Let’s face it: a lot of cars have a loud, obnoxious bark but no teeth to actually bite you. All talk, no action. Their looks talk a good game, but their game itself is very, very weak.
Listing malaise examples would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Naturally, anything branded as a “performance” edition from the seventies was pathetic, but relative to everything else on the market in those dismal times they really weren’t that bad. However, post-malaise “sports” models didn’t have much of an excuse to suck, or at least no reason not to be at least significantly better than a cooking variety model.


If you heard that a car called the “OZ Rally Edition” was arriving back in 2003, you possibly envisioned something to kick up dust on Pikes Peak while spinning its fancy Italian wheels. When you realized that it was going to be a version of a Mitsubishi Lancer, your imagination ran wild to EVO-equivalent competition-style cars. It’s understandable that there was a bit of disappointment when we saw what an actual “OZ Rally Edition” turned out to be.

Oh, those are OZ wheels alright; whopping 14-inch meats that fit into the unmodified factory wells with room to spare. They probably could have gone down the 13s and still been able to accommodate the tiny rear drum brakes. Not that you needed giant cross drilled discs with 120 horsepower on tap, or a bit less than half the output of the vaunted EVO. Even the small rear wing was a weak substitute for the Evolution’s big ironing board.

How about a 1986 Buick Century Gran Sport? Sure looks pretty sinister in its monochromatic paint scheme.

That Regal GN-style logo with the arrow-in-a-circle promises force-fed induction for the V6, or so you thought.

Sadly, you don’t get it. No, the Gran Sport has a 150-horsepower, normally-aspirated motor right out of your Aunt Cassie’s Century sedan; the arrow-in-a-circle thing must relate to the steering wheel? That lying logo that they put everywhere, including the headrests, was false advertising.

The gauge cluster tells you how pathetic this “performance” car was. A rectangular cluster like that could have been absolutely anything, yet we got a ribbon speedometer with an add-on hand-held video game LED tach where the column shifter gear indicator would have been (the Gran Sport at least had a floor shifter for the mandatory automatic). There is prominent space being used for a slightly crooked BUICK MOTOR DIVISION “gauge.” I’d forgotten how bad these types of speedometers were with kilometer markings. Poor Canadians, it’s just gloriously bad.

Throwing a supercharged 3800 under the hood, disc brakes all around, and a set of round instruments would have given us a GNX-style sleeper. Instead, we got a snoozer, an accountant in a Darth Vader costume. Come on, this wasn’t 1976; GM had so much stuff in their parts bins at the time, they could have easily made the Gran Sport so much more.
What are some other paper tiger “performance” or “sport” models that have left you wanting? Have you ever owned one yourself? The Autopian is asking!
Top graphic image: Mitsubishi
As many older readers may recall that despite the lack of performance the Lancer sold like hotcakes at a breakfast buffet. Most folks go for looks anyhow, right?
I owned a Chevy S10 SS and while it was a fun, decently quick little truck, it offered nothing you couldn’t put together without the SS badge. Just a standard cab/shortbed, 4.3L Automatic, with ZQ8 suspension and the LSD. More of an appearance package than anything.
Needed the Sy/Ty motor or a V8.
Seriously
The fact they had both, awd from the square bravada that fed the syclone, and now a lt1 engine, coulda made the factory mule missle a real deal, and carried that torch with not a gallop, but a full on sprint.
Late ’80’s Thunderbird 5.0.
Mitsubishi 3000GT/Dodge Stealth
CR-Z(shouldn’t have been hybrid only)
Base model A80 Supra.
A 2015 BMW X5 sDrive35i with the M Package I married into. The M Package made it ride like crap on anything but smooth pavement and the sticky-ish run flat tires were obscenely expensive and only lasted 12K miles or so.
We traded it in on a ’17 MDX and it was so much nicer to drive, got 40K miles on the OEM Continentals and wasn’t that much slower in a straight line.
Then she traded me in on someone else and traded the MDX in on a ’23 Lincoln Aviator, which she likes even more than the MDX. The guy, not so much. Eh? I don’t care.
87 Renault alliance GTA
2nd gen Mitsubishi eclipses. Aggressive looks, but the only time I got behind the wheel of one I was totally underwhelmed.
Aston Martin Cygnet
They did fix it though.
https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/aston-martin/cygnet-v8
A one off parts bin special.
I thought that was obvious, I’m skimping of the (-; these days.
They did mention somewhere the possibility of making another for someone willing to spend half a million USD or so. That’s a while back, so…