Home » What Bizarre Misconceptions Do Your Non-Car-Person Friends Have About Cars?

What Bizarre Misconceptions Do Your Non-Car-Person Friends Have About Cars?

Bugeye Sprite Aa

I don’t want to be the type of individual who appears on some forum scolding a person because they misstated some bit of car knowledge. Turns out the Carrera Whatever GTS actually wasn’t available with the wing from the GT Whocares Weissach Edition? Big deal, you goofed.

However, I will say that, as an Autopian, I do hear non-car-person normies recite – confidently – some really strange misinformation about cars.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I’ve personally had at least two people tell me that they were considering a GMC product because “it’s professional grade” and “they know trucks.” I tell them that it’s a marketing play and these supposedly “heavy-duty” vehicles are built on the same assembly lines as Chevies and, as such, offer absolutely no benefits over bowtie-branded SUVs. Naturally, they usually go ahead and buy an Acadia instead of a used Highlander, and you know how that ends up.

Gmc Jimmy
GMC Jimmy (Source: GMC)

This is that same kind of “thinking” that gets people to dismiss our S.W. Gossin’s Sebring coupe as “nineties Chrysler junk.” Yeah, it was built on the same assembly line as the Japanese Mitsubishi Eclipse, so it’s as much of a Mopar as one of those Mercedes Crossfires. Wow, I forgot that these were really nice-looking cars:

Sebring Coupe 11 4
Chrysler Sebring Coupe (source: Stellantis)

Has anyone ever talked to you about Austin-Martins? I have, and such a misguidedly convoluted name had me envisioning Bugeye Sprites with machine guns behind the headlights.

Bugeye Sprite 11 4
Austin-Healey “Bugeye” Sprite (source: Bring A Trailer)

Some of these people are the same ones who let a fuel-injected car “warm up” so that it doesn’t stall. That’s not as bad as the person who was irate when the mechanic said that their diesel car needed new “glow worms.” They weren’t going to buy that crap!

You must have heard some real eye-rollers yourself. Let’s hear a few!

Top graphic image: Bring A Trailer; Empty Shell LLC

Follow us on:

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
382 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hatebobbarker
Hatebobbarker
3 hours ago

Manual transmissions suck to drive. Almost anything people say about manual transmissions honestly.

Chewiechew37
Chewiechew37
4 hours ago

This has been said a few times but I didn’t see it explained in detail… people’s misunderstanding of fuel economy.
Ask someone if their vehicle is “good on gas?” and they’ll answer, “oh it’s great, only $60 to fill it up”. My eye must twitch every time because how little sense this makes.

Common things related to this that I’ve heard, and I fully understand a lot of these overlap:

If they refuel less often, it must be fuel efficient.A longer range must be more efficient.If a vehicle has a bigger tank than another, it is less efficient than one with a smaller tank.Referring to fuel tank size by the cost to “fill” it.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Chewiechew37
El Jefe de Barbacoa
Member
El Jefe de Barbacoa
19 minutes ago
Reply to  Chewiechew37

Cost to fill is strongly correlated with fuel efficiency, because cost to fill is just a proxy for size of tank. Fuel efficient cars (eg. hybrids) generally have much smaller tanks. This also offers additional efficiency in not having to carry around that much gas weight all the time.

If your F-350 Supercab gets 8mpg around town, it needs a big-ass tank.

So you’re technically correct, but also missing the intuitive correctness of their correlation. Also, most people measure gas in how often they have to stop and how much it costs when they do fill it up, so it’s reasonable that the key metric they use for comparison is cost.

Butterfingerz
Butterfingerz
4 hours ago

My car will go 140MPH because that’s what the speedometer goes up to.

SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
4 hours ago

“Loud pipes save lives!”
Yes, I noticed you, but I have an urge to run you over to shut up your damn nuisance!
If that is your worry, then instead of shooting a loud noise out your rear end, create a decent noise aimed toward vehicles next to you. Like a reverse blind-spot monitor. (Okay, it would be annoying in stop-and-go traffic. Let’s face it, tall vehicles with distracted drivers are a nuisance.)

Wuffles
Wuffles
4 hours ago
Reply to  SlowCarFast

“Loud pipes save lives!”

I have personally witnessed the exact opposite- motorcycle splitting lanes in traffic (I’m not in CA, illegal here), revved the engine to get some lady to move over, and it startled her enough to jerk the wheel over right into him. He was pretty badly messed up, taken away on an ambulance. Ended up giving statements to the cops and both sets of insurance adjusters and lawyers, so my impression is there was a pretty vicious legal fight going on. Not sure who wins in that- yes the lady cut over into his path, but he was illegally splitting lanes at the time, and didn’t have the right of way.

SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
3 hours ago
Reply to  Wuffles

Sounds messy. Perhaps the rider should just wait for an open spot.
And yeah, loud noises mess with me enough that I could see myself doing that.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
5 hours ago
  • I need a car.
  • The right car will get me laid.
  • My child will die if I don’t drive them everywhere they need to go.
  • Red and other bright coloured cars are more likely to get speeding tickets and have higher insurance rates.
Chronometric
Member
Chronometric
4 hours ago

I have personally tested all of these.
Need / want all the same.
Maybe I haven’t found the right car yet.
Well they do hold their breath and turn blue.
My tickets are evenly distributed across red, silver, blue, and green. So far no tickets for the yellow Fiat 500 but it only goes 45.

Space
Space
4 minutes ago
Reply to  Chronometric

Surprisingly “Buick” is the right car for the 2nd bullet point.

Kevin B
Kevin B
5 hours ago

My neighbor, a Viet Nam veteran told me he never changes the oil in his vehicles because he worked on helicopter engines and they never changed the oil in them.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
5 hours ago
Reply to  Kevin B

After a particularly long oil change interval on a beater I had just bought, I had a mechanic jokingly warn me that the sludge was clogging the leaks and I should not put new oil in. He was kind of right, but it was an engine that was very old, high mileage and was probably already leaking sludge.

Wuffles
Wuffles
4 hours ago
Reply to  Kevin B

Lol, yes, because most Hueys never came remotely close to their service intervals. Brief googling suggests average lifespan of a Lycoming T53 in the jungle was 30-40 flight hours before getting pulled due to damage where they got a full teardown or were just scrapped.

This is true for most engines used in most wars since internal combustion became a thing- the duty cycle for a combat engine is intense enough you won’t have to worry about changing the oil.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Wuffles
Kevin B
Kevin B
3 hours ago
Reply to  Wuffles

Yeah, I understand the concept. Too bad my neighbor doesn’t. I kind of figured some aircraft engines are rebuilt long before the oil wears out.

JayJay
JayJay
5 hours ago

The vast amount of people who think a Porsche 356 has a VW Beetle engine, because they look roughly the same way…

Ricardo M
Ricardo M
5 hours ago

It took a very long time to convince my grandmother that her Opala 400 had a 4.00L engine and not 400 horsepower.

I’ve seen people say they couldn’t get a RWD car because they need to get to work in rain.

The amount of people who get talked out of buying a sedan/hatch because “what if it snows” or “what if you go on a dirt road” makes me really sad.

The idea that cars are less safe/reliable than they used to be, they’ve definitely gotten harder to fix, but you have to fix them WAY less often. Also the idea that cars have gotten slower/less powerful for the sake of fuel efficiency. That hasn’t been true since fuel injection was invented.

382
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x