Home Ā» The New Yugo Looks Too Cool To Be A Joke

The New Yugo Looks Too Cool To Be A Joke

Yugo Comimng Top
ADVERTISEMENT

The original Yugo was always the punchline of the joke—the bargain-basement car from a strange, far-off land that always looked just a bit off. Now, though, that name is set to land on a brand new hatchback. Only, this time, it’s apparently going to be cost-conscious and fashionable, if such a thing is possible.

The Autopian published an exclusive earlier this year announcing that the Zastava Yugo was to be resurrected. Not in its original form, of course, but reimagined as something thoroughly modern. The project is helmed by Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Bjelić, an engineer with decades of experience in the German auto industry. Armed with the rights to the Yugo name, he’s set about the mighty task of bringing an affordable small car to market.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Thus far, all we’ve seen are sketches and concept drawings. At the Car Design Event 2025 in Munich, however, we were treated to our first look at a scale model of the new car. You might have expected an awkward Eastern European microcar with oddball looks, but Yugo presented anything but. What we got was a sharp, modern looker that’s more than trendy enough for today’s roads.

The Lighting Design Yugo
The lighting design goes a long way to bringing the Yugo into the modern era. Credit: Yugo

The front end is perhaps the most striking design feature. The linear LED lighting design feeds into a glowing Yugo logo, front and center—instantly drawing the eye to the all-important branding. Meanwhile, from the side, it’s a well-proportioned two-door, with sharply raked windscreens front and rear. Combined with a few select trim pieces and an excellently-fitted wheel and tire package, and it’s got looks befitting a proper hot hatch.

Design-wise, there’s a lot to like. It’s future-forward, yet with an unmistakably retro feel. Some of the elements hit on the same popular tropes as the Rivian R3. You could make easy comparisons to the classic Volkswagen Golf or Lancia Delta. One might credit Serbian designer Darko Marčeta with excellent taste when it came to developing the model. The compact bodystyle might feel like a throwback, but the company notes that it “does not just serve as a historical reminiscence, but underscores the affordability and the sportiness of the new model.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s worth noting, though, that there are some odd lines on the car. The bottom line on the doors sits lower than those of the fenders, and the rectangular front grille is a little ungainly. Ultimately, though, these are minor quibbles, and some may be tweaked before the model reaches production.

Ygooooh1
Credit: Yugo
Ygooooh2
Credit: Yugo

[Editor’s Note: I’d like to note that red line at the front and rear, which calls back to the rakish red stripe Yugo bumpers had. I always liked that odd detail on the original, and I’m happy to see it referenced here. – JT]

While the design is firming up, we only have limited information on the drivetrain. Yugo notes that the new hatch will launch with naturally-aspirated and turbocharged engines, with both manual and automatic transmissions. The company has also stated an electric version is possible, though it’s not yet determined if this is on the cards. Most excitingly, as reported by Car Magazine, details will be forthcoming on a performance variant in September this year.

We’re currently told that a prototype Yugo is planned to debut at the Belgrade Expo in 2027. Production is slated to begin that year, though there is no word as yet to where that might happen.

494169117 1142669847900948 3285703666467408719 N
The Yugo has been widely mocked as a weird cheap car, but it holds a special place in the heart of enthusiasts, particularly amongst some of us here at The Autopian. Credit: Yugo America

Right now, the Yugo project is an exciting one. The nascent rebirthing effort has a slick design and a very memorable name to work with. All that remains is the enormous challenge of taking those grand ideas and turning them into a company and factory that is capable of mass producing actual automobiles. Given how good this thing looks, though, there will be a great many enthusiasts cheering on the return of Yugoslavia’s prodigal son.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credit: Yugo

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
97 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Saul Goodman
Saul Goodman
2 days ago

*shacks feverishly, rabidly in Car Enthusiast* manu…manual…transmission… *shakes more*

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
2 days ago

Wasn’t the Yugo a USA only branding and Zastava Jugo everywhere else?

Maybe that indicates selling it here?

Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
1 day ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

They were sold across Europe as mostly as the Yugo 45/55/60/65; Zastava Jugo/Yugo/Koral was what it was called in Yugoslavia, and the UK may have also had them in some variation of that branding. In Italy they were also sold as Innocenti Koral. But it’s all admittedly very confusing. Feels like their branding was dictated more by the badges they had in stock than any kind of marketing strategy.

Last edited 1 day ago by Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
Theotherotter
Theotherotter
2 days ago

That model is kind of wonky. The front end is not quite level (it appears to be a bit higher on the right) and the grille element in the lower fascia, aside from looking like it was taken off of a toy, is not quite level in the other direction. There are the assymetric fascia cut lines, a finish flaw in the gloss black part of the front end, and the scale of the metal flake in the paint is such that it would have looked better with solid paint.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
2 days ago
Reply to  Theotherotter

The lighting of the head-on photo is not doing it any favors. It definitely looks asymmetrical. And the lower grill looks weird. The backend looks ok. To rid itself of the stigma of the previous version, I think they should just go electric or at least hybrid.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
2 days ago

The red stripe on the first Yugo was Giorgetto Giugiaroā€˜s signature , much like the red stripe he put on the Nikon F3.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
2 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

And carried on with subsequent models. I knew a press photographer who blacked out both the Nikon lettering on the pentaprism and the red stripe. His rationale was he didn’t want to be identifiable as a press photographer in crowds. As if an SLR and a Domke bag with lenses wasn’t a tell. I was shooting video with an RCA TK-76 and a Sony tape deck back then. Pretty hard to blend in with crowds with all that stuff. If he really wanted to just blend in, he probably should’ve been using a black Leica M5. I was a newspaper photographer before I lateralled into TV News in 1980. I had a Nikkormat and then an F2 in college, but switched over to Canon when I turned pro. Equally great glass for less and my A-1 was far more reliable than the F2. And the 5 FPS motor drive for it was $200 vs $500 for the F2’s. I’m retired now with a crappy spine from the TV days, but the current mirrorless camera battle between Nikon, Canon and Sony has been fascinating to read about. And the stuff I (and anyone else with a good eye or being in the right place at the right time) can do with an iPhone, compared to what I was using back then blows me away.

Jonah
Jonah
1 day ago

A friend of mine who’s a photographer blacks out all the branding and chrome on his cameras, but for a different reason. When he’s shooting products that are in any way glossy it cuts down on any extraneous reflections.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
1 day ago
Reply to  Jonah

The ā€œwhy do photographers wear black?ā€ answer.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
1 day ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Ha! I did the opposite. As a newspaper guy, I wore a light-colored shirt in the summer and a white sweater in winter to bounce the flash of my Vivitar 283 strobe on a remote cord to fill in. Who needs umbrellas when you’re wearing one. Ha!

When I went over to TV, in 1980, I had to deal with 250-1000 watt halogen lamps, umbrellas, light boxes and little slotted things we carved out of carboard to highlight a certain part of some object.

Back then, the still photogs had it so easy. If it was a big event where we all were there, the TV people already had it lit up. On their own, the gear was so light in comparison to the TV stuff that messed up my spine.

And it’s so much easier for the newspaper photogs now. After a day of shooting back in the day, I had to develop the film. And then print the photos. Now they can just upload digital files through their cell phone or wi-fi at Starbucks.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
1 day ago
Reply to  Jonah

That makes total sense. And far less pretentious.

Everyone is or can be a photographer now. A smartphone is so inherently capable compared to the analog film days.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
1 day ago

Yeah, I always taped over the Nikon badging on my F2s too. Not that it made me particularly inconspicuous carrying two of them with big ASCOR strobes.

Actually, people would ask me what the plain prism meterless F2 was all the time, because it didn’t have the Nikon bulge. It turns out celebrities are very conscious about what equipment is being used to photograph them.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
1 day ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

What were you doing with your taped over F2s? And what did the celebrities think about guys that were shooting Canons? F’ing cheapskates? Who knows. I have a photo of Jimmy Carter, from my college days and Rosalyn when she rode a tricycle through a very early solar panel equipped subdivision in Northern California. I’m sure neither saw me or conscious of what I was shooting with. There was a SF Chronicle photog shooting with a Nikon FE and I got a shot of him having a moment of hilarity on the press bus. ~45 years later, I found and then sent a scan of that photo to him in his retirement, and he was appropriately appreciative in response. So, I was happy he was still alive and be able to find a valid e-mail address.

I never got a job as a still photographer at a bigger paper as a lot of two-newspaper towns were becoming single newspaper towns. I was in the running for a bigger market paper, but a woman laid off from a paper in one of those bigger consolidating markets got it.

I lateralled over to TV news and started at a station that just did one newscast a day at 10 pm and I had a lot of time to learn how to edit both 16 mm film and videotape.

I missed being able to shoot vertical/portrait mode. And the zoom lenses on TV cameras back then did not shoot very wide. My 24 mm lens was one of my favorites back then. A 1980 zoom lens on TV cameras back then got to about 35 mm-equivalent wide. And all that gear was so f’ing heavy, compared to a couple of Canon bodies and a bag of lenses.

Sorry this was a long post, but I just kind of got on a roll.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
1 day ago

Stuff like this
https://titleofwork.com/collections/hugh-crawford
Did a little show last year.
The same week as I was a character in an opera, well an oratorio actually, then I got a detached retina. All the same weekend. The first two were fun, the third I don’t recommend.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
1 day ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Wow! I mean WOW! To have been there then! And as a still photographer.

I shot video in Cambodia back in 1985 with a group of guerillas propped up by the CIA to harass what was left of the Khmer Rouge, a month around Russia in ’87 trying to explain the Soviet Union and two years later for the Reagan-Gorbachev summit.

And a lot of other stuff. Grenada, Other CIA-sponsored stuff in Honduras, Eating and drinking my way through Italy. It was fun. A nd a lot of other forgettable stuff too.

But your shots are amazing. And being there at that time was a gift.

I’m really saddened to read about your detached retina. Both of my eyes have gone through posterior vitreous detachment which resulted in a bunch of “floaters.” The first one happened in an evening in Las Vegas and the second one at lunchtime in Ottawa. I remember both events clearly. Floods of corpuscles clouding half of my vision and now three prominent floaters that persist. I was in my late 40’s when they happened.

The first thing that sprang to my mind was the opening line of Rolling Stones song Monther’s Little Helper.” “What a drag it is getting old.”

Unfortunately, there’s not a little pill to take to remedy what happens in this realm.

But other than what look like fruit flies zipping around, what I went through hasn’t really impaired my vision.

I was also exposed to very loud events, including getting nearly blown on my ass by the Green Mamba, that have resulted in tinnitus. In both ears. Hope this really long link works:

https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=6440eae404f4fec8bec91bff7a25a4cb4fdbb88a77bb77551c47dad62674e7d1JmltdHM9MTc0Njc0ODgwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=1df6119d-8c2e-6ef1-18d2-04bc8d036f99&psq=green+mamba+dragster&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cueW91dHViZS5jb20vd2F0Y2g_dj0teTk4clV0ZzE1cw&ntb=1

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
2 days ago

You’re asking for full fender replacement with a slight corner tap. No wrap around front bumper shell, the fender just comes right down to the leading edge of the car…… I take that back, its got a wrap around bumper shell on the left side only (you can see the panel line between the bumper and fender on the left side in the left rear 3/4 and as well on the dead on front view, but not on the right). Who made that model?

Last edited 2 days ago by Nick Fortes
M SV
M SV
2 days ago

Looks like various vag hatchbacks and a Hyundai got blended up. Could be interesting

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
2 days ago

“…rakish red stripe Yugo bumpers had…” Alright, tone it down, sheesh lol <s>

Mr E
Mr E
2 days ago

Even if the production model retains all the obvious styling foibles, I bet it’d still sell better than the Slate if they brought it to the US*, simply because it offers a gas engine.

(*assuming they price it correctly – which they probably won’t, so my argument is null and void and moot and all that)

I generally like the design of this Second Coming Of The Shitbox.

LTDScott
LTDScott
2 days ago

Looks like an Ioniq 5 left in the dryer too long

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
2 days ago

Will they be assembling these from knock down kits supplied by Stellantis?

J Money
J Money
2 days ago

Coming next: The Edsel!

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
2 days ago
Reply to  J Money

I feel like the current crop of Lincolns are more Edsel than Lincoln.

Jack Swansey
Jack Swansey
2 days ago

Unrelated to the main topic of the article – I have that Yugo magazine ad framed on my bathroom door.

Patrick
Patrick
2 days ago
Reply to  Jack Swansey

When you need to go, Yugo!

97
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x