If you can’t be first to something, be a fast follower. The Nissan Leaf was the first mass-produced electric car for sale in the United States, but it’s fast-follower Tesla that’s worth all the money. The Model Y has been around for a while, and many companies have tried to copy it with mixed success, but it might finally have a true competitor, at least in China.
That’s right, The Morning Dump is going to talk about the YU7 from Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi. The company has already proven it can build a car with the extremely popular SU7. Now it’s showing it can design an SUV that’s competitive with the Model Y at an even more competitive price. Just don’t ship too many at once! That’s the advice from an expert on shipping following the sinking of another car carrier.


This comes as Elon Musk’s breakup with the Trump Administration means it’s unlikely he’ll have any sway to help save the tax credit. You know who might? Car dealers. Specifically, Carvana and Carmax are trying to get the Senate to kill the killing of the EV tax credit. One automaker that’s probably a little less impacted by the change is Toyota, which is currently kicking butt thanks to hybrids.
The Xiaomi YU7 Will Cost Just $35,300, Compared To $36,760 For A Model Y
Let’s assume that, tariffs aside, the politics of Elon Musk and his connection to President Trump are currently meaningless to Chinese consumers. That means that the issues they’ll judge a car on are the usual ones: Design, cost, performance, prestige, et cetera. Unlike Europe or the United States, it gives us a much clearer view of how well Tesla’s products will perform. So far, sales are down this year in China, both due to a factory switchover and some new competition.
There are cars like the Geely Star Wish, which Tesla simply has no car to compete with, and homegrown hybrids and EREVs from BYD that, again, show where Tesla lacks a fighter. The one place where Tesla has long ruled is in the mid-sized crossover space, thanks to its wildly popular Model Y. While there are a lot of cars roughly in that bracket, including the BYD Sealion 7, there’s nothing that’s quite had the verve of a Model Y.
That’s changing this week, as four different Model Y competitors launch almost simultaneously. While many of these are interesting, the one that I care about is the YU7.
As you’ll remember, Chinese smartphone company Xiaomi made waves with the SU7, a sporty sedan in the mold of a Model S that captured the imagination (and wallets) of the country. Even Ford CEO Jim Farley was kind of obsessed with his. But Chinese consumers, like all consumers, enjoy an SUV, and the reveal of the YU7 showed that Xiaomi may have an answer for the Model Y.
Now it looks like the company is going for the jugular, per Nikkei Asia:
Xiaomi’s Hong Kong-listed shares opened 8% higher at an all-time intraday high of 61.45 Hong Kong dollars before investors pared back some of the gains. It closed up 3.6%, achieving a record closing price of HK$58.95. The company’s shares are up more than 70% this year, giving it a market capitalization of HK$1.53 trillion ($194.9 billion).
On Thursday evening, Xiaomi Chairman and CEO Lei Jun announced that the new SUV, called the YU7, will start at 253,500 yuan ($35,300). That is lower than the 263,500 yuan price tag for Tesla’s popular SUV, the Model Y.
Within the first hour, Xiaomi received 289,000 pre-orders for the YU7, according to a social media post by the company. It later said 240,000 orders were confirmed.
CMB International, a Chinese brokerage, said in a report on Friday that the starting price was “largely in line” with what market watchers anticipated, but that the scale of the pre-orders “exceeded expectations.”
Why people like the YU7 is that it looks great, comes loaded with technology, is from a local Chinese automaker, and seems to just be fresher than even the refreshed Model Y. It’ll also have a longer driving range and more space.
Car Shipping Disasters Have Cost $1.8 Billion

There have been three massive car shipping disasters in as many years and, while we can’t quite say the most recent one was precisely due to the shipping of electric cars, that does seem to be a constant in all these major fires.
Earlier this month, the Morning Midas was carrying a load of cars from China to Mexico, including hundreds of electric cars, when something started a fire. The ship eventually sank and, while thankfully no lives were lost, the total cost of the accident is going to be about $560 million. WHy does this keep happening?
Automotive News spoke to a marine risk consultant who said what we’re all sort of thinking:
When it comes to shipping EVs, there’s always the risk of fire, explosion or thermal runaway, Capt. Randall Lund, senior marine risk consultant at Allianz Commercial, told Automotive News. Even if an EV is not the cause of a fire, it increases the chance of a fire turning disastrous. And if a fire starts, there’s not much that the ship’s crew can do.
“They are not professional firefighters,” Lund said.
While all crews receive basic firefighting training, it’s very broad, and EV fires generally require firefighting expertise, Lund said. Most crews aren’t even aware where EVs are stored on the vessel.
[…]
The industry needs to work with automakers to help them “understand that maybe they can’t ship 400 EVs at one time,” or that “cargo ships require additional spacing,” Lund said.
This seems like a fixable problem.
Carmax And Carvana Want To Keep The EV Tax Credit

There have been a lot of automakers pleading to keep the tax credit, arguing that the companies were incentivized to build electric cars by previous generations and that not doing so will risk competitiveness with China. Now, some major dealer groups are becoming involved, again from Automotive News:
Carmax, Carvana and other auto retailers are urging the Senate to preserve electric vehicle incentives in the budget bill, arguing that abruptly axing the tax credits would threaten dealerships that have invested in EV sales and service.
Automakers have required many dealerships to make large investments in EV infrastructure, including on-site chargers and service bay equipment.
“Dealerships like ours have invested billions of dollars as small businesses to serve our communities, to improve EV education, and offer exceptional service,” dealers said in the June 26 letter. “We need a stable and consistent market for our dealerships to plan, invest, and grow.”
The dealers said tax credits for new and used clean vehicles, the Advanced Manufacturing Production Tax Credit meant to incentivize battery production, the Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property Credit and others “must continue, even in a reduced form, for at least the next several years.”
The retailers are also opposed to a new fee for registering EVs meant to counter the fact that they don’t contribute to road building via the gas tax
Toyota Hits Another Record, Because Hybrids

I promise an update is coming on our cross-country trip, which was a surprising success. I just got home late last night and traveled home from the airport in a Toyota Highlander. Was it a hybrid? Of course, it was a hybrid. They’re all hybrids now, basically.
That’s helping propel Toyota to even bigger sales.
Toyota Motor Corp.’s sales reached a third straight monthly record in May on strong demand for hybrid vehicles in the US, Japan and China, even as global automakers braced for big losses triggered by President Donald Trump’s tariffs on imported cars.
Toyota’s global sales — including subsidiaries Daihatsu Motor Co. and Hino Motors Ltd. — reached 955,532 vehicles last month, up 8% from a year earlier, the company said Friday. Worldwide production came in at 906,984 units.
Toyota and its Lexus brand vehicle sales rose more than 4% in Japan, 7% in China and 11% in North America.
The world’s biggest carmaker will raise the prices next month of some vehicles it sells in the US by more than $200, as part of a regular revision based on factors that include market conditions and competition, a spokesperson said last week.
I’m thinking people will pay the extra $200.
What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD
It feels like I was on that trip for 10 months, so it’s nice to be “Home Again” as Michael Kiwanuka points out above.
The Big Question
What’s the best example of a car (or any product, really) that came out second, but absolutely killed it?
I’d say nearly any product that 3M has touched. Their entire industry is based on just making more effective versions of current products.
The Macintosh was sort of a pared-down Lisa, both of which followed the Xerox Star.
Maybe they failed to account for the cargo turning to gold on the next sunrise? 😉
Oh yeah, they’re gonna love that. Shipping companies are big fans of lower density in transport.
I realize this may not be completely apples-to-apples (pun entirely intended, as you’ll see in a moment), but Blackberry got everyone hooked on smartphones, then Apple came in and ate their lunch. Actually, Apple is probably the best example of this in pretty much any market segment they exist in. They’re rarely the first, but they love to take other people’s ideas, polish the hell out of them, and make loads of money off it.
Yeah, Apple certainly is the king of taking emerging or less popular tech and making a ton of money. I can’t think of anything they’ve made that is the first of its kind, but almost all of their products become ubiquitous.
Uh, I’m thinking The Autopian referencing an Automotive News article about the sunk boat is problematic.
That maritime safety expert spouts “understand that maybe they can’t ship 400 EVs at one time”
The problem? The boat that sunk had very few EVs. To quote the NY Times “70 electric vehicles, 681 hybrids, and more than 2,000 conventional vehicles, according to the US Coast Guard”. The Coast Guard stated 3,084 vehicles. So 2,333 gas cars. So less than 2.2% of the freaking cars on that boat were EV’s.
How about spreading FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) with that stupid uninformed quote. They imply the ship had 400 EV’s when it had a grand total of 70. That “expert” sure is implying that the fire was caused by the EVs. There is absolutely no proof of that yet.
The Autopian is also just as culpable as Automotive News by highlighting that quote without doing a cursory fact check with how many EVs were on that ship. Facts matter.
Facts matter. Like EVs on fire sunk the boat. Go whine somewhere else.
There is no proof that EVs started the fire. That is the problem with the reporting. Please quote a source that confirms that EVs definitely started the fire.
Once one of these car transport ships catch on fire, they are left abandoned. That same ship with 100% gas cars would also be abandoned and left to burn and sink. It is too dangerous to fight that type of fire even for firefighters. It’s not like there are fire boats patrolling the oceans to fight a fire once one breaks out.
You know what the Coast Guard did? They evacuated the crew, and dispatched three boats. Two to monitor for pollution and clean up of any pollution released by the boat. The other was a recovery boat to try and tow the boat to shore. At no time did they attempt to stop the fire.
Your snarky response is telling. Do you think reporting there were 400 EVs on the boat when there were only 70 is fine? Do you think implying the EVs started the fire is fine? Do you think implying the EVs are the reason the ship sank is fine? I guess facts don’t matter to you. You want the narrative to meet you beliefs rather than worrying about reality.
If expressing concern about items reported as fact are wrong, is whining, I guess I’ll just keep on whining with gusto.
Easy answer, it’s the Mustang. Barracuda came out first, but the first gen was kinda nerdy and didn’t sell well.
RE: EV Tax credits: All they need to do is convince the Senate that the tax credits help corporations and the 1% while simultaneously hurting poor people.
That’s a win-win for the Senate; those are their two favorite things.
I saw a refreshed Model Y driving into work this morning with an “Even my dog hates Elon” sticker on it.
Dude its a refreshed Y; you knew who he was when you bought the thing.
Yeah, I’ve been enthusiastically giving the finger to every Cybertruck I see while driving, and I’m tempted to start bird-watching for refreshed MYs as well.
I have a friend who asked me about EVs before buying his (non-refreshed Model 3). Elon was known to be shitty, and this guy is very politically aware. I gave him some options that seemed like they would work for him. He bought a Tesla and almost immediately slapped a “bought this before we knew” sticker on it. Some people are plenty willing to make the purchase if they think they can still save face.
Yeah I get that. At least your friend got the old version to try to give some plausible deniability. I’d give him hell for it though.
I definitely do.