Let’s face it: a lot of cars have a loud, obnoxious bark but no teeth to actually bite you. All talk, no action. Their looks talk a good game, but their game itself is very, very weak.
Listing malaise examples would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Naturally, anything branded as a “performance” edition from the seventies was pathetic, but relative to everything else on the market in those dismal times they really weren’t that bad. However, post-malaise “sports” models didn’t have much of an excuse to suck, or at least no reason not to be at least significantly better than a cooking variety model.
If you heard that a car called the “OZ Rally Edition” was arriving back in 2003, you possibly envisioned something to kick up dust on Pikes Peak while spinning its fancy Italian wheels. When you realized that it was going to be a version of a Mitsubishi Lancer, your imagination ran wild to EVO-equivalent competition-style cars. It’s understandable that there was a bit of disappointment when we saw what an actual “OZ Rally Edition” turned out to be.
Oh, those are OZ wheels alright; whopping 14-inch meats that fit into the unmodified factory wells with room to spare. They probably could have gone down the 13s and still been able to accommodate the tiny rear drum brakes. Not that you needed giant cross drilled discs with 120 horsepower on tap, or a bit less than half the output of the vaunted EVO. Even the small rear wing was a weak substitute for the Evolution’s big ironing board.
How about a 1986 Buick Century Gran Sport? Sure looks pretty sinister in its monochromatic paint scheme.
That Regal GN-style logo with the arrow-in-a-circle promises force-fed induction for the V6, or so you thought.
Sadly, you don’t get it. No, the Gran Sport has a 150-horsepower, normally-aspirated motor right out of your Aunt Cassie’s Century sedan; the arrow-in-a-circle thing must relate to the steering wheel? That lying logo that they put everywhere, including the headrests, was false advertising.
The gauge cluster tells you how pathetic this “performance” car was. A rectangular cluster like that could have been absolutely anything, yet we got a ribbon speedometer with an add-on hand-held video game LED tach where the column shifter gear indicator would have been (the Gran Sport at least had a floor shifter for the mandatory automatic). There is prominent space being used for a slightly crooked BUICK MOTOR DIVISION “gauge.” I’d forgotten how bad these types of speedometers were with kilometer markings. Poor Canadians, it’s just gloriously bad.
Throwing a supercharged 3800 under the hood, disc brakes all around, and a set of round instruments would have given us a GNX-style sleeper. Instead, we got a snoozer, an accountant in a Darth Vader costume. Come on, this wasn’t 1976; GM had so much stuff in their parts bins at the time, they could have easily made the Gran Sport so much more.
What are some other paper tiger “performance” or “sport” models that have left you wanting? Have you ever owned one yourself? The Autopian is asking!
Top graphic image: Mitsubishi
1977 AMC AMX
2nd Gen Audi Coupe Quattro
BMW E31 3 Series
1977-1981 Chevrolet Corvette
1982-1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
1974 Dodge Challenger
Ford Mustang II King Cobra
1972 Ford Gran Torino Sport
1980 Mercedes-Benz 450SL and 1981-1985 380SL
1970 Mercury Cyclone
Plymouth Volare Road Runner
Mk3 VW GTI (non VR6)
I used to own a 2002 Crown Victoria LX Sport. The “Sport” was a lie, as in it offered no extra power beyond the “high output” engine, which was actually just dual exhaust and super common on other trim levels.
The 235HP and 270 torques were adequate, but there was no “sport” about it. Suspension might have been a bit stiffer (from a P71 maybe?) and the rear end ratio might have been a 3.55 instead of a 3.27, and it wasn’t a 2.73 for sure (nor a 4.10). And it looked great. But it lacked any extra real “go”.
Don’t get me wrong. I LOVED that car and kept it for a bunch of years. But Ford has this odd habit of throwing a “Sport” sticker on lots of cars, and offers not much more than a trim level.
Early Golf GTI MK IV with the 2.slow
Surprised no one has mentioned the Delorean DMC-12. Low slung, Giugiaro-designed stainless steel bodywork, and ad copy that stated, “Performance is our top priority.” But the PRV V6 couldn’t cash the checks the body was writing. It was $10K more, but it was 2+ seconds slower to 60 than the contemporary Corvette and 280ZX Turbo (from a December 1981 comparison test in Car and Driver).
I was pretty disappointed with the 6000 SUX.
The Ford Escort EXP. A two door coupe version of the first generation Escort that was somehow slower than the mid-trim sedan version because it weighed more and had a smaller engine. It also couldn’t handle corners because the Escort was already an understeer stricken flop roller, and the EXP’s even worse forward weight bias meant the car would shudder under braking making preloading the suspension absolutely useless. The worst part is that over half of them were sold with the three speed ATX automatic that was so bad Ford went with an entirely new design for the next generation of transmissions.
S10 Xtreme, my cousin had a bright red regular cab one when I was a kid and I thought it looked so cool and figured it must be fast, still think they’re awesome looking trucks actually! However once I found out his was a 4 cylinder with the automatic transmission I was like wtf is “Xtreme” about this…
>How about a 1986 Buick Century Gran Sport?
Came up on another auto forum the other day, the only reasoning I could think it existed was to pick up a few more marginal sales of the slow-selling 2 door Century since Buick-Olds were about to get a new A-body coupe roofline while Chevy and Pontiac dropped 2-doors entirely.
In America, GM sold the 1980 Chevette S/R, which featured a mighty 80 HP engine. The base model engine provided 69 HP of urge. If memory serves, the 0-60 MPH time was approximately 16 seconds, which was a second or two faster than stock.
I remember in the mid 1990s, Ford was selling an “Escort LX Sport”
It was just a stripes and non-functional spoiler package. Had the same asthmatic 88hp 1.9L 4 cyl as the base trim.
to be fair though, there was an Escort GT, which actually did add more power. It got the 125 hp 1.8L
If you wanted 4 doors, there was the Tracer LTS with the same 125 hp engine
Oh I know. I just found the Escort LX ‘Sport’ to be mildly offenive.
Arguably the base model was more sporty since it weighed less and thus, had slightly better performance.
I remember the extremely ’90s TV ad that was run in the Denver area for that car. It talked about how eventually we all have to drive over “the pass” (assumed to be Loveland Pass if I remember correctly), and you’d never want to do it in your old college car. But the Escort LX Sport came with alloy wheels, an airbag, and a rear spoiler at no extra charge!
That was part of Ford’s “four body styles, one price” promotion, they threw in a spoiler and alloys for the cheapest base price 2-door hatchback.
I remember the Mecury Marauder being kind of disappointing, good concept, but 0-60 in 7.5 seconds was a little more than a second faster than a regular Grand Marquis, despite the price premium, flashy exhaust pipes, and all the fuss over the DOHC engine. It was definately a case of more hype than substance, and still kind of is, given how they’ve held their value
The Crown Vic LX sport was nearly as quick and nobody paid any attention to that
Yeah, the LX Sport is just a retail version of the CVPI, which means all the cop shit but less beat on.
and yeah, that Marauder engine should’ve been standard on the Marq or Town Car. The base V8 might as well been a V6 (some versions of the Duratec 3.0 back then could make 220 hp), and the V8 should’ve been the Mustang’s 260 hp version.
Too bad the Marauder didn’t get the Cobra’s supercharger.
And the CVPI was essentially the towing package, with a stripped down/decontented interior
I can’t remember the Canadian market name for the package, but in Australia, it was the Kia Rio Sport Pac – a basic Rio in electric blue with a hood scoop and wing that suggested an alternate reality where Colin McRae did pizza delivery.
The Honda Civic Del Sol. It was still a lowly Civic CRx with a removable roof. best case in the states 160 HP, and although that was not the worst in these little motorcycle alternatives, it was still not nearly as sporty as they would have had you believe.
The CRX was a great sports car. But when they went from the CRX to the Del Sol they went the boulevard cruiser route.
Hear me out… Toyota Paseo.
Now, all of us know it was just an Echo Coupe. An Echo was fundamentally a Tercel replacement. “It’s a car”, but it a more fun shape. No one expects performance.
Where it really becomes a headscratcher is how insurance companies handled it. I know people who wanted to pick them up used, because they were Echo coupes. They just wanted “a car” that would be cheap to run, but in a more fun shape.
… yet insurance was on par with something like a SN-95 Mustang GT for someone 21 or younger. It was wild. Insurance companies treated it like something it wasn’t. So Paseos had a real problem on the used market, because the normal people you’d expect to pick them up were allergic to them because of the insurance costs.
the Paseo was a Tercel, not an Echo 😛
It was out from I think 92-96 or something
My main point remains, I barely remember the things.
What I do remember is a friend getting a 2-year old Eclipse GS-T over a Paseo, because it was $1000/yr less (in 2000 money) to insure the Eclipse.
He went to multiple insurance agencies for quotes, and all the agents were like, “Well, the Paseo (with its what, 90HP?) is a performance car” every time.
wow that’s a shame 🙁
This might be a bit of a hot take but I always thought the late ‘90s Subaru Impreza 2.5RS was a bit of a disappointment. There was a WRX (and a WRX STI) in Japan. Subaru took all the good parts out of the JDM WRX except the engine. Instead they threw in the slightly more powerful engine out of the Outback into the Impreza, and that was what America got instead of the WRX (until 2002). The 2.5 RS was a better performer, but it felt half hearted to me because of the engine.
the SVX seemed ok on paper, 230 hp flat six and all, but the auto and awd really sucked the life out of those in a hurry, making them mush slower in reality in most cases.
Subaru is really good at making a car really good except for one thing. Like the auto in the SVX or the lack of a turbo in the 2.5RS. Another good example is the 3rd generation Forester XT (2009-2013). Great engine but you could only get it with a 4-speed automatic.
Or the new Crosstrek and Impreza finally get the 2.5 but only with a CVT. The latest Legacy GT has the same issue too.