Good morning! I wasn’t sure what I wanted to do for this week, so I just grabbed a bunch of car ads that caught my eye and started pairing them up by whatever criteria I could think of. Today’s cars both have two doors, eight cylinders, and different wheels than they originally came with. I guess that’s enough to tie them together.
Friday’s choices had about as much in common; they were both freshly-painted cars from the 70s that needed some mechanical work. And it was no contest; the AMC Hornet not only won on its charm and price, but it also pushed the nostalgia button for a lot of you. We forget, as rare as they are now, but AMC’s cars were actually pretty popular in the 70s, so nearly everyone who was alive then remembers one or two.


And I learned something about each of the cars from the comments, which is always fun – a lot more fun than when I get something completely wrong and you all jump down my throat over it. The Dodge Magnum’s clear headlight covers were retractable because DOT required it, so they’re probably not missing on that car, just stuck open. And the US Forest Service once used a fleet of AMC Hornet sedans, painted in my beloved Forest Service Green. Now that would be a cool project to find.
Non-car people don’t often get this, but a car’s wheels can absolutely make or break its appearance. Since the wheels are one of the easiest things to change on a car, a huge aftermarket exists offering just about any style of wheel to fit just about any car you can imagine. The right set of wheels can make a car look the way it was always meant to look, but the wrong set can destroy the whole effect. Luckily, if you find a car that’s otherwise appealing but has the wrong wheels, you can change them easily. These two have some questionable wheel choices, but they’re both interesting enough cars to warrant a look.
1961 Buick LeSabre – $3,000

Engine/drivetrain: 364 cubic inch overhead valve V8, two-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Auburn, WA
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: “Runs, drives, stops”
Here we have a prime example of why I have stopped trusting sellers. This car is listed as a 1963 Buick LeSabre, but it didn’t quite look right. I thought I remembered the ’63 GM full-size cars being boxier than this. This style of hardtop coupe, with its slender pillars and huge windows, is commonly known as a “bubbletop,” and it was only produced for one year: 1961.

The ’61 LeSabre is powered by a 364 cubic inch version of Buick’s “Nailhead” overhead-valve V8, along with a two-speed “Dynaflow” automatic. If you’ve never driven a car with this transmission, it’s wild – it almost acts like a CVT. The torque converter does most of the work; in fact, the Dynaflow normally operates only in high gear. If you want low gear, for acceleration or climbing hills, you have to downshift it yourself. If you’re thinking that sounds horribly inefficient, you’d be right. This is not an economy car. It runs and drives, but that’s all the seller has to say.

It has been customized a bit inside; someone has covered the seats and door panels with some sort of fuzzy purple material. I don’t know the condition of the seats under it, but I have a feeling it’s not good. If you’re OK with looking like you skinned Grimace for your car interior, it might be best to just leave it.

Outside, it has some rust, but it’s probably ignorable unless you plan to really go deep and fully restore it. The seller does say that the trunk floor is rusted out, though, so if you want to put anything back there, you should probably weld a new pan in. The wheels are unfortunate, but they can be changed, and you could probably sell these to fund something more suitable – I’m thinking steelies with baby moon hubcaps.
1983 Mercury Cougar LS – $3,500

Engine/drivetrain: 302 cubic inch overhead valve V8, four-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Odometer reading: 128,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
The Mercury Cougar was always a car with an identity crisis. It started out as a fancy version of the Ford Mustang, then later became Mercury’s version of the Ford Torino and Elite, and then joined forces with the Thunderbird. The generation before this was virtually indistinguishable from the Thunderbird, so for this 1983 redesign, Mercury made sure the Cougar stood out. Whether or not that’s a good thing depends on how you feel about its odd bolt-upright rear window.

The standard Cougar engine was Ford’s Essex 3.8-liter V6, but this one has the optional V8, which Ford calls a 5.0-liter, but only if you round up. It’s really 4.942 liters, but that doesn’t look as good on a badge. In the Cougar, this engine is fed by throttle-body fuel injection and makes a tire-chirping 130 horsepower. The transmission is Ford’s AOD four-speed automatic. The seller says it’s dependable and was recently “serviced,” whatever that means to them.

Ford did a slightly better job with interiors in the 80s than GM or Chrysler did, but there’s still an awful lot of creaky plastic in here. It has bucket seats and a center console, but for some reason the shifter is still on the column; maybe Mercury thought a floor shifter was just too racy for its customer base. It’s in reasonably good shape, but I can’t tell if the upholstery is dirty, or worn, or just badly photographed.

It’s clean outside, and as rust-free as you’d expect a desert car to be. I’m guessing this car originally came with steel wheels and fake wire wheel hubcaps. I guess the American Racing five-spoke wheels are an improvement. At least it has all four center caps, unlike so many cars from the ’80s and ’90s that wear these wheels.
These two are basically the same idea, just a couple of decades apart, so I guess the question is whether you prefer late Jet Age styling, or the early aero efforts of the Reagan years. You’ve got a good-running V8 either way. So what’ll it be?
Love the ’61 LeSabre style, but there are just too many cheap Mustang parts that bolt right into the Cougar.
I know it was a year ago, but $5500 bought you this ’61 LeSabre on BaT…
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1961-buick-lesabre-7/
I doubt I can make this LeSabre look like that one for $3k.
So I guess Cougar it is, but really I’d look for another deal on a LeSabre because it is 1000x’s cooler looking.
Looked at both of these and the price. Threw up in my mouth a bit. And decided to listen to The Boss and buy some sneakers. It’s like you aren’t even trying.
Buick … Although it was 1 year before, and with the larger engine, this car is from an era when Buick did some extraordinary things. Throw out the upholstery, the wheels, and probably lots else, to make it worthwhile.
I actually LIKE the Cougar, price is ok for a V8 in this condition.
I had the Oldsmobile version of that Buick as my first car. There’s more maintenance tasks that are not needed on modern cars. Plus I do not miss vaporlock. I’m voting Cougar.
This was easy…60’s classic Buick! (is always gonna win over early 80’s ugly FoMoCo product w/ throttle body) This Lesabre design isn’t my favorite, but it’s still decent and unique. I’d swap out the wheels in a jiffy though. I think those seats may be ok- sometimes owners cover them to protect them (a lot of times not though) I look forward to cruising in comfort/style while hearing the music of that big ol’ V8!
I hate the roof on the Cougar but I won’t cut off my nose to spite my face. You almost had me at baby moons and steelies.
While I’d think about a ’61 LeSabre, this rolling 70’s lounge interior with ugly, oversized wheels ain’t it. Its a perfect example of ‘the worst taste in everything.’
So, begrudingly, the Cougar. The first gen Cougar is probably the only Mercury I would ever actually want, but this style was the one I remember from my youth, so I would be ok with it.
All I can hear in the back of my head is a Southern Youtuber saying “puh-tina.” Heck off with that Buick. Pull the seats out of the Couger and put in something less worn/faded to hell (desert!) and I’m in.
I’m not a fan of Fox body Cougars but this one presents much better than the Buick. And look it’s got period-correct aftermarket wheels! You can also spice things up on that 302 with less than $1K. I’d just do that and a good clean up.
Honestly if the Buick didn’t have a rusted out trunk or the crappy interior it would’ve won as it’s brown and gorgeous on the outside. But these two issues combined are a big nope for me.
I guess the Cougar, but only because that Buick’s interior makes me Grimace.
*I understood that reference* GIF goes here
I don’t want either of these uninteresting roached out shitboxes this time. Buick if you put a gun to my head.
From a design standpoint, the Buick is simply gorgeous – the bodywork and curves are just so spot on for that period. The problem here is the rest of that package. Boring by comparison, the Cougar is far from perfect, but pefectly serviceable as is. If you’re looking for a full resto, the Buick is your choice. I don’t have the funds for that, so I’m cool with tooling around in the Cougar. Hell…maybe the AC still works (!)
I think I’d rather sit on Grimace hide than whatever is going on on in the white thing from Quality Is Job One era Ford
Those wheels would go day one—if I didn’t just show up with black steelies and leave them with the questionable-decision owner’s driveway
I’m certain this is a bad decision, but that’s what we’re all here for, no?
You get the brief! This isn’t “Thomas pick your next car”.. It’s good decision or bad decision, which would you rather? The LaSabre is infinitely better looking, if more work, that the bar of soap with Cougar badges.
I’d take the Buick for looking better. They just don’t do cars with curves like that anymore. If I found myself with the Cougar, I think it would have to get chopped up and turned into some type of unholy ute with a pickup bed to match that flat rear window.
I wanted to vote for the Buick, but in its condition and comparable price to the Mercury, I had to go with the Cougar.
V-8 Fox Cougar, white with red interior, aftermarket wheels that actually look good, no rust, and the 1983-only hood ornament? There is nothing that does not appeal to me about this car.
Not sure we had any doubts with that username =D
I’m ashamed to admit I don’t hate the wheels on the Buick.
Even though it has the asthmatic ‘no output’ version of the Ford “5.0” 302, I’m going for the Cougar as I think that old LeSabre will need a ton of work and is likely even slower.
I do really like the style of that LeSabre. It would have gotten my vote if it was in better condition, didn’t have the ‘fur’ interior and didn’t have those stupid wheels on it.
Yeah, ditto. Add to that the aftermarket Cougar wheels don’t really look bad.
Given the glorious choices today.
I vote crackpipe.
Lewin ruined my sense of perspective with the “Hotrods of Iran” today. (not really)
YMMV
The Buick has charm in spades, but the better deal is the Mercury.
I’ll take the Buick, the interior and engine look OK even with the muppet factor.
Buick. Despite all the red flags, including the rust and non-original engine, I just cannot like that generation of Cougar. I don’t know exactly what it is that falls flat for me, but the Buick design is timeless.
Would have gone Buick but for the rust that’s surely a lot worse than it even looks, wrecked interior, and awful Dynaflow.