I think I’ve written before about what torture it would be to own a really low-mileage, perfect-shape car. I say this, because such a car would be, effectively, undriveable, as so much of its value would be tied up in the fact that it had never been actually driven. So you’d have this perfect car that would become a bit of sculpture, a statue dedicated to the concept of frustration. And who wants that?
That was my first thought when I saw another remarkably preserved 1977 Volkswagen Beetle on Bring A Trailer; the car was in a dealership’s collection and only has 130 miles on the clock. It is an absolute time capsule, with everything preserved exactly as it was back then in the year when the first Star Wars movie came out and the Atari VCS/2600 first hit the market. It was a long time ago, just in a galaxy very close.


I mean, this thing is perfect, down to the stickers on the inside of the engine lid and on the doorjambs. I’ve hardly ever seen Beetles with as little wear and tear as this one, and it really is fascinating to see all these details in their pristine state. Look at some of these pictures!






Also, I have to hand it to the sellers for taking pictures like this one to show every section of the taillight illuminated, which would require the car to have its parking or headlights on, a foot on the brake, in reverse gear, so that means clutch down, too, and the hazards/or turn indicators on:

This Beetle is showroom-fresh. And while there exist a few other Beetles in this condition, there can’t be many. There’s other cars like this, of course, ultra-low mileage, and they would also be miserable to own.

Cars like this turn up every now and then, often collectible ones with dedicated followings like this Corvette with 33 miles:
Much more uncommon but less valuable on the market are ultra-low-mileage commonplace cars, like, say 1980s Honda Accords or a ’90s Ford Tempo or something of that nature; those would be real holy grails. You know, like this delivery-milage ’82 Chevy Cavalier!
And while I still stand by my assertion that owning an ultra-low mileage car would be a miserable exercise in frustration, I do acknowledge that there is something of value to cars like these. Just not to a private owner. I think in the case of these cars, we need to listen to noted archaeologist Dr. H (I) Jones, Jr., PhD:
They belong in a museum. Or, better, a sort of federally-owned automotive library. Let me explain.
What we need is to establish the Smithsonian National Archive of Automotive Original Reference Vehicles (NAAORV). This archive would collect and store, indefinitely, in a climate-controlled environment, cars with 500 miles or less on the odometer, the more original, the better. There will be no duplicates, though different years of the same model are, of course, acceptable.
Any mass-produced car is acceptable for the collection, where it will be stored and made available for researchers, restorers, historians, and even regular automotive enthusiasts to view, examine, take measurements, photograph, whatever. This will be more like a research library than a museum, but instead of books, there will be extremely original cars and their related documentation and equipment.

The good news is that I think this can be pulled off for a fairly minimal outlay of resources; the initial facility is already just about ready to go: Pod 6 at the Smithsonian’s Museum Support Center in Suitland, Maryland is scheduled to be opened this year, where it was to provide 187,735 gross square feet of storage space for use by a variety of institutions, inlcuding the National Museum of Natural History, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, National Postal Museum, National Museum of American History, and the National Gallery of Art (NGA).
My proposal is that we tell all those organizations: tough testicles and they can wait for Pod 7, because Pod 6 is now home to the NAAORV. It’ll be fine. They’ve waited this long already! I’m sure the Hirshhorn, for example, can stack a bunch of shipping containers full of art in that huge center area of the drum-shaped museum for a little while. What else are they using that space for? Seriously, it’s fine.
So, we’ve got the location already figured out, and I have a plan for how to fund the acquisition of these low-mileage cars for the museum. We’ll need a support staff, of course, people willing to scour collections and auctions all over the country to find as many low-mileage cars as possible, and as many different types, with special emphasis on the mundane and/or forgotten. And, of course, we’ll need money to buy the cars themselves. Here’s how we do it:
We just print the money we need.
Yes, you heard me: we just make a deal with the US Mint to print whatever money we need. Now, I know the government can’t just do this william-nilliam, and if every government agency did this, it would collapse the economy or something. Fine. But for one sub-section of the Smithsonian? It’ll be fine. Who’s gonna care?
We’ll hire some lobbying firms too, so we can massage the messaging and blackmail or threaten any senators or activists who think what we’re doing is “wrong” or “irresponsible” or “dangerous” or some other meaningless words. I don’t care. What would they rather us do, tax these bastards back to the Stone Age to fund this? No.
Besides, it’ll be a drop in the bucket, really. We just run those money-presses for like 15 minutes once a month or whatever, and I’m sure we’ll have plenty of operating capital. Again, and I think this is important, I don’t care about some negligible effect on the economy, which is boring and stupid anyway. This is what matters: a national archive of pristine, original reference cars, one that will serve the automotive interests of America (and the world) for centuries to come.
Maybe we’ll hire some goons to work people over if they try to look into this too much? That’s fine, too! This is the fucking Smithsonian Institution we’re talking about here – do you think they’ve never gotten their hands dirty getting Lincoln’s sock garters or the urine bags from Apollo 11 or the William Shatner’s merkins? Of course they have, don’t be so naive.
And we’ll continue that long tradition! If some collector has a 1982 Toyota Starlet with 40 miles and isn’t letting it go, maybe some Smithsonian goons will pay them a visit to convince them to do what’s right for their nation and not keep that unique machine hidden away in some closed garage. I can’t say any of us will know what went on behind closed doors, but if NAAORV gets an important new acquisition, I’m not sure I care.
The NAAORV will be an incredible resource for so many people, and it will free car collectors of the idiotic burden of ultra-low mileage cars. No longer will there be that obligation to own one of these albatrosses, because you’ll always know they’ll have a home at NAAORV, where they will become an invaluable resource for artists and scientists, movie makers and academics, anthropologists and technologists and ichthyologists and clergypeople and everyone.
I’ve got all the details figured out! It’s time to make this happen.
It seems that seeing an amber taillight lit has given Torch a case of brain-fever.
Perhaps a little personal time is in order?
The energy crisis came early to our house when we were kids, as my dad worked peripherally to the natural gas industry. He had a Bug just like that, luckily avoided getting run over a few times, then got a CJ7 just before my sisters and I started learning to drive… Those were the days.
Damn that bug is gorgeous!
The old man I bought my bug from was the original owner, and it only had a confirmed 34k original miles on it when I bought it. I’ve since replaced the engine with a larger built and upgraded one, and rebuilt the trans along with replacing pretty much the rest of the car that had sat since it was “restored” in the 90’s.
Sure would love to have a pristine all original one like that, but I love the way I’ve set mine up! Just installed a new narrowed beam this past weekend.
https://www.thesamba.com/vw/gallery/pix/2592863.jpg
Looked and looked, and I’d swear the bumper droops slightly to the left in that front-on photo. Is that a VW feature?
It’s definitely droopy. I brought the image into an edit window and from the wiper pivots, down to the headlight trim screws everything is “level”, that bumper is absolutely not.
Just looking at the small version posted above, it’s clear that the bumper isn’t level relative to the headlight buckets.
Maybe Gunther sitzed himself down a bit too hard when the schnitzel break bell rang.
Just cut every senator and congressperson’s salary to zero and use that money. I’d get 100% more use (and 100% less frustration) from the car library.
And divert the funds/kickbacks that they receive from lobbyists and “special interest groups” to this endeavor and you’ll have more than enough.
This is my situation, I suppose. Two years ago I bought a nine-year-old Mercedes GLK with just 12,500 miles on it. I was happy to pay top dollar for it, $28,000. I’m not in the mood to price it out now, with 36,000 miles, but I doubt it would break $20K now.
That’s irrelevant, because I won’t be selling it soon. I’m enjoying a Mercedes in the prime of its life, with little concern about wear and repairs yet. Finding a barely used one-owner car was a blessing. It really was the little old lady (age 92, four-foot-ten) who only left the garage on Sundays! I wasn’t in the market for a $50K car ten years ago, and when I finally decided I wanted a GLK, most were selling with 90,000 miles or more. So this was my second chance car. The money Iose on depreciation is offset by what I’m not spending on repairs, yet. So don’t cry for me, JT.