I have to admit, modern Chrysler kind of fascinates me. It’s one car. It’s like the automotive equivalent of Vichy France or Brunei or Nicaea – a rump state. A strange and sad reminder of a once-proud empire, still clinging to the old heraldry and trappings of a time long since gone, lumbering on as a sort of ghost, a memory rendered in metal and rubber, getting by as best it can but desperately avoiding quiet moments of reflection when the full brunt of reality can no longer be ignored. It didn’t have to be like this.
The hows and whys that Chrysler ended up in this position are complex and could probably fill a book I’d put off reading, but that’s not why I’m talking about this right now. I’m talking about it because today we wrote about how Chrysler is now officially a one-car brand and that reminded me just how big and bold and visible Chrysler was with concept cars in the 1990s to early 2000s. It feels like for a while every car magazine I saw had some manner of exciting and delightfully overdone Chrysler concept car on the cover.
That was an exciting time! And I think on this day of being reminded of Chrysler’s contraction, it’s worth taking a moment to remember all the exciting and even romantic sorts of cars Chrysler was imagining for their future that never quite came to be. Well, some of it came to be, in some ways. Let’s just get into it.
Chrysler Chronos

I think what I like best about this period of Chrysler concept cars is that they all, generally at least, felt like they were operating from the same fundamental set of rules. And those rules seemed to be ones laid down by legendary designer Virgil Exner, head of Chrysler’s design throughout the 1950s and 1960s. It was like someone in Chrysler’s design team managed to get hold of some of Exner’s ashes and had the entire design department snort a fat rail of Exner to get inspired.
And boy, did they get inspired; look at this 1998 concept, the Chronos. In some ways, this was one of the most direct Exner-golden-era-influenced cars.

The proportions and curves and whole design language really feel like the legendary Chrysler D’Elegance updated with a ’90s design vocabulary and stretched into a four-door sedan. I mean, look at the original:

Remember, the D’Elegance was also the car from which Volkswagen and Ghia cribbed the design for the Karmann-Ghia:

It was an exciting concept car! I desperately wanted big American sedans to look like that! That’s a future I could get into. I’d even consider dressing a little better if this is what cars looked like.
Chrysler Phaeton

In a similar vein, there was the Chrysler Phaeton in 1997, which sought to replicate the drama and presence of Chrysler’s Imperial Parade Phaetons, special open-topped cars specifically designed to ferry Terribly Important People around in parades and other contexts for the great unwashed to gaze upon them with wonder and reverence. You know, people like ambassadors and Poet Laureates and performers of the caliber of, say, Gallagher II.
The Phaeton had a retractable hardtop made by American Sunroof Company (ASC) and even featured a powered retractable rear-seat windshield and additional gauges for rear-seat passengers:

Even with the top up, this was still a pillarless hardtop design, and despite its considerable bulk and length, it was a strikingly elegant car. Though just a concept, this thing had a real drivetrain, two Chrysler LH V6 engines mated together to form one V12.
I think, more importantly, you see the pattern here, and it’s all about drama. Chrysler understood that our cars should be a little reminder that even if your day-to-day routine feels mundane, there’s no reason why you can’t at least pretend everything is more stylish and elegant and thrilling, right?
Chrysler Atlantic

I really love the Chrysler Atlantic, because it’s such an unhinged idea. Chrysler, in 1995, decided to make a modernized revival of the Bugatti Type 57SC Atlantique, a legendary car they had absolutely nothing to do with. Oh, and there’s also a lot of Talbot-Lago T150 SS in this design, too, another car Chrysler had no hand in. Who does that? Sure, carmakers resurrect their old heritage cars all the time and attempt to revive them, but who tries to bring back a car they didn’t make?
Chrysler had no ties to Bugatti, yet they made one of the most exciting classic Bugatti revivals of the 1990s, or perhaps ever? Would Bugatti have been cool with this if they went to market? Did Chrysler (or maybe designer Bob Hubbach) even bother with a phone call to Bugatti to give a heads-up? I doubt it. They just did it, because it’s fantastic and dramatic, and I think they wanted more of that in the world.
They also made it run with a pair of Neon inline-four engines stapled together to form a very strange straight-eight engine that, allegedly, didn’t sound that great. Still, who cares? I love this absurd thing.
Chrysler CCV

You know what’s really nuts? The Atlantic wasn’t the only time Chrysler decided to just remake an old legendary car. In 1997, Chrysler decided they’d just go ahead and make a modern version of another iconic French car, but at the other end of the spectrum this time: the Citroën 2CV. They did the re-imagine-another-company’s-car thing again.
I’ve written about the resulting car before, the Chrysler CCV, an extremely clever and bold re-imagining of the 2CV. Chrysler’s concept was made from soda-bottle plastics and had a little V-twin Briggs and Stratton engine and was about as close in concept and soul to the original 2CV as one could get in the late 1990s. It never really went anywhere despite some daring plans, but it’s just another great example of how daring 1990s Chrysler could be.
Chrysler Citadel

This may be the closest one to what modern Chrysler has become, because, well, it’s a minivan, like 100% of the current Chrysler lineup is. But the Citadel, shown in 1999, isn’t exactly like current Chrysler, because the Citadel makes me kind of excited to be alive instead of feeling like maybe nothing really matters, like modern Chrysler does.

The Citadel was a take on the minivan that sort of reminds me of how the Brubaker Box imagined vans to be: long and low, still useful but also slightly menacing and purposeful-looking. The silhouette of the Citadel is sleek and taut, and that Kamm-like cutoff rear end is a fantastic touch.
The Citadel had a gas-electric hybrid drivetrain driving the rear wheels, tuned for performance. I think it still feels modern today, and if Chrysler announced that, yes, they were going to remain a minivan-only company, but this was the minivan they were talking about, I think I’d be absolutely thrilled.
There were more concepts from this era worth talking about, of course, and I encourage you to shove links in the comments and discuss, at length and loudly.
What happened to you, Chrysler? All of this excitement and imagination and optimism, daring you used to have, and now look. A shell of what you once were. I’m not giving up hope, though. I think some of what once made Chrysler exciting has to be still there somewhere, soaked into some patch of carpet or forgotten in a closet behind a break room.
Someone at Stellantis just needs to find it and set it free.









I’m down for Chrysler to be a van-only company, but please give me the Portal! They showed it off, said it was headed to production, and then killed it.
Also, I remember seeing the Nassau at a car show back in the day, and that thing definitely fit the big elegance and drama vibe.
What happened?
Ze Germans happened.
Chrysler had billions in their rainy day fund because they knew the car industry is very cyclical. In the “merger of equals” Mercedes gutted that rainy day fund to pay for the updated Mercedes models that came out from there on out.
As a young and know-nothing auto enthusiast (with no understanding of the heritage Torch notes here), I loved the Chrysler Atlantic concept car so much, I snagged a great 1:12 scale model that remains in my display cabinet to this day.
Worth mentioning that the concept for the Crossfire, which gets occasional love here, was put into production almost without change.
https://assets.dyler.com/uploads/posts/1267/images/12262/chrysler-crossfire.jpeg
https://youtu.be/4qgDSFJ69cU?t=15
And a reminder that the utter banality of the current Chrysler emblem, which replaced this one, is indicative of the sheer exhaustion of the entire brand.
Old:
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/logo-chrysler-logo-chrysler-car-color-vector-format-aviable-ai-124813016.jpg?w=768
New:
https://fabrikbrands.com/wp-content/uploads/Chrysler-Logo-7-2048×1280.png
Imagine if Chrysler was to pick one of the top three and stuff a hemi in it, and then one of the other two and electrify it. You cannot convince me that a combo of two of those top three cars, one with a hemi and one with a torque-crazy electric motor, would not sell like hotcakes.
An anecdote if you will, on what has happened to Chrysler.
I used to regularly visit the Chrysler Tech Center, for; reasons as recently as pre-pandemic 2020. One of the things that stood out as odd, were giant screen CRT TVs, buried in cubbies throughout the main hallways of the building. I finally asked someone in the know about why they were all just sitting there, doing nothing.
It was a two part problem:
So the final decision was, do nothing, and just leave them in place.
I feel like this has been the Chrysler brand since the introduction of the 300, heightened by the Pacifica launch.
That’s amazing.. I’ve seen that in a semiconductor fab, they had a very old like early 1990’s version of one of our processing tools. I asked “why not get rid of it?” similar answer; it wasn’t even worth the time and material to patch the hole in the cleanroom wall, never mind the moving and disposal.
As somebody who got his first license by chauffeuring the examiner around in my father’s 1960 Chrysler Windsor, I’m sad that the company is withering away like this.
Aw I sure remember these, had a hot wheels of the Atlantic that was a personal favorite. So much style, so little follow through…basically Chrysler in a nutshell shell…
In 1995 Romano Artioli’s Bugatti went bankrupt and it was 3 years before VW bought the name.
I believe at the time Chrysler owned Talbot through the Roots Group — not to be confused The Roots.
Nicaea? !
Don’t get me started.
Nicaea? I barely know ‘er!
This is my favorite concept they never made:
https://www.drivingline.com/articles/the-srt-powered-dodge-razor-was-an-american-miata-beater-that-never-happened/
It would have DESTROYED very expensive mercedes, it was basically the benz/rwd crossfire chassis with the SRT4 engine in it. It was designed to have empty speaker areas and empty stereo areas, so you could outfit it with whatever aftermarket you wanted. Goal was under $20k. It would have destroyed $50-60k Benzes so it didn’t get greenlit. Shame.
The MB/Crossfire rwd chassis could already have been had with the SRT-6 supercharged V6 in it. I’m not seeing a slot for this car in any case.
The SRT6 engine was much more expensive to make, heavier, and the chrysler/benz badges meant it had to be ‘luxurious’ which drove up the prices of the cars as they stuffed them with leather and tech.
Imagine a cheap dodge Miata with the SRT4 engine and you’ll start to realize how compelling it would be, for a driver’s car.
Having owned a Crossfire, I agree that MB was un-usefully jealous of their parts and price points. I just don’t believe that Chrysler using a (even previous generation) SLK chassis and a turbocharged engine, would have been able to compete with Mazda at $20k, and I don’t think there was an American market for another two-seater. Because Americans hate fun.
The R170 SLK wasn’t a particularly compelling driver’s car when it was new in 1996. Cost cutting it even further than 1990s Mercedes already did to maybe get it under twenty grand nearly a decade later wouldn’t have helped it compete against the NC Miata.
Maybe if Mercedes had acted completely out of character and let Dodge use the R171 SLK chassis; but there’s no chance they were going to do that when they in the process of foisting the original SLK onto Chrysler to sell at the exact same time they themselves were debuting the much improved second generation car.
Re-living Chrysler’s 30 year old concepts is like Al Bundy re-living his 4 touchdown game in high school,
Um, maybe more like Uncle Rico reminiscing about taking State if they’d have put him in in the fourth quarter….
Al Bundy did drive a Dodge, so there’s that connection too.
Chrysler design was at its peak during the Tom Gale era. He surrounded himself with talented design executives with great taste and made Chrysler the centre of the automotive design universe in the 1990s.
The Chronos and Citadel were designed by super-talented and super-nice-guy Osamu Shikado, a Japanese designer who made the risky decision to leave an established position at Toyota because he wanted overseas experience. Of course, Jason is spot on, he was channeling the Chrysler D’Elegance for the Chronos.
His story in his own words:
https://motor-fan.jp/article/1310260/
https://motor-fan.jp/article/1325743/ (featuring the Chronos)
https://motor-fan.jp/article/1344931/ (featuring the Citadel)
I saved this one in the Glovebox. Someone I know was a really high-ranking executive with Chrysler during these concept years. He might have some good stories to tell about any one of these.
90s Chrysler, and Dodge were on a roll. The cab forward cars were distinctive, the Ram truck was a stylistic innovation and they fixed some of the quality issues and shed most of the K car baggage. Then came the 1-2 of Daimler and Cerberus. I don’t think the Crossfire and the 300/Charger/Challenger platform were worth the damage Daimler did elsewhere and then Cerberus did what private equity does best. I can’t fault Agnelli for trying stuff but Stellantis as a,whole is more 1914 Austria-Hungary than 1914 France
The Citadel should be made right now, with a Hellcat version, but our dumbest possible timeline will not allow for that obvious win.
I’m still baffled that the electric Charger wasn’t built as a new 300E. Electric for Chrysler, petrol for Dodge. Revives Chrysler and doesn’t completely upend the Dodge brand identity.
Hire me Stellantis, I’m not greedy, I’ll do it for a measly mill/yr.
That… that makes lots of sense.
Yeah, that’s brilliant…