One little detail on certain cars that I always thought was cool was frameless door glass. You don’t see it much anymore; I don’t know if the new safety regulations make it more difficult, or if designers have just abandoned the idea, but I kind of miss it. So today we’re going to look at two coupes from years past with no frames around their door glass.
Yesterday’s cars didn’t have anything in common except the price, and the fact that they were both pretty awful choices. You had to choose between a complete lack of horsepower, and a complete lack of taste. The Dodge’s junkyard status and horrible modifications were just too much for the majority of you, though, so the Aspire sort of won by default. This is probably the only thing an automatic Ford Aspire will ever win, so I’m happy for it.


Actually, I kind of like that little blueberry. I don’t want to try to drive it over a mountain pass, or in DC traffic, but for buzzing around town, it looks like just the ticket. It would be a cinch to park, and you’d never have to worry about anyone stealing it; it would be the world’s slowest getaway vehicle.
Everyone has their little details that they love about cars; one of mine has always been frameless door glass. There’s just something cool about opening the door to a car with the window down and having nothing sticking up above the top of the door. It does have its drawbacks; a friend’s Camaro in high school had the most rattly glass I’ve ever seen. When the windows were half-open, you could move the glass an inch back and forth. His dad warned him repeatedly to only close the doors with the windows all the way up, or all the way down, nothing in between, to keep from breaking them. But the cars that I have had with such windows have all been fine, including my MGB GT, which scores bonus points for having frameless windows alongside flip-open vent windows, which are also very cool.
But enough about my weird fenestral predilections. Let’s look at some cars.
1997 Buick Riviera – $3,100

Engine/drivetrain: Supercharged 3.8-liter OHV V6, four-speed automatic, FWD
Location: Hurricane, UT
Odometer reading: 79,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well, but needs tires
The Buick Riviera pretty much bookended the personal luxury coupe era. There were a few that came before it, and a few that straggled on after it, but for the bulk of the style’s popularity, the Riviera was there. And for much of that time, it was one of the coolest options around. Sure, there were some pretty sad offerings in the late 70s and early 80s, but all cars were sad then. The Riv started strong, in 1963, and I’d say it ended pretty strong as well, with this final generation.

The Riviera went front-wheel-drive in 1979 and stayed that way for the rest of its run, generally using the same platform as the Oldsmobile Toronado and Cadillac Eldorado, both of which were already FWD. But while the Toronado bowed out in 1992, and the Eldorado suffered the indignity of a string of terrible engine choices, the Riviera got some serious muscle back in its final generation, courtesy of the supercharged 3800 Series II V6. It puts out 240 horsepower, or about twice what the V6 in the early 80s Rivieras had to work with. Ain’t technology something? The seller says it runs and drives well, but has old tires, so you should probably replace them before using too much of that power.

The Riviera was Buick’s flagship, and therefore heavily optioned, but this one has an interior I’ve never seen before, with a cloth split-bench seat and a column-mounted shifter. Every other Riviera I’ve seen from this era had bucket seats and a center console, and nearly all of them had leather. It looks nice, just unexpected. The air conditioning is not blowing cold, and not blowing out of the dash vents, either. My guess is that the actuator motors for the HVAC system have failed; they have a finite life on GM cars. Sometimes they’re easy to get to, and sometimes they’re really not. But they’re cheap parts.

I remember a coworker of mine at the garage referring to this style of Riviera as the “Lady Remington,” complaining that its rounded shape looked like a women’s electric shaver. But he had terrible taste in everything else, too; this is a nice-looking car. This one could be a more exciting color, but it’s in good condition.
2000 Toyota Celica GT-S – $3,100

Engine/drivetrain: 1.8 liter DOHC inline 4, six-speed manual, FWD
Location: Kent, WA
Odometer reading: 272,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well, driven daily
The Toyota Celica certainly was never a personal luxury coupe, but it could be called a pony car, at least in its early days. Like the Riviera, however, it switched to front-wheel-drive halfway through its life, though for a few glorious years a turbocharged all-wheel-drive version was offered. For its final generation, the Celica was FWD only, with a choice of two twin-cam four-cylinder engines.

This is the GT-S model, with the more powerful 2ZZ-GE engine and a six-speed manual transmission. It has a ton of miles on it, but the seller says it runs great, and they still drive it daily. It’s not quite stock; the suspension has been lowered, and for some bizarre reason, the power steering has been deleted. I don’t know why anyone would want to remove the power steering on a nose-heavy FWD car with wide tires; exercise, maybe? At least all the stuff is included to put it back.

It’s showing its age in the interior, with lots of wear on the driver’s seat, and some general grubbiness. But it’s a Toyota, so I assume everything still works. It has a sunroof, and there’s some weirdness going on around the edges of it, but the seller says it works fine and doesn’t leak.

It has some dings and scuffs, but that’s to be expected with this many miles. One issue that happens a lot with cars this age is cloudy headlights. There are polishing kits available to remove the cloudiness, but the seller of this Celica solved the problem in a better way – by replacing them.
$3,100 isn’t nothing, but it’s still pretty cheap for a running, driving car these days. They’ll both need a little work, but I think they both have good bones. So would you rather buy tires and do HVAC work, or rebuild a power steering system? The choice is yours.
My last car was an 07 Subaru Outback, and I thought one of the cooler features of the car was the frameless doors. I miss them!
I’m shocked the Buick is winning this race, but they’re both good choices today. I voted for the Celica.
I could pretend I’m in the sopranos with the riv, all I need is a tracksuit
Just a side note – in my 41 years of driving, I’ve owned only four cars, and all were frameless window coupes. I’ve been driving my 05 Stratus R/T coupe since new. I also had a 77 Grand LeMans, 86 Grand Prix, and 95 Z-28.
Toughest choice of the week so far. But the less work for the better design Toyota won out but not by much as those interiors are night and day. But then again the Toyota will get you around the world a few times it looks like it only has one lap left.
Both are interesting options but the Buick has a timeless design to it.
I wish the Buick was that pearl white though instead of 90s champagne, but I voted for it regardless.
I do like the Celica style more than I did back in 2000.
This was tough as I have a thing for both of these cars. That’s a lot of miles on the Celica, even if it is a Toyota. It’s been lowered and the steering has been depowered? Sounds janky. The column shift and bench seat hurt my feelings on the Buick, but I still love that deep-dish retro dash. I’ll go Buick.
If someone shuts my frameless door by pushing on the glass I will fling a brick at their head with all my might. Peace.
Make sure the windows are down before you leave it at them
I was pretty sure when I voted I was going to be a contrarian with my vote for the Riv. Imagine my surprise at being with a significant majority. If I needed a car there’s a lot worse ways to spend $3100, or even more for something less useful and reliable. The Riv is in lovely shape and should have a long life ahead of it.
Owning a 96 Subaru, I can tell you one of the issues with frameless glass is it’s super easy for someone to get into the car.
Worst 6spd I’ve ever tried. 1st 3rd and 5th had the same position. F the celica
Too many miles on a Toyota that’s too ugly. I’m not opposed in principle, but I never thought this model had good style, it hasn’t aged especially well, and say what you want about Toyota longevity, 222k miles is a lot, especially for something sporty.
By contrast, I didn’t love this Riviera when it came out (thought it was far inferior to the contemporary Aurora), but it grew on me pretty quickly, and it only looks better with time. And a 3800 with 79k miles has a lot more time left than even a non-sporty Toyota with 222k.
Supercharger pulley change to a 3.4″ or 3.5″ with supporting mods. Open up the exhaust. Change the S/C oil.
Yeah, you’ll eventually pop the transmission if you hoon it too much.
But you’ll have a great highway cruiser with passing power galore in the meantime.
The Buick is likely the better choice. That model Celica wasn’t a great car to drive, and the 3.8 is an engine that could give Toyota a run for its money. With 160,000 fewer miles, it seems to be the obvious choice, especially when the Toyota is cursed with another person’s modifications.
Agreed that is one of the few that could compete with the Toyota engines but with GM everything else on the car is going to shit where most of the rest of the Toyota is as good as the engine
I’m going w/ my heart today…I like both of these, but gotta go Yoda…that Riviera body style was kinda weird especially the front end. The Celica was always a lot of fun and it will be nice cruising in it especially since it’s stick
Toyota’s are reliable sure, but 272k is a lot of miles. Combined with the questionable mods, I suspect there is other strangeness in that car. Price is CP.
Give me the Buick with the supercharger. That was a reliable drivetrain and the inevitable annoying failures are well understood and easy to fix.
My El Camino has frameless door glass. That’s one of the reasons I bought it 25 years ago.
I’m a GM guy, so I voted Buick. But the 3 pedals in the Celica did make me 2nd guess myself for a while.
Buick would have been the choice if the AC worked and it had the expected interior with the floor shifter and buckets. As it stands, it’s basically someone’s grandparent’s car who apparently got too cold when the AC was on anyway. I don’t like my chances at being able to fix all the ills under the dashboard there, so I’m willing to roll the dice on making the sketchy toyota workable.
Counter opinion: Frameless glass sucks. When the window regulator wears (and it will because there is no support from a frame), the window will pull away from the seal at speed and make for horrendous wind noise. Then, when you replace the window mechanism at great cost, the seals will dry out and the terrible noise will return.
Rinse and repeat.
Lived with frameless. I experienced that seals didn’t work unless the door closed with the window fully up. Which was an issue as I had no ac. Fun fact a loyale at 80mph had no resistance to a door opening fully. Like you had to stop the door before it left your hand.
Not a great choice. Like some of you, I’m not a fan of the styling of that generation of Celica. It’s also more beat-up than the Buick. The Celica would clearly be a lot more fun to drive, though, especially during the summer here. And as someone else mentioned, if the A/C on the Buick was an easy fix, it would have been done. I picked the Toyota.
I voted Riviera. I wasn’t a fan of the design at the time, but it has really grown on me. Too bad it’s that champagne color that every surviving late-’90s and early-’00s Buick seems to be painted.
The champagne of paint colors still beats white, grey and black. Anyone think they changed from gray to grey to add some excitement?
This s a tough one the Celicas as just about all Toyotas of that era have grown on me. But so have that gen of Rivera. I’ve looked for both occasionally. 72k mi seems like you would have jump on it too had it’s not that blue on blue though. They could be the last true old man sports car nice plush interior still kinda bouncy suspension but decent power.