There’s this event at Monterey Car Week called the Quail: A Motorsports Gathering. Personally, I think that full name is kind of pretentious, but I got a PR company all cross at me last time I made fun of it, so I’ll let it slide. There’s a lot of interesting stuff at the Quail, including a colossal inflatable bellhop and Road & Track‘s free caviar bar. Seriously, both those things are real.
The Quail is also known for having a shocking number of automotive supercar startups showing off their stuff, and they’re almost always low, wide, wedge-ish shaped supercars with doors that open in novel and funny ways and huge mid-mounted engines making thousands of horsepower and costing more than a whole truckload of fresh human kidneys, individually wrapped.
There were plenty of those this year, of course, and I’ll admit that at this point, I’m getting pretty blind to these things, since these kinds of wildly expensive supercars, even if they actually get built, are so inaccessible and removed from the actual normal-person world of driving that they really just don’t matter.

One of these startup supercar companies at the Quail this year actually did manage to catch my attention, because they seemed to be doing something actually different, and had a car that actually stood out from the crowds, especially the crowd of your standard low, wide, carbon-fiber-slathered funny-door supercars. That company was Dacora, and they’re building a striking-looking, retro-inspired, gargantuan EV, slathered with exotic high-end materials.

Of course, the first thing you notice about the Dacora is the design, which feels vaguely late ’30s to early ’40s, an Art Deco-ish sort of thing. There’s a number of cars where I could sense inspiration came from, though the founder of the company MIT engineering grad Kristie D’Ambrosio-Correll would only confirm one of my guesses, the Chrysler Airflow.

I see some Tatra and Skoda and Adler in there, too, but I may be projecting, of course. Sure, the look is perhaps verging on caricature, but I still like it; it’s striking and fun and non-boring, and if you’re going to be dropping a ton of money on a car, why be subtle? Who said there has to be restraint for a comfortable, big, expensive car? Why not evoke an alternate world where zeppelin travel is common and everyone dresses in smart suits and everything is elegant and exuberant?

What I especially like about Dacora is what they’re not doing: developing an EV drivetrain. They say they have a drivetrain with an 800 horsepower motor and 400 miles of range and while I believe that range number as much as I believe in the Tooth Fairy and her global empire of child tooth-collection (which are sold to piano key and cue ball manufacturing concerns), I do respect that they understand that now is the time for coachbuilding companies, ones that make bodies and use existing platforms and drivetrains.
Because, really, what would they bring to the table that’s not already available? The dirty secret is that EV drivetrains really aren’t all that different, so why waste time and money developing something no one is going to notice as being any different than any other EV?
Now, D’Ambrosio-Correll wouldn’t tell us just whose EV platform they were using, but they did say it was an American one, and I have my suspicions. David thought he recognized some suspension parts from a Tesla, and found at least one part sticker that seemed to confirm this, and looking at some pictures from Dacora’s press release, I think I see Tesla wheels and seats:

We asked D’Ambrosio-Correll about this in an interview (which we’ll have soon) but until then we have this short reel:
Those Tesla wheels and seats didn’t stick around, of course. There’s custom full-disc, more retro period-appropriate wheels and some very fancy interior fittings far beyond Tesla’s offerings.

I especially like how they’re handling their digital displays: they’re projected through the wood, a fun party trick, and a nice way to hide a big dumb touchscreen.

The physical brochure I was given shows four different seating configurations, ranging from four to six seats, and one three-seater dictator’s spec, where a Very Important Somebody can take up the whole back half of the car.

There are luggage areas front and rear, and that long hood hides a frunk that’s so huge it’s almost truck-bed sized; Dacora says a full-sized skis can be stuck in there. I think the founder even mentioned something about tailgate-style seating under that long wooden hood? Or maybe just organizing systems. It’s big, I know that much.
Dacora plans to build these in the Hudson Valley of New York, and they’d like $500,000 of your dollars if you want one of these striking cars. They say they’ve had a substantial number of pre-orders already, at full price (!), which is, um, surprising. I’m not sure I think $500,000 makes sense for this or, well, almost anything outside of a spacecraft, if I’m honest, but if they can get takers at that price, fantastic.
What I’d love to see is this coachbuilding approach applied to cars that sell for something more reasonable, say $100,000 to $200,000 or so, which is still plenty of money. Really, I’d like to see many more companies using this approach popping up, taking EV skateboards and popping on interesting bodies. I’ve been saying this for a decade!
I’m very curious to see where this goes; it usually seems like these sorts of companies show some bold ideas and then we never see them again; I’m hoping this one will be different.






Ooh, Dacora! When only the fanciest of light switches will do!
It’s basically a classic Chris-Craft wooden boat, except it’s a car.
This seems like a perfect car for today’s wealth gap. Seems more Cruella DeVille than anything else in its price range.
That said, I would have liked more pics.
I really like it and that it’s something different, not just another boring car. But at this price point…who cares…
I… kinda like it! And the coach building idea is one whose time has come!
God its ugly. Didn’t anyone lean over the screen when it was being designed and say: ” Yeah… let’s not do that…”
This!!! I’ve been whispering this into my closet for a few years now! I wish the price point made more sense, but someone else finally passed through my wavelength!
My only design critique is that the back of the front fender needed to have a recurve back to meet the running board rather than cross it. The three seat configuration is dumb.
Ugh. I just had a look at their website. 6,500 lbs? With a driver and three adults plus luggage, this would scratch the upper limit of what I could legally drive here.
They must have used a Hummer EV’s skateboard.
It’s cool that someone is taking the coachbuilding potential of EVs somewhat seriously.
Even if the price isn’t.
But that name – It sounds like a brand of the kind of plastic faux-gold crap from China that’s strewn all over the Oval Office these days.
“… it usually seems like these sorts of companies show some bold ideas and then we never see them again…” I am going with this read.
I like it. From the pictures it looks retro, but not in an awkward late-model-Excalibur kind of way. It does exude a weird sort of class.
I think it’s all in the rake of the windscreen. The Excalibur looks to have used enough parts (scuttle panel, door glass, whole doors maybe?) from a donor car that the windscreen rake was set at the angle of the donor vehicle – and whatever that was it was far too raked for a car pretending to be that old.It’s a common problem for any ‘new car pretending to be old’ – the output of Mitsuoka springs to mind too.
I’m impressed that it looks like this one doesn’t use any of the body structure from the donor vehicle, which has allowed them to use an appropriately upright screen for the body style.
Excalibur used their own windshields and cowl, there were surprisingly few split V windshields in production in the ’70s and ’80s for them to borrow
Clenet, though, used the complete body tub of the Super Beetle convertible, doors, cowl, windshield
Weird. Why on earth would you make it look like that if you had the choice?
Are you thinking of Excalibur or someone else like Zimmer or CMC?
No, definitely Excalibur – like this one.
https://www.schmitt.com/inventory/1982-excalibur-series-iv-roadster-70q/
If the windscreen was less raked it would be a lot more believeable.
Of course Torch likes it … It looks like a bejewelled Beetle from the front!
You see 30’s Art Deco, I see a modernized take on a 1967 Mohs Ostentatienne!
The interior is amazing. The outside looks like a modern Excalibur.
I think it would have stood out more if it were designed for no driver, ala a rich person’s robotaxi. Then you wouldn’t have to have the seats facing forward. They could be facing each other, like in a private jet. Since this is trying to be a modern take on, say, a Duesenberg. No rich person then would be caught dead actually driving it. That was for the Help.
So, they basically are doing what YouTube’s “Superfast Matt” did a few years back, fitting a Tesla drivetrain to a Jaguar Mk. IX, but with a bespoke body designed by ChatGPT.
I couldn’t put my finger on it, but it really does look like the body was designed by ChatGPT. It looks… weird, and not necessarily in a good way.
Their website does scream of AI generation, there’s some real nuggets of brown in there.
Wonder how it changes the driving dynamics when you shift the passenger cabin so far back on the wheelbase.
Don’t know about this one in particular, but in general terms as you get moved back further you lose the immediacy of the feedback on what the car is doing traction wise relative to turning and braking thus hurting your ability to drive at the limit, but in exchange you gain an immediacy on the feedback of traction relative to the overall rotation of the car that helps you drive the car closer to the limit. FWD / AWD I’d rather sit a bit forward of the center, but in RWD I’d rather be at the center.
Although a lot of luxury goods exist simply to separate rich people from their money, I’d take this funky design over the tacticool low poly bunker-on-wheels fad any day of the week. I think it looks both goofy and neat in a Chevy SSR kinda way.
For that much scratch, they better be offering hefty customization. You sure don’t want to be pulling up behind your twinsie in the valet line for $500k.
I believe that is part of the plan.
I like weird pretentious stuff so obviously this caught my eye, but the moment you mentioned the frunk being so big you could store skis in it I feel like the bubble popped for me – the point of having a nose like that is to have an engine inside it; if you don’t have 16 cylinders in there, it’s all just so much cosplay. I don’t know what the design language for “fast car in the electric era” is, but just covering yesterday’s hits is gonna get old at some point.
(Edit: that said, they get some points back for the 3-seater layout. Yes to my executive chariot pls)
am trying to imagine someone driving this to the ski hill…
I can see the designers clearly enjoyed huffing blue spray paint.
The hood makes it look like an upside down dead whale. They need something to break up that vast expanse. Not necessarily a traditional grille but something between the “hood” and the “grille” areas.
Other than that it’s an interesting development I shall never be able to afford.
Crap, I can’t see anything but whale now.
It’s nice to see someone actually using the ‘skateboard’ instead of just developing new skateboards.
I love the looks of this, although the headlights remind me of WWII German cars with the top and bottom of the headlights blacked out to avoid detection by aircraft.
Like the Red Skull’s car from the first Captain America movie!
I saw this in person, and to my eye the proportions were off. I could see what they were going for, but for me they missed the mark quite badly…
Hudson Valley eh…. off to see if they are hiring. This is quite nice, and certainly original and interesting.
Wonder if it’s a Rensselaer offshoot or what. Troy’s a cool old town.
Troylet?
Look, it has RPI, the gas regulator building, Uncle Sam, a decent Crossfit box, Dinosaur BBQ and The Ruck, and most importantly it’s not Albany.