Home » I Was So Bored At Work I Redesigned A Tiny Engine Part For Fun And Accidentally Saved 22,000 Pounds Of Aluminum

I Was So Bored At Work I Redesigned A Tiny Engine Part For Fun And Accidentally Saved 22,000 Pounds Of Aluminum

Boss Change Ts2
ADVERTISEMENT

As a Powertrain Design Engineer, the first time you design a cylinder head is a huge challenge. You have to contain gasses at 1200°C (2200°F), coolant at over boiling temperature that can’t be allowed to boil, hot oil at pressures high enough to send a flammable jet across a room, and air passages that have to have minimum flow disruption despite being completely blocked by a valve 60 times a second. Plus all of that in a single lump that mounts the valvetrain, inlet manifold, exhaust system and anything else that’s nearby in one big complex casting, while being bent by thousands of explosions every minute. And oil drains, mustn’t forget oil drains (my very first job on a cylinder head was to add oil drains that the previous guy had forgotten – it’s a very complex part).

By the time you’ve designed a few (they can each take months or even year) and had several of them binned when projects got cancelled, it just starts to feel like routine work. What makes it feel even more just like routine work is that OEM’s have standards for everything, and often they are legacy habits from a time when there wasn’t CAD, or they used inches as a unit, or had lazy designers who weren’t exactly terrific.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

[Dave Larkman is a mechanical design engineer who had a 25-year career at Lotus  Cars and Lotus Engineering (the consultancy business that worked for other OEMs), eventually becoming Lead Engineer of Powertrain Design.  He has also been a semi-pro drifter, rides sports bikes, and used to feel ashamed about his taillight collection until he found Jason Torchinsky on the internet. Wait, why am I writing this in third person? It’s me, Dave, writing my own bio. – DL [Ed note within ed note: Sorry, Dave. I’ve got a Jeep to fix and no time to write bios. -DT] ]

This particular project had a cast bolt boss-standard that was simple, logical, and boring. A bolt boss is any feature on a casting that you fit a bolt or a screw into (fun way to make engineers fight: ask them to agree on a definition of what makes either a bolt or a screw). You need the boss to be deep enough for the screw thread, which will have a minimum length based on the material and how it’s made, and wide enough to have enough material around it to not only be strong enough, but to not leak (castings can be a bit porous, and there is often an oil passage running right next to your bolts). All of that has to take into account the manufacturing tolerances on the tooling, the casting and the machining. So it’s low risk to just look up an M6 boss or whatever and copy the dimensions down.

However, it’s a bit dull, because it’s just a slightly tapered cylinder with a spherical end, like this:

ADVERTISEMENT
Blue Bore Labeled2
Image: Dave Larkman

The actual machined feature is a drilled hole with a cone on the end, then a slightly wider, slightly shorter thread. I thought, why not take the minimum wall thickness from the standard boss and offset that from the feature I actually need? It’ll be no harder to make, but lighter and therefore cheaper, but most importantly it won’t be the same ball-ended blob I’ve been modeling for ages.

So I quietly came up with this pointy, stepped blob and threw it all over the place.

Green Bore2
Image: Dave Larkman

There was no justification for doing this; it was already under the mass and cost targets by enough to get a little pat on the head, and still chunky enough to zip through durability testing without getting a massive kick in the groin for failing and costing the client millions. But, you know, bored.

Now would be a great time to show you a picture of the actual cylinder head, but, as my confidentiality clause is still both valid and terrifying, I’ll show you a picture of something else to give you some context. This chunk of metal is the monoblock (a combined cylinder head and block) of Lotus’ Omnivore research engine from 2009, which is a single-cylinder two-stroke engine and therefore relatively simple; and it’s covered in bolt bosses. [Ed note: I circled three of ’em – Pete]

Bosses Circled
Image: Dave Larkman

My new cylinder head and comedy-bolt bosses went through the design review without a murmur and passed testing with no problems, at which point my job was done. It then went into production, made no great impression on the world and, several years later, went out of production with no internet-verifiable reputation for massive cylinder head failures. Phew. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Years later, I was explaining this whole thing to a fresh, shiny, new engineer in the hope that they might strive to avoid lazy design, and they asked how much weight this actually saved. I had no idea, so I checked, but not before correcting them on the use of weight, which is variable, instead of mass, which is not. So I modeled up the standard blob and my slightly better version to compare the two…

Combined Bore2
Image: Dave Larkman

It saved just 0.7 grams, which is 0.0015lb. But wait, you lose about half that saving because the bosses tend to be blended into a wall. So it saved just 0.35 grams, which is the approximate mass of the air in a small sigh of disappointment.

However, when you multiply that by the number of bosses per head, then multiply that by the  number of heads made before someone else came in and redesigned it for the next version of the engine, you get a mass saving of 10,214kg, or 22,518lb. Over ten metric tons of aluminium that didn’t have to be mined, transported or smelted. I’m not going to do the maths on the environmental impact of that because it’s too hard, and I’m not going to cheat and get Google’s AI to guess a value, like I did earlier with the mass of the air in a small sigh of disappointment.

Three Bores 3

But if every car that engine went into did 100,000 miles before it died, then 1,021,400,000 kg-miles were saved (yes, I know that unit is a horrible mess of metric and imperial, welcome to the  UK, where we sell fuel in litres but measure fuel consumption in gallons). If the average mass of my cars was about 1,200kg (which it is, I have a spreadsheet, obvs) and my average yearly mileage is 10,000 miles, then the kg miles saved is the equivalent of 85 years of me driving around (very roughly speaking). A few minutes of boredom has offset my personal transport needs for life, assuming I don’t keep driving until I’m 102 years old, which seems like a reasonable assumption.

ADVERTISEMENT

I’m going to ignore the obviously egregious skewing of the figures that results from nine years daily driving an S1 Elise. And the three years in a 2CV. And whatever additional environmental harm the RX7 caused. Hope you don’t mind.

Top graphic images: Dave Larkman; DepositPhotos.com

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
99 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Slow Joe Crow
Slow Joe Crow
16 minutes ago

Incremental gains are how Team Sky claimed to have won the Tour de France so many times. Pay no attention to dodgy TUEs and Bradley Wiggins’ mysterious jiffy bag.
But seriously this is a good explanation of how to optimize something and how little things add up, like salami slice embezzlement. Welcome to The Autopian and I look forward to more adventures in casting design

El Jefe de Barbacoa
Member
El Jefe de Barbacoa
21 minutes ago

What a great article. Well-written and amazing engineering content. Nothing like hearing stories about engineering stuff, would buy Dave beers all night to hear him tell away.

American Locomotive
American Locomotive
29 minutes ago

Hm. 10,214kg/0.35g. Figure 10 bosses per head? = ~3 million cylinder heads.

Guess I should be be on the lookout, because that engine should be quite common.

Last edited 29 minutes ago by American Locomotive
Goaticus Maximus
Goaticus Maximus
32 minutes ago

I mean if you want to make it really fun, you could calculate out the raw bauxite mass that had to be mined and then calculate out how much energy it required to reduce it. Though it would depend on how much recycled aluminum was in there.

Richard Clayton
Richard Clayton
33 minutes ago

Mech Eng here. Two “Units” stories. Way back at the University of Waterloo in Ontario the policy on tests was you couldn’t be marked down by more than 10% for arithmetic errors. Cue to a Thermodynamics mid-term exam. The prof had set questions with the basic data in wildly inconsistent units – a holy mess of metric and imperial. The answers were multiple choices of different numeric answers. So I turned the paper over, defined the variables, wrote out the formulas and reduced them. I got 9/10 on every answer. You need to take advantage of the loopholes.
At an early job the older guys from Europe worked in “metric”. But they used odd units like kP/cm^2, which is numerically almost identical to the kgf/cm^2 they were used to. Newtons are an awkward unit for engineering use resulting in constructs like MPa or insane scientific notation indices for Young’s modulus.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
39 minutes ago

Wow yeah that’s a lot of soda cans LOL

Strangek
Member
Strangek
44 minutes ago

Nice work Dave! I think?

Shooting Brake
Member
Shooting Brake
45 minutes ago

This is brilliant and super fun! If only all manufacturers would apply a gram strategy think of how much we’d save!

99
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x