Home » Four Decades Ago, Toyota Unveiled The Modern Camry And Challenged America’s Best

Four Decades Ago, Toyota Unveiled The Modern Camry And Challenged America’s Best

Camry V20 Ts3
ADVERTISEMENT

Long before SUVs and crossovers took over the streets of America, it was the sedan that ruled the country. In the 1980s, you couldn’t turn a corner on the average U.S. city block without seeing a Chevy Cavalier or a Ford Escort transporting a family of four. Four-door sedans and their wagon counterparts were the decade’s lifeblood.

Toyota was well aware of the sedan’s potential by the time the 1980s rolled along. In 1983, it launched the first Camry in the United States, following its rise as the number one import brand in the United States in 1975, surpassing Volkswagen. While it sold well, the Camry wouldn’t really hit its stride until the second-generation car’s arrival in 1986.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Seeing the possibilities the American market had to offer, Toyota smartly designed the second-generation Camry, internally designated the V20, to cater first and foremost to U.S. buyers. It had to be comfortable, spacious, relatively quick, and economical—all for a price consumers wouldn’t balk at.

Seichi Yamauchi had a gargantuan task on his hands. The Japanese designer, who was head of the Toyota design arm, is best known for his work on the first-generation MR2 sports car. This time, he had to take on one of Toyota’s most important products, one that would define the brand for decades to come.

Designed With America In Mind

1998001 1987 Camry Sedan Color 2
Source: Toyota

This is what Yamauchi came up with. While the V20’s wheelbase remained the same—102.4 inches—the body was longer and wider than before, and more trunk space was added. The car retained its “three-box” bodystyle, but with a slightly more curvaceous front end, both for modernity’s sake and to improve aerodynamics (it got a drag coefficient of 0.34, according to Car and Driver). The roof was lowered by half an inch, too. It was shaped more like an American car than anything from Japan, which was exactly Toyota’s goal. The company wanted to meet consumers where they were. And they were in cars like the Chevy Cavalier and the Celebrity—the best-selling cars in America in 1985 and 1986, respectively.

ADVERTISEMENT

To capitalize best on every avenue of the American buyer’s tastes, Toyota also introduced a wagon version of the Camry for the first time. Yes, there was once a time when wagons were so popular that manufacturers would design them specifically for the U.S. market—something I can only dream of now. Design-wise, the station wagon was near-identical to the sedan, save for the extended roof, the extra pillar, and the new glass.

1998001 1988 Camry Le Wagon
Source: Toyota

Inside, the Camry was simple and analog done right. There was nothing mindblowing about the four-pod gauge cluster, the climate control, or the radio. Everything used real, physical buttons, and took no time at all to figure out. It was just easy to use, which is exactly what the average American buyer desired at the time. Remember, the first-gen Camry was already a success, and Toyota didn’t want to mess with the formula too much. If I time-traveled to a Toyota dealer back in ’87, I’d probably get the Deluxe edition just to have the fancy blue fabric. Though I’d miss stuff like the power windows, power door locks, and better stereo found in the LE trim.

No matter which trim you went for, your V20 Camry came standard with four-wheel independent suspension, held up by coil springs and struts at all four corners, with anti-roll bars at either end. The base car got ventilated disc brakes up front and drums in the rear. If you wanted more stopping power, going up to a higher trim got you discs out back, too.

It Was No Slouch Either

Toyota Camry3
Source: Toyota

Buyers in America and buyers in Japan have different ideas about what “power” really means in a car. Toyota couldn’t just bring over a tiny engine from its Japanese-market sedans and call it a day here. So, in addition to the base 1.8-liter engine, came the 3S-FE. The twin-overhead cam 2.0-liter four-cylinder shared some of its design with the 3S-GE found in the Celica GT-S. It had double the valves of its predecessor (16 versus eight), and could rev to 6,000 rpm. The engine was rated at 115 horsepower at 5,200 rpm, 20 more than the 1.8-liter in the previous Camry. Torque climbed slightly, too, from 118 pound-feet to 125 lb-ft at 4,400 rpm.

Screenshot 2025 09 22 At 12.47.11 pm
The 2.0-liter four-cylinder. Source: MotorWeek on YouTube

There were two transmissions available with the V20 Camry at launch: A base five-speed manual and a three-speed automatic with overdrive. Weirdly, you couldn’t get the stick with the LE trim. That means if you wanted a manual, you’d have to make do with the lesser stereo and manual door locks. Boo!

ADVERTISEMENT

Toyota’s intent to take over the sedan market didn’t stop with the Camry’s new design. The company was entirely committed to the car’s long-term success in America, opening a factory in Georgetown, Kentucky to build the car—the first such facility wholly owned by Toyota in the U.S. The first vehicle to roll off the line in 1988 at Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky was a white Camry. The facility has since expanded and can produce 550,000 vehicles and over 600,000 engines every year, and it built its 10 millionth car back in 2014.

Americans love choice, and Toyota made sure to give buyers plenty of it with the V20. In addition to the two body styles, Toyota also introduced a 2.5-liter V6 engine—the first for any Camry—in 1988. Though it wasn’t directly marketed as a performance engine, the 24-valve mill made 153 hp and 155 lb-ft of torque, making it the most powerful engine ever offered in the car.

Toyota brought in the V6 as a response to the Ford Taurus SHO and its Yamaha-designed engine—at least according to The Man Himself, John Davis of MotorWeek. The publication reviewed the V6 Camry back when it was new, and seemed to really enjoy it. Please focus on the car and not the way Davis pronounces Camry (or as he likes to say, Cam-ray).

ADVERTISEMENT

 

That same year, Toyota introduced another first for the Camry: All-wheel drive. The V20 was the first generation to receive the company’s All-Trac system, which made its debut on the Celica that same year. It uses a locking center differential—the type of thing you’d normally only see on off-road-focused trucks and SUVs, even today.

Though it sounds like something that should’ve been a hit, the All-Trac Camry died after the ’91 model year, and an all-wheel drive Camry wouldn’t return to the market until Toyota added it back as an option for the 2020 model year. Like many of these ’80s and ’90s AWD cars, it was simply too far ahead of its time. Having owned a similar type of car—a 1988 BMW 325iX—I’ll always wonder why buyers were hesitant to hop on the all-wheel drive bandwagon for so long.

Toyota Camry2
Source: Toyota

All of these innovations for the Camry nameplate resulted in heaps of sales. On its introduction in 1987, Toyota sold 186,623 Camrys—the most ever in the United States. Sales jumped even further from there. In 1988, dealers moved 225,322 Camrys. And in ’89, Camry sales crossed the quarter-million mark, coming in at 255,252 units. By the end of its lifecycle in 1991, Toyota had sold over 1.2 million V20s. The car was widely perceived as solid, reliable transportation, with an economical engine and an affordable price tag. The pivot towards American tastes was a resounding success.

It Was A Hit, But It Wasn’t American Enough

At least, it was a success compared to the first-gen Camry. The V20’s sales cemented Toyota as a major player in the American market, but it still faced stiff competition. The second-generation Camry was never the best-selling car in America when it was new. In 1987 and 1988, it was bested by both the Ford Escort and the Ford Taurus. Then, in 1989, the Camry’s sworn enemy, the Honda Accord, took the crown for best-selling car in America, with 362,797 units sold.

ADVERTISEMENT
Screenshot 2025 09 22 At 1.01.25 pm
The 1988 Accord Coupe. Source: Honda

The Camry might’ve had the Honda beat if it weren’t for the Accord’s three available body styles. Unlike the Toyota, which came in just sedan and wagon shapes, Honda sold an Accord coupe, an Accord sedan, and an Accord hatchback. This was a time when coupes were still making up a not-insignificant portion of car sales in America, so it mattered.

The battle for sedan supremacy only got hotter as the ’90s rolled in. The Accord would receive a major update for the 1990 model year, resulting in a sales surge and two more years as the top-selling car in America. Ford, seeing its sales crown slip away, would respond with the second-generation Taurus. That car topped the board for four straight years.

Ford Taurus 1992
The 1992 Ford Taurus. Source: Ford

Toyota’s success with the V20 was the catalyst for ensuring future Camrys would have success. Its replacement, codenamed the XV10, had to be even more Americanized—something that then vice president of sales Bob McCurry told Toyota directly. Automotive News published a retrospective of the third-gen Camry back in 2007 that sums up Toyota North America’s demands succinctly:

It was 1989, a year after the first-generation Camry had gone into production in Georgetown, Ky., and just before the Lexus brand was to launch. The Japanese executives were confident about their performance in the United States to that point — but then they had to face some tough talk from their top U.S. executive.

McCurry wanted a vehicle suited to American tastes, not the traditional low-key Japan-sized model he saw in the designs. There is no explicit record of what the Japanese had to say about McCurry’s forceful way of making demands — a dramatic departure from the way things typically were done in Japan. Yoshio Ishizaka, senior vice president and chief coordinating officer of Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. at the time, says only: “Some were very much offended by McCurry’s comments. Americans like a big car. Always, American opinion is the bigger, the better. That’s a very simplified argument.”

Toyota’s then-head of R&D Akihiro Wada reflected on the struggles to achieve the high demands needed to make the car competitive.

“It was too narrow and not suited for the United States,” he says. “The engineering problem was the cradle, or engine bay, holding the motor. For America, we had to cut it in half and widen it. The chief engineer proposed some very difficult designs. I made lots of comments.”

It was not a matter of not understanding what the Americans wanted, according to Wada. “All chief engineers understand American tastes,” he says. “Americans are very frank. But the engineering to meet those tastes was very difficult.”

Toyota Camry4
The wagon version of the VX10 is especially cool. Source: Toyota

The result was a car more American than Japanese. It was two inches wider and six inches longer. The engine, now 2.2 liters, made 130 horsepower. The V6 was still an available option, now making 185 horsepower. It could even break the 0-60 barrier in under eight seconds, according to Automotive News. It wasn’t an immediate dominator—like I said before, the Taurus was eating every competitor for lunch in the early ’90s. But like the V20, it helped Toyota encroach on the segment and claw more market share year after year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then, in 1997, it finally happened for Toyota. The VX20 Camry, the VX10’s successor, took the sales crown in America, with 397,156 units sold. The ubiquitous sedan gripped that trophy tight and never looked back, taking the sales crown for cars for the next 25 of 26 years (the Accord briefly took the top spot back in 2001, before relinquishing it back to Toyota the next year). The Camry’s streak was broken unceremoniously in 2024 by its own stablemate, the RAV4 crossover, which sold 475,193 units despite being in its last year of its lifecycle.

1998001 1988 Camry Sedan 3
Source: Toyota

That quarter-century of domination can be traced back to the V20’s mainstream success in the late ’80s and early ’90s market. Without that car, Toyota would’ve been several steps behind the competition for years. It took those learnings and smartly applied them to the VX10 and eventually the VX20. From there, sales skyrocketed.

The next 25 years of Camry sales probably won’t look like the last 25 years, but the V20 will always be remembered for being the foundation of Toyota’s reputation for steadfast, reliable, affordable, A-to-B transportation. Next time you see one on the road, remember that.

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Top photo: Toyota

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
100 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ignatius J. Reilly
Member
Ignatius J. Reilly
1 month ago

No mention of the “Punch it Margaret!” ad?

Davey
Davey
1 month ago

Our 95 Camry wagon had the 3.0L V6, that was such a great engine and made it to 450,000klms until rust got too bad on the vehicle. Oil was still coming out looking like new every oil change. Fantastic engine. Wish they made a straight 6 version of that.

1978fiatspyderfan
Member
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

IMHO Toyota took over because of reliability and fuel efficiency. Something they still do today. As a marketing specialist I would have fought the crappy built US Cars using the built in America with a The first foreign built car made in the US. Maybe introduce the workers from the plant.

Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
1 month ago

Camrys are certainly decent cars. At least easier to work on as opposed to something like the new LC250 (which has a bunch of wires).

Also, yes, they are economical to own. But some cars can match their longevity. Late 3800s (once the intake issue was fixed) were good contenders.

Camry cars are not the only boring vehicles around. The Malibu also was (other than bad reliability rating in some years, and lemons) a boring car as well. Yes, now the naysayers will start yelling at my comparison, but I used it to make a good point.

The bottom line however, is that newer Camrys are FAR MORE EXPENSIVE than what they used to be. Here in Qatar they start above 100k riyals for the first time.

DJP
DJP
1 month ago

This generation Camry really drives home just how vastly different the automotive landscape is in 2025. What is crazy is that a loaded Camry $16k in 1989, and running that through the inflation calculator tells me that is the equivalent of $47,000(!!) in 2025. The top end Camry Hybrid starts at $34,000 today. It’s crazy to see just how much car you get for the money in 2025. While I guess this is great for consumers, I really miss how straightforward, engineering driven and unpretentious 80s Camrys were.

RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
Member
RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
1 month ago

My 1st car was a light blue 87 Camry…I loved it, it was a blast to drive, and ran like a top! I also went my fastest ever in it: 120MPH on a back highway straight stretch…it had no problem doing it too. These were a sleek design but I still prefer the Accord. I’ve had 2 of those 3rd gens…5spds and pop-ups! They are such a great body style. Now I want a Prelude of that era, and a CRX

TriangleRAD
Member
TriangleRAD
1 month ago

I hate to be pedantic, but by the time the Accord snagged the top sales spot in ’89, the hatchback had been dropped from the lineup. ’88 was the last year. On the plus side, 1989 is the only year when the best selling car in America featured popup headlights.

How far we have fallen.

Vetatur Fumare
Member
Vetatur Fumare
1 month ago
Reply to  TriangleRAD

That’s my favorite trivia thus far today, and it is unlikely that I will hear anything better.

Scott
Member
Scott
1 month ago

Thank you for this Brian, I enjoyed it.

Not really relevant, but I recently saw a photo of the current Toyota Corolla wagon, which isn’t available in the U.S. (of course 🙁 ) and I like it so much I just wanted to mention it here. The current Corolla has been using Toyota’s very good TNGA platform, and gets good reviews for having low NVH levels for what’s supposed to be an entry level car (since Americans no longer get the Yaris from Toyota). Of the Corollas we do get, I suppose the hatchback is my fave, even though it’s small inside cargowise for a hatchback, and no longer available with a manual transmission.

Anyway, here are some photos of the current-gen Corolla wagon, which seems almost as big and sensible as the early gen Camrys:

https://www.autotrader.ca/editorial/20230310/the-toyota-corolla-wagon-is-one-of-the-best-cars-i-ve-ever-driven …scroll down just a bit and click the ‘Gallery’ link on the right. 🙂

Last edited 1 month ago by Scott
Roofless
Member
Roofless
1 month ago
EricTheViking
EricTheViking
1 month ago

A neighbour told us that he had considered Camry (V20) but decided against it due to the motorised shoulder seat belts. He hated them so much and vowed he would never drive one with that satanic system ever again.

Sissyfoot
Sissyfoot
1 month ago
Reply to  EricTheViking

People are weird, man.

EricTheViking
EricTheViking
1 month ago
Reply to  Sissyfoot

Obviously, you never experience the satanic system so you don’t know what it’s like. So, don’t waste my time.

Sissyfoot
Sissyfoot
1 month ago
Reply to  EricTheViking

I mean, I did. I had an SVX for fourteen years. So, maybe phrase it as a question next time instead of making assumptions.

I didn’t mind the motorized belts in my SVX at all. Come to think of it, a Legacy we owned may have also had motorized belts.

People have different opinions. It’s not worth being rude over…a type of seat belt? What? Come on.

Sean Ellery
Sean Ellery
1 month ago

I had a 1990 1.8L manual Camry. Bought it in 1996 and then drove it for 293,000kms over the next 9 years.

Brilliant car! Easy to see out of in all directions (actually the best car I’ve ever had for this), decent power even with the 1.8L and it could tow my Surf-cat yacht trailer with ease. Mechanically, it was a Camry so basically bullet proof.

Eventually it started to get rusty panels and in the last year I spent $1200 for a new radiator and alternator… on a car worth $1500 at best. Traded it in for $1500 and bought a 2000 Camry :+) That one I only kept for 3 years though. Now I’m on my 4th Mazda.

Luxrage
Member
Luxrage
1 month ago

I was lucky enough to pull the top trim double-din OEM Technics radio from the first-gen Camry. It would look at home in any spec’d out 80s luxury car with all of the extra features and a full equalizer.

Last edited 1 month ago by Luxrage
BryaninTowson
BryaninTowson
1 month ago

My first car was an 89 Camry with the 2.5 V6. It was smooth, comfortably and was actually really nice to drive. It also was a total rust bucket by 1999. I think the v20 still holds up as a really handsome car, inside and out.

Kuruza
Member
Kuruza
1 month ago

Such a great design. It’s a reminder that the “elegant” meant “pleasingly ingenious and simple” before common use shifted toward splendor and richness.

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
1 month ago

We cross-shopped an ’86 Camry and Accord LX-i and bought the latter. It just felt like it was more fun to drive but rode as comfortably as the Camry. And I liked Honda’s instruments and general styling more. It was a great car for its time. Since my wife was going to be putting most of the miles on it, she wanted the automatic.

I had a coworker who had the same year and color car but with a stick. I asked her if we could trade cars for a day to play a trick on my wife. The next morning my wife was less than amused. Maybe I should have swapped partners.

I’m not anti-Toyota. I have owned three. If it weren’t for horrible nose treatment on Lexus and Toyota sedans these days, I might own one. Instead, I have a 2017 Accord.

The World of Vee
Member
The World of Vee
1 month ago

I have very fond memories of a green, manual, cloth seated VX10 Camry sedan. young love, two idiots teaching each other how to drive stick, and many a night in secluded parks and the hydroelectric powerplant of all things.

Being 17 before everyone’s movements were tracked at all times sure was a blessing, I kind of feel bad for my kids and how uncool their mother is going to be about all that haha.

Rahul Patel
Rahul Patel
1 month ago

I remember seeing one in my high school parking lot as a lad, and was blown away by the fact this box had a manual transmission. Wasn’t expecting that based on the staid exterior. I imagine it belonged to a teacher.

Last edited 1 month ago by Rahul Patel
Dodsworth
Member
Dodsworth
1 month ago

John Davis is a treasure, but sometimes he puts his own spin on pronunciation. Cam-Ray? He drove me nuts every time he said Jeep Com-PASS.

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
1 month ago
Reply to  Dodsworth

Could be worse… Comp-ASS. But that might be more accurate.

CTSVmkeLS6
CTSVmkeLS6
1 month ago

The 90-91 Lexus EX250 is the finest example of this generation Camry chassis. It’s a clean, understated looker.

DJP
DJP
1 month ago
Reply to  CTSVmkeLS6

100% this!! It was overshadowed, quite understandably, by the LS400, but this was a beautifully styled Camry with a Lexus interior. I’ve always had a soft spot for this one.

InvivnI
Member
InvivnI
1 month ago

My family owned all three generations from the V20 onwards discussed here, and have only just purchased an EV to replace their 26-year-old XV20. Funnily enough, all three cars were purchased from a coworker of my dad’s over the years as he upgraded, each time, to the newer-gen Camry. The V20 was in the white colour shown here that seemingly 80% of them came in, and was my oldest sister’s first car. The XV10 came in the maroon, also shown here and also what that generation seemingly all came in, and was my second-oldest sister’s first car after my mum had it. The XV20 was not my first car, but it was the first car I learnt to drive in. It’s been exceedingly reliable for my parents and still feels tight-as-a-drum today. I’ll always have a soft spot for these cars – every time I jump in the XV20 I feel like I’m in my early 20s again, leaning hard on the suprisingly strong V6 as I head off to my retail job. However, to be honest, it was pretty dull to drive, especially compared to the RWD competition from Ford and Holden in Australia at the time.

Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
1 month ago
Reply to  InvivnI

I think Holden Commodores with the 3.8 v6 were also pretty dull. Holden also has made some dull cars too, in addition to their exciting ones (which aren’t really special compared to the German cars they competed with).

InvivnI
Member
InvivnI
1 month ago

I think the public saw the Commodore as dull because they were so common. But, along with the Falcon, where else could you get that combination of reasonable power (for the time) in a decent-handing RWD package at such an affordable price-point? Sure, an equivalently-sized 5-series probably handled better, but it was in a completely different price bracket, especially if you wanted one that was also more powerful.

Not disputing Holden also made dull cars though, I was specifically referring to the Commodore as the rest of their sedan lineup at the time was FWD.

Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
Ramaswamy Narayanaswamy
1 month ago
Reply to  InvivnI

The maintenance costs of the 5 series is a different matter versus the Holden Commodore/Falcon.

100
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x