Home » Study Says Drivers Are More Likely To Use Their Phones While Speeding Which Makes Me Way More Scared Of Everyone Else On The Road

Study Says Drivers Are More Likely To Use Their Phones While Speeding Which Makes Me Way More Scared Of Everyone Else On The Road

Lady Texting While Driving A Car, Risking A Road Accident

Texting while driving is illegal in 49 out of 50 states because it takes both your eyes off the road and takes at least one of your hands from the controls, making for an incredibly dangerous situation (Montana doesn’t have a law banning it, if you’re curious). I’ve only attempted texting while driving a few times in my life, and it felt sketchy enough for me to swear off the practice for good.

Banging out texts to the group chat at the speed limit is one thing—at least you’re only breaking one law. But some people even text and drive while they’re breaking the speed limit, which feels like an even more potent recipe for disaster. According to a new study released by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), there is a correlation between speeding and cell phone use. And it’s not the good kind.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

The study, which used data from insurance companies’ safe-driving apps on driver phones to collect data, found that drivers are actually more likely to use their phones while speeding. According to the IIHS, this flips the commonly held notion that drivers usually only use their phones at slower speeds, and highlights how frequently people might be combining two dangerous driving activities.

The Results Paint A Scary Picture

In the nationwide study, the IIHS found that as people increased their speed over the speed limit, their cellphone usage also increased. The correlation shifts greatly depending on what type of road the user was on. For example, on highways and other limited-access roads, where you need to enter via a dedicated on-ramp, the share of driving time handling a phone rose by 12% for every 5 mph drivers went over the limit. But on roads where you have to be more actively involved in driving, that percentage dropped. From the IIHS’s release:

On other roads, such as arterials and routes that connect towns, every 5 mph over the local limit was linked to a smaller 3% increase in phone handling. These roads often have traffic lights, intersections, roundabouts and stop signs that require drivers to take action periodically, even when traffic is flowing.

04xx26 News Img 20260406 123217 032
Source: IIHS

You’d think that as speed limits grow, people would be more attentive behind the wheel, since stuff is going by faster and incidents can occur in the blink of an eye. But according to the data, the opposite is happening. Scarily, the IIHS found that phone usage actually goes up as the speed limits increase. From the report:

The increases were larger on roads with higher posted limits. On limited-access roads with 70 mph limits, for example, for every 5 mph a vehicle exceeded the limit there was a 9% larger increase in phone handling than on similar roads with 55 mph limits.

A similar pattern showed up on roads with more access than freeways. Compared with roads posted at 25 or 30 mph, there was a 3% larger increase in phone handling for every 5 mph drivers exceeded the limit on 45 or 50 mph roads and a 7% larger increase on 55 mph roads.

Why are people mixing and matching these two law-breaking activities? The IIHS has several theories. The simplest is that drivers who take more risks—a.k.a., those who more often use their phone behind the wheel or speed regularly—are more likely to risk doing those things at the same time. Another factor, according to the organization, is related to stress. It references research that shows phone use and speeding spike (separately, independent of each other) during rush hour and school drop-off times.

The IIHS says that it could also be as simple as drivers responding to road cues like lighter traffic, fewer pedestrians, and long gaps between traffic devices like stop signs and stoplights, where you actually have to be an active participant in driving. It sort of makes sense—when you’re cruising down an open, high-speed highway with no traffic and tons of visibility, you might feel more comfortable grabbing your phone to send off a quick text, even if you’re already going 10 mph over the limit.

How They Got The Data

Hot Line 80s Nec Phone Ts
Don’t want to be tracked? This is the only foolproof way.

Depending on how you feel about data tracking and big corporations watching your every move, the methodology for getting this level of data will be either deeply fascinating or deeply unsettling. The IIHS analyzed nearly 600,000 trips across the United States between July and October 2024, excluding Alaska, California, Hawaii, and New York. Such a large sample size wouldn’t have been possible if not for the immense amount of tracking data that can now be extracted from each user’s phone, thanks to telemetry-monitoring apps tied to insurance. From the report:

More nuanced information about driver behavior has recently become available with the proliferation of safe-driving apps. These apps, which promise cost savings for drivers who enroll, let insurers adjust premiums based on how each person drives. Using a smartphone’s GPS and other sensors, the apps track speed and location, time of day, events like hard braking and rapid acceleration, and phone use. With large amounts of aggregated data, researchers can now measure phone use much more comprehensively than before.

The study included only trips that lasted longer than 18 minutes and involved at least two minutes on an interstate. The data, supplied to the IIHS by Cambridge Mobile Telematics (CMT), also excluded any driving time spent more than 5 mph under the speed limit, to eliminate data produced from heavy traffic.

If you’re wondering exactly how the study determined a driver was handling their phone while driving, the IIHS provides a pretty detailed explanation that makes me scared to even touch my phone while I’m in my car:

Drivers were counted as handling their phones when the phone’s internal gyroscope detected a significant rotation while the screen was unlocked. The phone-handling rate was calculated as total phone-handling time divided by total driving time. To identify speeding, CMT matched each trip’s GPS location to a speed-limit database. The IIHS researchers then used statistical methods to estimate phone-handling rates for limited-access roads and other thoroughfares, across different posted limits and with different levels of speeding (for example, 5-10 mph over a 60-65 mph limit on a limited-access road).

Bad driver or not, it’s a reminder that no, you’re not crazy, and yes, your phone is monitoring your every move at all times.

What Can Be Done?

While those monitoring apps mentioned above incentivize safer driving by offering lower premiums to people who go the speed limit and don’t touch their phone while behind the wheel, the results from this study prove they can’t ever really fully eliminate the problem.

Operation Hard Hat New York State Troopers Police 8
Source: New York State Police

Police are already on the lookout for speeders and cell phone users, but most of the time, those two types of enforcement happen separately. The IIHS suggests the best way to approach this is to develop safety cameras that monitor for both speed and cellphone use at the same time. Road cameras designed to catch phone users in the act have been used overseas, in places like China, for years now.

Another idea the IIHS doesn’t mention in its news piece on the study, but does mention in the study abstract, is to make roads seem more convoluted to keep drivers’ attention:

Countermeasures that raise perceived roadway complexity may also reduce the likelihood of both phone manipulation and speeding.

How exactly road builders would go about making highways more complex isn’t clear. Maybe a bollard that pops up from the ground once in a while, at a random time in the day? Or a stoplight that turns red every 45.6 minutes? Maybe highway workers can simply start occasionally releasing robot dogs into the road that drivers need to avoid. That would certainly get me off my phone and lock into the act of driving. If you have a better idea, I’d love to hear about it in the comments.

Top graphic image: DepositPhotos.com

 

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
157 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RallyMech
RallyMech
4 days ago

I average approx 700mi a week, with 95%+ being 70mph interstate. The number of people I see on their phones is one of the reasons I don’t speed. Lately I’ve been averaging 1 avoided wreck per week, and 10ish cars driving in the dark with their lights off. A large percentage of both categories involve the driver having a visibly unlocked phone in their hand.

Ricardo M
Member
Ricardo M
4 days ago

People have a “natural” speed they want to travel at on any given road, and for most people in most modern vehicles, that speed is above the legal limit.

Speeding is rarely an active decision, it’s the passive state of traveling at a speed that doesn’t require the driver to consciously hold back the car. Drivers should constantly make that effort, but the performance, size and isolation of modern cars really isn’t helping them with that.

Most people only stop speeding when traffic becomes an obstruction, and that’s the exact condition that also discourages phone use, because that’s the condition with the most things happening around the driver that they might have to react to.

Pit-Smoked Clutch already made this point, but I typed this comment before I read theirs, so I’m posting it anyway.

Pat Rich
Pat Rich
5 days ago

I’m not really surprised. This is like finding out that the guy that cut you off in the line also parks badly.

Pit-Smoked Clutch
Member
Pit-Smoked Clutch
6 days ago

Another way to write this headline is “Drivers are more likely to use their phones in light traffic.” STOP THE PRESSES!

Kleinlowe
Member
Kleinlowe
6 days ago

Countermeasures that raise perceived roadway complexity may also reduce the likelihood of both phone manipulation and speeding.

Once again, my proposal to improve our highways with jump pads, boost arrows, and question blocks proves forward thinking and sensible. And they laughed at me! They LAUGHED!

TurboFarts
Member
TurboFarts
6 days ago

Speeding = increased risk
Texting while driving = increased risk

Risk taker more likely to take risk…

Don’t need a study to get to the conclusion in the article.

Dolsh
Member
Dolsh
7 days ago

I tried to text while walking earlier today and almost killed myself (or at least, almost walked into a wall), so I have no idea how people do this when they’re moving 70x faster.

Dirtywrencher
Member
Dirtywrencher
7 days ago

2 things that amaze me every day:
People on their phones to or from work.
People smoking pot on the way to work.
WFH 2 days a week has helped my sanity.
I am so jealous of countries with good public transit.
I will appreciate when I retire at the end of the year and can increase my ratio of pleasure driving to required driving.

Scott Wangler
Scott Wangler
7 days ago

If using Wayz to check for cops counts as using my phone than I am one who goes faster using my phone.

M SV
M SV
7 days ago

More convoluted doesn’t work. It’s just makes the situation worse. I’ve witnessed absolutely insane behaviors in convoluted messes of interchanges where the civil engineers should have lost their heads for crimes against logic.

I’m not so sure it’s any worse them before cell phones or texting were common place either. It used to be pretty common to look over and see someone reading the paper while driving or doing makeup. Smoking a cigarette with one hand drink in the other. The nanny features they have added probably have helped some feel more secure and then they mess up or the illogical person gets in a vehicle without it and causes bigger issues. I’ve heard that used as an excuse in a vehicle that didn’t have the feature. “The other car I drive steers for me.”

Some extremely moronic interchanges where you have you get dumped off on one side of 8 lanes and have to get to the other side with in a mile or so. You see absolutely horrific behavior of people doing tiktoks while driving and swerving all over.

Last edited 7 days ago by M SV
Drew
Member
Drew
7 days ago

Countermeasures that raise perceived roadway complexity may also reduce the likelihood of both phone manipulation and speeding.

This strongly correlates with this:

The IIHS says that it could also be as simple as drivers responding to road cues like lighter traffic, fewer pedestrians, and long gaps between traffic devices like stop signs and stoplights, where you actually have to be an active participant in driving.

I’ve been seeing headlines pop up about this, but it seems so simple–people driving under the speed limit are often doing so because of something external that causes them to drive carefully and be more aware, such as children, animals, or road conditions. Seems like those people would be less likely to use their phones at that point (and, conversely, seems like people using their phones might not notice things that should cause them to slow down).

The only somewhat shocking part is that a significant number of people download the insurance’s nanny app and proceed to do the things that the app is designed to monitor.

Last edited 7 days ago by Drew
Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
7 days ago

And yet fucking around with your giant touchscreen attached to the car is perfectly fine, and not monitored at all. Makes perfect sense…

It’s not the holding of the phone that is the distraction. You only need one hand and one foot to operate a vehicle with an automatic (or no) transmission. It’s the paying attention to anything that isn’t the driving of the car that is a problem.

Distracted driving is distracted driving – it doesn’t matter HOW you are distracted.

Anonymous Person
Anonymous Person
7 days ago
Reply to  Kevin Rhodes

And yet fucking around with your giant touchscreen attached to the car is perfectly fine, and not monitored at all. Makes perfect sense…

The touchscreen on our 2024 Trax has a lot of its functions disabled while the vehicle is in motion. I would love to be able to switch to a different playlist on the USB drive while driving, however, I have to pull over to the shoulder and stop in order to do so. Once we start moving again, those type of functions get ‘greyed out’.

However, I can scan up and down the FM radio dial as much as I want while I’m driving so the system isn’t perfect.

M SV
M SV
7 days ago

I’m sure you can use a voice command to change to the Sirius xm station you want too.
They could have easily set up voice commands or mapped a button for the function you want but then you might not buy their premium subscription that you aren’t going to buy anyway.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
7 days ago

And yet in my cars I can do all those things by feel, because there are no touchscreens. And without being knocked around by bumps and hitting the wrong place, because it’s all physical controls, and on the Mercedes, which has a ridiculous amount of infotainment, your arm is firmly on the armwrest well supported and stable while you twiddle the Comand wheel. The Germans figured out how to make a complex system more reasonably safely navigable with iDrive/Comand, but even they have fallen for the touchscreen stupidity today.

Plus even aside from all that, touchscreens get absolutely disgusting in short order from finger grease. Yuck. When I had my GTI, I was cleaning it all the time even though I didn’t actually need to touch it to do much. Thankfully while my Fiata had one, I NEVER touched it because it also had the iDrive-alike scroll wheel.

Harveydersehen
Member
Harveydersehen
7 days ago

We need Torch to study the prevalence of gut bacteria on car touch screens, especially in light of the car seat toilet design he wrote about not long ago.

I’d invest in Lysol wipes futures just in case those seats become popular.

Last edited 7 days ago by Harveydersehen
Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
7 days ago

This should surprise absolutely no one. Everything within 100ft of a bathroom probably has some measurable amount of fecal matter on it. Humans are disgusting creatures.

CTSVmkeLS6
CTSVmkeLS6
7 days ago
Reply to  Kevin Rhodes

Agree 100%. Some you have to go in a menu to change heat or heated seats etc. Then hit a bump and press the wrong logo etc. Eyes off the road so much more.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
7 days ago
Reply to  CTSVmkeLS6

I find them infuriating due to that. And they get so damned disgusting so quickly from finger grease!

MikeInTheWoods
Member
MikeInTheWoods
7 days ago
Reply to  Kevin Rhodes

I came here to say the exact same thing. Dials and buttons for dashboards. You could just have the phone do some version of “airplane mode” when you start the car. People would never go for it. But cars are all screens anyway, and according to a different article here, they will be watching us inside after 2027 too. I’ll just be the old car driver who drives around all the screen tappers.

157
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x