History is important to automakers; their reputations are built on years of satisfied customers and brand loyalty. But given a long enough timeline, the only thing a newer model has in common with an older model from the same make is the name on the back. Sometimes they’re better, sometimes they’re worse, and sometimes they’re just different. This week, we’re going to look at two cars of the same make, with decades between them.
We finished up on Friday with a couple of squish-mobiles for cheap. Both choices have a loyal following and a good reputation, so I was curious to see which fanbase would turn up in greater numbers. As it turned out, the Buick LeSabre won, based largely on its better condition, from the sounds of it.


I think that’s the way I would go, as well. I’m not crazy about transverse V6s when it comes time to fix something, but I’m generally more familiar with how GM does things, so I’d be more comfortable under its hood. I imagine the comfort behind the wheel is about the same.
Chrysler has reinvented itself more times than Madonna, and has changed hands more times than the Stanley Cup. The marque is one hundred years old as of this year, and currently sells nothing but minivans. But it has had some bangers over the years, like the Airflow and the 300 letter-series cars. Of course, it also sold the Executive Limousine and the TC by Maserati, but nobody’s perfect. Today, we’re going to look at a last-hurrah big sedan from just before the first bailout, and a sleek coupe from the Daimler days.
1977 Chrysler New Yorker – $3,500

Engine/drivetrain: 400 cubic inch OHV V8, three-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Dallas, TX
Odometer reading: 100,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives
The New Yorker was the top of the Chrysler range, one step below the lofty Imperial, which was a separate marque for many years. It was big and flashy, powered by a series of eight-cylinder engines – inline until 1951, V8s after that. Like most American luxury cars, it grew in size up until the 1970s, then was drastically downsized to save fuel. This 1977 model is the last of the big ones, and it is big – nearly nineteen and a half feet long. It’s also the last generation to feature a pillarless hardtop; you can open both the front and rear windows for a huge, uninterrupted swath of fresh air.

One of two large V8 engines lurks beneath this New Yorker’s hood: a 400 or 440 cubic inch big-block. Both used an early implementation of Chrysler’s Electronic Lean Burn system, designed to lower emissions and improve fuel economy. It may have done those things, but it also sapped a lot of power and caused a lot of drivability problems. I don’t know which one this car has, so I’ll assume it’s a 400, and then if someone goes and looks at it and it turns out to be a 440, it’ll be a pleasant surprise. It runs and drives, but that’s all the seller tells us.

The deeply button-tufted seats look pretty good, as does the rest of the interior. The dash top is faded, but surprisingly, considering the Texas sun, it isn’t cracked. Chrysler was operating on a shoestring during these days, and build quality was sort of an afterthought, so don’t look too closely at the fit and finish, and you won’t end up disappointed.

Outside, the paint looks all right, but the vinyl top is shot. The worry is that it has trapped water and started rusting the roof. The photos in the ad don’t give much away, but the area around the rear window worries me a bit. If it were me, I’d plan to strip off the rest of the vinyl and get the roof repainted.
2008 Chrysler Crossfire Limited – $3,850

Engine/drivetrain: 3.2-liter OHC V6, five-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Conroe, TX
Odometer reading: 340,000 miles (!)
Operational status: “Fun and fast” is literally all the ad says
The 1998 merger between Daimler-Benz and Chrysler produced some unlikely offspring, not least of which were the hugely successful LX and LD full-size sedans, which mated Mercedes suspension and driveline parts to a big American V8, and stayed in production forever. Not every child of that particular ill-fated marriage did as well; the Crossfire, a Mercedes SLK-based two-seater with controversial styling, managed to combine Chrysler quality with Mercedes service costs. It takes a special sort of person to appreciate it, and an even more special person to run one up to the sky-high mileage of this example.

The frustratingly terse ad for this car just says “Fun and fast.” I’m going to assume it runs and drives well, based on that. The mileage reported in the ad is almost unbelievable at 340,000, but then again, Mercedes drivetrains have a history of racking up the miles. The single-overhead-cam V6 used in this car is generally known to be reliable, as is its 5G-Tronic transmission. The Crossfire itself has sort of a hit-or-miss reputation, with occasional electrical problems. Maybe if you actually talk to the seller, they can tell you more about this particular car’s foibles.

This is the only photo of the interior in the ad, and it’s not much to go on. I guess I have to assume that, at that mileage, the rest of it is pretty threadbare. Someone has kept it up-to-date with a modern stereo, so you can have CarPlay and Bluetooth and all that good stuff, but it’s not the most attractive thing. But then, the Crossfire’s silver plastic interior always looked a little tacky to me anyway.

Some folks love the Crossfire’s styling; others, not so much. I think it looks pretty good as a convertible, but I’m not sold on the coupe version. The roofline reminds me of an old Rambler Marlin, and not in a good way, and the silver A-pillar treatment sticks out like a sore thumb. Condition-wise, it’s not bad; it just has some faded paint on the bumpers and some cheap window tint slowly turning purple. The headlights could use a polishing, too, but that’s true of most cars this age.
Chrysler in general is a hard sell around here, I realize, but you’ll notice I spared you the entire K era this time. Not that pre-bailout or Daimler-era cars are any great shakes, but big old New Yorkers are cool, and you have to respect anything with over 300,000 miles that still runs well. So what’ll it be – the big white whale, or the little speedboat?
The New Yorker is straight up UGLY, but 340k on a Crossfire with little info and few pictures? Run away!
Based on similar miles I’d go Crossfire because I like the looks. However the generic Car for sale no information makes me think runaway.
It’s the same as people on Facebook selling car tires or clothes but won’t tell you sizes and expect you to scroll to the last picture to see an unreable tag or black numbers on black tires taken in low light and get pissed when you ask. Like hey I’m not scrolling through 10 pictures hoping the size is right just post it
The New Yorker is a little toasty, but it seems to be less of a ticking time bomb than the Crossfire. Plus, the New Yorker wears the same front and rear fascia as the ’75 Imperial.
We’ll take the yacht.
At least if it stops running you can rent it out on airbnb
Bigger than the last Airbnb I rented for sure.
That New Yorker will allow me to live out my Park Supervisor dreams – no contest for this one.
This was SO easy…I REALLY want a New Yorker…been looking at those and Lincoln Mark V’s for a while. Land yacht cars are so awesome…they are comfy stylish cruisers…plus V8! I also like the Crossfires due to SWG. It’s interesting the Benz influence on them. I’m guessing SWG will choose it!
You know me so well! Thanks for the shout-out!
Ha ha yeah, you’re welcome!
Also, I was just wondering if you got my message…was just curious if there’s any way I can buy an Autopian shirt? (There were a couple people who also asked about them in that 2CV article)
Been swamped with incoming lately and working my way through each message, slowly! I should have the next batch of Gossin Motors shirts cooked up by the end of summer and I made a list of all that asked for one – you’re on it!
Keep on me and we’ll get you one, my dude!
Ok, yeah figured you were “swamped” in that lair under that volcano over there yonder, ha ha
Ok sounds good! Thank you
For that price, the Crossfire is fun until something big breaks. Then you can scrap it without guilt. The New Yorker, on the other hand, is no fun from start to finish.
Dang at almost 20 feet long it would be a total kick to just wallow along at 30mph wing amazed by its’ gargantuan ness
I think the Crossfire gets more hate than it deserves and at first glance thought I would pick it, but 340k miles is just too much for me to take on. Kudos for keeping it running that long though.
“Chrysler quality with Mercedes service costs.” Nope, and nope.
Built by Karmann in Germany with parts out of Daimler’s bins. No Chrysler part or person ever touched the car before it came off of a boat, and I suspect no Crossfire in history has ever visited Detroit. The most common problem with the Crossfire was a bad crank position sensor, entirely a product of the MB M112 320 engine and frequent under a generation of three-pointed stars.
And I never found a Mercedes dealer that would service it. Literally wouldn’t make an appointment for the car. Speak as you will about Chrysler’s failure to train their techs and buy tools marked in millimeters, but whatever service costs one paid for a Crossfire visit weren’t paid to an MBUSA service department.
Also parts had to be shipped from Germany they did not stock them here
I’d think most dealers had allocations of ones and twos: no point in stocking parts.
In what world is a 77 New Yorker that’s completely trashed with three thousand five hundred American dollars? Scrap value is somewhere south of $100, it should be “tow it away and it’s yours”.
Sorry just metal value has to be $500
Oh God no. I had a gold ’77 New Yorker for a while during my college years. (Yes, long ago.) 9 MPG on the freeway. A radiator that constantly blew. (To this day the smell of rusty steam gives me PTSD.) For a broke college student it was a bad choice. The one thing it did have was room – I could sleep AND change clothes in the back seat when necessary. Gimme the Crossfire.
I’ve always liked the Crossfire, and IMO the New Yorker was from the “jumped the shark” era of personal luxury cars.
What strikes me as weird with the New Yorker is that it’s the passenger side seat that appears to have issues. Must’ve spent a lot of time with someone riding shotgun.
That is phenomenal amount of miles on the Crossfire. I had a company car (a Diplomat wagon) that had a Lean Burn 318 and it was probably the worst car I ever drove.
Repairing the Mercedes bits on the Crossfire is something I hadn’t really thought about, but fueling the New Yorker would probably make it a wash.
It’s not the Mercedes parts that are the challenge It’s mostly MB parts, and you can get all of them. Engine and transmission were in many hundreds of thousands of cars, 1996-2015, maybe millions. It’s the Chrysler parts that’s the challenge. Break a headlight and you’ve probably totalled the car.
Sleep chamber: I can use a nap.
My Grandma had a beige ’78 one of these new when I was little. I loved it, but she hated how impossible to park it was, and could not have been happier to trade it for one of the first H-body Buick Park Avenues in early ’85.
Anyways, the vinyl top does give me pause, but I’m going boating today in a big ass Chrysler!
where’s the neither button?
Had to go with the New Yorker for nostalgia reasons. Drove a burgundy brougham with acres of leather through high school, and many good times were had.
New Yorker. It’s the kind of thing I wouldn’t drive very often, but it would be fun under the right circumstances. I’ve always disliked the styling of the Crossfire enough that I’d never drive it.
And hell, I could always have a few friends over for wine and hors d’oeuvres in the Chrysler while it sits in the driveway.
This is a neither kinda day. If have to choose, the New Yorker. Crossfire would be nice, but it’s basically abandonware from both Chrysler and MB so getting parts is nigh impossible. At least the the old New Yorker you have options for repairs, parts, etc, even if it isn’t all that desirable.
I only chose the New Yorker because a 340K mile SLK hardtop is going to be a nightmare to keep running.
Another day of neither. However I will pump up New York, New York by Frank Sinatra, and Crossfire by Stevie Ray Vaughan! Turn it up!
I learned to drive in Blue/Blue 1977 Chrysler New Yorker! And later owned a 1976 White/White New Yorker Coupe with the 440. Although my current daily drivers include a 2CV and an XJR6, I always watch the markets for a clean 1969 to 1978 big body Mopar. I want to find a super nice late Imperial or New Yorker, and change it over to single point fuel injection – I love the cars, but the lean burn era carburetors are terrible.
Both these are NP cars at less than $4k, but I had to go with the New Yorker for nostalgia reasons. But the sun fade kinda scares me, and the vinyl top needs torn off, and the roof refinished. The is nothing uglier than the rusty water/glue run off from a bad vinyl top.
Possible to change the NY hardtop to convert?
You can call me Captain Stubing today
I don’t think I would really buy either of these cars, but the Crossfire has some parts that are rare and I would probably drive it till it broke and try to make some back by parting it out. The lean burn make me take a hard pass on the New Yorker. Not in good enough shape to be cool, not valuable enough to restore.
This is one of those “not even for free” days on both of them.
I’d rather have the Crossfire assuming it goes, turns and stops as it was designed to.
It will be an all-around better driving experience compared to that old New Yorker… and be way more fuel efficient as well. Parts will likely be more expensive, but I’m okay with that. And I don’t need all the extra space that the New Yorker has
My gut tells me that both of these will need a decent amount of work. So I might as well go with the one that is a better/more enjoyable car to drive.
Also one thing I do know about the Crossfire is the V6 and that Mercedes 5 speed automatic are rock solid durable designs.
What the Crossfire will need is a bunch of little things… starting with a headlight restoration kit.
With the New Yorker, the first order of business would be to de-landau it. And that would also likely involve painting the roof.
EDIT: Also that New Yorker was right at the time when Chrysler was adding the unreliable Lean Burn system to their V8 engines. So if that is still in place in this New Yorker, you’re gonna have fun trying to fix it and/or deleting it.
https://www.allpar.com/threads/the-chrysler-lean-burn-engine-control-system-first-onboard-auto-computer.229998/