d but 38 more lb.-ft. of torque. Pair that with a ZF eight-speed automatic transmission, and the result was an EPA rating of 32 MPG city, 42 MPG highway, and 36 MPG combined. Right on par with its closest rival, despite higher output.

Jaguar Xe Diesel 4
Photo credit: Jaguar

However, let’s just say that the XE 20d needed more torque than the BMW 328d. See, an all-wheel-drive diesel XE would tip the scales at nearly two tons despite aluminum construction, which meant that it wouldn’t exactly set your follicles ablaze in a straight line. When Car and Driver tested a diesel XE, the magazine only managed zero-to-60 mph in 8.4 seconds. At the drag strip, this reasonably elegant sedan would be in a dead heat with a stick-shift Toyota Echo. Granted, the Jaguar was more economical than an Echo, and it offered decent stick too. As Car And Driver wrote:

Ripping around our favorite winding, two-lane roads, the XE certainly feels less isolated than the 3-series—a great start. Even though this particular car wore 18-inch all-season tires—R-Sport V-6 models are available with 20-inch performance rubber—lateral grip was a still impressive 0.88 g, which is more stick than the XE’s minimally bolstered seats can handle. However, despite more than ample grip, taut wheel and body control, and quick steering, linking corners in the XE doesn’t come as naturally as in our transcendent favorites.

So, a competitive but not superlative sports sedan with excellent fuel economy. While it didn’t exactly make a huge dent in BMW 3 Series sales, the Jaguar XE 20d was a competent machine for serious mile-munching. Or at least it would be if it weren’t for one big issue.

Timing Is Everything

Jaguar Xe 2016 Engine Bay
Photo credit: Jaguar

As these Ingenium two-liter diesel four-cylinder engines aged, a common problem started to rear its ugly head. In theory, a timing chain should be essentially maintenance-free. With hydraulic tensioners and a metal chain that doesn’t dry rot like a rubber timing belt, this sort of timing arrangement should last the life of a vehicle. However, not only did Jaguar use wearable plastic timing chain guides, the chains themselves are known to stretch on occasion. Some owners report hearing a rattle on start-up and needing a new timing chain with less than 100,000 miles on the clock, and it’s a big job. We’re talking thousands of dollars to sort.

ADVERTISEMENT
Jaguar Xe Interior
Photo credit: Jaguar

At the same time, turbochargers can fail, and a leaking thermostat housing can take out the solenoid controlling oil flow to the piston oil squirters. Then there’s how the particulate filter on this diesel engine isn’t always happy with prolonged around-town use. It really needs a good run down the highway every week or so to clear out the particulate filter, otherwise owners may be looking at bills for forced DPF regeneration. In short, while there’s a chance an XE 20d could be just fine, it also could produce repair bills that eliminate any cost savings of the excellent fuel mileage. Perhaps that’s part of the reason why these cars are so cheap secondhand.

Bargain Bin

Xe Diesel Cars And Bids
Photo credit: Cars & Bids

Jaguar only sold the XE 20d for three model years in America, from 2017 through 2019. Unsurprisingly, sales volumes weren’t huge, but you can find higher-mileage examples for less than $10,000 if you poke around. Here’s a 2017 model that recently sold on Cars & Bids for $8,200. It had 102,300 miles on the clock at the time the hammer dropped, but it looks tidy and boasts a clean Carfax.

Xe Diesel Autotrader
Photo credit: Autotrader

Likewise, here’s another 2017 XE 20d, and this one’s up for sale in Tennessee for $8,951. Alright, it has 104,465 miles on the clock, but it’s a decent spec with the split-five-spoke wheels and leather seats. Then again, it does look like it needs at least a pair of tires soon, and some interior wear is evident.

Sorry, You’re Not A Winner

Xe Diesel 3
Photo credit: Jaguar

Alright, so the Jaguar XE 20d wasn’t particularly quick, or impressively reliable, or significantly more economical than its rivals. It didn’t sell in huge numbers, and the interior had its own whiffs of cheapness. However, it’s definitely a strange car to offer in America, which is why we should celebrate that Jaguar tried it for three years. It wouldn’t be my first pick for a used diesel sedan, but that 20d badge is interesting to see in the wild.

Top graphic image: Jaguar

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stavers69
Stavers69
1 month ago

Anything with a diesel Ingenium engine is best left well alone. They have a truly awful reputation for reliability – pretty much on par with any wet belt engine.

Scott
Member
Scott
1 month ago

Never knew these existed. Thanks Thomas! 🙂

Justin Thiel
Justin Thiel
1 month ago

I had a 2016XFs. That thing was really great. I had it for 3 trouoble free years. The car was fast and comfortable and looked really good in my eye. When the warranty ran out – i bailed.

ImissmyoldScout
Member
ImissmyoldScout
1 month ago

I took one for a test drive. The engine sounded like our old John Deere, and the transmission had no idea what gear it wanted to be in. Gave it a hard pass and bought a Golf R instead.

TurboFarts
TurboFarts
1 month ago

Sort of a weird cross-shop. Good choice in the end.

Shooting Brake
Member
Shooting Brake
1 month ago

I wouldn’t trust a Jag as far as I can throw it, and I’d consider owning an Alfa…

Space
Space
1 month ago

Huh, Jaguar. Maybe there is an author on this website that could give us insight into the Jaag ownership experience.

Eric Gonzalez
Eric Gonzalez
1 month ago

Not a bad looking car, but slow, unreliable and with parts that are surely hell to source… nah, thanks. Give me the previous gen. At least that one had character and a much better interior.

PresterJohn
Member
PresterJohn
1 month ago

Man these things speak to me. I realize the article doesn’t even paint that rosy of a picture and neither do the comments but I still like it. Into the glovebox it goes…

Cam.man67
Cam.man67
1 month ago

It’s a shame Jaguar has a deserved reputation for being hellishly unreliable. Because, damn, can they make a handsome car when they try. Maybe an OM606 swap is the way to go.

Mthew_M
Mthew_M
1 month ago

The real ticket would be a diesel XF. Barely heavier than the XE, but offering a lot more space (and better looks, to me). The F-Pace (the SUV) could also be had with the diesel, but, that just might be too slow.

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
1 month ago

Aren’t SUVs passenger vehicles?

TurboFarts
TurboFarts
1 month ago
Reply to  Mr Sarcastic

Sure are. Note that he states “passenger cars”, not passenger vehicles. If you are going to be pedantic, do it right.

Matthew Lange
Matthew Lange
1 month ago

I owned one in the UK albeit a 2020 refresh version. It followed a BMW 120d as my daily. The Jaguar was insanely economical I managed to get it to average 72 imperial MPG on a highway run during Covid. The chassis had a great handling and ride combination too (better than the F Type I have now) . The big dislike was the narrow powerband of the Jag diesel which made it a bit like an on/ off switch. The BMW 2.0d had a much wider powerband. I’d quite like another XE but a supercharged V6 one.

Ppnw
Member
Ppnw
1 month ago

We should consider ourselves lucky that diesel cars never took off in the US. Europe is doing a good job of undoing that generational mistake, but a ton of damage was done in the meantime.

Rockchops
Member
Rockchops
1 month ago

I love the look of these, but having sat in a couple as ubers, they feel cheap inside. For less than 10k though, I could live with that (I’d be disappointed if I bought it new). I feel the same way about Maseratis…not a bad buy highly depreciated but would hate to be the rube who bought a new one. As far as this jag goes…I’m a glutton for punishment and I don’t think I’d touch an Ingenium engine. They’re utter garbage, and have earned their poor reputation. I’d entertain a 3.0 supercharged version, seems like it’d be fun!

Ranwhenparked
Member
Ranwhenparked
1 month ago
Reply to  Rockchops

Yeah, the interior of the XE was a really huge letdown, especially against Jaguar’s previously high standards

FormerTXJeepGuy
Member
FormerTXJeepGuy
1 month ago

Always liked the look of the XE. Got a gas one as a rental car in Los Angeles once and enjoyed driving it, especially through the canyons going up to the valley.

Jason Noiles
Jason Noiles
1 month ago

That’s three years too many. Don’t romanticise it. This was a dogshit car when new and time has not improved it.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
1 month ago

Of course, the biggest problem is that it’s a Jag, which means it’s a POS in terms of reliability.

Too bad we never got the diesel X-Type wagon over here.

Jason Noiles
Jason Noiles
1 month ago
Reply to  Dogisbadob

No, it isn’t. It’s lucky you didn’t get it.

21
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x