Home » Pontiac Once Made An Efficient, High-Revving Overhead Cam Motor And Nobody Cared

Pontiac Once Made An Efficient, High-Revving Overhead Cam Motor And Nobody Cared

Pontiac 9 11 Topshot

Creating the right idea at the wrong time is a classic and tragic mistake for many automakers. Chrysler’s wind-cheating Airflow was too soon for the people of 1934 to comprehend, when even buyers of 1986 barely understood the Taurus. The International Scout and AMC Eagle could have been huge hits had they stuck around for another decade or two and made it to a time when SUVs and crossovers were the rule and not the exception.

For today’s Pontiac Pthursday, we’ll look at an innovative but efficient and still relatively powerful engine that this GM division came up with during a time when absolutely nobody needed or wanted it. By the time they did, it was too late.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

In case you missed it, last week we started the Pontiac Pthursday weekly series where we dig deep into one of our favorite dead car brands to find some of the lost greats (and greatest fails) that even many hard-core enthusiasts forgot about. 

The Camshaft Wasn’t Stainless Steel

Look, I already know the stories. During his time at GM, John Delorean launched the Chevy Vega with a straight face when he knew it was crap. He also came up with a cool-looking but highly flawed sports car, got in trouble with the feds, and saw his dreams go up in a cloud of nose candy. I get it, but that shouldn’t take away from the admirable work Delorean did back at the Pontiac division, which he headed up at the record age of only 40. There are many engineering patents to his name, but his most famous work is likely his simplest: violating the unwritten rule at the time of putting an engine bigger than 330 cubic inches into a mid-sized GM car.

The loophole Delorean found was to offer such a motor as an option, in this case putting the 389 V8 into the Pontiac Tempest as part of a package known by three letters: GTO. Arguably the first true muscle car, the GTO made a name for Delorean and paved the way for his meteoric rise at GM.

Pontiac 1964 Gto Ad A1
General Motors

However, another one of the creations that he is far less known for but is considerably more innovative was a new six-cylinder engine for Pontiac cars; the first “six” for the brand since the old flathead had been discontinued in 1954. Delorean was a fan of European cars like the Jaguar and Ferraris, and he felt that the overhead cam valvetrains of these cars would be ideal for a motor powering Pontiac’s new generation of smaller cars. Delorean looked at adding this tech to what was usually the “losers’ lunch” powertrain of cheapskate sixties cars: the straight-six.

1964 Pontiac Gto Front 9 4
General Motors

The OHC engine was first seen in the 1964 Pontiac Banshee show car, a machine far too close to a Corvette for GM brass to ever approve, but a great showcase for this new engine.

Banshee 1 9 4

Banshee 2 9 4
Lenny Napoli/Dragone Auctions

Under the hood, it resembled an Aston Martin DB4 or Jaguar E-type with the long, trim-looking powerplant.

Banshee13
Lenny Napoli/Dragone Auctions

The motor got the go-ahead for production in “normal” Pontiacs for the 1966 model year. Yes, David Tracy, I know that Jeep had offered the first overhead cam motor in America in their Tornado four, but the camshaft was chain-driven. The Pontiac OHC straight-six would be the first one with a fiberglass-reinforced belt-driven camshaft (and one of the first in the world). The motor employed a number of aluminum parts like the cam cover and accessory drive housing; to paraphrase John, with aluminum it’s better than gold because it weighs less (sorry, sorry).

Ohc Detail 9 4
General Motors

That accessory drive housing also had attachments to support the distributor, fuel pump, oil pump and oil filter; these were driven by the camshaft belt to simplify the manufacturing and service of the engine.

Six Img 7 9 4
General Motors

The 230 CID OHC engine with a single-barrel carb developed 165 bhp at 4700 rpm and 216 lb-ft of torque at 2600 rpm, twenty-five more horsepower than the similar-sized Chevy engine on which the design was based (but shared essentially nothing with).

The real news and the true manifestation of Delorean’s vision was the “Sprint” version with a four-barrel carburetor that produced 207 bhp at 5200 rpm and 228 lb-ft of torque at 3800 rpm (later 215hp). The fact that it could be revved to 6500 and beyond was practically unheard of at the time in a run-of-the-mill American car.

Sprint Ad 2 9 4
General Motors
Sprnt Logo 9 4
Classic Cars .com

I like how advertising of the time touted the OHC 6-powered sedans and coupes as being cut-rate Jaguars. Sure, that motor was pretty slick, but nobody was going to confuse a Tempest for something from Coventry or Modena (and those Euro exotics usually sported an extra camshaft as well).

Sprint Ad 9 4
General Motors

Offered in the Tempest and the LeMans sedans, Pontiac also put the OHC 6 into a Firebird. Jay Leno proudly owns a 1968 example of this rare ‘Bird, and if Jay likes it and actually has one in his vast collection of blue-chip steeds, that says a lot about this overlooked powerplant:

For the 1969 model year, a special “high output” Sprint for manual transmission cars with 230 horsepower was available. That was a pea-shooter number in a world of 400 horse big blocks, but an impressive figure for what was considered such a small motor at the time.

69 Sprint 9 4

69 Sprint 2 9 4
PJs Auto World

The hood-mounted tach (part of the Sprint package) is always a fun sight to see:

69 Sprint Int 9 4 2
PJs Auto World

The OHC 6 was actually a great looking engine, too. In this Firebird it seems right at home and has a bit of the appearance of a Euro sports car that John wanted.

69 Sprint Engine 9 4
PJs Auto World

Exactly how to market such an advanced-for-the-time motor seemed to befuddle many at Pontiac’s marketing department. You could see some of the confusion even in Pontiac’s own ads, like the one below, where they had to slot the Sprint 6 confusingly above their least expensive V8:

Firebird Ad 9 4
General Motors

The OHC 6 was not going to win any stoplight races with a V8 GTO, but contemporary road tests in 1966 typically turned quarter miles in the 16 to 17 second and 80 mph range. That’s still not bad, though even a base ’66 GTO with a 389 could run through the eyes at about 14 to 15 seconds.

Don’t forget that the lighter weight of the OHC 6 made for a better balanced and finer handling car than one with a big iron V8 lump over the wheels. More importantly, the Sprint’s performance could have been had with greater fuel economy than any eight-cylinder selection. Do you know what the EPA estimates were for the OHC 6 compared to the V8? Are you kidding? This was back when we dumped used motor oil into the ground, and your mom smoked cigarettes in the delivery room. What was the EPA?

That was the problem: did anyone care?

You Could Get Faster But Not More Expensive

While a lot of you snarky jerks out there would assume that the end of the OHC 6 came from some GM engineering failure similar to the diesel V8 or Vega four, that’s not the case. Even the new belt-drive for the overhead camshaft proved rather reliable. The demise of the OHC 6 was that it was an answer to a question that, at the time, nobody was asking.

Ohc Detal 2 9 4
General Motors

Sales reflected this. To take just one year and model as an example, out of the 107,000 Firebirds the Pontiac made for 1968, a mere 4,662 of those were Sprints.

Sure, I dig sophistication in a drivetrain, but one of the few things that my dad told me that I hold to this day is “there’s just no substitute for cubic inches.” Indeed, with thirty-cent-a-gallon gasoline I’m not sure I’d give up a big honkin’ V8 back in 1966. Most potential buyers in the period agreed. Sadly, most GM executives thought the same way, and not without good reason. You see, nobody was willing to shell out a premium for a motor with fewer pistons, which was a problem since that fancy OHC 6 cost significantly more than a standard 326 V8 to produce. Why would anyone pay that when fuel was flowing like wine, but far cheaper? Pontiac read the room, and the last OHC 6 left the line in 1969 after a mere four-year run.

Pistons 9 4
General Motors

Of course, nobody at Pontiac could have seen the future: gas nearly doubling in price and people pushing their empty-tanked behemoth cars past NO GAS signs at fuel stations a mere four years later. Suddenly, that power-and-economy compromise would have looked a lot more appealing, but it was too late for the clever Pontiac motor that dared to challenge the muscle car establishment.

Ohc Ad 3 9 4
General Motors

Today, that coulda-hada-V8 mentality of the sixties persists, and OHC 6-powered Pontiacs languish in value next to their more plentiful brethren with two more cylinders. As a rough example of this, a Firebird with the smallest V8 that might command around $18,000 today would likely pull about $4,500 less than that with the OHC 6 under the hood. From that standpoint, you get better bang for the buck for a rare performance machine that you won’t see at every cruise night. If you can find one today, an OHC 6-equipped Tempest, LeMans or especially a Firebird is certainly worth a look.

Pontiac Points: 85 / 100
Verdict: Not the King of the Hill, but a valiant attempt that will get you noticed at car shows while avoiding the gas pumps
 on the way there. 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
65 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phil Ventura
Phil Ventura
5 months ago

look at all that room in the engine compartment!

Geoff Campbell
Geoff Campbell
5 months ago

Yes, the ohc six was one of the great engines ever made…but in the muscle car years, it’s still a six- banger…

Shooting Brake
Member
Shooting Brake
5 months ago

I’ve loved this motor since I first heard about it some 20 years ago in high school, but I don’t think I’ve ever even seen one in real life. Would love to swap one into my brother’s ‘68 Firebird and put a 5-speed and updated brakes/suspension behind it. But first I’d have to find an engine, oh and restore the whole car…

Last edited 5 months ago by Shooting Brake
Bookish
Bookish
5 months ago

Cool engine, but check the forums and YouTube for serious design flaws.

I want power down low, not wimpy and have to rev to the moon to go anywhere. Lotta hatred for pushrod V8s, but they won for a reason in the US where displacement wasn’t taxed and gas was (and still is) cheap.

J Wamsley
J Wamsley
6 months ago

I owned one of these in the 1980s. It was a 1967 tempest, bought out of an older woman’s driveway for $100. It ran okay, but pulling the valve cover off revealed the cam was very worn. My dad was a former Pontiac tech, and he said that was common, as the oil would drain down to the pan overnight and the cam would starve on startup. He told me that first start in the morning, crank it without setting the choke until the oil light goes out, then set the choke and start it.

In 1987, you couldn’t order a cam off the internet. We were looking around, and while attending a funeral in upstate Pennsylvania, we came across a junkyard with some older iron. Sure enough, they had a 68 tempest OHC-6. While my mom watched in horror, dad and I borrowed tools from the yard owner, stripped out of our suits to our boxers and pulled the cam, which was integral with the valve cover, and the head.

Turned out the junkyard cam was in great shape, and my brother, who worked in a machine shop at the time redid the head with oversize valves. After we swapped the parts out, it ran great. It would cruise at 70 on the Jersey Turnpike all day and make 19-20 mpg.

I really loved that car, but eventually sold it for a 75 Grandville convertible with air condtioning. I’ve been looking for a replacement lately, but as you said, there were few takers on that engine. Interestingly, my dad’s sister also had an OHC-6. She had an orange 68 Firebird that I lusted after. White interior. She sold it in 1985 to buy a 6000 STE. I guess I can’t complain about that.

Tony Sestito
Tony Sestito
6 months ago

Back in high school (late 90’s for me), we had a Pontiac OHC six sitting on a test stand in our Auto Shop along with a Ford 289. They were donated to the school by a local car dealership chain back in the late 60’s, and when the shop was in full swing, the students would be tasked with taking them apart, putting them back together, and test firing them on the stands. By the time I got there 30 years later, no one was doing that anymore, but my friends and I wanted to! We decided to skip the “take it apart” part and just try test firing them. We did get that 289 running fairly quickly, but we were dead in the water with the OHC Six because the timing belt was broken and no longer available from anywhere we could find. We were so disappointed. That thing became my “white whale” for the rest of high school, and just sat there taunting us with its cool aluminum finned valve and timing covers.

Years later, they closed the school auto shop, and I wish I inquired about that poor OHC Six, which I’m sure got scrapped. Even as a garage ornament, it would have been cool to have. I always had dreams of getting one, cobbling up a multiport EFI system, and turbocharging it to drop in a 1st gen Firebird.

S boser
S boser
6 months ago

My high school auto shop teacher (proudly named captain caida) owned a Pontiac Tempest and a Porsche 911. I always enjoyed looking under the hood of that Tempest, it was clean and all the aluminum was polished. That was 1974. Dude was way ahead of his time and a great teacher.

Spectre6000
Spectre6000
6 months ago

I did not know about this engine. I like my engines to spin like tops: smoothly, with poise and balance. Rotaries are my #1, straight-6es a close second. American muscle cars never really did much for me, but I’ll bet there’s a way to zhoozh up the handling of one of those to make it actually all around fun to drive! Too bad the stable is full right now…

Ricardo M
Member
Ricardo M
6 months ago

“last week we started the Pontiac Pthursday” is a missed opportunity to hyperlink last week’s article, which I missed and will now search for.

Ricardo M
Member
Ricardo M
6 months ago
Reply to  The Bishop

No worries, I’m more concerned about the site missing out on chances to get two reads for the price of one.

Melanie Fuhrman
Member
Melanie Fuhrman
6 months ago

These OHC straight sixes sound absolutely amazing. I would love to have a Firebird equipped with one.
https://youtu.be/TZaK2IHTSPQ?si=QmdXTHsPyIVD9HKT

M. Park Hunter
Member
M. Park Hunter
6 months ago

“Yes, David Tracy, I know that Jeep had offered the first overhead cam motor in America in their Tornado four…”

Whut? You go apologize to David Tracy right now, young man.

The Tornado six (not four) debuted with an OHC in 1962. A modification of the old Continental six, it was nifty but had some durability issues.

But every single Crosley built after WW2 had a shaft-driven OHC. That’s, oh… roughly 78,000 cars. The Crosley OHC went on to a long run, even outliving the Pontiac Sprint Six as an outboard motor for Boston Whalers into the 1970s.

Before WW2, Duesenbergs were OHC. They’re kinda famous.

(Sorry, my inner auto pedant kicked in.)

Mike McDonald
Mike McDonald
6 months ago
Reply to  The Bishop

The Bishop drove a Firebird. =)

M. Park Hunter
Member
M. Park Hunter
6 months ago
Reply to  The Bishop

You are most gracious. Thanks for a good read – I’ve always thought the Sprint Six was a cool engine.

Ben
Ben
6 months ago

Willy’s 230 OHC was a six, I believe.

65
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x