Conventional front-engine pickup truck design is, once you distill it down, pretty basic. A low, enclosed box in the front for the engine, a taller, enclosed box with windows, ideally, behind that for people to sit in and charge their phones, and then a long open box at the rear for all the stuff you want to haul. That’s pretty much how all of them work. But there’s two major variations of how that big box on the rear is built, and I have to admit, I’m not sure I really understand the point of one of these types.
You know the two types of beds I’m talking about? I’m sure you do, but just in case you’ve recently taken a blow to the temple with a 2×4, I’m delighted to cover them again. The two types are the now far-more common type of truck bed, with flat sides and wheel wells integrated into the bed, and the “stepside” type. where the bed is a rectangular box set between external fenders.
That style with separate fenders used to be the default style of pickup truck until the late 1950s, as a result of how most automotive body design and construction was handled. You can see this back to some of the earliest mass-produced pickup trucks, like the Ford TT:

See how the bed is just a rectangular box shoved in between the fenders? That was just the most straightforward way to adapt the Model T body to incorporate a load bed, and continued to be the most straightforward way as long as cars were designed with separate fenders.

Eventually, carmakers learned that you could have a notably wider load area and simplify the construction of the bed by integrating the fenders into the bed itself, making a truck bed with flat sides. The first production car to do this was Crosley, in the 1940s:

Crosley, of course, was a pretty niche maker, as their trucks were quite tiny, so I suppose we can also give credit to Chevrolet for popularizing the flat-sided truck on a more mainstream level with their Cameo Carrier:

The Cameo Carrier was interesting; this was a pretty novel departure from conventional pickup truck design, and Chevy leveraged their experience with fiberglass bodies from the Corvette to make these new, sleek, slab-sided trucks.
Ford noticed the success of Chevy’s flat-sided trucks, and introduced their all-steel Styleside trucks in 1957:

These trucks offered more room in the bed in front of and behind the wheel wells that intruded into the bed, and the wheel wells themselves could have 2x4s placed across them to allow for a wide area to slide sheets of plywood or other big, flat cargo.

In almost every way, this new way of building truck beds seemed better than the old external-fender way. And yet, somehow, carmakers still offered the older style, calling that flareside or stepside or fenderside or something like that.

Now, there may be some good reasons to offer this more archaic style, even when it really didn’t mesh with the look of more modern trucks: that step just forward of the fender could be pretty useful, and I suppose some people may just prefer the look. The taillights, which were generally not integrated into the bodywork in these sorts of designs, were also cheaper to replace.
But you still had a narrower bed, sometimes significantly. Ford was the last company to offer a bulging-fender stepside truck design, finally ending them after 2009.

So, I guess all of this is to ask, “what do we think about stepside trucks?” I love the way they look on old 1950s-era and earlier pickups, but I think as time goes on, they tend to look more and more forced. The step on the side is helpful, but is it worth the reduction of cargo room in the bed? Those areas fore and aft of the wheel wells can hold a lot of stuff.

So is it style? Is there something crucial I’m missing here? How did these last so long after they were so effectively replaced?
Let’s take a poll and discuss in the comments. I’m genuinely curious!






I just use the rear tire as a step if I can’t be arsed to put the tailgate down. Stepsides are needless.
All flaresides are good lookin’, I can’t discriminate.
I’ve long wanted to change the Styleside bed in my Ranger to a Flareside. It’s less useful, but looks so cool.
The marketing names were good too: Flareside, Stepside, Fenderside, and Utiline. It’s odd Toyota didn’t come up with a name for theirs, though the Tundra stepside was by far the ugliest pickup I’ve ever seen.
I ordered a 1997 Chevy Silverado 1500 Extended Cab Sportside Z71 4×4 truck with third door on the passenger side in like fire engine RED! I threw a nice emergency light bar on top and had me a very sharp Private Public Emergency Response Vehicle. (My transportation to the fire department during a fire call.) I loved my Sportside bed. Easy to hop up inside the bed from any of the three sides of the truck. I ordered that truck from the dealer, this was before online ordering. I went through all the options with the salesman, but I forgot Keyless Entry. I kicked myself in the ass almost every time I manually unlocked my door. Years later after Big Red and I had a separation, I see her at the gas station. I approach her current owner, explain I ordered the truck from the factory and forget the keyless entry…And then I apologize and walk away hanging my head.
it is all about change and adoption. style sides were new and different, but plenty still thought the step-side looked more like a proper truck, in the 80’s and 90’s they started to take on a sporty truck persona. but once the Extended cab/crew cab became the norm for trucks, the looks of a short stepside was spoiled.
with the current resurgence of Sport trucks though, we shall see if Ram tries to cash in on nostalgia and try to make a modern Lil Red Express.
“… and the wheel wells themselves could have 2x4s placed across them to allow for a wide area to slide sheets of plywood or other big, flat cargo.”
Except, did any manufacturers actually incorporate such provisions for this in their inner-stamped steel truck box until the 1983 Ford Ranger – which was needed because the space between the inner fenders was nowhere near wide enough for 4′ of whatever?
Dad’s ’73 F100 sure didn’t have that.
My dad owned a piano business and, although there were other trucks before, he loved his ’68 Chevy stepside as it was perfect for putting the back of a piano flat against the side to strap it down, and it still left him room for his dolly, pads, piano rolls and the bench.
As our current crops of pick-ups are size of small houses having step sides to reach cargo in the bed seems like a good idea. That or finding some way to incorporate a flight of stairs from the cab to the bed.
Chevy GMC puts a flight of stairs in the tailgate for ya!
Awesome
Ford offered a fold up penis handle to assist your climb into the bed.
I feel like it was driven largely by nostalgia, a point likely lost by the fact that the generation who grew up with stepside pickups are mostly gone. It’s proof that even a working vehicle is a personal choice so long as the driver is buying, and perhaps not entirely logical. That’s something we need to remember when looking back in history.
Personally, I like the way they look. Maybe it’s the parts boy SVT Lightnings, or the Lil’ Red Express, but they do say ‘sporty’ to me.
What if I’m too drunk and have a bunch of wildly inappropriate, not even tangentially-related opinions? I feel silenced, dammit.
Feel free to share them anyway, Mr. Wham. We, drunkards, are not a censorship board.
Stepsides make cargo easier to access, but I’m not aware that you can get a cap, camper, or other bed accessories for a stepside. Plus, it would look pretty awkward for all that mass to be inset from the cab.
You can.. or could… but yeah, they look awful.
Hold my beer…
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1966-chevrolet-k10-pickup-6/
https://pin.it/25w318rbp
I don’t get them either especially for what is allegedly a working vehicle. However it seems no different to the ridiculous Cayenne “coupes” for example where people reduce the interior dimensions of a normal square back SUV to a curved fast back roof for zero benefit .
Oh man on the farm, step sides were the greatest. You could hop on and off the truck while is still moving assuming that moving was about 5 miles an hour. It was great for being able to grab stuff from the front portion of the bed without having to climb up into the truck bed. It was really great if you had a flamethrower and were out hunting weeds, you could stand on the step and burn the shit out of weeds with the tank in the back of the truck. Actually, for serious weed burning you would rent a 800 gallon propane tank and an 8 foot wand.
The steps they have now are weird vestige indentations that are completely useless, when pick up stopped having running boards, the steps got kind of flimsy to tell the truth.
But riding while standing on the step was the best. We even put grab handles on the roof.
Thanks for reminding me me, hadn’t thought about that for a while.
Reminds me that using a manlift is still on my to-do list.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_manlift
Hugh I was confronted with an operational ‘belt man lift’ in the central bank of Bratislava about 10 years ago. As an American accustomed to warning labels and safety railings everywhere, it boggled my mind. It was simply a hole in the wall that you stepped into. I used to have a video riding it but have unfortunately lost it. I saw no sign that it would hesitate to rip your body in half if you put your torso in and left your legs dangling as it dragged you up. Still, incredibly efficient – so as an engineer I love the concept and design.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEQI4Dny9oU
I had to use one of those in a grain storage building for work. I don’t know exactly how high it was, but I was nervous as hell. Wide open on the way up or down, just you on a belt, trying to hold onto your things!
We had a belt lift in a baby lime bean warehouse that was for the beans, but my grandfather and the workers would ride it to the second floor. It was decommissioned before I got a chance to try it.
There was one at the Sutter-Stockton parking garage that always fascinated me. It used to be valet parking, so all the parking valets would take your parking ticket, hop on the man lift, and return with your car. 7 year old me thought that was the coolest job ever.
Often called a ‘Pater Noster’, both because the motion resembles a person praying through string of rosary beads and because a quick prayer is recommended before hopping on or off. There are still a few of them in use in the UK.
In the London School of Economics, for example.
Which might simply have been engineers expressing their opinion of economists.
These were great for moving stuff! You could load a hole and let it ride until someone came to pick it off.
Back when pickup truck beds were a reasonable height and you could easily step up/down from them?
It’s been a while.
Front wheel drive pickups would be great. You could have the bed as low as you wanted, sort of like the Corvair rampsides.
Somehow the idea that pickups might be use for easily hauling light cargo seems have gotten lost in a frenzy of cosplay.
“Crosley, of course, was a pretty niche maker, as their trucks were quite tiny”
Oh, yeah, Crosleys are small, that’s for sure!! Here’s a photo from 1952 of a street scene in Los Angeles that shows just how tiny a Crosley was in comparison to other cars of the day (to be sure, the Crosley in this photo is a car and not a truck but Crosley’s trucks were actually based on their cars.) In fact there’s a stepside pickup truck right behind the Crosley, lol:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEganWsGSHEz73AKtTpY9u4m-K8KCW6_iqPEQ-VaCrtgoOFNf5xgQ8ZdhOD-xVhjUVQ1Do40JuFd3AxuGJjJrWcpfJo4GgOHoZP-cH5UZByk7L-ro8zZ4mrMWVxe0O71EHDIrt3ht7JXtt_5/s1600/LA_crosley.jpg
However, nothing of that era compares to all the massively bloated SUVs and trucks of today, good grief. And to think people actually wonder why pedestrian fatality rates are so high nowadays when the answer is quite literally staring them right in the face if they walk up to the front of a modern truck or SUV.
I first saw a Crosley when James May took one on the Grand Tour. At the time, I thought “Well, that’s a bit small, but still looks like it could be fun and useful.” Then my brother married a woman whose grandpa had collected several Crosleys (along with several model As and dozens of Indian motorcycles going back to the teens…) and I sat in one for the first time. Nope. I’m a big guy in 202+ and sure, people were a few inches shorter and mostly thinner when it came out, but still…. It made a Spirit Airline seat feel spacious.
I vaguely remember Chevy in the late ’90’s tried to solve the big square box of a step side but also full width of a fleet side by offering a dually with just the outside wheel? I did an Internet search and didn’t find anything but I swear around 1997-ish there was an option for a wide axle, dually fender’d, single rear wheel, square interior box Chevy.
Umm, you can… step on the side?
There’s also the third kind, the flatbed:
https://cdn.classicdigest.com/live/carimg/101401_101500/101455_7d700ea5bb35d82f.jpg
(and of course I chose that one, just for you JT)
I would make a best of both worlds: Inner vertical sides inside of the wheel wells, and then use the space between the inner and outer sides for suitcases, toolboxes, sleeping bags, shopping, all kinds of smaller luggage. Off course with a lockable top! Boom 😀 Somebody must have made that at some time, if I can think it?
-But I live a place where it rains and snows now and then, so I just drive a van:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DNoG76xIgji/
Happy TG by the way! 🙂
Something like this?
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ba/bc/38/babc38ee53e911e9f257b0f486e207d6.jpg
Deberti has built versions with more trick openings.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.ford-trucks.com-vbulletin/1024×512/deberti2_4019c28d2c2e714f47717c51ecb8e855ba36c04d.jpg
Most of the versions I’ve seen look more like this:
https://i.pinimg.com/474x/b1/9d/34/b19d340dd6d95bbb3fad2504b88c1336.jpg
All I want for Christmas! 🙂
VW “dropside” Transporters
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wbaiv/4311291002
I see them as flatbeds. The smuggler’s hatch is cool though 😎
Funny how aircooled VW pickup beds always seemed inconvenienty high years ago, but with the giant tanks people are driving nowadays, they’re just normal 😀
–Too bad VW missed the opportunity to put the “pancake” Type 3/4 engines in some lower bed T1/T2 based pickups: That would have been the shit!
T25 VW had the pancake Wasserboxer engine…
Yup that’s why I wrote T1/T2 😉
The T25 (T3) was brilliant. Only owned one though:
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bsi0140nUm6
And the Wide Bed versions…
https://www.pcarmarket.com/auction/marketplace-1960-volkswagen-type-2-single-cab
Depending on the particular truck, the step sides look sportier. When you have to grab something from the bed near the cab that step is a wonderful tool. It’s also easier to load cargo when the flat side is on the inside.
Step sides are a good precaution in case your drag coefficient looks like it might be below 1. Don’t want a fuel mpg in double digits, now.
Just wanted to say that Crosley had 35-50 mpg?!
I think it’s not a coincidence that these things died out with the purchasing per of people old enough to have conscious memories of the old separate fender style of vehicle construction.
Jason. I get that you are trying to hit your content quota before tomorrow, but seriously, go spend some quality time with your family.
Timed posts. Knock it out on Tuesday for posting over the weekend 🙂
Step side pickups have a particular utility in that the lack of wells make it easier to get out loose loads, like dirt and stones
Exactly. Stepside is for when you’re in there with a shovel
Dirt and stones? What the hell are you doing with your twuck? /s
Using them as trucks? I have hauled lots of dirt and rock in my own and borrowed trucks.
Growing up in rural Wisconsin they were sometimes referred to as “Stingy little farmer boxes”
I love the look of the stepside, at least before the Ford jelly bean trucks, but I would never buy one. I’m a car guy, so for me trucks are always a 2nd vehicle and a tool, not daily transportation. I prefer a large bed to a large cab, and I loath crew cabs with short beds that have been the rage for the last quarter century. I could go with an extended cab for a little extra secure storage, but I’d rip the rear seats out.
“I would never buy one. I’m a car guy, so for me trucks are always a 2nd vehicle”
How about a ‘ute?
An El Camino or Ranchero would rock!
Well here ya go! Buy it, throw in the 80’s tape of your choice and start growing your mullet:
https://stockton.craigslist.org/cto/d/holt-1987-chevrolet-el-camino/7892844032.html
Got a utility trailer?
IMO, the last stepsides to look “right” to me were
The 1987 GM squarebody models.
Fords look good until the end of the 9th gen, 1996.
I think the Dodge D/W series lost the option of a stepside in 1986 (I think).
After that, all stepside beds look contrived to me.
I’m not a fan of step sides or gmt400 trucks in general however for some weird reason I think the combo works.
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1989-chevrolet-k1500-pickup-gmt400-5/
My teen years were in the 90’s and while I didn’t like step sides, these Chevy step sides somehow weren’t offensive. Chevy did a pretty good job blending the modern square fronts with these squarish rear step sides. That step however was a bit on the high side for shorter people, but visually it worked really well.