In the US, Mitsubishi is known for having a somewhat aging lineup. Head over to Asia, though, and the situation is even more geriatric. In foreign markets, the Japanese automaker is still selling vans that first entered production over 45 years ago.
We usually see automakers turning over models on a five-to-seven year timeframe. Some last a little longer, some less so. Generally, change is driven by sales. Customers tend to grow weary of a model as it grows older, with its look and interior becoming dated and its technology failing to compete with rivals in the marketplace. And yet, every so often, a vehicle comes along that lasts much longer, with production stretching for decades as the rest of the world moves on.


Enter the Mitsubishi Delica, a van that’s proven popular for both work and play. The fifth-generation Delica is the most recent model, having first been introduced in 2007. At eighteen years old, it’s getting pretty long in the tooth. But head around Asia, and you’ll find something even more shocking. Mitsubishi is still producing Delica vans that first entered production all the way back in 1979, with no signs of stopping yet!

The Taiwan Situation
“30 years of dominance.” That’s what you’ll read if you head over to the website of Mitsubishi Motors Taiwan, speaking to the long and successful run of the Mitsubishi Delica. In truth, though, the van is much closer to approaching its fortieth birthday. That’s because the Delica on sale in Taiwan was first introduced in 1986.
Where the rest of the world saw all-new Delicas introduced in 1994 and 2007, things went a little differently in Taiwan. That’s because the nation hosts its own automotive manufacturer—China Motor Corporation (CMC).


If you’re confused as to the name of China Motor Corporation, it’s rooted in the history of Taiwan itself. Most specifically, the island is known as Taiwan, while the nation state itself is formally known as the Republic of China (ROC). This dates back to 1949, when the Republic of China government used to rule both Taiwan and what we now refer to as mainland China. From 1927, a civil war raged between that government and communist forces, which culminated in 1949, when the People’s Republic of China government expelled the ROC government from the mainland. The ROC then effectively moved itself to the island of Taiwan, which was still under its control. 20 years later, when automotive manufacturing was established, the Republic of China name was still in common use, and hence the China Motor Corporation was formed.
In 1970, CMC signed a technology sharing agreement with Mitsubishi. This arrangement saw CMC producing Mitsubishi vehicles for the local market, oftentimes tweaked to suit local tastes and conditions. After Mitsubishi introduced the third-generation Delica in 1986, CMC would begin producing cargo versions of the model in 1991.

The third-generation Delica is an easy spot, because it’s so out of date compared to modern vehicles. The original van debuted in the 80s with a simple slab-sided body with a blunt nose. CMC has refreshed the design over the years, but there’s only so much you can do with a box on wheels. One revision in the mid-2000s saw the Delica get a chrome fasica that looked more fitting for a 1990s Japanese luxury sedan.
Today, the CMC-built Delica wears a black plastic bumper that gives it a Predator-like visage up front. The result of a 2019 facelift, it’s vaguely similar to what you see on modern Mitsubishi vans in other markets. You can get it body colored, too, but only on certain models. The look is further modernized thanks to the new, more angular headlight design. However, it’s still unmistakably a third-generation Delica at heart. You can tell by the downward swoop of the window line on the front doors, and the body lines for the sliding door on the side.




As for powertrains, the Delica is currently sold in Taiwan with the 4G69 four-cylinder engine. It’s good for 133 horsepower and 147 pound-feet of torque. It’s not a powerful engine, and only achieves around 20 to 23 mpg, depending on the vehicle’s exact configuration. It’s paired with either a four speed automatic or six speed manual. Notably, the Delica is also available in two main bodystyles—either a fully-enclosed van, or a cab-chassis truck.
Despite the model’s ancient origins, interior appointments are vaguely up to date. I say vaguely, because Mitsubishi Motors Taiwan lists the vehicle as having a Bluetooth audio system that can also handle MP3 and WMA files. I don’t even think Microsoft remembers WMA files, but this obscure arm of Mitsubishi apparently does.


While it’s lacking a proper infotainment system, the Taiwanese Delica has most of the usual equipment you’d expect on a vehicle built in 2025. You can get air conditioning, power windows, and audio buttons on the steering wheel if you so fancy it. It also comes with tire pressure monitors, stability control, automatic emergency braking, hill start assist, daytime running lights, and dual airbags—all features that were completely alien back in 1986.
Notably, CMC wasn’t the only outfit churning out third-generation Delicas for an excessively long period of time. Mitsubishi itself had introduced the fourth-generation Delica in 1994, but kept the old generation in production for export markets until 2013. Soueast Motors of mainland China also built the model from 1996 to 2013, giving it a truly hideous front end with massive headlights. Hyundai built the model, too, producing it under license from 1986 to 2004 in Korea. It’s proven remarkably long-lived, but nowhere else so much as Taiwan, where it’s still built to this day.

Even Older
The third-generation model is old, but not the oldest. You don’t have to head far south from Taiwan to run into even older Delicas that are still coming off the production line in 2025.
The second-generation Delica first entered production in 1979. It debuted as a relatively conventional van, with round headlights and a simple, slightly blob-like design. It could be had in passenger or cargo form, and could also be had with four-wheel-drive for those looking to adventure off-road. In this way, it set the trend for many Delicas to come. It would get a facelift in 1983, switching to square headlights and introducing other minor visual updates.


Mitsubishi was a well-established Japanese automaker at this time, and it didn’t limit production to its home country, having already established factories all over the world. In 1981, Mitsubishi would see fit to put the model into production in Indonesia. Then, in 1987, after the third-generation model was launched, it started up a production line for the second-gen Delica over in the Philippines. Indonesian production would eventually come to a halt in 2022, with the model instead imported from the Philippines. According to company documents, however, Indonesian production began again in the company’s West Java factory in 2023.
In Indonesia, it’s sold as a work vehicle named the “Colt L300,” while in the Philippines, it’s known simply as the L300. Neither country sells the vehicle under the Delica name. The second-generation Delica is easy to spot, just by virtue of how old it really is. The design is even more basic than the third-generation model. The main tell is the doors, with the flat-bottomed cutouts for the driver and passenger windows.
There have been multiple facelifts over the years, the most recent of which happened in 2019. Regardless, the examples currently produced in Indonesia and the Philippines still stand out from more modern traffic. The front grille has been updated with sleek chrome bars and the three-diamond logo, but the headlights and marker lamps are still virtually unchanged from the 1979 model.



In Indonesia, only a pickup tray or cab chassis is available. The classic van body style is no longer available, and hasn’t been for some time. Instead, it’s sold more as an out-and-out truck.
Meanwhile, in the Philippines, a whole range of body styles are available. These are designed to allow businesses to buy the vehicle they need in a spec that’s as close to ready to go as possible. It’s possible to buy an L300 with a dropside tray, a public transport version with seating in the rear, or even a refrigerated version for cold transport, among others. The largest variants seat up to 17.



Inside, though, it’s like a time portal back to 1979. While the dash cluster has been updated to a mid-2000s level of sophistication, just about everything else is as it was 46 years ago. Jump in a Colt L300, and it’s like the last few decades never happened. You get crank windows, a twist-and-pull parking brake, and an old-school thin-rimmed steering wheel with chunky horn buttons. Forget bucket seats, too—a classic bench is all you get.
As for the engine, both markets get the Mitsubishi 4N14. It’s a 2.2-liter direct-injection common-rail diesel, good for 99 horsepower and 147 pound-feet of torque. The only transmission on offer is a five-speed manual. Emissions-wise, it meets Euro 4 standards—not extremely dirty, but not particularly clean either.

Hanging On
It’s usually working vehicles that remain in production for many decades at a time. Average consumers buying passenger vehicles are far more sensitive to things like style and available amenities. When it comes to trucks and vans, things like cargo capacity and tow ratings are far more relevant than what the vehicle looks like or whether it appears “new.” It’s also the case that third-party licensed manufacturers tend to keep things in production longer than the original manufacturers themselves. No surprise, given they tend to have shallower pockets, and paying for R&D or to license a new model can be a costly affair. They also tend to sell in more isolated markets where there isn’t the same competition or consumer demand for regular model updates.
In any case, Mitsubishi’s boring old van continues to be boring and continues to get the job done. Unless that changes, it’s likely to keep selling for some time yet—and factories across Asia will keep them coming.
Fun fact, L300 owners in Indonesia specifically asked Mitsubishi to not change the steering column mounted gear lever because it would be harder to put passenger in the middle if the gear lever was moved in the center
I think this is great! As a society of humans we could really do a better job of just sticking with a good tool once we get it sorted out.
Wow. Suddenly the Express feels all newfangled and fancy.
Not only is it exclusively manual, you forgot the most important part. Its a column shift manual!!!!!! Is there another car on sale anywhere in the world with a column shift manual still?
All vehicles pictured here would benefit from a two-tone paint job.
There’s something about the modern JDM version pictured. I can’t quite put my finger on it. It seems like the front end is too plain. It just needs moar. /s
I especially like it in the ‘pickup’ version, where the cab reminds me a bit of the commercial Mitsubishi Fuso cabover trucks: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Mitsubishi+Fuso+cabover+trucks.&t=opera&ia=images&iax=images I assume that they’re not so great in frontal collisions, since they seem a lot like kei trucks, but for around-town delivery, they’re probably close to ideal with whatever box or bed out back that suits the needs of the business.
That is utterly tremendous. Guess we know where to go now for a dose of 80s nostalgia.
Excellent synopsis of the Taiwan-China situation, or stalemate really is what it is.
I’m pretty sure that just by publishing that Taiwan is the real China, the people in charge of “China” China have probably put you on some sort of list.
I like to call it Formosa, just to piss everyone off.
Couldn’t have said it better myself, and I’m actually sorta from that region! (the “China” China side, though some extended family managed to flee across the strait). Whenever I visit family along the Fujian coast, we get so close to the Matsu Islands (RoC governed) that our cars manage to pick up uncensored Taiwanese FM stations; reception’s surprisingly good as well, and there doesn’t seem to be active jamming.
Bring the D-max and/or Triton here!
As of 2020, the Taiwanese Delica is no longer produced exclusively as a Mitsubishi. Some models are now badged as a CMC model in two versions: there is the D260/270, which is the regular model, and a 3.5 ton dually called the P350 Hybrid. Sales are still strong, this one isn’t going away anytime soon. CMC’s other two main products, the Zinger MPV and the Veryca, a smaller truck/van, were also originally based on or sold as Mitsubishi vehicles. The company also manufactures all Mitsubishi products sold in Taiwan.
Today in my small town (southeastern US beach town/tourist destination) I saw a geared up Delica that looked ready for a jungle safari, a Suzuki Sambar van filled with screaming teen girls, and a Toyota Hijet pickup hauling a couple of paddle boards. All of this in the 15 minutes it took me to go to the post office. The Kei revolution is alive and well.
Aren’t airbags dangerous if the rest of the car’s crash structure wasn’t designed around them? I mean, I can’t just put airbags in my ’78 car and expect them to work fine when the steering column will probably impale me first and the airbag will inflate inside my lungs. These old-ass vans don’t even have crumple zones.
Collapsible steering column wouldn’t be a difficult change to make.
Sure you can, but I seriously doubt Mitsubishi had made other safety changes to these Delicas other than adding those airbags. These cab-over-engine hood-less designs are inherently unsafe.
Driving is inherently dangerous.
How am I only learning about this now?!? I must figure out two things: First, what the import laws are to the US from Indonesia, and second, if the 4g69 is a drop in swap to the second gen version for reasons…..
You had me at 4G6x…. the 4G63 is the lord of turbo 4s, the Original Lancer EVO engine and Eclipse/talon/Laser engine capable of all the power. The 4g64 is a very similar engine but in 2.4L form that can be modded just like the 4g63, and the 4g69 I believe is a revised version of the 4g64 2.4L with fancy MIVEC, so I believe it can be modded just like the 4g63s of the world as well. That would be way too fun of a way to die, driving one of these with 800hp….
I have stepped away from DSMs but that engine family just keeps calling me (at least until I boost my current LS3)
The USDM Delicas all had the basic 8-valve 4G64. I’m told those truck blocks are very sought after by 4Gx tuners because of their greater rigidity and the wide bell housing pattern.
The Ford E-series is still sold as a chassis cab, and that chassis is from 1975 (though it got a new body in 1992)
Other than the radius rod brackets and spring towers the chassis was new in 92 too.
A 1 star crash rating.
Oof.
I wonder if the cab and chassis version will do an endo?
TBH that one star was just a consolation prize. These things were designed so many years ago that crash safety was mostly “How about you don’t”
However I don’t fear death so I’ll take a fleet of 27
Several years ago, I read an article about the diamond-shaped bicycle frame. I think it was introduced around 1910-1920 and has remained essentially unchanged in design for 100+ years because there is simply no better shape for a bicycle frame.
In countries where there aren’t ever-increasing safety/emissions/fuel economy rules, some vehicles are just good enough for purpose that there’s no real point in changing them.
The double diamond shape can be traced back to the 1885 Rover Safety bike and really standardized by 1890. Yes, same Rover that eventually became part of British Leyland and Tata Motors. Different drivetrains, but I could buy a steel framed bike today that effectively was designed 135 years ago!
http://onlinebicyclemuseum.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/X-1890-Westminster-invicta-buckingham-adams-open-frame.jpg
That most recent facelift of the Taiwanese Delica reminds me of what Mitsubishi Australia did for the final facelift of the Magna…. Grafted a new, somewhat contemporary looking fascia, that looked like it belonged to an entirely different car, onto the same old otherwise unchanged vehicle! The foreign outposts of Mitsubishi really do now how to get the maximum life out of old platforms!
Would be neat to import a new gasoline powered one and “restore” an older one. With a turbo diesel engine swap, of course.
One of the things I want to do if I had infinite money and wanted to annoy the government is try to import a new Taiwanese 3rd-gen Delica and claim it’s Substantially Similar™ to my 1989 USDM Mitsu van.
To be incomprehensibly based – this is the kind of automotive ecological sphere I prefer. Not the design changing mildly every 2-5 years to try to get you to keep up. The developing world today still tends to buy cars out of practicality and necessity, which contrasts with our westernized economies which buy cars out of vanity, with the tacit and some times explicit cooperation of the government to push you into them.
The only comparable vehicle we have to the Delica here is the Chevy Express and Ford Econoline. For extra funny thoughts, I imagine a fantasy world where some blokes in a shed in Nebraska got the old body dies and tools from Ford and are still artisanally cranking out 3rd-gen E350s.
Sometimes, something is so well-designed and engineered for purpose, that there’s really no “better” replacement that doesn’t incur more complications and unnecessary cost to change. Sometimes “boring” is really just perfectly utilitarian, economical, and exactly what people need and want.
The Econolines and Expresses have pretty bad ergonomics though. No idea how tradesmen can stand driving them around all the time.
Ford Transits are far more comfortable and better to drive. I do admit though I still get a warm nostalgic feeling when I drive an Econoline or Express.
That “warm nostalgic feeling” is the heat from the doghouse.
I think the base-model seats in the E-series vans are perhaps the worst on the planet — flabby foam and limited adjustments make for a long day.
Haha
I rode short buses back in school and they were all variants of Econolines and Expresses, hence the nostalgia.
I do just rent them occasionally to move shit around for a couple hours. I’m sure the feeling would wear away fast if I actually had to live with one. I would choose a Transit or another Euro van if I were to buy one to keep.
As a certified subscale manlet, I find the ergonomics perfectly workable!
Don’t forget the Panther platform — Crown Vic, Town Car, etc. While not as long-lived as the Delica, I’d say for a passenger-focused vehicle, that was pretty insane. Or genius. Or a little of both.
I literally saw one of these in Ohio yesterday. First I’ve seen one in the states.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZTiuL14JAbi2u3R87
I’ve seen a couple in Ontario, but they’re always RHD JDM models like the one in the photo you shared.
The idea of an LHD Delica is compelling, but I guess they must be harder to export from Taiwan than Japan.
Should be a good spare parts supply, anyway.
I think that’s why it’s popular. If I need a work truck, I’ll buy the one that everybody have because I’m sure every mechanic knows how to work on it and there’s plenty of cheap parts available.
Exactly. Does what it says on the tin, doesn’t cost inordinate amounts of money and time to keep it doing what it’s supposed to do.
The “work truck” is largely a solved problem everywhere in the world. Model changes and re-works to be “new and better” is largely an exercise in making more profit for automakers. But a work truck doesn’t need to be anything more than a durable, economical platform for carrying cargo and/or equipment to get work done. Nothing glamorous; just pure utility.
Here, when someone needs a work truck, they’ll say “I need to buy a Dyna”, when you need to move heavy loads, you go rent a Dyna (with driver).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Dyna