Home » Visceral Or Velveteen: What’s the Neoclassic Car Supposed to Be?

Visceral Or Velveteen: What’s the Neoclassic Car Supposed to Be?

Neoclassics Ts2
ADVERTISEMENT

There was a time when looking like a refugee from the past ensured you were, in fact, at the cutting edge of automotive luxury and flair. I’m talking about neoclassic cars, a movement that began in the ‘60s and exploded in the following decade.

As a kid, I adored the 1979 book Elite Cars, a bible containing plenty of machines from the school of neoclassicism. Vehicles like the Clenet and the Sceptre aped ’20s and ’30s design language, while revivals of Stutz and Duesenberg pulled period marques from the archives and attempted to blow the dust away. “The neoclassics appeal to those who missed out on the chance to own one of the originals, or who simply prefer vintage styling combined with the advantages of a modern, reliable chassis and running gear,” the book’s introduction crows. Ha. The emission choking of ’70s regulations did nothing to age that sentiment.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

More than forty years on, only a few are keeping the torch of these oddball status symbols burning. Myron Vernis, of Akron, Ohio, is one of those few. He owns a car from each end of the neoclassic spectrum – an Excalibur Roadster and a gilded, bastardized Lincoln called the Bugazzi (not to be confused with Bugatti). The Excalibur serves as the thesis statement, its rakish design beamed in from a bygone era and performance that embarrassed Corvettes of the day. This is the visceral neoclassic.

Excalibur2

The Bugazzi is velveteen, more of a rolling couch than a hot coupé and the ultimate iteration of the “land yacht.” Everything’s turned up to eleven here (and, chances are, that’s how many of the alleged twelve-car ‘production’ run are left). I love satire, and the Bugazzi is satirizing the concept of “high-end automobile.” I mean, just look at the name!

ADVERTISEMENT

Bugazzi1

When Vernis allowed me to visit his eclectic collection of cars, I received a metaphorical visit from my childhood self, who pored over Elite Cars and begged me to check out the Excalibur and the Bugazzi. In one corner, a genuine attempt at bringing the death-defying thrills of the past back. In the other, a fat cat that even Gatsby’s landlord could not have envisioned.

As I drove over to Vernis’ garage, I asked myself: What do people want out of a neoclassic? Do they want the to-the-bone thrill of the playboy racers from years past, or the smugness of eclipsing every Rolls-Royce at the club? Do they want an homage to ye olde sports cars, or something a Steely Dan song might mention in its lyrics about a prostitute killer? Do they want the smoke, or the joke?

It’s only fitting that the Excalibur Vernis owns is one of the earliest of the breed. The prototype’s debut in 1963 gave birth to the term “neoclassic,” after “contemporary classic” and the more humorous “new old car” failed to catch on.

Excalibur3

ADVERTISEMENT

Excalibur originated as a plan to save a flailing Studebaker, one of America’s oldest carmakers. Nicknamed “Mercebaker” for its Mercedes SSK-esque design, the low-slung, doorless wonder floored crowds at the 1963 New York Auto Show. Mission accomplished for designer Brooks Stevens, who envisioned Studebaker making the car as the SS. Problem was, though, Stude disowned the radical roadster at the last second before showtime. Stevens remained resolute, displayed the car as a “Special Project,” and began production himself, ditching the Studebaker powerplant for a 327 Chevrolet motor. Around one hundred of these svelte, O.G. Excaliburs were built.

Excalibur Ads
Excalibur

Vernis calls the two-seater the “taproot vehicle” of the neoclassic style. “I think the genre probably started when people said to [Stevens] ‘I really want one of those cars, but I need back seats, and my wife can’t crawl over…,’” Vernis says. The Series I Phaeton, with seating for four and lacking dead-ringer SSK looks, is considered to be the proper starting point of the neoclassic.

Don’t be fooled by the Excalibur’s exquisite body, or the fact that the one I drove was allegedly bought new by a producer of pornography: this car gets vicious, quick. My focus on this aubergine roadster centered on maintaining a firm grip, and not just on the wooden shift lever from Hurst.

Shifter

The Excalibur was acting a bit fussy before I took a spin, hence my refusal to pull over and take some more photos (for fear I’d be left stranded). That being said, 350 horsepower, a curb weight of just over a ton, and an absence of safety features means you’ll have your hands full even on a smooth drive. I grit my teeth, soaked in the rat-tat-tat from the sidepipes, and floored the brakes (which are akin to pencil erasers) between stoplight-to-stoplight rips.

ADVERTISEMENT

Excaliburwheel

Vernis told me, “You’re workin,’ dude!” He’s right. The Excalibur demands effort.

Airhorns

No wonder the car comes with air horns on the side: the freight-train driving experience feels as heavy-duty as the Bugazzi, despite the latter weighing almost three times as much.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking of which, let’s have a look at the opulent-ay-eff Lincoln MK IV. I admit to originally thinking that the Bugazzi came to be in the late ‘70s, rather than 1972; it’s an omega point for the nouveau classique. When the Bugazzi rolled out of iconic customizer George Barris’ studio, the asking price scraped $50,000, which was “nice house” money in its day.

The interior, trimmed in marble, makes the set of Scarface seem corner-cutting.

Marble Copy

Everything’s gold, Persian, leather, and creamy. As for the exterior, those wire wheels may just be my favorite feature of the car. Perfection.

Bugazziwhitewall

ADVERTISEMENT

I dig the little pinstripe design on the rear, as well.

Graphic Copy

As for the driving experience? Here we have a car you do not accelerate – you persuade the Bugazzi with an occasional glance at the Cartier clock before you. The cabin sways about, to the point that a seasick passenger is a more likely event than a carsick one. If you’re wondering, the V8 burble doesn’t escape from the sidepipes, mere ornaments in the quest to wow onlookers.

The Drive ran a great piece about Vernis’ Bugazzi in 2021. I would be foolish not to ask Victoria Scott, the journalist behind the article, about her experience behind the wheel.

Scott lovingly heralds the beast as a shameless piece of excess. “The Bugazzi’s relaxed demeanor about its extravagance is refreshing,” she says, in an age of modern luxury cars that feel the need to offer breakneck performance and the proverbial “loads more.” Like me, Scott agrees that the car is something of an ‘omega point,’ calling the Bugazzi “the final boss” of the land yacht.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrisbadge

If you’re curious, she’d take it any day over the giant-killing Excalibur. “The Bugazzi [is just] what it says on the tin. In the ‘60s, if you wanted vintage styling in a ‘modern’ car, you still had some MG models that were pretty solid track contenders!”

I wouldn’t. The Excalibur won my heart. If it were better-built and a smidge less risky in feeling, I’d grab the keys and the title. As a 1978 Porsche 928 owner, the Series I reminds me of an amped-up variation of the driving experience.

So why did this “old sport” movement jump from an emphasis on tire-squealing velocity to tire squealing in a gentle bend? When did extra features leap from a no-skid step over the searing-hot exhausts to a television?

Skidplate

ADVERTISEMENT

Television

I’d say that those who were rich enough to afford an Excalibur or, indeed, a Bugazzi, already had a bitchin’ Cobra or something of that ilk in their garages. Later Excaliburs (like the one in Elite Cars) grew bloated, serving an approximation of the Bugazzi’s grandeur. The majority of Excalibur’s clientele sought to be seen arriving, not leaving. No wonder the initial glimmer in Stevens’ eye devolved into parody.

While the Excalibur and Bugazzi have different missions, both of them make you feel like a character from fiction. The Excalibur: Mr. Toad from The Wind in the Willows. The Bugazzi: a Warner Brothers cartoon villain with a car that appears ten seconds before he does, the hood stretching out for ages. Each dish, while different, will leave you with a stupid grin and a full stomach. In a world where restomods, such as the 911s by Singer Vehicle Design and the Broncos and FJs by Icon, decorate driveways of the wealthy, perhaps we can view these old-school exercises in looking back and realize they were looking forward.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
28 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ignatius J. Reilly
Member
Ignatius J. Reilly
2 months ago

The Excalibur is like a person wearing one of those t-shirts with the tuxedo print on the front. You hope it is being worn ironically, but the chances are it isn’t. At least the Bugazzi is an attempt to apply classic ideas to the era in which it was created.

In current terms, the Bugazzi is a snapshot of the ideas and style of a certain moment in time. The Excalibur just represents a lack of imagination and being cheap.

The difference between Neo-classical and a replica is the “Neo” part being applied to the design rather than just the year in which it was built. Replicas and cars like the Excalibur aren’t Neo-classical.

Last edited 2 months ago by Ignatius J. Reilly
Ariel E Jones
Ariel E Jones
2 months ago

When I was younger and first stumbled on the neoclassics, I had pretty much nothing but contempt for them. Gaudy, restylings of weak, oversized land barges from the 70s didnt ring my bell. Years later, I still feel the same way. I find the it interesting then that I really kind of like the restomod class of car. Taking a 69 Camaro body and putting it on a modern chassis with all the convenience and performance of a current vehicle. That, makes sense to me.

Racer Esq.
Racer Esq.
2 months ago

This particular Excalibur is more of a well done replicar while the Bugazzi is pure neoclassic, like a Zimmer. A neoclassic mixes new and old styling, either intentionally or because of cost limitations in modifying the body of the donor car. The Excalibur is all old, like a modern “Cobra” replicar, which I don’t think anyone would call a neoclassic.

Racer Esq.
Racer Esq.
2 months ago
Reply to  Racer Esq.

And if we are excluding replicas and looking at pure neoclassics I think the winner has to be the Zimmer QuickSilver.

Duffman
Duffman
2 months ago

Making a 70’s car look like it’s from the roaring 20’s is equal to making a Car from the 20’s we currently live in look like a car from the 70’s, so I guess the appeal of 50 years ago never really dies, no matter what year it is.

Rocky Roland
Member
Rocky Roland
2 months ago

Do I want the smoke, or the joke?

Let’s see…
One involves Steely Dan and a prostitute killer
One has creamy leather, marble, and gold 
One puts the Scarface set designers to shame
One prevents carsickness by getting you seasick
One doesn’t require driving, just persuasion
One has a Cartier, so I won’t miss my favorite TV show, and
One makes me feel like a cartoon villain…
Plus those wheels!

It’s a no-brainer

Jack Trade
Member
Jack Trade
2 months ago

I think the neoclassical definition is like that of a certain type of contemporary art – it’s all about intent.

Nobody thinks of Morgans as neoclassical, yet they’re as visceral as any Excalibur. It’s just that’s the way they’ve always been, whereas Excaliburs were created brand new to be that way.

Similarly, the Bugazzi seems a conscious attempt to separate luxury from function in a way that mainstream luxury cars never really did b/c of their roots as, you know, cars.

Both seem to exist as manifestations of wishing the world were different than it is. Nothing wrong with that, and perhaps that’s what draws their buyers, deep down?

1978fiatspyderfan
Member
1978fiatspyderfan
2 months ago

Wonderful, iam going Visceral. The Excalibur has the exotic looks and if you use on the highway as a cruiser instead of a city car, something it’s not, I bet that beast calms down. Similar to letting a wild animal run free instead of keeping it on a leash. I’d love a follow up on a cruise. The Bugazzi on the other hand looks like from the outside at least like some 16 years old teenager (male) got grandparents hand me down Lincoln, cashed in his Bat mitzvah bonds and took it to Pep Boys. Even the elegant bits start to look cheap when the ordinary bits rip, tear, and fade.
In addition don’t diss the Porn industry it is far more profitable and honest, the actors know they are going to get screwed vs Hollywood.

Last edited 2 months ago by 1978fiatspyderfan
Joe L
Member
Joe L
2 months ago

I’d love to see an interview with Myron Vernis that includes some other cars in his collection, too. I’d see him occasionally on BaT auctions and I seem to recall he had a thing for old Japanese cars, especially rotaries. I always wanted to know more about him.

Idiotking
Member
Idiotking
2 months ago
Reply to  Joe L

Agreed. Mr. Vernis was a legend on the BaT boards (back when the posts actually required a trailer) and often had many insightful comments to share. I seem to recall he had a thing for oddball Italian marques as well…?

Joe L
Member
Joe L
2 months ago
Reply to  Idiotking

Yeah the idea I got from his comments was that he was a “yes, and,” kind of collector.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
2 months ago

Nether of these compare to the opulence that is a Rolls Royceified VW Beetle:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5a/8e/a0/5a8ea06599481cef75d3c3686722b3fb.jpg

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
2 months ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

Spot on! The coolest bit of kit you could order from the Sears catalog when I was a kid. Might was well get a new motor from them while you have it all apart anyway.

Acid Tonic
Acid Tonic
2 months ago

Wow really thought this would have been an Adrian article.

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
2 months ago

We all understood the difference when they were new:

The Excalibur is neo-classical.
The Bugazzi is pimp-mobile.

James Wallace
James Wallace
2 months ago

I grew up in Laguna Beach, back in the 60-70’s. It was a weird place to grow up with a capital ‘W’. These Neo Classical heaps abounded. While the cars were essentially magnets which drove through junkyards of chrome, what was truly appalling were the giant Phallo-Cephalics that drove them. The term self possessed didn’t even come close to describing them. It led to my opinion later in life to being clouded by automatically applying the term something-something-head to anybody driving one. Deserved or not.

Hautewheels
Member
Hautewheels
2 months ago
Reply to  James Wallace

“Phallo-Cephalics”
Well done! I’ll be stealing that for future use.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
2 months ago
Reply to  James Wallace

I would seriously LOVE to meet someone who bought one of these things new. The mind boggles. But I suppose the inevitable coke habit did most of them in.

Roofless
Member
Roofless
2 months ago

The marble in the Bugazzi is something, but that Persian carpet is amazing – that’s the piece that knocks it over from “try-hard” to “genuine article.”

Tbird
Member
Tbird
2 months ago
Reply to  Roofless

Go full out or go home.

4jim
4jim
2 months ago

I sadly remember the 1970s and the cars that looked “classic”, in my childhood memory, leaned hard on the plush side of things. People who wanted more engaging classics were building kit cars and/or vw bug conversions. Jebus the 1970s were horrid in nearly every way.

George CoStanza
George CoStanza
3 months ago

That Bugazzi looks more Chuck Barris than George Barris.

1978fiatspyderfan
Member
1978fiatspyderfan
2 months ago

Actually the Bugazzi looks a bit understated for George Barris.

Cerberus
Member
Cerberus
3 months ago

I wonder if George Barris was really a near future AI design program that was sent into the past as an aesthetic Terminator.

Last edited 3 months ago by Cerberus
Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
3 months ago

Phyllis Diller famously owned several Excaliburs and drove them so hard that her own staff was too scared to be her passengers.

Interestingly enough, 101 Dalmatians came out a couple of years before the Excalibur, so rumors that Cruella Deville‘s car was based on the Excalibur are false, but there is an uncanny resemblance.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
2 months ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

The car in the remake live-action movie is a Panther DeVille – which was certainly, by FAR, the best of this woeful breed of car. And Britain’s most expensive car most years it was in production.

Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
2 months ago
Reply to  Kevin Rhodes

The cool thing about the original Excalibur was what totally bonkers over the top rather crude fast car it was. The looks were predicated on a Studebaker Mercedes-Benz merger that never happened even though Studebakers were wearing the Mercedes-Benz version of Groucho glasses for a few years.

As soon as they realized people were buying the cars for their looks they got soft and tacky.

Anoos
Member
Anoos
3 months ago

I’m torn. Both are legitimately neoclassics. I would like as much opulence as possible, but still with an open top. I don’t want to feel like I’m risking my life trying to wrestle a classic vehicle around a bend, but I also don’t want to be confined in a slightly more elegant (if at all) Ford Thunderbird interior.

I guess I’d want something that looks old but drives new. It doesn’t need to drive like a new 911, but it needs to be able to turn at least like a current Elantra. It doesn’t need those silly through-fender flex pipes, but I do want old-timey fenders and running boards.

I feel like I would need to build my own best neoclassic, but it’s not a car I’m passionate enough about to take on that project. Especially when I have so many production cars left on my bucket list.

If I had to lean in one way or the other, I’d have to lean to Visceral. But it’s hard to commit to someone intentionally building a car to be worse than it needs to be by modern standards.

Last edited 3 months ago by Anoos
28
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x