Twenty-three years ago, one of the world’s most respected sports car marques unveiled an SUV. The original Porsche Cayenne rolled out to raised pitchforks, and it took a while for people to at least accept its styling, but it ended up being a remarkable machine. An SUV with a proper two-speed transfer case, locking differentials, available air suspension, a proper tow rating, and a Turbo model that could keep up with a BMW M5. Fast forward to the present, and history certainly has a way of rhyming. The Porsche Cayenne Electric is here, yet asking some Porsche diehards to accept electric propulsion is like asking a surf rocker to pick up a synthesizer. However, I don’t think enthusiasts have anything to worry about. You’re going to want to hear about what this thing can do.
Under the floor of the Cayenne Electric sits a 113 kWh battery pack, slightly larger than the one in a BMW iX but smaller than the long-range pack in a Ford F-150 Lightning. It’s actively cooled on both sides and integrates with an 800-volt architecture to DC fast charge at 390 kWh through the SUV’s NACS port. Or, if plugging in is a hassle, Porsche’s latest EV can be specced with wireless Level 2 charging. Yep, inductive charging for your whole EV. Out of the two launch models, the base trim with 402 horsepower is definitely the sensible choice. A launch control function whacks it up to 435 horsepower and 616 lb.-ft. of torque, good enough for a zero-to-62 mph dash in 4.8 seconds.
If you thought the idea of an electric SUV with a Turbo badge seemed silly, just wait until you get an earful of these numbers. While 844 horsepower in normal operation and 1,017 horsepower with the temporary overboost function enabled are already excessive, activating launch control in the electric Cayenne Turbo unlocks 1,139 horsepower and 1,106 lb.-ft. of torque. Porsche claims that’s good for a zero-to-62 mph run of 2.5 seconds, but that’s not the most impressive figure here. The top-spec electric Cayenne is said to run the quarter-mile in 9.9 seconds. If independent testing can replicate or beat those numbers, we’re looking at the quickest production SUV of all time.

For context, the quickest quarter-mile time Motor Trend coaxed out of the bonkers series two quad-motor Rivian R1S was 10.5 seconds. The Lucid Gravity Dream Edition clicked off a 10.6-second quarter-mile in the hands of Car And Driver. The Bugatti Veyron, the McLaren Senna, and the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ are all slower through the quarter-mile than this new electric Cayenne Turbo. It’s nearly as quick as a Porsche 918 Spyder, but that seven-figure hypercar sure isn’t rated to tow 7,716 pounds like the Cayenne Turbo is. What about the Tesla Model X Plaid? Well, the major magazines haven’t tested it, but CarWow was able to coax a quarter-mile time of ten seconds flat out of Silicon Valley’s fastest egg. Close, but no cigar.

Obviously, that sort of acceleration needs serious stopping power, so 600 kW of regenerative braking and optional carbon ceramic brakes combine forces on the Cayenne Turbo. As for ride and handling bits, adaptive dampers with air springs are standard, but you can option Porsche’s magic carpet Active Ride system if you’re the sort to want it all. It’s also worth noting that a limited-slip rear differential is standard on the Cayenne Turbo and optional on the base model, while four-wheel-steering is available as an extra on both cars. Promising stuff, and although Porsche is tight-lipped on range, Motor Trend managed more than 350 miles on a single charge in a pre-production unit.

On the outside, the Cayenne Electric looks unmistakably like a Cayenne. All the typical Porsche elements are here from the rear light bar to the Taycan-like headlights, just set in a larger mold. Up front, you get a pretty successful application of 911 Carrera GTS-style aero blades in the grille, and frameless windows and surprisingly normal door handles make an appearance in profile. It’s also worth mentioning that the wheels are large but not silly large. The biggest alloys you can spec measure 22 inches in diameter, and the smallest are dubs. Considering you can now get 20-inch wheels on a Mitsubishi Outlander, that sort of fitment is downright sensible on a 196.3-inch-long Porsche SUV.

What I’m not quite aesthetically sold on is the Porsche Active Aerodynamics system which includes extendable rear bumper fins on the Turbo model. While these should create a virtual longtail, they also look a bit weird. Then again, the whole rear bumper does have a generally blocky form, so perhaps it’s best to reserve final judgment until I see the Cayenne Electric in the metal.

Moving inside the Cayenne Electric, you’re immediately struck by a lot of screen. There’s a 14.25-inch OLED digital display for the gauges, a curved OLED infotainment screen, and a separate optional 14.9-inch OLED screen for the front passenger. It’s all so much screen that not much space has been prioritized for physical controls. There are rocker switches for temperature and fan speed, a scroll wheel for stereo volume, and that’s it. Everything else is either capacitive touch or in the screen, from turning on the heated seats to adjusting the climate control vent positions. On paper, it seems like a step backwards from the elegant simplicity of the combustion-powered Cayenne’s interior, and I’m afraid there’s a touch more bad news. The traditional V-shaped console-mounted grab handles are gone. Quelle tristesse.

On the plus side, at least Porsche has gone hard with color. Because not everyone wants a black interior, you can have a lavender one, or a sage one, or one in classic Pepita check. Changing the color of the gauge faces and general user interface is as easy as selecting a “Mood Mode”, heated armrests are unbelievably clutch, the available dimming moonroof seems nice, and that big tray with USB-C ports and plenty of phone storage seems more open than the console storage in the Macan Electric. I’d also want to try out the massive 87-inch augmented reality head up display, because it sounds pretty nuts.

Of course, the big reason why many people buy a Cayenne over a Macan is interior space, which continues to be a theme on the electric models. That five-inch wheelbase stretch ought to pay dividends when it comes to rear seat room, and you get 19.5 cu.-ft. (781 L) of cargo space with the rear seats up, 56.1 cu.-ft. (1,588 L) of cargo space with them down, and a 3.2 cu.-ft. (90 L) frunk for good measure. Pragmatic stuff.

What we have here seems like a machine of many talents. It can tow your race car, carry your whole family, and should run the quarter-mile in the high nines. The new Porsche Cayenne Electric promises to do it all, just like the original Cayenne did more than two decades ago. Pricing starts at at $111,350 for the standard model and $165,350 for the Turbo in America, and $131,300 for the Cayenne and $171,300 for the Cayenne Turbo in Canada. On the high end of the segment, but then again, when hasn’t a Cayenne occupied that upper echelon?
Top graphic image: Porsche






I just don’t see the point of an 1100+hp family car.
It’s a
Jeeprich people thing, you wouldn’t understand.That looks… unfortunate. It’s like it’s trying to look taller than it is. The headlights look awkward. Pretty ugly update imho.
1 minute photoshop hack job, fixing proportions: https://i.imgur.com/7PlFVd9.jpeg
This fixes most of the issues I have with the new Macan. It’s more muscular with a better stance, more defined hips, and less egg-like overall.
My (gas powered) Macan Turbo is the best all-rounder car I’ve ever owned, and it’s not particularly close. This blows it out of the water. Consider me interested.
I’ll do without the passenger screen, though.
I look forward to the ‘Ring time battle between this and the Xiaomi YU7 Ultra.
The Taycan got bitch-slapped pretty hard on their home turf, so I expect a better showing this time.
I can’t figure out where the headlights are so I am unable to form an opinion at this time. Please check back when I’ve figured out where they are located.
I have confirmed that the projectors are in the headlights, unlike the terrible, awful, blasphemous Macan EV design. It still looks like a chinese knockoff but at least it doesn’t have split headlights.
Fake split headlights are kinda crazy tho. This may be an industry first.
Perhaps @Torchinsky can confirm?
Rear looks pretty good by modern Porsche standards.
Sweet, another car I can’t afford. What’s it weigh?
2.7 tons
The moon called, it wants its gravitational influence over the tides back.
When comparing a Tesla Plaid to any Porsche EV:
Can the Tesla do it any more than once? When the Taycan first came out there was a test somewhere with a head to head with the Tesla, and while they were similar, or maybe the Tesla was even slightly faster on the first quarter-mile. However after the first, the Tesla battery got hot and went into a reduced power mode.
So the Tesla did exactly 1 fast quarter-mile.
The Porsche did at least 10 pulls maybe more, getting the same fast time, every single time.
Colors for the interior and exterior, and actual door handles. Kudos!
Now, about the price…
I’m curious if it’s faster in the quarter mile because of the two speed transmission (is Porsche still doing those?). I know the original argument for it was that it increased power at high speeds when the the motors would otherwise be running out of grunt.
This one is single speed.
This seems like a beast. If you don’t want full EV you can spend the same amount to get the Turbo-hybrid. Always great to have a choice. For an SUV/CUV that will get driven daily by most buyers, EV would be the way to go for so many reasons. Only reason I would go gas in this would be if I road tripped a lot and for some sound. Otherwise, after driving an EV for over a year and PHEV two cars ago, EV is the way to go for daily driving. If we were talking about a true sports car, I probably want to be back in a gas car, just for the sound.
1200hp Honda HRV? No seriously, either everything looks like a Porsche now or Porsche wants to look like a Honda?
cant unsee this now
They didn’t know what chicken tasted like, so they made chicken taste like everything!
Damn it. It does look like an oversized HRV.
The second I saw that buttonless interior, I lost all interest in the car.
How long before such interiors become illegal for safety reasons?
They must allow beer lunches in their tech center. I imagine the engineers (after passing around 5 boots of Dunkel) yelling “it needs more POWAAHHH!!”
This will almost certainly not sell, but I think it’s neat and that there’s some cool engineering going on here. I’d love to pick one up for $50,000 once the initial lessee takes the mondo depreciation to the face.
There are certainly buyers. Park City and Jackson will be full of these within a couple years. Enough people that don’t see $200k+ as a lot of money, especially when they can brag about how fast and now how “green” they are.
I’ve known several people that buy a new Cayenne Turbo every few years to keep in their garages up here for a couple trips each season, and others that just have to have the latest and greatest every year. Had one client ~15 years ago that had a new Prius for daily and a new Cayenne Turbo for snow days. They were at this house maybe 5-6 weeks a year.
Occasionally you can find a pretty good deal on very low mileage Cayennes, 911s, G-Wagens, etc. as the owner wants to upgrade. Sometimes they get annoyed the battery always seems to be dead when they show up. Often they get offered to a house manager, personal chef, or similar first.
Agreed. I live in ev loving Silicon Valley and I’ve seen 2 Macan evs.
Those piano black plastic wheel arches really sell the luxury.
“It can tow your race car, carry your whole family, and should run the quarter-mile in the high nines. “
Just not all on the same charge. I hope you live near the track and have few inclines if towing, and don’t need any freeway miles.
Great. Now take the drive train and pop it into a proper looking sports car. Embrace your heritage.
They are building electric Boxsters and Caymans. I don’t think they’ll be big sellers, and neither do they, since they announced that they’re working on some ICE versions again (although only on the high end).
Seconded. Soulless and boring consumer trend. What is wrong with people?
When I first glanced at it, my mind immediately went to a Genesis GV60 that’s been slightly inflated. I stand by that statement.
DoA: The Car.
EVs kinda make hypercars utterly pointless, don’t they?
Too bad Porsche couldn’t bother with styling that made it look like a Porsche.
Only in a straight line.
The wireless charging is an awesome addition.
Just pull into your garage and park like normal, and you car is always topped up and ready to rock.
I also think they’ll sell. That range is genuinely usable, even cutting it in half will probably tow your 911 to the track day.
I actually disagree on the wireless charging part, at least for at home. It’s going to be super inefficient, and in general just a power waste compared to directly connected charging cables.
The SAE J2954 standard is well defined at this point, and recent tests (from Porsche, I believe. I’ll have to check my notes) have shown efficiency above 94%.
I’m willing to give up 6% for the convenience, and at $0.15/kWh where I live, I’m still far ahead vs gasoline at $1.40/liter
A 6% loss through inductive charging? Not too bad actually, considering what’s being done. On a typical home L2 system of say a 6.8 KW, that’s about 400 watts. Thats a bit much for my tastes, as I yell at the family for needlessly leaving on a 12 watts LED bulb. Now I’m curious what the resistive losses are for plugging in a standard 1772
There’s a few voltage drop calculators on the internet. pop in the wire gauge and other parameters. It’ll tell you the resistance per meter and the voltage drop. You can calc wattage loss easily.
Many of these buyers will take the loss in efficiency for convenience. Around ski resort towns many of the potential buyers spend many thousands of dollars per month to heat their driveways at 8000’+
This would sell if it was on a modular platform with ICE and hybrid options, but being EV only will really hold it back, IMO. It was a huge gamble for Porsche to make its two biggest sellers EV only, and it hasn’t paid off for them as far as I can tell. I have so far seen 1 (one) EV Macan since it came out. The Macan and Cayenne were both in desperate need of a new generation and Porsche absolutely did not need to reinvent the wheel for them, but they did, and now here we are.
Oh they’d absolutely sell better with flexible drivetrain options. But I believe these will still sell.
They are continuing to upgrade and sell the previous generation of ICE models indefinitely. I agree it was a mistake to go all in on EVs but they are at least realizing it was a mistake by now.
Well, this is one way to fix cylinder scoring issues
Excited to see many of these turbo specs going 5-10 mph max on the 101 and 405 soon.
I wish I could find it in my heart to care, because on the spec sheet and in photos, this does seem like an excellent all around effort, but I simply can’t imagine looking at both this and an Escalade V and choosing the Porsche in real life.
I feel that physical size plays a role here. The Escalade is massive in both size and appearance.
Sure, they might not be the most direct of competitors, but for me personally who finds large size a virtue, comparing two performance oriented $170,000 SUVs isn’t the biggest stretch in the world.
I’m willing to bet the rich neighbourhoods of older cities do not find virtue in vehicles that won’t fit in their driveway.
In the multi-million dollar areas of my downtown city, a Cayenne is basically as big as you can go and still open the doors in the driveways of 100 year old brick houses. Especially ones where your yard is above the driveway, and there’s a retaining wall next to you when parking.
The actual difference is 15″ of length and 3″ of width.
I’m willing to believe there are some cases where that matters, but in general people overrate the dimensions of “full size” SUVs compared to trucks or other large vehicles. A crew cab truck is much longer than an Escalade, but is usually lumped together with them in these discussions.
That’s a huge size difference. Just look at the number of people who buy a half ton with the shortest 5.5′ bed option, compared to my preferred combo of crew cab with the 6.5′ bed.
When I bought my F150 in 2018, the dealer proudly told me “we have 198 F150s on the lot”. I told them I wanted crew cab with the 6.5′ bed
“We have three”
So yeah, size really does matter.
Wealthiest dude I ever worked with ($250M net worth in early 2000s) bought cars 6-years old. Whatever reliable Eurowagon his independent mechanic recommended for his wife to haul gardening supplies home with, and whatever mid-size sedan said mechanic also recommended. He’d then run ‘em 10 more years before re-assessing based on repair intervals.
Though he still had a Triump TR2 he had for 30+ years. He liked his cigars, and when he took me for a ride, he would reach back with the car in motion to light the match for his cigar on the rear tire.
That was in a super hoity-toity but stealth wealth Mass. town.
Up here in the land of salt, a lot of people are on indefinite leases.
Or it’s old money that doesn’t put on miles, so they buy a vehicle and run it for 20 years.
My grandparents are in this category, their ML350 and CT5 550t have less combined mileage than my daily, and the Merc is a year older than my 2016.
The E-class wagon has long been known as the subtle millionaire daily, though.
A lot of people do that, but it’s not truly old money. Might be third generation, but I consider old money 6th+.
Old money has structured things to keep that money old forever. Ten generations? Twenty? It’ll still be there.
There’s fewer and fewer of that type of wealth every year.
Concentrated wealth for the increasingly few. Poor existences for the rest of us. Sounds like a feudalistic society in the making.
I didn’t say it was a good thing. I just have met actual old money, and they don’t habitually buy things, and leasing would be anathema. They’re aware “stuff owns you” and what they want is their time, not dealing with yet more things.
Guy I worked for 20+ years ago was old money, but didn’t like the stigma, so he went off and joined the Navy. Made sure no one knew who he was. Started in mail rooms and doing menial work. Got up to a reasonable officer rank before moving on, but stuck around for a bit because he genuinely liked ships.
Back then he helped organize (but not compete) in one of the major yacht races. What boat did he personally have? A literal dinghy with a pedestrian outboard, because he felt anyone with enough skill and knowledge could do anything worth doing with it.
Pretty sure people shopping for EVs are not cross-shopping ICE Uber-XXLs.
The Slade is barely a foot longer than the Porsche.
The Cayenne is not some dainty little thing either.
I expect there’s more cross shopping than you think between performance models.
Funny, given those two options I can’t imagine picking the Caddy.
It looks so generic! You can say that about most SUVs, but the Cayenne had a bit of it’s own style. This has nothing.
Maybe it’s really just a rebadged Chinese CUV?
I doubt it is, but it looks like one.