It’s no secret that kei car enthusiasts have been having a rough time. From tariffs on imported cars to various states waging war against these tiny 25-plus-year-old JDM cars, it’s recently grown harder to import a tiny, sub-660 cc car to America. However, if the White House gets its way, enjoyers of small cars might not have to wait to import them, because the government wants to see them made and sold in America.
On Wednesday, the White House held a press conference where President Donald J. Trump announced less stringent Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards.
However, at roughly 11 minutes and 51 seconds into the livestream, Trump announced some completely unexpected news. Here’s the unedited quote, straight from the President:
One of the other things we’re doing—it’s separate from this meeting but I think everybody here would agree with it—if you go to Japan where I just left, and if you go to South Korea and Malaysia and other countries, they have a very small car—sort of like the Beetle used to be with the Volkswagen—they’re very small, they’re really cute, and I said “How would that do in this country?” And everyone seems to think good but you’re not allowed to build them, and I’ve authorized the secretary to immediately approve the production of those cars, so you’ll be able to buy the—they really are, some of them are really beautifully actually if you take a look. Honda, some of the Japanese companies do a beautiful job, but we’re not allowed to make them in this country and I think you’re gonna do very well with those cars, so we’re gonna approve those cars.
Present at the conference was Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa, who stated, “Thank you very much also for this great news of the kei cars,” to which Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy responded, “Yes.”
Whew, there is a lot to unpack here: questions about what barriers actually exist for kei cars in America, what changes are actually being made to permit new kei cars on American roads, whether domestic production of kei cars is viable, and, of course, whether this pledge will actually play out as promised. We don’t want to count our chickens before they hatch, so let’s take a look at several of these barriers.
One solid argument against kei cars is that some of them might not be as safe as cars already sold in America. After all, U.S.-market cars must pass unbelted occupant crash testing, a strenuous process that’s kept certain cars away from these shores. The Alpine A110, for example. In addition, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards deviate from the UNECE standards most of the world uses, so some market-specific changes would be necessary. Headlights would need to be changed, amber front retroreflectors would need to be added, that sort of stuff. While the Mitsubishi i-MiEV proved it’s technically possible to sell a modified kei-class car in North America, there are a few reasons why we haven’t seen many of them sold new in America.
Firstly, let’s talk about the EPA’s footprint rule for a second. From 2008, Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards included a modifier based on a vehicle’s footprint, calculated using its wheelbase and track width. Under this structure, larger cars could emit more pollutants while smaller cars had to emit fewer pollutants. For example, in 2011, cars with a footprint of less than 40 square-feet would’ve needed to achieve a CAFE rating of 31.2 MPG, while cars with a footprint above 55 square feet would’ve needed to achieve 24 MPG. Those numbers don’t seem like a huge deal, except that at the time, the proposed standards for 2025 were 61.1 MPG and 45.6 MPG, respectively. While the CAFE MPG and the number on a window sticker aren’t the same, the footprint rule makes it somewhat punitive to sell small cars in America.
Reading between the lines, it certainly seems like this proposal would legalize U.S.-built kei cars, and that’s where another potential sticking point comes in. When we’re talking about truly inexpensive cars at the bottom of the market, labor costs make up a considerable portion of their wholesale prices. If kei cars were to be built in America, they might not be as cheap as some people hope. At the same time, who knows if imported kei cars will be legal? Given current pricing plus tariffs, an $11,390 Honda N-One could be Nissan Versa money if it were to land in America.
The Autopian reachd out to the DOT about all of this, and it didn’t really answer any of our questions, so much as repeated what Secretary Duffy said on CNBC the next morning. This is exactly what it sent us:
Secretary Duffy on CNBC today“He [the President] called me after the meeting, actually, and said, let’s change the rules. And so I worked with NHTSA. We’re in the process clearing the deck. Listen, if there’s a market for those vehicles, I want to give our manufacturers the opportunity to build those cars. And so we are and it’s going to clear the deck, clear the rules and let them build those small cars. And again are they going to work on the freeways? Probably not. But again, vehicles that work in cities and if that’s where you drive, it could be a great solution for you. And by the way, much more affordable than other options that are on the market today.”
Then we get to the final question: Would the general public even want kei cars in America? While inexpensive cars have seen a resurgence in popularity, kei cars are an order of magnitude smaller than even a Nissan Versa. We’re talking 11.2-foot-long cars with engines displacing less than one liter and zero-to-60 MPH acceleration times usually in the double-digits. They’re economical and inexpensive, but a used Camry is physically a whole lot more car. It can cruise on Texas’s 80 MPH toll road without breaking a sweat and comfortably seat three adults across the rear bench, useful stuff in a nation of long commutes, high-speed roads, and relatively inexpensive fuel. While a domestically-made kei truck would be useful for urban deliveries and light farm work, kei-class passenger cars are a harder sell.
While it’s certainly interesting to hear the White House paving the way for U.S.-market kei cars, the battle to bring truly small cars back to America has only just begun.
Even after that DOT response, it’s still not clear what barriers would need to be lowered or have been earmarked for alteration in order to sell new kei cars in America, and we still don’t know if consumer demand truly exists outside of cities and some commercial uses. Needless to say, we’ve reached out to Honda and Toyota for comment and will update you should we hear further developments.
Top graphic image: Honda, DepositPhotos.com
[Editor’s note: I emailed the DOT yesterday when this story dropped, and it got back to me today (Thursday, the 4th). I’ve added its statement above. – Brian]
To everyone crapping on the idea, you forget that between 2008 and 2020 interest rates were close to or literally 0%. It cost you very little to finance way more vehicle than you needed. We don’t live in that imaginary world anymore. At 5-9 % interest, the actual cost of the vehicle matters much, much more than it used to.
Additionally, the used market is filled with problematic, high technology vehicles that are very expensive to maintain at old age. The average age of vehicles on the road is at record highs.
If cheap, and mechanically simpler cars are made legal to buy, there is a large market that has been completely ignored out of regulatory compliance. You’re not courting the modern egg car buyer, you’re courting the 20 something that is still driving a 2004 Sentra they bought in highschool and are praying it doesn’t break down driving to work this morning. Same market segment the Slate truck is targeting.
Yes, that “beginner” market needs a lot of help. My son is driving a 2010 Soul and wants to replace it, but anything in his price range of used cars is no better. I’d love to see him be able to get something new(er) at a reasonable price, and until he has a family he has no need for a bigger car. His favorite at the moment is the Fiat 500 Abarth, so I’m sure he’d love a kei car if he could get one in better shape than what he has now.
The 20-something without a huge paycheck crowd really does need reliable transportation so that they don’t lose the crappy job they have managed to secure. For that matter, a retired empty-nester has no need for a big car either, and on a fixed income something small, cheap, and easy to maintain would be a boon.
Agreed. We’re missing simple cars these days, such as the first gen Honda Fit. What we still have available is the spiritual successors to the Chevy Cruise, which was cheap for all the wrong reasons and over complicated in the worst ways.
You can easily get a refreshed (2018 – 2022) Chevy Spark with less than 100K miles for less than $10,000.
Look a little harder and you can get that down to $7K to $8K for a car made in the 2020’s. (Shopping for Sparks at the moment)
Yes a COVID era car that’s been through every round of GM cost cutting is totally a great idea. Make sure you get one with the CVT for extra spice. /s
The best use for those Sparks are drag racing push cars, just like a Smart ForTwo.
The Spark is a simple car – with a simple 4 Cylinder NA engine, available with a 5 speed manual. I had a 2016 Spark EV and it was a fine commuter.
Don’t want a Spark? Buy a Sonic, Mirage, Versa, Kicks, Corolla, Yaris, Fit, Trax, Encore Fiesta, Accent, Rio, Soul, Sentra ….
There are literally thousands of small cars and crossovers 2018 or newer listed for sale with less than 100K miles for less than $10K
No, I’m not forgetting the short and temporary period of time when interest rates were artificially low.
I also remember when I bought my first new car in 2000 and paid 9.9%. I also remember when my parents were paying 15% to finance a car and the same for a 30 year mortgage.
I also remember buying simple cars from the 80’s as my first car in the 90’s and they were absolute total garbage that fell apart in less than 100K miles.
My first new car was a 1989 Mercury Tracer
Financed at 13%.
I’m curious if you liked it. I had one ( I bought it slightly used ) and loved it … until the heater stopped working ( I live in Wisconsin ) and no one, including the dealer, could figure out how to fix it.
It was a really good car – although slightly boring, as Ford/Mercury damped down the controls to the point of numbness.
I should have kept it for longer than I did.
You’re making my point. We don’t live in the infancy of computers anymore, but we do have the interest rates. The average cost of vehicles ($50k) is ten grand more than an inflation adjusted average 2014 vehicle. The bottom of the market has been ignored.
The average (mean) cost of a new vehicle is pretty meaningless as it is heavily influenced by vehicles on the high end and a shift by buyers up the chain. The cheap cars are still there – people just are buying fewer of them.
The median would be more useful and it is quite a bit lower than the mean (which is likely why it gets no press)
The bottom of the market isn’t being ignored either. However, inflation and rising wages have moved that bottom to $20,000.
In 1995 a Geo Metro was GM’s cheapest car. It cost $8,395 when the median US household made $34,080. That is 12.8 weeks of income to buy a Metro.
In 2024 the Chevy Trax was the cheapest car GM. It started at $20,490 and the median US household income was $83,730. That is 12.7 weeks of income to buy a Trax
30 years later and the bottom of the auto market is in the same place relative to average (median) income. That buyer is also getting a LOT more for their money today than in the past.
Does that median include incomes like Elon’s?
I don’t think most people grasp how close to the edge most people are now.
What do you think people that broke can finance anyway?
First time I visited Austin, ages ago, everyone either made $3 an hour or comfortable money for a tech company.
Not much in between.
Yes, the median includes Elon Musk although Musk has little effect on the median.
The median is the number in the middle of a group. Line every income up from smallest to largest and then pick the one in the middle.
The mean is what most people think of as the “average” and that is adding up every income and then dividing by the number of incomes.
Say we have 5 car sales. $20K, $25K, $30K, $35K, $200K.
The Median is $30K
The Mean is $62K
I thought so.
I took engineering math, but don’t need it often.
Either way, it misrepresents the problem of what more appropriately should be called subsistence workers.
No way to build up savings, no fair deals on insurance or loans, and often owning cars they can’t afford to repair.
The working poor aren’t new but they are a bigger share than in the past. The data shows the pattern you mentioned in Austin.
While the median is the median the distribution is not as even as in the past. The number of middle class households is shrinking and those people are splitting into the working class and upper income. More are moving up than down the income ladder which moves the median up but doesn’t change the reality for the people being left behind.
At the same time growing income inequality is not a problem for automakers to fix.
They might find it wise to address the loss of entry level customers before someone outside the industry tries to do it for them.
As long as USA is a country essentially without mass transit, lack of affordable transport affects everything else.
The way to address a customer that cannot afford a new car is to sell them a CPO used car. It isn’t selling them a new car at a loss.
Lack of affordable transport for workers is an issue. In other parts of the world it is addressed by companies running their own bus lines to transport workers to and from work.
Companies address their own concerns. It is up to government to address larger societal concerns.
I asked this the last time there was a mean new car price because medians are generally more useful when there’s only outliers in one direction (which is often the case when you’re looking at a data set of only positive numbers) and while I don’t remember the exact answer the median price was lower, it was not markedly so – like maybe $1,000.
I have not seen a median new car price for at least a decade – can’t find one today either.
What I can find is averages by market segment which show how much the US fascination with driving full size trucks skews the numbers and how much extra buyers are paying to drive a crossover instead of a sedan in the same class size.
$24,061 – Subcompact Car
$27,003 – Compact Car
$30,594 – Subcompact SUV / Crossover
$33,524 – Midsize Car
$36,517 – Compact SUV / Crossover
$48,650 – Midsize SUV / Crossover
$64,780 – Full-Size Truck
$77,568 – Full-Size SUV / Crossover
$132,999 – High Performance Car
In the Compact class choosing a crossover over the sedan we used to buy adds $9,514 on average. Step up to midsize and the penalty is $15,126.
This says nothing about CAFE standards which have encouraged the move away from cars, especially compact/sub-compacts.
You are absolutely correct. CAFE was very punitive to small cars, despite being the most efficient.
I would like to have a car built exactly like the early Honda Insight, but more functional.
Possibly just a gas engine?
In order to not hurt a manufacturer’s CAFE rating, something that small would have needed to hit high 50’s, low 60’s, for combined MPG rating.
My friends worn out Insight does 50 on long trips, did 80 routinely when new.
But I agree that rule is clearly skewed.
That’s just it though. Getting 50 when the rules say you need 60, hurts your fleet average way more than a significantly more profitable truck getting 24 instead of 25.
And that’s the insight being a hybrid, not a pure ICE vehicle.
My friends Insight has a rescued battery pack because the car will not operate without it, but the hybrid part is not really in play.
50 mpg in a car with hundreds of thousands of miles isn’t terrible.
On flat ground at highways speeds I wouldn’t expect benefit from the hybrid part anyway.
80 mpg was routine early days.
And the Insight build quality is holding up better than my 2005 4 cyl Camry.
Yep; a 2005 Corolla is worth more or equal to a BMW 5-series of the same vintage.
Late to the party, but I’m just not seeing it. The Honda Fit was one of the best selling small cars in America and even it couldn’t sustain enough sales for Honda to keep it around. America had tons of small and tiny cars not too long ago. There was the Ford Fiesta, Mazda 2, Toyota Yaris, Chevy Sonic, Chevy Spark, and probably more that I’m forgetting. None of them are around anymore. Even the Mitsubishi Mirage eventually kicked the bucket.
Smaller than those? The Scion iQ, Fiat 500, and Smart Fortwo. No member of that trio could say they had good sales. I highly doubt there’s a long list of people who want a tiny 64 HP car that would feel winded at realistic American highway speed (75-80 mph) and will disappear in front of the hood of a pickup truck.
I guess an American Kei could have a larger engine. But you have to remember that these cars already have to be modified to our standards. Then, in order to dodge tariffs, these cars will have to be built here. I doubt this would be done cheaply enough to keep a Kei at an attractive enough price.
Americans might say they want a cheap “people’s car,” but we clearly don’t buy enough cheap cars for automakers to care. I’m not convinced that bringing even smaller cars here is the antidote to that, and I say that as someone who adores and owns Kei cars.
maybe would people go in for a small commuter? I would. I signed up for the slate but am about to snag a Corolla, so I don’t know
Honda was selling over 50k Fits a year until 2017 when it started to slip in sales, but I’d imagine there were other factors that came into play for that time, and the average person certainly can feel that we’re in a recession period more like the late 00s and early 10s when they were at their peak sales. People aren’t lining up to buy cheap people’s cars because they barely exist anymore. The options for cars under $20k aren’t particularly great either, just boring compact sedans of dubious quality that scream I BOUGHT THE CHEAPEST CAR; the kei stuff gets a lot of envy because they’re still fun despite being practical and economical options.
50K a year is not enough to bother making unless the vehicle has a hefty profit margin.
The Chevy Trax is a cheap car – one of the cheapest in the USA and it sells 200K a year. It sells because it is in the form factor that people want to buy and is actually a decent car. Add in the other variations as GM is selling 350K on the platform with all of them starting at less than $25K
Make it a loss leader, I don’t weep for low margins for the automakers. The Fit sales still represent hundreds of thousands of buyers who need cars and like the small form factor. The Fit especially was a long lasting reliable car that’s great to have in the used market as well. I doubt we’ll see as many Trax last as long as most Fits (I’m not sure I see that many on the road currently but they’re so boring they might just slip by). Who knows how many others get scared away from smaller cars because of the fucking ridiculous behemoths on the road now anyway, in regards to what people “want to buy”. I’m on board with anything that might help deflate SUV and truck proportions in this country, maybe making small cars cool will be part of the solution.
Why should a company make a vehicle and sell it for a loss? Please explain the logic.
I do weep for low margins – as I work for an automaker and my bonus is directly tied to our percentage return on sales. This year it will be basically zero due to tariff costs.
The Fit does not represent hundreds of thousands of buyers. If it was selling hundreds of thousands a year it would still be on sale. The Fit average 51K per year. The 3rd gen saw a little bump then a steady decline to less than 33K when Honda pulled the plug in 2020
I believe the “hundreds of thousands” they were referring to was the Fit’s overall sales, not annual.
But I think you’re both letting your differing perspectives block you from seeing the other person’s point. Honda “only” sold 50k Fits a year, sure, but that was just in the US (and if you average that out, that’s still a thousand Fits per state per year). The Fit was sold in several markets and was a fairly popular choice in all of them, so Honda could spread the development cost out over hundreds of thousands, if not millions of units. And that’s also hundreds of thousands if not millions of people who got a taste for Honda’s products, and might come back at a later date and buy another Fit, or upgrade to an Accord or a CR-V.
But you’re also correct that selling a car on slim margins to a small market is financially unsustainable. If Honda were just selling those 50k Fits per year in the US, and didn’t have other markets or other cars that it shared parts with to back it up, then it wouldn’t last. The price would go up, the sales would go down, and sooner rather than later, production would cease.
So the problem isn’t any one thing (demand, cost, whatever), but it’s that all of those things combine to make it such that unless you have an existing product that you can easily make legal to sell in the US (Fit, Mirage, Versa, Yaris), it just isn’t going to happen. But if you do have that, then we’ve proven that it does work.
My perspective is from working for an automaker and seeing how the sausage is made. Models, Trims, Options – they get cut when they stop making a margin that makes them worth spending the money to make them. Generally that happens when it come time for a redesign or regulations change and a company has to decide whether or not it makes sense to spend many millions and years of R&D to keep selling that car.
The most recent example I was personally involved in was cutting the manual from a model. Happened during the redesign and the manual was 3% of sales. Keeping the manual would have added cost to the automatics – more than the profit from selling the tiny number of manuals. Numbers went up the chain of command and a decision came down to kill the manual. People like to come up with conspiracies but it comes down to dollars and cents.
Yes, a model like the Yaris was / is sold in other markets. That helps with economy of scale and makes it more viable in a small market like the USA. However, it only helps. Honda can’t sell a European or Japanese spec Fit in the USA. It takes many millions of dollars and years of R&D to make a version that meets US regulations. Companies expect a return on those millions and it is really hard to make the numbers work on the low end.
The best thing that could happen for fans of small cars is if the US either harmonized our standards with the EU or at least allowed EU compliant cars to be sold in the USA. If we could just ship a EU spec LHD car to the USA without all the extra cost it would make many more cars economically viable here.
Indeed, our differing safety regulations do make things quite difficult. I mean, I’m all for letting the “local” government decide what the “local” population needs, but I really don’t think we’re doing anything different from the Europeans or Japanese that’s appreciable.
When I was doing interiors we had 6 different versions of the dash for different crash standards and LHD vs RHD.
For safety the EU is ahead as they assume the front seat passengers will wearing a seatbelt while the USA requires automakers to restrain a unbelted adult male. This leads to more powerful airbags that injure small framed people and changes in the lower dash that increase injuries to the lower extremities for belted passengers.
Much has been said about how much better EU standards are for lighting.
Emissions is a bet of a mixed bag. They have stricter regulations for gasoline cars as they have PM and PM count standards that require most DI turbo gasoline cars to have particulate filters like diesels.
Japan adopted EU emission standards as part of the free trade agreement. I don’t know if they have adopted crash standards as well.
Why should car companies want to sell affordable cars?
After reading about the FX16, I told a friend about it and we went to check them out.
We were already fans of the Mr. 2.
We test drove the faster Mister 2 and the FX16, and he bought the FX16.
Absolutely loved it.
Then his son rolled it into a lake, and the insurance company totaled it.
He wanted to replace it, but found Toyota no longer offered that car.
The only thing available was a tarted up version with body cladding, the exact opposite of what the FX16 was, and with the price doubled.
He eventually gave up and overpaid for the base FX, which only resembled the FX16 on the outside.
The tiniest brakes on it, barely had an interior, a sad car.
He never forgot it, never bought another Toyota.
People like us sold those cars, then watched Toyota kill their market by profiteering.
My friend has an unlimited Tesla now, so that’s the customer they burned.
When cars seem to mysteriously lose sales, often there is a clear reason.
“Why should car companies want to sell affordable cars?”
That wasn’t the question. The question was why should an automaker sell a car model at a LOSS.
There is no mystery as to why small cars are losing sales. It is happening across the entire segment at the same time sales of small crossovers are booming. Buyers prefer the crossover form factor. They prefer it enough to pay significantly more for the vehicle.
They’re not selling the Fit at a loss, it’s just not as profitable as other models and the fucked US market is a great excuse to push more profitable models. And yeah like clueless mentioned, it’s overall sales, most of the 50k sold one year still exist the next year and so on. Adds up to hundreds of thousands of buyers and cars, not to mention the used market, likely hundreds of thousands more buyers.
Sorry your bonus is getting fucked, but don’t forget to take a look at what your execs are getting for their bonus this year. I doubt they’re taking a hit.
If the Fit was profitable it would still be on sale here. It isn’t like other small cars where the assembly line was repurposed to build a higher margin product. Honda is still turning out the Jazz for other markets but not the USA.
The Fit died when it was resigned for the 4th gen and it didn’t make sense for Honda to spend many millions to sell 30K (or less) a year while paying CAFE fines on every one sold.
(A Fit in 2025 would be required to get 67 mpg CAFE / 47 mpg EPA combined. )
To add to that, America is poorly designed for Kei cars. They are best suited to cities with little space, which there are in the US, but these are not going to sell enough, because of the other part that is mentioned, culture.
Our culture is not anywhere close to Japan’s, in which kei cars are a part of life because of how rules and regulations brought them to the market. It would take a massive shift in our culture which I don’t ever see happening.
If you’re talking specifically about Kei class Japanese cars, I agree. If you’re talking about similar but not exact, disagree. Smaller cars are incredibly useful in most US cities, especially for parking in what seem to be ever shrinking parking spots. Most importantly, it’s a portion of the market that basically doesn’t exist in the US today.
The one thing I am not sure about is how much of the blame lays upon dealers. Commission-based salespeople would have no incentive to sell smaller, cheaper cars to people.
Sure, but you make more money selling one cheap car than selling zero more expensive cars. If I were a dealer, I’d be looking at the figures and seeing that there are a lot of people in the budget new / low-mid-price used car market, and basically nothing to sell to those people. Used cars are either new enough that they’re nearly as expensive as new cars, or are old and used up or have lots of problems.
That may be the way of things NOW, with car prices being so unaffordable, but historically, dealers had every incentive to upsell people the largest, highest-trim cars they could get their customers into.
Last new car I bought, special ordered, the sales manager told me the salesman only made $25.
I don’t know if that’s true, but I pointed out he took the sale from a competing dealer.
His store had quoted me high when I first went in.
There’s definitely a market for small, cheap cars. It’s not a huge market in America, but it’s there. Those cars just don’t make the kind of profit margins that big corporations like, and they figured out if they just don’t make those cars, people will just buy bigger, more expensive cars on long, high interest rate loans. It’s not a lack of consumer demand, it’s corporate greed.
This is what I came to say, its not that they don’t sell, its that they don’t make as much money. I mean a civic is like $25k to $50k now, and midsize trucks are rough too. You aren’t getting an American one for less than $40k with decent options. The Tacoma maxes out at the starting price of a GX550! BRZ is like $10k more than it was 10 years ago.
Even people that can easily afford new cars have stopped buying them.
Auto manufacturers won’t be the first companies to tank their own industry.
YTD though November S&P Global is showing 14.7 million sales. That is 300K ahead of 2024. We are looking at 16 million +/- vehicles in 2025 which would be the best year since 2019.
There is also the reality that many automakers are no longer chasing market share by overproducing then selling cars with massive incentives.
You should also mention that most kei cars have struggled for sales even in Europe with bigger engines and more conventional gearboxes. Ultimately they are Galapagos cars that make a great deal of sense in the environment they’re designed for but often lose the value comparison in markets that are less size and power constrained.
Oh I think there’s plenty of potential customers here in America IF they have a similar price to their JDM counterparts. So many people are fed up with new and new-ish used cars being crazy expensive, while affordable used cars are on their last legs a lot of the time. A new box on wheels with good space utilization and great fuel economy for under $15,000 should sell like hotcakes, especially if there are multiple such cars on the market so they’re normalized – you’re not automatically recognized as having bought the cheapest car on the market, because there are several similarly priced cars out there.
As for cheap small cars not selling well here in the recent past, have you seen those cars? No, you probably haven’t, because companies barely marketed them if at all. People are unlikely to buy cars they can’t find or don’t know exist… But also, there were barely any options, and most of them were just not good cheap cars. No fun to look at, no fun to drive (and plagued with CVTs), not immune to dealer markups, and not always great quality either. We haven’t had any real cheap AND cheerful cars in a long time. That’s where Kei vehicles come in – they’re heaps of fun! They have fun designs that are full of character, making them instantly appealing to consumers, and as far as I’ve heard they’re pleasant to drive too.
If nothing else, I think they can be a profitable niche product if regulations allow them to be sold here without a substantial redesign from JDM specs. Homologation is expensive and prevents most things from being sold here, but if Kei cars are being legalized, it sounds to me like Kei regulations are being adopted as a new category of road legal vehicle, likely exempting them from size-based CAFE standards.
If one thing does change from Japanese standards though, it should probably be engine size. Even the Kei cars Japanese automakers sold abroad had export market specific versions with larger engines. I’d love a Kei car, but it’ll need to be able to cruise on the highway comfortably (as in, engine not screaming from over-exertion).
Another factor that I think is important to consider is that new Kei cars could be affordable enough for young adults to consider buying one. Younger generations don’t necessarily have the same biases against small efficent cars that older generations do – if anything, there’s an increasing resentment of large, inefficient trucks and SUVs. Kei cars are a way to make a countercultural statement, like the VW Beetle used to be, and they’re a heck of a lot more attainable than something like a Prius.
I for one have assumed that I’d never own a new car, simply because they’re prohibitively expensive and that makes them too big of a risk. If Kei cars were sold here, though? I could actually see myself buying one new, because it wouldn’t be a huge financial burden, and would be extremely useful. So, this news is exciting to me and gives me hope.
“A new box on wheels with good space utilization and great fuel economy for under $15,000 should sell like hotcakes”
NO – They won’t. As recently as 5 years ago you could get a selection of cheap boxes on wheels for $15K – $17K range and they did not sell. Spark, Sonic, Mirage, Yaris, Fit, Rio, Accent. They did not sell and where cancelled. People in that price point will almost alway take a CPO used but nicer car vs the new but cheap car.
I actually had a 2016 Spark EV. It was a small basic car that did all car required things just fine. I’m actually thinking of get a gas version as a toad.
Those cars sold, but they weren’t selling hundreds of thousands of units a year. We’re just in a stage of Capitalism now where manufacturers need everything to be an immediate gold mine of guaranteed massive profit or else they won’t even bother. I have no doubt there would be buyers of kei cars, but it just won’t be worth anyone’s while to sell them here, even if the Orange One somehow makes them legal.
They didn’t sell in high enough volume to make a profit.
No automaker is making massive profit margins. Most risk billions every year to get a profit margin that you can beat with a guaranteed CD or Treasury.
We are at a stage of capitalism where automaker will no longer subsidize the sale of cheap cars with profits from models that actually make money.
“We are at a stage of capitalism where automaker will no longer subsidize the sale of cheap cars with profits from models that actually make money.”
There are two main reasons for that… the footprint rule and modern hybrid/BEV tech.
The first is obvious. With the second, in the past to get a vehicle with great fuel economy, you had to go small and light with a tiny engine.
These days? To get the best fuel economy, you get a BEV… or the next best thing, a regular or plug-in hybrid.
With the large scale production of hybrids and BEVs, many of the people who used to buy small cars switched to larger hybrids or BEVs. Sure they cost more upfront. But the fuel savings negated much of the price difference and they are much more pleasant to live with compared to the small economy car of the past.
Yes, before the footprint rule every automaker had to sell small and underpowered cars to meet CAFE rules. Most where sold at a loss – subsidized by other vehicle sales.
Hybrids and BEVs are why even if we got rid of the footprint rule we will not see a return to small compact cars and hatches.
Dude, speaking as a zoomer, the middle class has shrunk drastically in the last 5 years. More and more hardworking people are priced out of reliable cars, big or small. I’ve known a good handful of people myself who were without transportation for a year +, some of them working multiple jobs trying to make ends meet.
We need a new Geo Metro.
The Trax is the new Metro and it is cheaper than a 1995 Metro
In 1995 a Metro cost the median household 12.8 weeks of work. The 2024 Trax cost 12.7 weeks.
The middle class is shrinking and splitting. Some households are moving up and some down. More households are moving up than down which is why the median household income is increasing after adjusting for inflation.
There are lots of things we can do as a society to address this. It won’t be solved by automakers selling new small cars at a loss.
While the Trax may be roughly the same number of weeks of work as far as cost is concerned, I would be curious as to how many weeks of work a home, home insurance, car insurance, a kid’s college education, a family’s healthcare, etc costs now vs then. Any increase in any of those reduces the number of weeks of work simply available for the car purchase if you catch my drift, i.e. the relative available buying power since the days of the Metro. I’d be surrised if ANY of them are as similar as the Trax/Metro (and yes the Trax is a FAR nicer car than a Metro with the exception of fuel cost however may not exhibit the same longevity.)
The Real Median Household Income is up 28% vs 1995.
(C-CPI includes rent, insurance, heathcare, transportation, education….)
Real Median Household Income in the United States (MEHOINUSA672N) | FRED | St. Louis Fed
Ask potential customers about their dealer experience. I have only had that happen twice. One was Honda.
I had done some work for a gm dealers home and he was very happy.
Made a point of finding who did the work and told me to call him if I was in the market for a car.
Main issue was gm didn’t offer a manual except in a 3 speed, but worse was they quoted me high prices, then steered me to their used lot.
They knew the owner referred me, but didn’t take it seriously, I think.
Later he called me after I had bought elsewhere, and he was furious at his sales people.
I assume since you are talking about 3 speed manuals this was decades ago.
Small cars didn’t die out in the last 10 years because of dealer experience. They have died across the board at every automaker.
GM, Ford, Dodge, Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Mazda, VW. All of them dropped their smallest car and some multiple small cars.
But the only impact eliminating regs will have to make this happen is to make it possible for it to get lower gas mileage and have lower crashworthiness.
You can buy a Kia K4 today for <23k with 190 hp, multiple airbags, a suite of safety sensing equipment, and gets 29 city/39 hwy. Is anyone really lining up to pay 15k for a car with no standard safety equipment that also can’t get out of its own way but still only gets 30 mpg?
No, at least not in the real world of people paying for things with their own money.
People that understand it will pay for repairable cars.
It’s like the guy is running out of lies to tell. Seriously, we’re scraping the bottom of the barrel here.
I just lost 25 lbs, I am ready to fit in them
I predict that commercial fleets would buy kei trucks in droves if they’re cheaper than current offerings. Or hatchback kei cars for food delivery.
Some of the Air Force bases I was stationed at had a few kei trucks and vans. The DoD bought them because they were multitudes cheaper to buy and fuel than the crew cab F250 diesels that they normally purchase.
I work on a base and used to drive a kei truck for my job. They’re almost perfect for getting around an industrial area or military base. The speed limits are low enough even a kei car can easily keep up with anything, you can haul just about anything you’d need, you can (relatively) comfortably transport 2 people (in the truck versions), and they can be parked anywhere (parking can be at a premium, and maneuvering a full-sized truck is often just not possible). All this while still having better creature comforts (ie. heating in the winter) than most side by sides, while still having a smaller footprint.
I’ve also heard that they can make shockingly good drift vehicles when things get snowy…
There is no safety argument to be made about Kei cars as long as motorcycles are legally sold in the USA.
Where I live it’s legal to ride without a helmet. I see this frequently.
I think TheDrunkenWrench’s comment brings up a good counterpoint here, commercial fleets would go nuts for these, and I tend to think employers should be required to provide their employees airbags, while on-duty. This has me torn; I’m also very tempted by the forbidden fruit lol.
Luckily, TFG just lies about s**t he doesn’t understand, and has mostly incompetent sycophants around him, so we needn’t worry too much…
So many commas omg should’ve proofread that
I just thought you were writing beat poetry. In that context, it works just fine.
Airbags won’t be a big issue, crumple zones would be.
Nah, your legs are the crumple zones…
I like my legs so I take isuue with that.
I didn’t claim it was an ideal situation…
The man can barely string multiple sentences together, color me skeptical that anything will come of this
Well, possibly two things will come out of it:
1) AAMVA will start their morning angry that the Annoying Orange pissed in their Wheaties
2) Somebody will be enjoying another million-dollar lunch at Mar-a-Lago next week, courtesy of AAMVA
In the end, no, we probably won’t be getting new Kei cars any time soon…
Just an update for you: Biden isn’t president anymore.
Buddy both of them have their brains melting out of their ears
Just an update for you: the current occupant of the White House is dumber, less coherent, more volatile, and more easily controlled by moneyed interests… than anyone who ever held that position.
Weren’t we supposed to annex Canada by now? Or was that Greenland…
Why not both? And what about those $1000 checks that were supposed to go out to all the taxpayers?
What do you mean? We’ll get exactly what this is intended to bring: more profits for oil companies.
Sure, making Kei cars “legal” will not bring Kei cars here. But the mechanism of cutting regulations that hypothetically allows for Kei cars will also likely allow for even larger, thirstier, and more dangerous trucks for the wealthy!!
We will not be getting Kei cars here.
Let alone ones built here in the USA.
This guy’s mouth is like a 6 month old babies ass.
Full of soft shit, (like his brain) that leaks out each time his pie hole opens up…
Screw the bullshit. I just want a President who is not a babbling idiot liar.
Is that too much to ask for?
Apparently so.
Remember when Dan Quayle misspelled “potatoes” that one time and everyone thought he was a blithering idiot unsuitable for public office because of it?
Who ever thought we’d wistfully recall the Dubya era?
Liberals seem to love whitewashing Bush’s legacy
Seems more a statement of astonishment after we all thought no one could do worse.
If you only acknowledge things that happen to people in this country then I’m sure it does seem worse.
You are missing the point… which is to compare that admin to the current one. They both suck, but the current one sucks so much more that the old one seems quaint (even with the war crimes).
A doozy of a parenthetical there boss
Thanks. Can’t argue with that logic.
There’s not much use in arguing with someone who thinks war crimes aren’t that big of a deal
Actually, there’s no use arguing with someone who can’t understand context clues.
I never said “war crimes aren’t that big of a deal.”
In fact, the implication is that this current admin has done that, and worse.
But carry on.
The current administration hasn’t done the same or worse. They’ve done fewer and different, the main difference being that he’s doing some of it in the US instead of mostly towards people in the middle east. It’s not a competition and Trump being a more blatant fascist doesn’t mean you have to hand it to the fascists that pretended to be decent while doing everything they could to set up a more fascist country. It’s just goofy shit that’s completely unnecessary and ahistorical.
K.
Forget that I’m making you mad for pointing this out and actually look at the reality of the situation. Bush Jr. and his father and everyone that’s been tied to the Republican fascist project since the Nixon administration are more directly responsible for Trump coming to power than Trump himself is. They may have put on the auspices of decency and respect but they were responsible for millions of deaths, financial ruin, and preserving corruption and white supremacy in this country. None of them deserve an ounce of grace. You can hate Trump and his administration without propping up the evil people who drove the country to this point.
K.
Not only that, but he misspelled it because he was given the misspelling on a cue card. He had good reason to believe that the people running the spelling bee knew better than he did.
I remember Danny making 4+ years of dumbass statements while GHW Bush & Co attempted damage control.
Yeah, the potato incident was probably a blessing for them because people focused on that instead of everything else.
True, but that’s the one that always sticks out. And the current guy has gone through Quayle’s four years worth in less than one.
So he’s talking about domestically producing kei class cars in the US? That’s never going to happen.
But for the sake of argument, let’s pretend that this does happen. If somehow this becomes a thing, will all kei class cars be grandfathered in legally at the federal level? I live in a state that is hostile to kei car ownership. I sold my Suzuki Capuccino before moving here since I could not register or insure it here.
The man is barely more lucid than a dying houseplant.
This will result in breathless articles from every automotive media outlet for the next two weeks before nothing ends up happening.
Get rid of the max engine displacement and the max horsepower gentlemans’ agreement while we’re at it. I want inexpensive RWD Kei-sized cars with big V8 engines, Cummins turbodiesels, and 1,000+ horsepower EV drive systems dammit!
They’d be like those little Penny Racer toys from when we were kids… CONSTANT WHEELIES LOL
It would be glorious.
With an oversized engine, a mid-engined design would help mitigate this a bit. I’d still want to have the machine’s weight distribution balanced. I like the idea of inexpensive, low-maintenance, easy-to-repair, fuel-efficient hoonables that can corner and maneuver very well with a skilled driver behind the wheel(and are constantly trying to kill said driver if they slip up). The greater the percentage of the car being powertrain the better, the lighter the car the better, and the more aerodynamically efficient the car the better.
TVR is the manufacturer that most closely fits this ethos, and I love them for it, but they have consistently also fallen well short of what is possible with a focus on aesthetics over platform efficiency. Lotus prior to being taken over by Geely would be a close second.
Kei cars are sufficiently tiny that legalizing them in the USA would open up so many interesting design possibilities.
Factory Fives can come in under 2500 lbs with a V8.
Probably hyper milers with a hot four cylinder?
If placed in a streamliner with a CdA comparable to or more slippery than a GM EV1, while keeping the entire car under 2,500 lbs, you could turn an LS2 V8 into a hypermiler. I bet 50+ mpg highway is possible with such a setup. Screw 4 cylinders.
“We don’t want to count our chickens before they hatch”
Don’t you mean “we don’t want to count our chickens before they’re taxed”?
Yeah, alas, to think we could’ve had all those cool air-cooled VW pickup trucks, those equally cool Citroën H-vans, etc, etc…
This is an excellent joke. Please applaud this man.
Aw, shucks, thanks!
We did get the Subaru BRAT with the jump seats so there’s that…
I was in Tokyo about a month ago, and you’re not gonna believe what I saw: a kei van modified with a nose job to look like a Citroen H-van. I’m not kidding! I have a photo!
Very good
Well done. And H vans rule.
Still hard to believe Ford had a meeting and decided to stop selling Ranger pickups, because “there wasn’t a market for them”.
Yeah, especially since the Ranger would’ve been produced right here in America so no Chicken Tax. Go figure.
Guessing the profit margin, while indeed existent, wasn’t sufficiently large to please the stockholders/owners… don’t know what Ford’s threshold for profit margins is but it may be similar to Disney’s which is why Disney gave the Spruce Goose the unceremonious and all too rapid boot when they acquired the venue where the Spruce Goose was housed. Seems that even though the Spruce Goose’s venue had made a profit most years with the occasional breaking even and rarely in the red and was actually improving Disney determined the profit margin did not meet their threshold. Heck, Disney actually threatened to have the Spruce Goose scrapped and when reminded of the bad optics they gave an inconscionably short deadline, which thankfully was extended, to have the Spruce Goose moved (it’s now in McMinnville, Oregon.) Yeah, a pox on Disney…
“ I’ve authorized the secretary to immediately approve the production of those cars, so you’ll be able to buy the”
That isn’t how regulations work.
Quiet, piggy.
COTD here!
Take your star.
That is how dictatorships work though. Next thing he’ll propose some kind of ‘people’s car’.
American Lada incoming.
Except it’ll probably literally just be imported Ladas and Bukhankas from his buddy.
Keis can not and will not ever be able to meet US crash safety standards. End of story. The random side comment from President Sundowner will not change this fact.
They’ll get exemptions. If you look around the US the only vehicles anything like a kei car are the smaller UTVs. So my guess would be that there’ll be a loosening of the regulations to make those 50-state legal on the street.
Safety standards aren’t written in stone, they can be changed or given exemptions
Unfortunately they’re usually written in blood, which is why unilaterally discarding them is typically bad policy.
Where the hell did I say anything about unilaterally discarding safety standards?
Sorry, not saying you did. There’s just a popular talking point (including the gist of the reasoning behind this announcement) that slashing regulations will reduce costs so that’s where we should focus our attention, but those claims rarely acknowledge the reasons for the regulation.
Works for the airlines
Any day now RFK Jr. will tell people that airbags cut your head off and seatbelts keep you from being flung clear and free from danger.
As a daily driver of a kei car, I fully support! They are much more feasible and livable than people think to drive one every day, even going 80mph (about max speed) on the highway is fine with the right wheels and tires.
I would say it probably depends more on the vehicle, a 4WD Acty, probably not, something like an Alto Works, sure
Sure this is something that we can all agree on, but we shouldn’t forget that the manner in which this is done is absolutely not ok. Assuming that it’s even possible, the president should not be able to just change auto regulations on the fly.
How does a kei car compare to a BMW i3, size- and power-wise?
I can’t compare it to the bmw, but the van I drove had a small three cylinder engine.
I put two Altec 604 speakers in it.
Could not recline the seat, but the doors closed with them inside.
I drove an imported kei van to Denver.
It ran out of steam on hills and at altitude, but it did fine on the streets of Denver.
In theory, sure, sound great, but there are so many regulations all riddled through FMVSS that would have to be repealed or heavily modified to make this possible, I’m not going to hold my breath
Put this in the column of crap that will never happen. Would it be cool for an extremely small minority of buyers? Yes, which the fact I described the market as extremely small is part one on why it will never happen.
Like his health care plan… oh wait here it is. If you can’t afford the insurance just go die. Speaking of which. Can you imagine what insurers would do to these? Visualize your basic Karen in a 3 ton SUV not seeing you in the right hand lane. Squish.
If you can’t afford insurance then you should just probably die…/s
“If they would rather die, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population”
Remember back when Ebeneezer Scrooge was considered a reprehensible character and not basically the avatar for a political party?
Same as a motorcycle or a bicycle.
Which is why I tell my grandkids while bicycling: Never Trust A Car. Also why I have not been on a motorcycle for decades. I am curious about when Red stoplights became optional, nevermind the stop signs.
Red lights and stop signs became optional at the same time “DEFUND THE POLICE!!” became a thing.
Weird how that works.
No manufacturer is going to build Kei-class cars in the US. No Japanese automaker is going to lose money by importing them. And American buyers aren’t going to be lining up to squeeze themselves into a vehicle designed for someone half their size. I’d say Trump is aware of this but “Trump” and “awareness” aren’t exactly on speaking terms these days.
I’ll believe it when I see it. He regularly spouts crap he knows nothing about and I don’t see this as anything different.
How dare he get away with Kimmeling!
I would totally buy a Kei van or truck! Although the possibility of this actually happening is slim to none despite Trump running his mouth.
Kei cars would solve my “last mile” problem, deploying one from the bed of my F250 commuter.
I’m reading this as “build them here”, not “import them.” It would take many years for an American automaker to make one which would wind up costing as much as a compact car. Then tell the customer they can’t drive on the Interstate. There’s just not enough of a market. He saw something shiny and wants to pretend he invented it.
We can just 3D print them here, ball ’em up, and toss in the recycling bin.
Also he’s comparing them to a Beetle so he’s thinking of these in terms of an austerity vehicle for us normal folks more than anything. A peoples car if you will.
A Trumpbant, perhaps.
Trumph Shitfire
This one got me with an audible laugh at my desk. Well done
A people’s car, that’s a fantastic idea, I’m surprised nobody thought of that before, its the kind of new thinking that could really build Trump’s legacy. Why can’t other national leaders have ideas like that?
Because 99% of Orange’s ideas are as well formed as baby shit…that’s why.
Sort of a Strength Through Joy car?
KDF-wagen, ja?
Note that I wrote that before the Somali outburst.
Question; Does Trump know he’s married to a woman who has third world citizenship?
She can demand to see a manager in six languages.
Even if they change those regulations to allow these cars, the next administration will probably kill it for safety and emission reasons.
It could be, although I’ve been surprised how many things do carry forward, even in a time of perceived polarity.
Nodding. That is true. Drive the Carretilla by Chevrolet!
I fully expect the next administration to be too weak to reintroduce any regulation that would be lobbied against
Use “State of Emergency” powers
Welcome news. Not sure if it will really go anywhere, but nonetheless, if the President must blow up things, I’d rather it be archaic or arbitrary regulations like this. Now, drop the tariff insanity and get us those delicious Chinese BEVs!
Sounds like another pile of Trump mouth diarrhea. Even if it were true, microcars and subcompacts don’t sell in adequate volume here for any manufacturer to tool up for it, so it ain’t gonna happen.
Gasp! Do you also doubt those tariff checks? We’ll get them any day now. Aaaaany day. I recommend that all Trump supporters stand by their mailboxes with their mouths open regardless of the weather until those sweet tariff checks get dropped off.
A well timed check before the midterms wouldn’t surprise me, especially if the AI bubble bursting crashes the economy in time.
A regular Kei car would not sell, but I bet you the Kei trucks, vans and Jimny jeeps would sell decently well.
They would be competing in an established UTV market, which would be a tough sell. Not saying I don’t want one, but I have a hard time seeing them succeed.
UTVs aren’t road legal, kei trucks that are somehow made to comply with FMVSS would be, which would make them substantially more practical and better value for money.
Agreed. But it would also seriously depend on the market. Here in Texas, the trucks would sell like crazy. Lots of ranchers have them, I’ve seen people use them for delivery busineses (think picking up packages and dropping them off at the post office), and there’s a general level of interest. It is the right tool for the job in many cases, not the hulking F350 they use to tow trailers.
I just don’t see them as primary cars for like 99% of the US. I’d love to daily one, but I know I’m in the minority. There needs to be a huge culture shift for them to really make any sort of sense beyond a second vehicle.
I think it would be a small niche market. The smallest car sold here was the Smart car which you’d see a few here or there but not large amounts.
I would not want to drive one of these in my neck of the woods. The texting, speeding, full-size SUV is far too common. Most Americans will likely agree unless we have a real culture change toward accepting adequate as enough.
Yeah. What really drove that home for me was seeing was a lady on her phone, on a twisty hilly road…with kids in the back. She almost ran off the road at one point. I love driving my old Beetle but there are places around here I would never drive it.
I wonder if the Amish would buy them?
Yeah, but they’d have to tow it around with a little horse.
Their thing is more about separation from the outer world.
Some groups allow cars, but typically blackout chrome and frou frou.
They are quicker to use technology for work.
Propane freezers and solar power aren’t rare.
2 seater cars that arent sports cars are sales proof in the US, even 2 seater sports cars are difficult. The ForFour would have had a better shot
I trust whatever comes out of his mouth as far as I can throw a kei car.
which is at least further than you could throw a regular car.
Especially a regular American car