Home » If ‘We’re So Back’ Was A Car, It Would Be The C4 Corvette: GM Hit Or Miss

If ‘We’re So Back’ Was A Car, It Would Be The C4 Corvette: GM Hit Or Miss

Chevrolet Corvette C4 Gmhom Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

Picture this: It’s the early 1980s, and you’ve survived the bleakest period for automotive performance since, well, ever. The first era of regression, the Malaise era. Opera windows replaced big blocks, miles per gallon replaced pounds per horsepower as the leading metric, almost everything grew massive bumpers, and you watched hero nameplates get sapped of their power. Then, in 1983, a car rolls off the transporter at your local Chevrolet dealership, an ultra-sleek wedge-shaped thing with a clamshell hood that doubled as the front fenders. You peer inside, and instead of a double-nickel gauge cluster, you see an arcade crammed into the dashboard, optimism for a digital future. The name on the back of the car? Corvette.

When Car And Driver tested the 1984 Chevrolet Corvette, it was the first production car to ever hit the 0.90 g mark on the skidpad, one of the six fastest then-current production cars in the world, and its 173-foot stopping distance from 70-to-zero beat the Porsche 928’s 180-foot figure and was only eight feet off the record at the time, 165 feet set by a Porsche 930 Turbo. And this was the lame-duck Crossfire Injection model with two throttle body injection units atop a 205-horsepower 5.7-liter V8. However, while a zero-to-60 mph time of 6.7 seconds was quick for the time, the real revelation of the inaugural C4 Corvette was the way it took bends. As the magazine wrote:

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Until the arrival of final understeer, which comes at lateral accelerations un­known to the average driver, the Cor­vette is race-car responsive. The exotic suspension, upgraded with a sensational Z51 performance handling package (special Goodyear P255/50VR- 16 tires with an F1-style “Gatorback” rain-tire tread mounted on 8.5-inch front and 9.5-inch rear aluminum wheel , plus quicker steering, tighter hocks, and heavier-duty bushings, sway bars, and spring ), creates handling that can make a quiche-eater look like a serious user of beef jerky and draft beer. The car revels in long, controlled slides. It begs to be steered with the throttle. It forgives ham-fisted operation like no other car on the road, and when driven seriously it will hook up under hard cornering to a point where one begin to wonder if Gordon Murray and Colin Chapman at­tached sliding skirts and ground-effects tunnels.

Such high praise indicates that the fourth-generation Corvette was off to a serious start by early-1980s standards, but the Corvette team didn’t rest for a moment. The 1984 model year was just the warm-up, with 1985 bringing a retuned suspension setup for better road manners and faster lap times, a new brake master cylinder, and modern fuelling. The Tuned Port Injection L98 5.7-liter V8 cranked out 230 horsepower and 330 lb.-ft. of torque, 25 more ponies, and 40 extra pounds-foot of twist compared to the 1984 models, enough for revised gearing. The result was dramatic: Car And Driver clocked a 14.5-second quarter-mile time for examples with the Doug Nash 4+3 manual gearbox, the sort of go America’s sports car needed. For 1987, output increased again to 240 horsepower thanks to valvetrain revisions, and the overall package was so formidable by the standards of the day that it was banned from SCCA Showroom Stock GT racing.

C4 Chevrolet Corvette
Photo credit: Chevrolet

See, from 1985 to 1987, the Corvette didn’t just beat its competition, it annihilated it. As SCCA Showroom Stock GT racer John Powell told Hagerty, “The Corvette beat Porsche 29–0 from 1985 to 1987.” That’s every single race of this class that it entered. Unsurprisingly, the Corvette was given the boot so that other marques could have a chance to actually compete, and that’s where things got really wild. Powell co-organized a one-make race series starting in 1988, the Corvette Challenge, and sponsors lined up to offer $1 million in prize money during the first season. The result was some of the best sports car racing of all time, involving some big-name drivers. Over the two seasons the series ran, entrants included Jimmy Vasser, Juan Manuel Fangio II, Caitlyn Jenner, Andy Pilgrim, and Scott Lagasse.

ADVERTISEMENT

Coincidentally, the year of the SCCA ban coincided with the first time a turbocharged Corvette was sold through GM’s dealer network. Ticking option box B2K and ponying up an extra $26,995 would get you a Callaway twin-turbo setup and a built low-compression engine, boosting the Vette to 382 horsepower and 562 lb.-ft. of torque. If you wanted a more powerful U.S.-spec production car in 1987, your only choice was a Countach. Speaking of speed parts, the Corvette got a ZF six-speed manual transmission in 1989 making it among the first, if not the first mass produced car with a six-speed manual, and then things really got crazy during the 1990 model year with the ZR-1.

C4 Corvette Zr-1
Photo credit: Chevrolet

Sure, the C4 ZR-1 isn’t the first Corvette to run that alphanumeric, with ZR1 being an option code for an engine package on the C3 Corvette, but it was the first ZR1 as we know it. A Mercury Marine-built quad-cam V8 called the LT5 cranked out 375 horsepower and 370 lb.-ft. of torque without any forced induction, a wider body hid massive 315-section tires, and Lotus-tuned adaptive dampers kept things under control. The result, when Car And Driver got one to test, was zero-to-60 mph in 4.6 seconds, the quarter-mile in 12.9 seconds, and a top speed of 176 mph. In 1990, those were supercar numbers, just married to the relative practicality and comfort you’d expect from a Corvette. It set seven FIA speed records, but now you can pick one up for the price of a new compact car.

C4 Chevrolet Corvette 4
Photo credit: Chevrolet

However, by the early 1990s, the regular Corvette had a problem, and that problem was Japan. Twin-turbocharged Toyota Supras, Mazda RX-7s, and Mitsubishi 3000GTs may have been more expensive than a regular Corvette, but they ran faster, revved higher, and paired big creature comforts with serious shove. The solution was called the LT1, a heavily reworked 5.7-liter small-block Chevrolet V8 that kicked out 300 horsepower and arrived on the scene in 1992. When Car and Driver tested it for its December 1991 issue, the re-powered Corvette hit zero-to-60 mph in five seconds flat, good enough to just about keep up with the Japanese competition for now. Still, it couldn’t catch the Japanese on refinement. The revised interior from 1990 onward was plastic fantastic, the cabin was noisy by 1990s standards, and the small-block still showed its roots.

Grand Sport
Photo credit: Chevrolet

By 1996, the writing was on the wall. The fourth-generation Corvette had been around for 12 years, sales were falling as buyers were captivated by new breeds of sports sedans and small roadsters, and GM was largely the one to blame for things going a bit stale. The automaker had even considered killing the Corvette as an entity, but eventually had a change of heart. A year before the C5 Corvette was set to arrive, the Corvette team gave the old car a victory lap with an engine called the LT4. Compared to the LT1, it had a more aggressive camshaft, a new crankshaft, 10.8:1 compression, port-matched cylinder heads, and a reworked valvetrain with sodium-filled exhaust valves and hollow intake valves, all to punch out 330 horsepower in stick-shift cars. The cherry on top? A Grand Sport trim that was mostly just an appearance package as you could get the F45 suspension as an option on non-Grand Sport models, and the LT4 came standard on all six-speed cars.

yellow facelift convertible
Photo credit: Chevrolet

As a result of this parabolic curve of competitiveness, the C4 is arguably the most enigmatic Corvette. For every flaw, there was a triumph. Abominably tall sills versus big-league grip, cramped footwells versus serious moments of innovation, brittle ride quality versus a performance package once so formidable that it was banned from an entire class of racing. However, it was exactly the flagship GM needed for the ’80s, a shot in the arm after the sad decline of the C3. After the malaise era of the late ’70s, this sleek sled was “we’re so back” in four-wheeled form, and that absolutely makes it a hit. If you’ve always wanted one, they’re now cool again, so why not pick one up?

ADVERTISEMENT

Top graphic image: Chevrolet

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
125 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shinynugget
Shinynugget
1 month ago

Even through all the revisionist hot takes on the C4, I always thought it was cool. This and the 1988 C1500 that changed the truck game forever were GM innovation at its best.

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
1 month ago

Eh, My ’17 Accord V6 can dust the C4’s 0-60 and quarter mile times. Maybe not dust, but still embarrass.

But I don’t imagine that even with better tires it could pull off 0.90 G around a corner. So, I will give it that.

And I have no illusions as to how it would compare to a newer Corvette.

But my point is that an Accord or similarly spec’d Camry are amazingly competent compared to the super-hero cars of our youth.

I am very familiar with understeer from my days in a Datsun 510, Peugeot 504 and (rarely) a SAAB 9000 Turbo. I have yet to experience it in my Accord.

Granted, I’m a much mellower driver than I was back in those days, but even in pretty extreme evasive maneuvers these days, cars, in general (even shitebox rentals), have gotten so much better than high performers then.

And much safer if something really bad happens. I’d love to see a video of how a C4 performs in a modern IIHS test.

NosrednaNod
NosrednaNod
1 month ago

FYI… cars perform better now then they used to because we are smarter now.

Shinynugget
Shinynugget
1 month ago
Reply to  NosrednaNod

Wait cars now are better than those from 30 years ago? I wonder how the 1984 ‘Vette compares to the fastest car from 1954. Same gap.

Jay Miller
Jay Miller
1 month ago
Reply to  Shinynugget

Yeah, but still remarkable in a way. I recently traded in a grocery getter Accord Sport 1.5t that basically matches the ’84 Corvette’s performance.

Last edited 1 month ago by Jay Miller
Shinynugget
Shinynugget
1 month ago
Reply to  Jay Miller

I had a 2021 Corolla hatch with 169 horsepower. That’s more than a 265ci 1955 Bel Air. Doesn’t make the Bel Air less cool.

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
1 month ago
Reply to  Shinynugget

But I bet it did make it much faster.

1973 BMW Bavaria Addict
1973 BMW Bavaria Addict
1 month ago
Reply to  Shinynugget

1984 was 41 years ago

Top Dead Center
Member
Top Dead Center
1 month ago

I’d say it was a hit, in a 1980s retro way. Taking it in its own context that is… I recall this ad on TV when I was about 6, blew my mind. Never before!
https://youtu.be/nghzWH0qNoo?si=upKn8xWmrna4er2q

MikeInTheWoods
Member
MikeInTheWoods
1 month ago

I had two Tyco 1984 Corvette slot cars. They were cool and it is a nice car. I didn’t like it for a long time after the 80’s. Then about two years ago a white one was for sale, lowered with really nice Volk TE37 wheels in white. It was beautiful. I should have bought it. I think it was about $4000. Half of that was probably the wheel cost.

Piston Slap Yo Mama
Piston Slap Yo Mama
1 month ago

We sold our ’90 6-speed convertible a couple years ago and I often find myself wistfully wondering why we let it go. Sometimes it had a weird stumble that nobody could track down but most of the time it ran beautifully. The biggest demerit is NO TRUNK LID. I feel compelled to write that in angry all-caps. Anything stowed was done like a barbarian by folding the seat fwd and shoving it into the abbreviated space behind the seats. The C5 fixed that by using a plastic fuel tank that conformed to the limited space in the rear, a luxury the C4 convertible did not have.

The people here deriding its looks need to get their vision checked. This was ours:

https://imgur.com/gallery/c4-corvette-best-fun-ratio-out-there-ZzcsYqw

Scott Ross
Member
Scott Ross
1 month ago

I was saying on the autopian discord how odd the 82 corvette is. It existed to preview what was coming with the C4. That was the first corvette with a fiberglass leaf spring, and with a hatch that could open

TriangleRAD
Member
TriangleRAD
1 month ago

Looking back on my car-obsessed youth, the introduction of the C4 feels like when the ’80s really began.

Commercial Cook
Commercial Cook
1 month ago

to me C4 was always visually “too narrow’ the wedged front makes it visually too long and too narrow. i wish it was few inches wider and not just the flares but the body. side view of it aged very well though

Melanie Fuhrman
Member
Melanie Fuhrman
1 month ago

GM *did* make a wider C4 Corvette, the ZR1. It was three inches wider than the standard model. They just did a really good job (perhaps too good) of a job hiding it. You have to compare them side by side to see it

Camp Fire
Member
Camp Fire
1 month ago

Thanks for the refresher course. To me the C4 is the “normal” Corvette. It’s the boring one, the mundane car I hardly think about. The styling didn’t age well, the contemporary Camaro is significantly more interesting to look at (IMO). So I’ve written them off in my mind.

Thanks for the reminder that they did some cool things. 🙂

Pilotgrrl
Member
Pilotgrrl
1 month ago

Looks cool, but so did my neighbor’s TR7.

Bill C
Bill C
1 month ago

I was never interested in Corvettes, but I’m definitely warming up to the late-year C4’s. I especially like that you can find them in colors like dark purple, “polo green”, aqua, and blue, with saddle tan leather interiors instead of black black and more black. You still have a hint of the C3 styling outrageousness, but all just a little more refined and grown up.

Mike B
Mike B
1 month ago
Reply to  Bill C

I saw recently saw a late model polo green over tan C4, I excitedly pointed it out to my GF, she replied “we have very different tastes”.

Bill C
Bill C
1 month ago
Reply to  Mike B

dump her. there was a purple one near me recently for a decent price.

Last edited 1 month ago by Bill C
Abdominal Snoman
Member
Abdominal Snoman
1 month ago
Reply to  Bill C

I’ll take her 🙂 I have to admit this is probably my least favorite generation of Corvettes, and the main reason is not the car but the people that owned them. Kind of like you expect the second owner of an Altima is going to be a menace on the road, the second owner of a C4 has almost universally been an asshole. That probably stopped being true about 20 years ago, but that’s still what I associate most with that car… dumb redneck jerks that are too full of themselves.

Angry Bob
Angry Bob
1 month ago

The best stat of the ’87 model is the torque – 345 ft lbs, starting pretty much at idle. That’s 45 more than the LT1 that replaced it in 1992. I’ve never driven anything that can rip the tires loose like the L98 Corvette.

Mike B
Mike B
1 month ago
Reply to  Angry Bob

I had a 88 GTA T/A with that motor, I loved it so much. It ran out of breath by 4500rpm but godDAMN was that thing a torque monster and the king of stoplight drags.

While I was still dailying it, I test drove a then new LS1 Formula. I was disappointed, thought the LS1 felt slow compared to the L98, even though by the numbers it was WAY quicker. You gotta get into the LS a little bit more before it wakes up.

Last edited 1 month ago by Mike B
OptionXIII
OptionXIII
1 month ago

The C4 just has so many cool features that would be absolutely adored if it had been Japanese or German. The forged aluminum suspension, for example, and the clamshell hood designed to show it off as well. The C4 ZR1 is without a doubt my favorite example of a car that’s designed to be shown off with the hood open. Sit in one and there’s so much glass, and such spindly A-pillars, that you really get the “fighter jet cockpit” experience.

I considered buying one for a while because Michigan roads aren’t that rewarding in a Miata. I got on track soon after and fell back in love with my NB. But sometimes, I’m jealous of my friend that bought a ’95 C4…

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
1 month ago

C4 styling aged terribly of all the Corvettes.

Bland 90’s to my eyes.

Aaronaut
Member
Aaronaut
1 month ago
Reply to  Spikedlemon

I felt that way for the longest time as well, but (maybe because so many brands are in a phase I call “Decepticon gothic random shapes mish-mash” with their design) it feels clean and sleek now.

Dan Parker
Dan Parker
1 month ago
Reply to  Aaronaut

Same, I don’t remember ever being particularly fond of them in era but anymore they look really pleasing to me. Probably doesn’t help that for most of my adult life the vast majority of them I saw were beat down and pretty sorry looking earlier cars.

StillPlaysWithCars
StillPlaysWithCars
1 month ago

I have and will always have a soft spot for C4s. My Dad had a ‘91 ( black with a 6-speed and targa top) that he got when I was a wee kiddo. I have fond memories of riding in it and thinking I was the coolest kid in the world.

He now has a C5 Z06 and while it’s much faster from a performance standpoint it feels much less special. The C5 may have been a step forward in performance but it also feels mass produced GM where the C4 felt much better built IMO. I’m sure everyone will tell me I’m wrong but there just was more Corvette exclusive components in the C4 compared to the C5 parts bin sharing interior.

TK-421
TK-421
1 month ago

My 1st job out of the Navy in 91 was a car dealership in New Orleans. Chevy/ Caddy/ Geo/ Lexus/ Rolls/ Sterling (yes Sterling). I was a QC inspector and general lot boy. I remember them giving me a ZR1 to test, driver said it had front end shake at 80mph.

Well, I guess I better go make sure they fixed it. Hello I-10. (Also one of the 1st manuals I had to drive was a new Vette, parked on a ramp inside the dealership that was basically like a parking garage. I was so paranoid, the manager tapped on the window and asked if I would like him to move it.

I promptly took a new Geo Tracker out into a nearby neighborhood and got fluent on driving a manual.)

Last edited 1 month ago by TK-421
4jim
4jim
1 month ago

The horsepower numbers back then compared to now. WOW!

My mother in law’s boyfriend was so proud to get a Corvette at a great price. When I saw it I understood. It was a white 1984 with an automatic. The least desirable Corvette possible?

Lew Schiller
Lew Schiller
1 month ago
Reply to  4jim

I’ve long thought it would be fun to get a really nice example of the worst Corvette and then be like excessively proud of it at car shows – particularly Corvette events where the guys with the actually good Corvettes would have to be all “Uh,,yeah,,that’s..nice”.

Zeppelopod
Zeppelopod
1 month ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

You’d be a star at Radwood, for sure.

4jim
4jim
1 month ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

I think it may have a red interior. I cannot remember.

Bill C
Bill C
1 month ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

C3 California Corvette!

Lew Schiller
Lew Schiller
1 month ago
Reply to  Bill C

Aw..I hadn’t even thought about one with maximum pollution gear!

Bill C
Bill C
1 month ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

and a 305 if I recall. The quintessential GM malaise-era engine.

Last edited 1 month ago by Bill C
Lew Schiller
Lew Schiller
1 month ago
Reply to  Bill C

Yes! 180 HP into an automatic. Perfect!

Jason Smith
Member
Jason Smith
1 month ago
Reply to  Lew Schiller

Serious “my Corvette is best Corvette” energy and I’m here for it!

125
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x