One little detail on certain cars that I always thought was cool was frameless door glass. You don’t see it much anymore; I don’t know if the new safety regulations make it more difficult, or if designers have just abandoned the idea, but I kind of miss it. So today we’re going to look at two coupes from years past with no frames around their door glass.
Yesterday’s cars didn’t have anything in common except the price, and the fact that they were both pretty awful choices. You had to choose between a complete lack of horsepower, and a complete lack of taste. The Dodge’s junkyard status and horrible modifications were just too much for the majority of you, though, so the Aspire sort of won by default. This is probably the only thing an automatic Ford Aspire will ever win, so I’m happy for it.


Actually, I kind of like that little blueberry. I don’t want to try to drive it over a mountain pass, or in DC traffic, but for buzzing around town, it looks like just the ticket. It would be a cinch to park, and you’d never have to worry about anyone stealing it; it would be the world’s slowest getaway vehicle.
Everyone has their little details that they love about cars; one of mine has always been frameless door glass. There’s just something cool about opening the door to a car with the window down and having nothing sticking up above the top of the door. It does have its drawbacks; a friend’s Camaro in high school had the most rattly glass I’ve ever seen. When the windows were half-open, you could move the glass an inch back and forth. His dad warned him repeatedly to only close the doors with the windows all the way up, or all the way down, nothing in between, to keep from breaking them. But the cars that I have had with such windows have all been fine, including my MGB GT, which scores bonus points for having frameless windows alongside flip-open vent windows, which are also very cool.
But enough about my weird fenestral predilections. Let’s look at some cars.
1997 Buick Riviera – $3,100

Engine/drivetrain: Supercharged 3.8-liter OHV V6, four-speed automatic, FWD
Location: Hurricane, UT
Odometer reading: 79,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well, but needs tires
The Buick Riviera pretty much bookended the personal luxury coupe era. There were a few that came before it, and a few that straggled on after it, but for the bulk of the style’s popularity, the Riviera was there. And for much of that time, it was one of the coolest options around. Sure, there were some pretty sad offerings in the late 70s and early 80s, but all cars were sad then. The Riv started strong, in 1963, and I’d say it ended pretty strong as well, with this final generation.

The Riviera went front-wheel-drive in 1979 and stayed that way for the rest of its run, generally using the same platform as the Oldsmobile Toronado and Cadillac Eldorado, both of which were already FWD. But while the Toronado bowed out in 1992, and the Eldorado suffered the indignity of a string of terrible engine choices, the Riviera got some serious muscle back in its final generation, courtesy of the supercharged 3800 Series II V6. It puts out 240 horsepower, or about twice what the V6 in the early 80s Rivieras had to work with. Ain’t technology something? The seller says it runs and drives well, but has old tires, so you should probably replace them before using too much of that power.

The Riviera was Buick’s flagship, and therefore heavily optioned, but this one has an interior I’ve never seen before, with a cloth split-bench seat and a column-mounted shifter. Every other Riviera I’ve seen from this era had bucket seats and a center console, and nearly all of them had leather. It looks nice, just unexpected. The air conditioning is not blowing cold, and not blowing out of the dash vents, either. My guess is that the actuator motors for the HVAC system have failed; they have a finite life on GM cars. Sometimes they’re easy to get to, and sometimes they’re really not. But they’re cheap parts.

I remember a coworker of mine at the garage referring to this style of Riviera as the “Lady Remington,” complaining that its rounded shape looked like a women’s electric shaver. But he had terrible taste in everything else, too; this is a nice-looking car. This one could be a more exciting color, but it’s in good condition.
2000 Toyota Celica GT-S – $3,100

Engine/drivetrain: 1.8 liter DOHC inline 4, six-speed manual, FWD
Location: Kent, WA
Odometer reading: 272,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well, driven daily
The Toyota Celica certainly was never a personal luxury coupe, but it could be called a pony car, at least in its early days. Like the Riviera, however, it switched to front-wheel-drive halfway through its life, though for a few glorious years a turbocharged all-wheel-drive version was offered. For its final generation, the Celica was FWD only, with a choice of two twin-cam four-cylinder engines.

This is the GT-S model, with the more powerful 2ZZ-GE engine and a six-speed manual transmission. It has a ton of miles on it, but the seller says it runs great, and they still drive it daily. It’s not quite stock; the suspension has been lowered, and for some bizarre reason, the power steering has been deleted. I don’t know why anyone would want to remove the power steering on a nose-heavy FWD car with wide tires; exercise, maybe? At least all the stuff is included to put it back.

It’s showing its age in the interior, with lots of wear on the driver’s seat, and some general grubbiness. But it’s a Toyota, so I assume everything still works. It has a sunroof, and there’s some weirdness going on around the edges of it, but the seller says it works fine and doesn’t leak.

It has some dings and scuffs, but that’s to be expected with this many miles. One issue that happens a lot with cars this age is cloudy headlights. There are polishing kits available to remove the cloudiness, but the seller of this Celica solved the problem in a better way – by replacing them.
$3,100 isn’t nothing, but it’s still pretty cheap for a running, driving car these days. They’ll both need a little work, but I think they both have good bones. So would you rather buy tires and do HVAC work, or rebuild a power steering system? The choice is yours.
Between tires and A/C, figure on being into the Riviera for $5500 tops, which is an absolute bargain for a classy way to waft up to the Del Boca Vista clubhouse for the mah jongg tournament.
A supercharged coupe with bench seats and that seems to only need a AC charge? And the Buick 3800?
Sign me the **** up.
Man, this is a tough one. I think your pic probably says more about your age then anything else. Fifteen years ago I would have picked the celica in a heartbeat. Now that my age starts with a four and not a two my choice would have to be the Riv. That supercharged 3800 really pulls and it’s pretty smooth. The Riv is also just a much nicer place to be. That 3800 will also outlast you and everyone you love.
I came in totally expecting to vote for the Celica but then I saw the miles and bizarre mods, and how clean the Riviera is, so I guess it’s Buick today.
Riv in a heartbeat. Tires are not an issue. Fix the AC, and that’s an EXCELLENT car. And kudos to GM styling. GM cars looked so much alike, particularly from 77-early 90’s that having a car that looked like nothing else from GM was a breath of fresh air.
Kinda want both. The Riv for the SC 3.8 and the Celica for the 6 speed. But the Toyota has been worked over so it’s Buick for me. I’m used to AC not working in pretty much the entire fleet.
Celica all day for me on this one, Yeah the miles are heavy but I always liked this model and these are pretty easy to do an engine swap on over a weekend assuming the rest of the car is reasonably solid. If it eats a rod in the first year I can swap it out or part it out. The power steering would have to go back in though, I’m too old to muscle it around in parking lots.
The Buick isn’t bad, it’s the right setup with the supercharger, the mileage is good and it presents well, just not my style at all.
Supercharged 3800? Bench seat with a column shifter?! Riviera all day!
Always wanted a Last Gen Rivie. Supercharged poverty spec…kind of a mixed bag there as this would not be something I would want to make into a sleeper racer or anything. Still I think the miles and overal engine spec wins me out today. I do like a manual Celica, and that one is not fully Boi raced out, but the miles still get me turning away from it.
Great choices today. I’m picking the Riviera and once I slap some new rubber on it, we’re going autocrossing!
This is actually a tough choice. Obviously manual vs auto but I’m growing more appreciative of comfortable cars and the Buick should have tons of that and actual space. But, no AC could create an unpleasant swamp ass scenario unless adressed. Still, I’ll take my chances on the Buick.
I am sure the AC can be fixed with a little love, I highly doubt the Celica has working AC either.
After being told on how badly virtually all of those stick last-gen Celica’s were beaten by my old college professor, I wouldn’t touch one with a 10-foot pole.
I’d rather deal with the same aged car (as myself) driven about as much as my own car.
I want a couch with wheels that can move fast, Riviera could be considered a sleeper. I already have a Miata that kills my back already lol
Never was a fan of the final gen Celica’s styling, and I used to rock a 92 Toronado – so I’m going Buick all day on this one.
Riv.
Celica is probably more “fun” but I place a high value on serenity as I edge toward 50. And since the Buick is mostly a W-body , there’s lots of possibilities if you want to get creative.
I’m TIRED of 4 cylinder engine notes and road noise.
I do like cars that handle well.
The Buick with some careful parts selection (a lot of stuff is going to need attention at some point, anyway – everything that moves is a wear item).
I’ll take my chances with the on the way back from the Moon stickshift Toyota over the Genuine GM Junk. That looks like a used suppository.
Not a choice. Toyota all day long. (It will go with my 90 Celica GTS former race car.)
I voted the Toyota at first but after thinking about it the Buick I could buy and then go buy a stick shift Fiero and put the 3800 sc into that and have a much more fun and cool car then either of these hoopties.
Ah optimism.
read my mind, same, right after I voted I went hmmmm, fiero swap!
(Internet high five) this guy gets it glad I am not the only crazy one haha.
I don’t particularly like the styling of either of these cars, but whereas I view the Toyota with mild distaste, I loathe the Buick. So it comes down to other attributes and a zingy four-banger with a stir your own six-speed is always going to beat grandpa’s V-6 and an auto box. Reluctantly, Celica.
That Riv is just begging to eat up highway, and has 200k less on it.
We’re rocking the Personal Luxury Coupe today.
That Celica is mighty tempting, but I cannot resist the idea of wafting into my golden years at the wheel of that supercharged Riv.
Get off my lawn!
I went for the Celica straight away on this one. The Buick is probably real comfy but I feel like a sport coupe today. Also I have frameless doors on my Delta and my 93 Legacy and I have to say it’s a nice thing to have.
Toyota reliability and a six-speed in a fun little coupe? Where do I sign?
I love these final gen Celicas – can’t go wrong with a Toyota take on the venerable everyday sport coupe concept. While I think the Scion tC was the one that nailed the formula for what most buyers actually wanted, I can’t resist the Celica’s micro GT racecar style. They’re shockingly low to the ground for something even of this era, not to mention now.
I was more than ready to be on Team Celica because I love that design, but damn, that’s a lot of miles even for a Toyota.