I feel on this site we’ve talked a lot about GM, with both glowing, jubilant praise and with puzzled resignation over their weird, often bad, decisions. I’ve been accused of both being unfair to GM and sucking up to them, so I must be doing something right, or, maybe more likely, wrong. Who knows. What I do know is that sometimes GM does something genuinely interesting and unexpected, and when that happens, I want to call it out. And there is something that GM did back in the 1970s that I think deserves some special mention: they made the most interesting rear windows of the entire decade.
Yep, you heard me. I know that’s an extremely bold and wildly specific claim, but I think you’ll agree. If we look at the grand, transparent panoply of rear windows in the 1970s, you’re not going to find anything that comes as close to some rear windows GM was producing for a few coupés in that era. And it’s all thanks to one particular piece of equipment, some designer must have seen at a trade show or something and arranged to have bought and placed in a factory: a Hot Bent Wire machine.
Specifically, the Pittsburgh Plate Glass (PPG) Hot Bent Wire glass forming and folding process, which could fold automotive glass into some dramatic shapes. While maybe not origami-level, exactly, the process produced something quite different than the sort of curved glass that car design had been using for decades, and the look, with its crisp edges and folds, felt genuinely new and novel.
GM really only used this process on two cars, both late ’70s coupés: the Chevy Caprice (or Impala) coupé and the Oldsmobile Toronado XS:

Of the two, the Chevy was by far the more common one. This was the coupé version of the 1977-1979 B-body Caprice, which was much more commonly seen in four-door sedan and wagon body styles. I grew up absolutely surrounded by these cars, and I generally found them pretty boring, if I’m honest. They were so rectilinear and staid, I just couldn’t get excited about them. But somehow, the coupé was different, and it was all because of that rear window.

There was something about that rear window, with its sloping profile and prominent creases, that made the whole car much more interesting, somehow. That rear window just didn’t look like anything else on the road, and as a kid I remember seeing them and wondering how they were made. Were they composed of three pieces, somehow adhesive’d together? Melted? They absolutely caught my attention.

The slope of that window gave the profile of the caprice a lot more sleekness, and the prominent creases of the folded sides made the window fit in with the design vocabulary of the whole car. If you are skeptical of my claim that this window was the defining stylistic element of the car, just look at what happened when GM replaced it with a boring old flat window with the redesigned B-body of 1980:

Tell me the car doesn’t lose something when they went to the flat window. That fastback glass adds so much to the car – sleekness, airiness, a visual element to focus on – and without it, that car is just difficult to really care about. Also, looking at these now I’m remembering how much GM loved those wire wheels. Oy.

The PPG hot wire machine also got some use from Oldsmobile, who used it to bend the rear glass of their Toronado XS into a dramatic wraparound rear window. This idea first came around with an experimental concept, the Oldsmobile Toronado XSR, which also featured power-retractable T-tops. This car was modified by American Sunroof Company (ASC), and only a few were actually built, in numbers that range from three to 12, depending on your source.

While the XSR with its powered T-tops never made it to market (those powered, retractable panels would have been complex, leaky nightmares, most likely), a version with a normal, solid hardtop (or a conventional sunroof) did make it to market, the Toronado XS. Of course, they only made about 2,100 of those.

That’s a hell of a rear window, right? Oh, and it’s also worth noting the high-mount brake and turn signal lamps that were set into the bodywork just under the rear window, almost a decade before high-mount stop lights were legally required! That’s some taillight innovation there, too!

That panoramic rear window gave the interior a very open feeling, no small feat in a car whose interior color and upholstery choices made it feel like someone crammed a bordello into an office cubicle:

Here’s a nice video walkaround/through of an XS so you can get a better idea.

GM returned to the PPG bent glass party trick in 1986 with the Chevy Monte Carlo SS Aero Coupe, where the addition of a bent-glass fastback rear window let them quickly and cheaply improve the car’s drag coefficient from 0.375 to 0.365, which is pretty good for just replacing a window. Well, a window and rear trunk lid, but that’s still getting off really cheap. I can’t think of any modern cars that are using this method of folding glass; smooth, graceful curves are more the norm now, but I think there’s still a place for these kinds of crispily-creased windows in cars. Maybe GM will be bold once again and give it another go.
Top graphic image: Wikimedia Commons






Those are all convex rear windows. You forgot the wonderfully (albeit curved and not creased) concave rear window on the 5th-generation El Caminos.
https://www.opgi.com/product/image/OP/223505/window-glass-rear-1978-87-el-camino-L240413.jpg
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/yv8AAOSwVbRh~WXH/s-l1600.webp
Those weren’t made with the bent wire process.
I know. I started my post before I fully read the article. Then I went back and added the (albeit, curved and not creased).
But they were still cool rear windows.
I love these Caprices. Been sort of looking for one lately, but they’ve gotten more expensive than I want to pay. I missed one years ago that had a 327 in it, gone within hours of the sale posting. Anyway, the other part of the later Caprice coupes that makes them boring is the upright angle of the forward part of the C pillar vs. the forward leaning one with the Hofmeister kink of the earlier car. I also like the landau roof. Normally, I hate vinyl roofs and half-vinyl even more, but I find the forward portion being the vinyl makes it more interesting. I think I’d rather just have the two-tone paint job they offered instead, but the Landau looks better than it has any right to. Tough thing with these is the wheels. The fake wire covers are cheesy as hell, but any kind of muscle car aftermarket wheel looks makes it look trailer-park I-really-wish-this-was-a-G-or-F-body-but-grandpa-willed-me-this-instead. I think something like an Alpina 20(?) spoke in a size that allows for reasonable sidewall would look good, but that’s obviously not a catalog item in the right bolt pattern and offset.
I read about those auto t-tops before and I believe they did have insurmountable leak issues. Quite extraordinary considering what they thought was acceptable from the manual ones they sold. Can’t remember the last time I saw one of those bent-glass Toronados, but it was probably the ’80s. I remember the first one I noticed threw me because the standard ones that were everywhere had normal glass, but seeing the bent-window had me question if I was just so oblivious that I never noticed that they all had that glass before. Not beyond belief that I might have missed it as that window was the only thing I found to be interesting about them.
Suddenly, almost involuntarily, I’ve been forced to add a retromod Oldsmobile Toronado XSR (complete with T-tops [I could live with non-automated if necessary] and hot wire rear glass) to my “if I ever win the lottery…” list.
I’ve always loved the back windows on these Caprices, and I had a Tomica toy version of the Olds when I was a kid that was always one of my favorites.
https://http2.mlstatic.com/D_NQ_NP_743954-MLA82186538101_012025-O.webp
Or the Gran Prix 2+2?
The rear glass on those was curved, not sharp edged.
Ok, how do we not have the boattail Riveria?
I’m so glad this article included a reference to the Toronado XS with the high-mount brake and turn signal lamps that were set into the bodywork just under the rear window. As a kid, someone at my church had one of these and I never knew what it was. When I thought about it later as an adult, I couldn’t figure out—no wonder, it was a super rare car!
This is why this site rocks!
Somewhere in the world, I’d like to think a former Safelite repair tech is having nightmares to this day.
I got all excited to mention the Monte Carlo SS Aero Coupe and then I saw it in the last paragraph, so I’m glad it wasn’t missed. Like 25 years ago a coworker’s idiot son had an Aero Coupe and somehow managed to break the back window while it was parked. The windows were almost impossible to find back then, so I can only imagine how hard they are to find today. If I recall correctly he ended up paying almost as much for a new back window as he paid for the car.
I have an 1987 SS Aerocoupe and the rear window breaking is my biggest fear.
I bet. I can only imagine the price for a window, assuming you can even find one.
Well, there’s at least one on eBay, but the asking price is $2500
“someone crammed a bordello into an office cubicle” is a rather good description of the 1970s.
Interiors were awesome then. Especially custom vans and big cars.
Or like the Voyager/Caravan from this morning’s showdown, it was like a bordello inside the corner office.
I spent a few nights in my teen years crashed on the rear floor with the seats removed. I had no game at the time, so these were all solo events. Sliding door for easy vomiting.
Well since you had the Monte Aerocoupe, why not include the Pontiac 2+2 of the same era?
It’s been my understanding that the production failure rate on bent glass was too high and it made each acceptable unit pretty darn expensive
The rear window in the Pontiac Grand Prix 2+2 didn’t have any facets, so would it be made the same?
Huh, I thought it was the same as the Monte. Guess I remembered wrong. Thanks for the correction.
This is back when GM still had *some* creative juice left.
GM has always been creative. Saturn, the EV-1, the Volt, etc. They just don’t know how to make things that people actually want, or when they do it’s too late and ‘we killed it because it didn’t sell well enough’.