Home » Oops, The Patent Office Just Revealed Chevy’s Most Important New Truck

Oops, The Patent Office Just Revealed Chevy’s Most Important New Truck

Chevy Patent Reveal Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

The vast majority of patents I sift through every week are incredibly uninteresting, but every so often, there’s one that has the opportunity to upend a company’s entire product planning cycle. Automakers plan out vehicle launches and reveals months ahead of time, making sure the timing is just right to make the biggest splash and attract the most eyeballs. Then, a patent drawing will spoil it all, revealing designs, products, or new features to the world before the manufacturer can.

That’s exactly what seems to be happening here. A patent filed on December 9th and uncovered by Car and Driver seems to show the upcoming 2027 Chevrolet Silverado’s design totally undisguised. While there are no actual pictures, drawings of the truck show the fascias, the proportions, and the rest of the body.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

The nice thing about this specific patent is that it has a drawing looking at every angle of the truck. So even though the car hasn’t technically been leaked, everyone now pretty much knows what it’ll look like.

How Legit Is This?

The patent was filed by General Motors, which confirms this is at least an official Chevy design. The patent describes the drawings as “a vehicle, toy replica, and/or other replica” showing a “new design,” but doesn’t name the year, make, or model.

2027 chevrolet silverado patent drawing
Source: USPTO

I reached out to Chevy to see if it would confirm whether this is, in fact, the new Silverado or not, and a representative sent me the following statement:

ADVERTISEMENT

GM regularly files with the US Patent Office to protect our IP, trademark, and technologies. Filings are not always indicative of future product. We cannot comment on speculation on future product.

Obviously, Chevy was never going to outright confirm this is the new, yet-to-be-revealed version of its most important truck. But designs that are this production-intent usually don’t make it into patents unless they’re going to be marketed and sold, so if I had to guess, this is very likely next year’s Silverado before you’re supposed to see it.

You Want Lights? You Got ‘Em

2024 Chevrolet Silverado Patart
Source: Chevrolet / USPTO

Huge headlights on American pickup trucks seem to be all the rage right now, with the current Ford F-150 sporting headlight assemblies that each look as big as my entire torso. Chevy’s gotten in on the fun, too, with its current Silverado HD’s headlights, which are literally over two feet all. You don’t realize how big these things are until they’re off the car, because proportionally, they make sense with the massive grille and bumper.

Going by these drawings, it looks like Chevy is leaning into the big headlight style for its standard Silverado 1500 as well for 2027. Like many new cars from Chevrolet right now, there are thin light strips at the top of the bumper area on either side of the grille, with a bigger cluster below, presumably for the main lamps. Though it’s tough to tell for sure, it looks like there’s also a central light strip running between the assemblies, bisected by a gigantic Chevy logo.

2027 chevrolet silverado patent drawing
Source: USPTO

The rest of the front end carries its general shape from the outgoing Silverado, albeit with a few more design elements in the lower section to break apart the massive frontal area. There’s space for all the active safety tech, and what might even be a set of fog lights. The hood, meanwhile, features a more prominent version of the two-hump shape found on the current truck.

As for the rest of the design, it’s shaped very much like every other pickup truck in this segment. That’s to be expected—Chevy isn’t going to take a huge risk by pulling a massive departure from what its customers know and love. The bed and four doors make up a classic pickup shape that should be familiar to everyone.

ADVERTISEMENT
2027 chevrolet silverado patent drawing
Source: USPTO

The biggest question mark that remains is with the cabin. Spy shots published by Car and Driver earlier this year show an absolutely massive screen occupying most of the dashboard, which is a pretty big departure from the current truck’s setup. Big screens are a mainstay of every vehicle in this segment these days, so I can’t say I’m surprised.

So When Will This Thing Actually Come Out?

The current Silverado has been around since 2019, which means it’s very much due for a big update. Combined with the fact that prototypes have been driving around throughout the year and the timing of this patent submission, I suspect Chevy will unveil the truck by the springtime.

2027 chevrolet silverado patent drawing
Source: USPTO

There shouldn’t be any big news in the powertrain department, according to Car and Driver. Currently, you can choose between two gas-powered V8s, an entry-level four-cylinder, and a Duramax turbo-diesel straight-six.

Screenshot 2025 12 17 At 10.56.29 am

As for price, the current Silverado starts at $38,145 for the most basic, stripped-out, four-cylinder Work Truck trim. As with any model year changeover where there’s been a heavy update or when a totally new vehicle arrives, expect the price to jump by at least a couple of thousand dollars.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top graphic images: General Motors / USPTO

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
43 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeremy Aber
Member
Jeremy Aber
7 minutes ago

I think it looks way better than the current one, but that’s not saying much. I have a GMT900, and I think pretty much all Silverados since then have been uglier.

Last edited 6 minutes ago by Jeremy Aber
Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
8 minutes ago

I hope this implies that they’re lowering the height of the headlights.

FormerTXJeepGuy
Member
FormerTXJeepGuy
13 minutes ago

Just make the whole front end lights already, I dont care anymore, nothing matters.

SCW
SCW
18 minutes ago

A yawn inducing mediocre snooze fest, the only excitement will be from getting a ride in the tow truck from all of the inevitable break downs.

Shop-Teacher
Member
Shop-Teacher
43 minutes ago

Thanks, I hate it!

Nsane In The MembraNe
Member
Nsane In The MembraNe
44 minutes ago

I mean it still has all the design issues that plague modern trucks. I’m going to try to be polite here and not dive into TRUCK GUY stereotypes but the hood is still way too high, the entire thing is still 20%+ bigger than it needs to be, it looks unnecessarily angry for no reason at all, etc.

GM has it in them to design a decent looking truck too! They’ve done it many times and I agree with RAMbunctious that their mid sizers (which really are full sizers in practice due to how bloated these damn things are now) are some of the best looking modern trucks. I would daily a GMC Canyon or Colorado without so much as a hint of irony.

I just don’t see the point to over-designing trucks and making every angle as harsh and angry as possible but people with office jobs literally line up around the block to finance these things at ludicrous terms to have a daily driver that’s objectively worse in every way other than towing than a run of the mill crossover blob, so what do I know?

If someone basically made a hybrid or PHEV Maverick with 10% more rear seat space I’d buy one tomorrow. Or even a hybrid Ridgeline. But then the American manufacturers might not be able to upsell me into a MOAB capable, $65,000, 15 MPG-getting luxury truck on an 84 month loan at 12% APR and we can’t have that now can we?

4jim
4jim
41 minutes ago

Well written, and having driven a lot of the trails around Moab I may say that Most of these new trucks are far to big and heavy for trail rides.

Nsane In The MembraNe
Member
Nsane In The MembraNe
40 minutes ago
Reply to  4jim

Bullshit! I got the TRAIL BOSS trim!

FormerTXJeepGuy
Member
FormerTXJeepGuy
12 minutes ago

The mid sizer is a great truck, I miss my last gen Canyons. The new ones look good, but man did they creep the prices up. Its also the right amount of truck for most people, even though they won’t admit it because once a year they need MOAR TRUCK (and a trailer rental could cover that need).

Nsane In The MembraNe
Member
Nsane In The MembraNe
8 minutes ago

Aren’t the Canyon and Colorado rated to tow almost 8,000 pounds? What percentage of buyers legitimately need more than that? Like 1%? If that? Like I said I’m going to try to be nice and not just throw a bunch of Truck Guy stereotypes around….but COME ON lol.

Goose
Member
Goose
1 hour ago

I just wish Chevy, and all trucks in general, would go back to more simple designs. I get it, there is a lot more bulk on modern trucks so I’m assuming designers don’t just want massive blank slabs, but sheesh why are there so many lines that change direction so many times, creases, seams, bumps, protrusions, folds, trim pieces, material changes, etc? Tail lights shaped like a kart track, hoods with the topography of skate park, and enough materials choices to match the dozen different facade choices on the latest 5over1 apartment building in the *insert latest gentrifying neighborhood here* is a bit much, isn’t it?

I feel like lots of things have replaced good design with a lot of design when it shouldn’t be a quantity over quality thing.

Last edited 58 minutes ago by Goose
Ash78
Ash78
50 minutes ago
Reply to  Goose

“Envision the next step on your Life Journey by making The Sierra AT4 your new home.”

Actually, they’re pretty big inside and why not live in the same place that drives you to work? This is pretty close to economic reality for Gen Z, anyway…

Grey alien in a beige sedan
Member
Grey alien in a beige sedan
1 hour ago

Whoever is in charge of finalizing the exterior modeling shouldn’t just be fired. They need taken to the town square for a good old-fashioned drawing and quartering.

To really rub salt in the wound, instead of using horses for this practice, they will use four Honda Ridgelines instead.

James McHenry
Member
James McHenry
1 hour ago

I struggle to see much different between this and Dad’s ’23. Is this just a mid-cycle refresh?

I do hope the clearance lights are strictly to cover the design of the 3/4- and 1-ton models and isn’t a sign that “every half ton and up model is big enough to require them now.” Makes me nervous enough to drive the 3/4 ton GMC at work with how big it is.

James McHenry
Member
James McHenry
1 hour ago
Reply to  James McHenry

Unrelated: my favorite truck-adjacent patent is the one for Bigfoot 8. So fast it was banned!

Ray Finkle
Member
Ray Finkle
1 minute ago
Reply to  James McHenry

Is this just a mid-cycle refresh?

Techhhhhnically it’s an all new program, but let’s be honest, it’s a mid-cycle refresh. Same platform, same powertrain options, probably some shared sheet metal, and tons of carry-over components.

I really hope these renderings are just showing the Trailboss/ZR2 and the other trims will be more refined, however the fact there’s a lower front fascia/air deflector points to that not being the case.

DaChicken
Member
DaChicken
1 hour ago

So intimidating! It should rightly shiver the timbers of all the other truck bros at Home Depot when they toss a bag of mulch in the bed.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
1 hour ago
Reply to  DaChicken

More like a throw pillow from Bed, Bath, & Beyond.

Gurpgork
Gurpgork
1 hour ago

GM hasn’t made an appealing looking truck since the GMT800 and they know it.

Robert M. Graham
Robert M. Graham
1 hour ago
Reply to  Gurpgork

I go back to the GMT400. Never liked the 800s.

Gurpgork
Gurpgork
59 minutes ago

The GMT820 is an eyesore’s eyesore, but I do like the 800s.
I’d still take a GMT400 with a 6.2L diesel and an NV4500 over anything.

Goose
Member
Goose
1 hour ago
Reply to  Gurpgork

Na, the GMT900 and pre-refreshed K2XX stuff looked great.

Gurpgork
Gurpgork
57 minutes ago
Reply to  Goose

Eww, no.
Absolutely not.
No.
Nope.
No.

Goose
Member
Goose
50 minutes ago
Reply to  Gurpgork

I respect your opinion, even if it’s wrong. /s

Gurpgork
Gurpgork
42 minutes ago
Reply to  Goose

I didn’t remember to do the appropriate /s postscript on my prior comment, but I’m glad that the interwebs didn’t distort my intent.

Doughnaut
Member
Doughnaut
42 minutes ago
Reply to  Goose

GMT900 GMC was great. The Chevy was… ok. My rankings starting with the C10:

  1. 2nd gen C10
  2. Pre-facelift Squarebody
  3. GMT400
  4. 1st gen C10 (except ’60-62)
  5. GMT800
  6. GMT900 GMC
  7. Pre-facelift K2XX
  8. Post-facelift Squarebody
  9. Post-facelift K2XX GMC
  10. T1XX GMC
  11. ’60-62
  12. T1XX Chevy
  13. Post-facelift K2XX Chevy
Gurpgork
Gurpgork
39 minutes ago
Reply to  Doughnaut

My first truck was a ’65 C10 and it was that generation that was so ugly, it was kinda astonishingly gorgeous.

Doughnaut
Member
Doughnaut
22 minutes ago
Reply to  Gurpgork

I’ve got a ’65 Suburban, so I’m a bit biased. I do think ’63 was the high water mark for the 2nd gen C10 though. The “good” hood paired with the knee knocker doors/windshield is just… <chefs kiss>

Acevedo12
Acevedo12
1 hour ago

I know they probably won’t, but from those drawings the headlights look very Mitsubishi

4jim
4jim
1 hour ago

Silly me, I was hoping for a lower hood so people would see pedestrians and children better.

RC in CA
RC in CA
1 hour ago

How groundbreaking. It looks like every other truck they’ve ever produced. Oversized headlights? Good to see they’re being consistent in catering to the fragile overcompensation crowd.

Steve's House of Cars
Member
Steve's House of Cars
1 hour ago

The drawing looks like they are migrated the big forehead’ed HD pickup front end to the half ton trucks. Those front ends were not universally loved, so I’m surprised GM decided to double down. Newer HD Chevy trucks appeared to have even moved from that styling, like GM knew it wasn’t all that pretty…

If anyone told me when the 2014 Cherokee leaked, with the eyebrow turn signals and all, that it was the direction of the future of styling I would have assumed they’d been drinking lead tainted water their entire life. Turns out they would have been right…

J Hyman
Member
J Hyman
1 hour ago

So, designed in Flint?

Jack Beckman
Member
Jack Beckman
1 hour ago

So…it looks like a truck. Huh.

Rippstik
Rippstik
1 hour ago

The only concerning thing I see is the radar detector in the lower grille. How would one modify the bumper for offroad use or a winch?

TheDrunkenWrench
Member
TheDrunkenWrench
1 hour ago

So they slapped some F150 taillights on their current design and called it a day?

RAMbunctious
RAMbunctious
1 hour ago

It’s hard for me to visualize from a line drawing, but if this looks like the current Colorado/Canyon, it’ll be a hit. I just bought a Ram, I think it’s the cleanest design in the class right now, but I may have strongly considered a GM if it looked like the midsizers, those are by far the best looking in their class.

Speaking of RAM, they actually went SMALLER with headlights for the 2025 refresh, and they weren’t huge to begin with. Reminds me of Clint Eastwood’s squinty stare.

Robyn Graves
Member
Robyn Graves
1 hour ago
Reply to  RAMbunctious

Now… I know what you’re thinking. Did he knock back five Natty Lights before getting behind the wheel of his Ram or six? To tell you the truth, I forget myself in all this excitement. But given that this is a Ram TRX with a Hellcat motor, the most powerful pickup truck in the world, that’ll knock your ass from that crosswalk you’re about to legally enter all the way to the Chipotle downtown, you gotta’ ask yourself one question: do I feel lucky?

Well, do ya’, punk?!

RAMbunctious
RAMbunctious
1 hour ago
Reply to  Robyn Graves

LMAO!

Nsane In The MembraNe
Member
Nsane In The MembraNe
58 minutes ago
Reply to  Robyn Graves

10/10 COTD

Nsane In The MembraNe
Member
Nsane In The MembraNe
42 minutes ago
Reply to  RAMbunctious

These takes are factual. The RAM 1500 is the best looking half ton and the Colorado/Canyon are the best looking “mid” sized trucks. Obvious you can make a RAM look like it belongs on the Fury Road without much effort but I appreciate how clean and unassuming they look in their factory spec.

43
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x