A large percentage of cars out there could be considered “disposable vehicles,” products to be unlovingly deployed until they are well and truly used up and then unceremoniously discarded. Exactly what the “most disposable vehicle of all time” might be is hard to quantify, but if nothing else, I found some statistics that could provide some insights.
You might remember Cash for Clunkers, the scheme to spur on car production and potentially help the environment by giving alleged clunker owners a guaranteed possibly-more-than-book-value sum for supposedly worthless “gas guzzlers” if they traded them in on a new car. There was much gnashing of teeth over the few enthusiast cars on the list that met the crusher due to this scheme, but the vast majority of machines that were literally bricked would almost certainly be considered “disposable”.
The data showed that the number two “clunker” taken off the road was the Dodge Caravan and Plymouth Voyager minivans with 23,998 destroyed. However, the number one car on the list had nearly twice as many victims as the second-place Caravan. Yes, 46,676 functioning examples of the second-generation 1995-2003 Ford Explorer (and its twin, the Mercury Mountaineer) gave their lives to the cause – and a further 11,612 of the first-gen Explorers took the number-nine spot on the top-ten Cash for Clunkers list.

Thankfully, around 120 or so examples of this underappreciated best seller probably did escape from the junkman’s grasp. That’s because these Explorers were specially modified by a noted high-performance car builder to be one of the first enthusiast-oriented SUVs that put on-the-road prowess over trail running capability, not to mention possibly the first factory-sanctioned supercharged one. Let’s take a look at the ultra-rare Saleen XP8.
What “Competition” Would A BMW X5 Be In Anyway?
Today, an AMG Mercedes or “Competition” BMW SUV doesn’t raise any eyebrows, but in the nineties, when the sport utility craze was in its infancy, the focus was on off-road readiness, or at least the appearance of such capability. Want a car that looks like the equivalent of your jeans, hiking boots, flannel shirt, and puffer vest? That’s what you were getting. The idea of such a vehicle that specialized in carving up asphalt roads but might get stuck in a pile of wet leaves was unheard of.
Regardless, in the mid-nineties, it must have been hard for Mustang tuner Steve Saleen to ignore all of the Ford Explorers prowling the streets. Introduced for 1991, Ford’s mid-sized SUV quickly became one of the best-selling vehicles on the market. It’s believed that Ford man Saleen realized with the arrival of the second-generation Explorer in 1995 that these ubiquitous vehicles weren’t going away. Next, he figured that it had an engine up front and four wheels, so what excuse could there be to not make it handle and go faster? Saleen was just the person to make it happen.

If you’re at all familiar with Steve’s Mustang builds, you know that he is far from content with making a straight-line warrior. Adding power is rather easy, but making an elephant dance is a bigger challenge. Starting in 1997 with either a 2WD or 4WD Explorer, he began by dropping the suspension a full two inches, installing springs and shocks from his company’s Racecraft components; a move that not only transformed the handling but improved the looks substantially, since lower is always better.

The 18-inch genuine magnesium wheels were rolling stock of Saleen’s own creation, fitted with Pirelli 255/55SR18 Scorpion S/T radials. Disc brakes all around included the option of special 13” front models that reportedly had issues with cracked brackets, resulting in them being recalled and replaced with stock factory units.
With this upgraded chassis, the XP8 was now begging for more power from the 302 V8. Saleen only offered the four-speed automatic, but you could go the puffer-or-no-puffer route. The normally aspirated version was a bit of a disappointment, with the only modification being a new intake that increased power by a mere 7 horsepower. That gave you a total of 222, barely any better than the stock V8 in the same year Grand Cherokee.

No, the supercharger version was the must-have, with the bolt-on blower increasing power to 286 horsepower. That was enough to drop the zero to sixty time from 8.8 seconds on the normally aspirated XP8 down to 7.4 with a quarter mile of 15.7 seconds at 88.1 mph, according to Motor Trend.
On the outside, custom front and rear fascias were installed, along with side skirts and door cladding to tie it together. A subtle rear wing on the hatch finished off the look, along with relatively subtle graphics that included the exclusivity-flexing production number on the front bumper.


There’s a fine line between being too subdued and looking like you took a Saturday afternoon trip to the Pep Boys “customizing” section, but Saleen always seemed to walk that line rather well.
Like You’re Stuck In A Rental Car Forever
Man, I hate to say it, but I’d forgotten how cheap-looking the early Explorer interiors were. You can see from some of these for-sale examples that they were also not exactly hard-wearing. Saleen could add either real wood or carbon fiber trim, but beyond Saleen gauge faces and floor mats, there weren’t any other changes to the somewhat disappointing cabin. A floor shift on the console might have been nice.

This is a very high-mileage example in these pics, so you can at least forgive a bit of the driver’s seat wear.

The standard flat-as-a-pancake rear seat and cargo area remained essentially stock, so none of the practicality of the Explorer was lost to silly roll cages or other such street racer nonsense:


If you had another $3950 to spend, a pair of much better Saleen/RECARO front seats and matching rear bench covers could be had.


None of these modifications were cheap; the XP8 started at $37,990, or around $18,000 more than the base price of a 2WD V8 XLT Explorer. The supercharged model would set you back a whopping $52,000. That’s $95,322 in today’s money, but you were getting a bespoke creation by a noted, factory-backed tuner (essentially, no two XP8s were specified the same). That’s obviously a serious chunk of change, but no different than today’s performance SUV world, where you could get two base-model Porsche Cayennes for the price of one ultra-exclusive faster edition.
If Saleen’s XP8 is an odd and elusive bird, there’s apparently an even stranger one out there. Details are sketchy, but it’s reported that one of the batches of V8-powered Explorers that Ford sent to Steve Saleen’s facility inexplicably included a few six-cylinder-powered cars. Instead of sending them back to the factory, the same non-engine-related modifications of the XP8 were performed on these smaller-motor examples. Dubbed the XP6, very few records exist on these builds; I’m really not sure who would have wanted one. An economy-minded downhill-only canyon-racer? With fewer than ten built, these are extremely rare.
Actually, any XP8 is rare. As with many of these kinds of specials, actual production numbers are hard to pin down, but the commonly agreed-upon number is 125 units from 1998 to 2001, when Steve stopped building them, likely when brands were starting to get in on the hyper-SUV game themselves. Despite the scarcity, the ones that come up for sale don’t go for much. Two on Bring A Trailer stalled at mid-$17,000s, while the white one with 161,000 miles you see in this post, in nice condition, sold for only $22,000 on Cars & Bids. That’s less than half the price of the XP8 as a new car in 1998 dollars. Even if you discount that it’s a super-rare factory-backed tuner machine, it’s a rather smoking deal on a tire-smoking great deal of SUV. What’s even better is that we’re talking about a 302-powered Explorer; you could literally put a rod through the block and fix it for less than most minor repairs on an AMG G-Wagen.
And Thus Began The Trend Of 600 Horsepower Family Haulers
As much as I scratched my head at Steve Saleen’s XP8 when I first heard of it decades ago, it’s obvious now that the man was pioneering a performance variation of something that would eventually make sedans and station wagons a distant memory. Just like with Mustangs, he proved that simple, affordable motor vehicles could be modified into rather fearsome machines. He also arguably beat the likes of X5Ms and AMG MLs before BMW and Mercedes were even building mainstream SUVs or crossovers in any form at all.

Go ahead and laugh at tread-separating “Exploders” all you want; this Ford SUV connected with late nineties and early 2000s buyers in a way that neither GM nor even Chrysler’s Jeep could ever match. You can take them for granted and crush all of the Explorers you want, but you’ll never take away the Ford SUV’s place in automotive history. Thankfully, Steve Saleen saw its potential.
Top graphic image: Cars & Bids






Give me a Shelby Durango over this everyday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZM6PKd9jOg
The stock suspension had to be miserable, I remember most were sagging in back by the time they were 10 years old. One of the reasons why I mentally added “barely” when you mentioned “functioning examples”. At least most of them weren’t as rusty as the Astro vans that went to C4C – at least they had been Astro vans once, by the summer of ’09 I don’t think most of them had a quorum of non-powdered sheetmetal left to claim either name.
I just never have understood the attraction of taking a vehicle built for one purpose, 4 wheeling, and making it unsuitable for that purpose and changing it to be a poor example at another purpose. Lower it makes unsuitable for wheeling and only makes it good for straight speed and there are so many other vehicles that are better at it and a lot less expensive.
So Saleen holds partial responsibility for encouraging this abomination of a trend. Confidently guessing all of those early 1990s Explorers met the same fate as the ‘93 owned by my future to-be wife at around 100k. Cracked heads.
This vintage Explorer (non-Saleen) has been showing up on my block the past week. It made me double take because most of these seem to have been junked or they look like they are driving around on their last dying breath. When I worked at the Ford dealership over 12 years ago, these would come in on trade and be immediate sled lot fodder. This one on my block is clean no rust and even had tire shine on the tires. Made me think wow someone is actually taking care of one of these things.
Want rare, look up the 94-95 Saleen V6 Sport. Very few, Very rare, very little on them. Ive only seen one.
This generation of Explorer was the one that had the Firestone lawsuit, correct?
For the deadly rollovers.
That said, the comparable 2 door Tahoes/Blazers or even the Expedition and Excursion were NOT any safer.
Yes. Even witnessed the thread delamination issue. Like peeling a banana or a getting a vehicular circumcision. I noticed when the car was parked. No idea how long she had been driving on that, she claimed ‘ I didn’t hear or feel a thing’.
My wife and I cross shopped AWD Explorers and Jeep GCs in 1994 when we lived in Cleveland. I loved the seats in some upscale Explorer we test drove. Eddie Bauer Edition? The thigh support was awesome. But the Jeep V8 handled so much better around corners and that’s what we went with. Sold it with ~110K miles on the odometer. No regrets. It pulled a U-Haul trailer to Seattle with no issues. It did its job, and I’ll let it go at that.
But we liked the CR-V we replaced it with better.
Oh man, we finally got rid of the Saleen Mustang that was hanging out behind the shop for like six weeks. I probably should feel guilty for seeing such a thing finally get yanked up on a flatbed and hauled away, but I don’t. I was just glad to see it go.
Wow, did not know these existed.
My old roommate’s Dad did have a fox body Saleen Mustang convertible w/ the supercharger and 5spd. It also had an aftermarket fuel management system. To pass emissions, you used a laptop to load in the ‘lean’ tune disk. Was instructed to drive it gently to go pass the emissions where it would pass with flying colors, and then gently back home to reload the regular tune disk back in. Otherwise, one might melt a piston or something.
It was a blast!
Neat truck. Given some Syclones and Typhons met their maker from cash for clunkers I wouldn’t rule out a few of these falling victim as well.
That’s insane. They’ve never been cheap, why would someone take one to C4C? They must have been really destroyed or something. Hopefully anyway….
The bad thing about cash for clunkers is they couldn’t even sell parts from them. They had the Vehicross on the list and I couldn’t even buy seats
Yeah those vehicles should have been parted out at a minimum rather than scrapped. Such a waste.
The only great Explorer was the 1st gens. These 2nd gens (and 3rd gens too) had the build quality go WAY down.
However, by FAR the best powertrain setup on 2nd gens was the 5.0 V8 with the VC awd transfer case.
4.0 pushrods would crack heads but weren’t terrible, 4.0 SOHC’s were trash, only the 5.0’s could cruise on with its original powertrain well past 200k.
When I saw that a huge amount of 2nd gen explorers were getting crushed it made me happy. That’s how much I hated them.
Meanwhile 1st gen Explorers (if maintained) were just as reliable, long-lived, and almost as off road capable as an XJ while offering much better room and comfort on the inside… it’s just that people don’t want to admit that because they aren’t as cool as XJ’s, which I understand.
I briefly had a 1996 Explorer with V8 and AWD, that thing was fun on the highway and in the snow. We got about 12″ of snow and it would would not get stuck even while hooning around hilly back roads. It just wasn’t great as a daily driver, I missed having a manual transmission.
I hope this Ford Friday thing sticks around.
Hey, you stole our name! Legal wants a word with you..
We all know the legal department is just Adrian with a nasty hangover and a cricket bat.
Adrian is the illegal department. The legal department is David asking Mercedes if Sheryl knows anything about whatever topic, then making a decision even more conservative than she suggests.
Live scenes of me lawyeringing for The Autopian:
https://youtu.be/sZTfQMGyxhg?si=uwPRQLcrH0p6KBz6
Drat! I knew I should have trademarked this!
And here I was feeling honored that you named a column after me.
I concur
Don’t remember these but Saleen was always the guy who wanted to be Roush but was always a second stringer.
Ford Friday? Shouldn’t this be coming out on like a Tuesday?
There was an immediate recall and it needed to be pushed back.
This is cool – somehow I wasn’t aware of these!!
Although I’d argue performance trucks and even SUVs weren’t unheard of – the 92-93 GMC Typhoon is the first performance SUV I’m aware of, plus there was the Syclone, Sonoma GT, F-150 Lightning, and 454SS in the street truck category.
I feel like the sport truck has been a thing then way more than sport SUV. I think the first one was the Lil Red Express truck. The Typhoon was the only true sport SUV. The Grand Cherokee 5.9 limited was kind of it but not really.
But this is sport SUV.
Okay was the Syclone spelled that way or was it Cyclone the correct way. This is giving me the shakes.
They definitely spelled it with an “S”.
XP8? Are we back on Atonepian?
I remember going to a junkyard for some XJ parts after one round of cash for clunkers and saw a sea of Cherokee XJs in fantastic shape all with intentional bricked motors. It was sad….
I owned a Cherokee at the time, so it was sad, but also a bonanza for cheap parts!
I was under the impression no parts could be sold of CFC Cars was I misinformed?
Engine parts couldn’t but everything else was fair game.
#42 was on Facebook Marketplace semi-local to me recently for $10K. It was not supercharged and had almost 200K but still a killer deal for such a rare vehicle. Of course, my wife said no.
As a multi-multi-time second gen Explorer owner, and site Explorer apologist, I have always wanted one of these. The closest I have been to one was a Saleen gathering in Dallas in 1998, and a guy rolled into the group of Mustangs with his paper-tagged XP8. Everyone laughed that him until they saw the blower and then suddenly there was a bit more respect. It didn’t handle like a Mustang, but I know it took corners far better than my ’95 Explorer XLT.
time for a Godzilla swap 😉
So, ummm, were non-Firestone tires part of the mods? 😛
Sorry, I had to! The Explorer was a POS no matter what brand tires or how much power the engine had. Rusty, low quality shit.
Also, there was the Jeep Grand Cherokee 5.9 at the same time. Not any better than the Explorer, but cheaper than a Saleen and possibly faster, too.
Sit in an Explorer or GC, then sit in a 4runner, Pathfinder, Montero, or Trooper.
I remember seeing a couple of these on the road in the late 90s. All were rusted to hell. The terrible plastic cladding had provided a strong foothold for corrosion, and once it grabbed hold, it would kick the Pep Boys quality plastic bits into the gutter.
I used to see this generation of Explorer in Qatar previously. In recent weeks, I saw ONLY one….
Older 5.4 Expeditions are rarer too.
Most 90s SUVs are either old Patrols/Land Cruisers or some older Tahoes/Suburbans.
Man, this is one of the reasons I love this site so much: learning about interesting and often appealing rides I’ve never encountered in the wild.
It’s actually helped me understand my extended family’s obsession with “birding”. If they receive the same thrill seeing a scarlet taninger(?) as I do seeing a scarlet-colored Syclone, I get it.
Autopian – providing family therapy since 2022.
Birder here and yes the thrill is real. We wander in jungles in central America looking for ‘life’ birds. Kind of like seeing a Citroen SM on the freeway in Milwaukee, but warmer