Last week I recounted how our documentary team digitized hours of lost AMC footage for our documentary, The Last Independent Automaker. Two weeks ago, I explained how we tracked down the 30+ vehicles featured in the series. For this week’s behind-the-scenes story, I’ll explain how we filmed those cars (and other footage) on a shoestring budget.
While every episode presented unique production challenges, I think Episode 3 probably had the most variety in terms of filming. Capturing AMC’s history from 1969 to 1974, it tells how the company launched the Hornet and Gremlin to combat the rising wave of foreign cars in America and how AMC came to acquire the “Jeep” division of Kaiser Industries. It features a half-dozen vehicles, close to 15 interviews, and several short reenactment scenes. When combined with our historical footage and photographs, I think it all came together rather nicely.


Spacer
Similarly to wrenching on cars, filmmaking often falls into the “good / quick / cheap” matrix, meaning you will always be limited to just two of the three. Since this documentary took almost a decade to complete, you can probably assume which two we chose.
We knew from the beginning that this would not be a big-budget production. There would be no $20,000/day track rentals or $500,000 Porsche Cayanne camera cars. For almost all of our equipment, vehicles, and locations, we either had to use what we had or beg and borrow from friends.

And that’s where my co-producer Jimm Needle came in. When I first proposed this project to him in 2015, I chose Jimm because he had a lot more experience producing, shooting, and editing video than me. I also chose Jimm because he was the only person I knew who owned a digital cinema camera that could shoot in 4K Ultra High Definition.

At the time, 4K UHD was cutting-edge, as most streamers and TV networks were still just 1080 HD. But 4K was clearly the incoming standard, and I wanted to “future-proof” the documentary by filming at the highest resolution I could. Jimm had splurged on a 4K camera for his production company, and the resulting work was beautiful. Thankfully, he was able to bring that skill and that equipment to our production, too.


Interviews, Interviews, Interviews
From 2016 to 2023, the only thing we filmed were interviews, which (in addition to the camera) only required lights, microphones, and a grey cardboard backdrop, all of which we borrowed. For our first big shoot, we packed up a borrowed Chrysler Pacifica and a broadcast communications intern we borrowed from a local college, and headed to Detroit. Once there, we set up a makeshift interview set in former AMC designer Vince Geraci’s basement, and for three days almost a dozen former employees cycled in and out as we interviewed them in two hour shifts.

Later that summer, Jimm and I traveled to the Kenosha History Center, where we repeated the process with former AMC factory workers. This time, however, we scrapped the cardboard backdrop in favor of the beautiful cars on display there.


These first interviews with white-collar workers from Detroit and blue-collar workers from Kenosha formed the backbone of our documentary, and we continued to interview more people up through 2023. Over time, we changed cameras, lights, and locations, but we always strove to maintain a consistent look, so that if any two interviews were shown side by side, viewers wouldn’t find the difference too jarring.



Although the new trend in documentaries is to have interviewees sit dead center and talk directly to camera, or to surround them with cameras and cut to a bunch of different angles, we avoided this. First, because talking directly to the camera rather than a person can be uncomfortable for first-time interviewees, which many of ours were. Second, we didn’t have the time, manpower, or the gear to set up three separate cameras for each interview.



Instead, we chose the classical “rule of thirds” look, with subjects positioned on either to the left or right of the frame, talking to a producer just off camera. I figured if it was good enough for Ken Burns, it was good enough for us. Although Ken Burns seems to love shooting interviews in warm, wood-panneled rooms with voluminous bookshelves, whereas our favorite backdrops were cars.

Perhaps our most adventurous interview was with David Tracy in 2022. At this point, David was still living in Michigan and would probably admit that he’d reached “maximum bachelor” levels. After scanning the inside of his house, I realized his backyard might provide a more visually appealing background. Once outside, I struggled to find a shot that I liked, but eventually we plopped him down on the tailgate of his Jeep J-10, parked his ZJ Grand Cherokee behind him, and it turned into one of the best-looking interviews we filmed.
Cars on Camera

By 2023, we had completed enough of the documentary script to know what car footage needed to go with it. Since we couldn’t afford to rent fancy equipment or locations, we had to use our limited funds very carefully. As I previously explained, that meant finding cars that were close to us, and–if possible–finding owners with multiple cars that we wanted to film, so we could combine trips. As for the filming itself, I credit the staff of the TV show MotorWeek for teaching me how to shoot cars on a tight schedule and a tight budget. There’s no official rulebook, but the formula essentially boils down to this: drivebys, GoPros, exteriors, interior.
Drivebys:
As you might expect, these are shots of the car going up and down the road. Obviously, a car in motion is more exciting than a car standing still, and drivebys give viewers a chance to experience more of a car’s personality and sounds. From a storytelling standpoint, a car driving toward you can help punctuate an important sentence as it passes the camera. Or, a car driving away into the distance can convey uncertainty, difficulty, or a transition to another subject.


Here in the real world, we couldn’t control everything, but I set some ground rules: no other vehicles or people could be in the shot, and no buildings or structures could blatantly distract from the vehicle. Unless it was a performance car, drivers had to go a normal speed, and they had to follow all signs, use turn signals, etc. I was especially a stickler for making sure people didn’t drift across the yellow line or saw off turns, which I think we all do more often than we’re willing to admit.
Before traveling to film, we used Google Maps to scout for good “driveby roads.” A perfect road has:
- Pretty scenery; no ugly buildings or houses with messy yards
- No large trees that cast shadows on the road (they make it hard to see the car)
- Large flat banks on the side, where we can setup our camera
- Not a lot of houses, so we don’t have to worry about nosy neighbors interfering
- Curves; cars always look more interesting on a curve than in a straight line
- Good turnaround spots. To get all the shots we want, a car may have to drive the same stretch a dozen times. Being able to turn around somewhere inconspicuous, like a long driveway, a small pull-off, or a public parking lot, is essential.
- Low traffic. This one is the most important! I prefer connecting roads, dead ends, and back roads are great. The prettiest road in the world is useless if it’s full of traffic.

GoPros:
GoPro and other suction cup-mounted action cameras revolutionized automotive media, and we knew they’d be an essential part of this production too. Often, the same roads that worked for drivebys were great for GoPro shots, too. And as a bonus, the footage would match when we edited it together.

Personally, I like when a GoPro shot has purpose. It’s not just wallpaper, but it shows a specific feature of the car that is important to the story being told at that moment. For instance:
Showing the Renault logo when talking about AMC’s partnership with the company …
Showing the Rambler’s gas cap when talking about fuel economy …
Showing the AMC hood ornament when talking about the company’s financial troubles …
… and showing the Pacer’s front wheel when talking about its ride and handling.
That last one with the Pacer was surprisingly difficult, as the one we filmed was located in Indiana. All of the roads were laid out in a grid, meaning there were very few places with the kind of smooth, swoopy curves we needed to demonstrate the car’s steering. Thankfully, we eventually found a place.
Exteriors: Without an airplane hangar like Jay Leno, we had to film car exteriors wherever we could. When possible, many car owners let us film on their property. When that wasn’t possible, we tried to find public spaces where we didn’t have to worry about securing location rights. Similarly to drivebys, we looked for pretty backdrops with no other vehicles or people. If we did end up filming around buildings, we really tried to find structures that were from the same time period as the car. The best locations were ones that matched the vibe of the vehicle. For instance:
A 1951 Nash Rambler in front of a garage painted to look like a 1950s Nash dealership …
A 1976 AMC Matador Coupe in front of a lake with a sailboat in the background …
A 1989 Jeep Cherokee in a beautiful forest clearing …
… or a 1983 Renault Alliance in front of this very French-looking monument, which is actually a tribute to a guy who manufactured cash registers in Dayton, Ohio.
Generally, we tried to film exteriors in either full sun or occasionally in full shade. The worst situation was mixed or mottled light, because one minute we’d expose the camera for the dark spots, only for the light parts to be blown out. (And vice-versa). I personally preferred overcast days, because then we didn’t have to worry lining the car perfectly up with the sun to avoid hard shadows, but overcast days also meant we didn’t have pretty blue skies as a backdrop. Further complicating things, if it was a really sunny day, we had to be careful about filming on grass, as the bright light would reflect off the ground onto the car and give it an unappealing green tint.

As far as the shots themselves, we followed the standard playbook I learned at MotorWeek: Shoot the car from all sides, because you never know when an extra shot will come in handy. Other shots were made to match specific parts of the script, such as when a side shot of a Hornet is to be crossfaded with a side shot of a Concord, to demonstrate how the latter was just a facelifted version of the former’s old bodyshell.

We also shot lots of closeups of details and logos, which can be useful pieces when editing. A slow rack focus of an AMC logo can demonstrate the seriousness of a moment. A quick pan to an AMC Gremlin character demonstrates the fun, quirky nature of the car.

Interiors:
Unlike exteriors, we preferred to shoot interiors in full shade. That way, we didn’t get a lot of harsh shadows inside the car. Because of this, it’s easiest to shoot interiors in the early morning or late afternoon, when the sun is low and the shadows are long. While in Indiana, we shot a lot of car interiors under a giant tree, which had enough leaf cover to give us solid shadows without mottled light. Throughout the day, we had to frequently rotate around the trunk to keep the car in the shade as the sun moved.

For interiors, the most useful shot is the front driver’s position, showing the wheel, gauges, pedals, seat, and a little out of the windshield. Overall, we used less interior footage than exterior footage, although certain features like the AMC Pacer’s giant windows or the Jeep Wagoneer Limited’s leather seats and deep-pile carpet warranted extra filming to make sure we got multiple shots and angles.


“It’s Called Acting”
Episode 3 contains several great stories from AMC employees, but we didn’t have any historical footage or photographs to go with them. In those rare cases, we were able to film reenactments of their memories.
One instance of this was when AMC’s head of interior design, Vince Geraci, explained how he and his wife and coworkers tested numerous denim samples when developing the interior for the Levi’s edition Gremlin. So we cut up some worn-out pairs of Levi’s jeans, laid them out in my parent’s laundry room, and filmed closeups of my co-producer Jimm’s hands sorting through them, washing them, and examining them.


A more challenging shoot was reenacting Billy Aiello’s raucous story of drinking on the assembly line. Using the most industrial setting I had access to, Jimm and I set up our lights and camera inside my dad’s unheated farm workshop on a brutally cold day in February. Then, with a vintage Coke bottle full of Pepsi and a bourbon bottle full of unsweetened iced tea, I made mixed drinks on an old parts table and then pretended to stash the bottles below. With the freezing temperatures and a limited supply of Pepsi, I was thankful to have captured it after just a few takes.


Ideally, we wouldn’t have to shoot reenactments at all, but given the nature of these stories, we had to have them in the film and there was simply no other footage we could use. And, rather than use animations or generative AI, I’m proud that we found a way to create visuals that matched the tone and look of the rest of the series, without being distracting. I don’t think Jimm or I will be hired as professional hand models anytime soon, however.
Card Full
In a way, I think our team’s modus operandi was a lot like that of American Motors. We were a small team, stretching every dollar that we could, using hard work and clever ideas to punch above our weight. Looking back, I sometimes wish we could have splurged on a professional drone pilot or fancy gyroscopic steadicam rigs. But if we had spent more money, it’s possible that we wouldn’t have been able to film as many cars or record as many interviews as we did. As a historical documentary, I’m glad we prioritized substance before style.

Ultimately, I am very satisfied with our footage. The shots are well-exposed, in focus, and visually interesting. The motion is smooth, the lighting is reasonable, and we had enough footage that every shot matches nicely with the script. And while some locations outshine others, all of them worked out well.
And most importantly, the cars look great.

The Last Independent Automaker is available to watch now on Public Television stations, the PBS app, and the AutoMoments YouTube channel.
The series is distributed by American Public Television. Maryland Public Television is the presenting station. The Automotive Hall of Fame provided fiduciary assistance. The Last Independent Automaker is funded in part by Visit Detroit, The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and MotorCities National Heritage Area. It is also funded by over 375 individuals and organizations who contributed through the project’s Crowdfunding campaign.
Top graphic images: Joe Ligo; depositphotos.com
Great work on the doc, and really appreciate the insight into your production methods! Smart choices.
That was an excellent article, I have the videos saved to my list and can’t wait to get the time to watch them uninterrupted so I can appreciate all of the hard work that went into making them.
I also love how much detail went into this about the back end. I have always been fascinated by film making and have worked on a few movies and advertisements, but I am also trying to make high quality videos that explore the cars and culture of the country where I live from the perspective of an expat.
The content of this article is really helpful for me to really up my game when it comes to editing and filming techniques too. My only gripe is that most of the negative feedback I receive is that my videos are too long, even when I cut them or release them in sections or chapters, hardly anyone watches more that 30- 45 seconds of my 5 minute videos.
Just 30-45 seconds out of a 5 minute video! Is patient concentration a lost art? This makes me think of people who comment before they finish reading an article.
I’m about to recommend this article as required reading to 3 teens I know who love cars and photography. Along with the actual documentary of course! Thank you for the backstory.
Fantastic! Y’all did amazing work on this and it turned out great. It’s all so interesting and awesome. I miss AMC! I already just got done w/ all the episodes. It was nice watching it on the PBS app on my TV…it looks nice watching it on a bigger screen.
“hired as professional hand models”
George Costanza? Ha ha
As a photographer and lifelong car enthusiast, I found this article fascinating. I definitely need to set aside some time to watch the documentary.
I have thoroughly enjoyed this documentary. You guys did an excellent job balancing out the back story and politics of the company while showing the cars themselves to keep everything interesting. I usually zone out and get bored watching documentaries and quit halfway through. Not these. Your content kept my interest every second of each episode. Your work deserves an award!!! Awesome stuff. Thank you for your hard work to make it all happen.
Thank you so much! That’s one of the nicest compliments anybody has said so far!
Your behind the scenes stories are as good as the documentary itself.
Thank you!
My ’87 Jeep Comanche Chief had an AMC key.
On the arcane side, RED Digital Cinema is founded/owned by Jim Jannard. Started the company after Luxotica cut him a $660M-ish cheque after the smoke cleared in their hostile takeover of Oakley. Not bad for someone who started out selling motorcycle grips direct to MC shops out of the trunk of his car.
In the early 2000’s, i worked with a customer named Milliken who is a big producer of dyes and fabrics. I happened to meet with one of the gentlemen who actually worked on the upholstery for the Levi’s Gremlin.
Unfortunately, i lost his business card about two decades ago. 🙁
What a great connection! The lead designer for the Levi’s Gremlin, Vince Geraci, said that Milliken did a great job on the Levi’s fabric. He said Milliken told him that the Levi’s fabric was their largest production run of any one kind of material for any car company!
I just finished watching on Sunday, and now I see you here on Autopian, thats awesome! You guys did a great job, easy to watch & follow, with no unnecessary cringy fluff.
It inspired me to drive down to Kenosha where the plant used to be, my buddy and I got a burger n beers, and bullshitted about AMC for a couple hours. Thanks for making this.
Thanks for watching! I’m so glad you enjoyed it!
A recurring challenge for my attempts to capture cars on camera is their shiny surfaces reflecting me and my camera. Any tips (or unique keywords I can put in a web search) on minimizing distracting reflections?
Other photographers probably have way better and more detailed advice, but these tricks usually work for me:
-I always shoot with a polarizer filter on the lens to reduce glare/reflection. It was a game-changer when somebody first suggested that to me.
-I try to never shoot a car “straight on,” where surface can reflect straight back at me. I’m always at a little bit of an angle to the car, which usually means I can’t see a reflection
-I often raise or lower my camera’s height so I’m either shooting slightly downward or upward, which again, helps reduce the likelyhood of a straight reflection.
-If I can see my reflection, especially in chrome, I try to keep backing away from the car, then zoom in. Usually this makes my reflection so small it’s less noticeable.
If you look closely, you’ll still see my reflection in a few clips throughout the documenary. But I tried my best to minimize it.
I polarizing filter will also (potentially) save your lens if you happen to have a case of the dropsies.
i once dropped my most expensive lens (a second hand Nikon Z 14-30mm) and the $65 polarizing filter took the brunt of the damage, saving me from outlaying $800 or more for a replacement.
Ooof, that was a close call! We had a few moments like that. You’re right that a cheap polarizer can save you a very expensive lens!
These are good tips from Joe. I do the same things when I photograph car shows. Another good thing about using a polarizer is it can help show decals or graphics on a car. There have been times when I wanted to photograph a Trans Am with the “screaming chicken” on the hood, but glare had rendered it invisible. With a polarizer, the screaming chicken becomes visible. A polarizer also helped me capture some cool airbrushing on a car that was otherwise hard to see due to the lighting. The polarizer can also help reduce the reflections of nearby cars or spectators.
This is incredibly cool, Joe. May I ask your projected and final budgets? Excited to watch this, congratulations!
I remember back in the late ’80s seeing a film crew trying to get driver’s POV shot with a huge camera and probably about 30 lbs of rigging to hold the camera to the car.
Amazing that the same shot could be accomplished today with a $500 Go-pro set-up weighing about 2 lbs.
It really is amazing how much technology changed, even in the last 7 years since we started shooting!
It used to take a million+ helicopter to shoot aerials and now you can do it 90% of the time with a $500 drone. Sometimes the drone video is better because you can fly in very confined spaces that a JetRanger or A-Star would not be able to go. Obviously, the drone is not going to have the telephoto capabilities of the gyro-zooms on ENG helicopters. But, being able to be closer and lower often makes up for it.
Hand models would be inauthentic, any worker worth a salt has weathered, scarred hands.
Love to see how the sausage is made.
I’ve been loving this documentary as it is, indeed, shot as a classic documentary you used to see on the History Channel in the 90s and of course Ken Burns. The driving shots are definitely MotorWeek style, which I think perfectly matches the rest of the production.
I noticed a lot of the cars have PA plates and I saw lots of PA scenery as well. Was this because that’s where the cars were or are you based in PA? Also curious where in PA the filming was happening, it looked to me like somewhere rural in SE PA, maybe just north of Amish Country, but south of the Lehigh Valley.
Sorry for so many PA questions but some of the background scenery felt very familiar. I grew up in NE PA in the Coal Region, but headed southeast many times in the 32 years I lived there before moving to CA.
You have a good eye! Our 3-man crew is located across several states from New England to the edge of the Ohio, so Pennsylvania was often a good middle ground for us to get together and film.
It also just so happens that Pennsylvania has a remarkably active AMC community, which meant it was easy to find a lot of the cars to film in that region.
In total, we filmed in Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, and Connecticut. It was the job!
Thank you for the great breakdown of how you went about this!
One question (as I have not been able to watch this yet), along with the still shots of the exterior of the cars, did you do any of those “slowly panning across the car” shots that I seem to see in car reviews ala MotorWeek? It seems to add motion or let the viewer know they are watching video instead of just a powerpoint of slides?
Yes, we did! Multiple episodes feature the classic slow pan or slow tilt. At times, I was literally reciting the script in my head as I moved the camera, so that the footage would be exactly the right length for the line of narration I knew would be matched to it.
We also used a slider bar in some shots, which moves the camera back and fort on a straight line, which adds a nice, smooth motion to shots.
That is great to hear, thanks for responding! Very fascinating to see how things like this are made. I’ll definitely be watching this whole thing soon (and I am not a huge AMC fan)
I know this is far from anything you’ve done, but I’ve scouted photo locations for several Hemmings Motor News shoots. No parking on grass, no parking lot lines and some nice background imagery too, please.
I loved this series and I wish someone had the wherewithal to do something like this for Studebaker.
The story of Studebaker has as much history as International Harvester, and the story is well told at the Studebaker National Museum in South Bend.
HEROS do exist.
Most viewers never realize the amount of work productions like this require. That’s what you want. Thanks for seeing it through.
A good trick when filming in bright conditions is to wet the pavement. It’s like when you drive in the rain and you think your headlights are off.
Anyway, congratulations to all involved.
Bravo, Joe!
It is all great!
Here is a question that I feel comes up often for me. The technology has made it relatively simple to capture humungous amounts of detail in all sorts of conditions, and the footage captured can look amazing, but the majority of views happen on a 6″ wide screen.
Obviously, a huge amount of effort goes into getting each shot, so you want to capture as much data as possible. When editing, do file sizes affect the time required to produce a final product? Along those same lines, when you crop and add graphics, do you prioritize how it looks on a small screen over a larger screen, where the resolution would be more important?
Not the filmmaker, but file sizes definitely affect the time required, though more powerful hardware helps a lot. A higher-though-not-top-end Mac can handle 4K these days, but more powerful is always better here, as well as having as much RAM as you can spec.
File sizes definitely were an issue. In total, counting interviews, car footage, historical footage, photos, music, and sound effects ended up with around 24 terabytes of raw material!!!
As far as screen size, the series was intended to be watched on TV, but all the graphics and images are large enough that it shouldn’t be a problem to watch them on a phone.
As far as editing, we mostly used a upper-tier intel-based iMac from 2018, which handled most of the videos without bogging down, although the fans were definitely working hard all the time. Once we added special effects and color grading, it struggled a little.
Later our team switched to a 2021 MacBook with the 1st-gen M1 chip, and we could definitely tell it had more power. A single episode took 3 hours to export on the iMac, vs 1 hour on the MacBook! It’s crazy how much better computers have gotten at editing 4K.
Thanks for taking the time for such a thoughtful answer!
Loving the behind the scenes info, and really loving the series. You guys did some incredible work to put all of this together!
Ever think about doing a follow-up on International?
It’s funny, I told a friend that an International Harvester documentary would be really cool. But you’d have to start the story all the way back in the 1850s! Haha.
The PBS Station in Fort Wayne, Indiana just put out a documentary called “Truck Town,” that is specifically about the Fort Wayne plant that made the Scouts. I haven’t watched it yet, but it looks interesting!
As much as people would deride the MFT mount (instead of the later EF mount) on the original Blackmagic Pocket Cinema, their portable nature with 4k shooting was a game changer. Fun to see how you used the equipment, but even more so that locations and subjects!
Yes! Our Blackmagic had the EF mount, and that was super nice that it could use Canon lenses.
I’ve watched it through 2x now! You did a amazing job on a tight budget, and yes is sure seems like your production was in the spirt (see what I did?) of AMC. I kind of want a ’79 Spirt AMX now lol
also why did John Davidson have so much makeup on? lol
Thanks for watching! I’m so glad that you enjoyed it! And yes, Spirit AMXs are super cool. I want one too.
As for John Davis’ makeup, having worked with him, he’s not lily-white; he’s kind of olive-skinned. So that’s his natural color, with just a little powder to reduce the shine under the camera lights.
Looks interesting I hope it can meet your goals.