You don’t have to be Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein to come to the logical conclusion that, if at least two examples of a car exist, there has to be a nicest version and a worst version. For extremely rare and valuable cars like the Ferrari 250 GTO, collectors and appraisers often have a good idea of exactly who owns those superlative vehicles. For more common cars, like a 1993 Oldsmobile Silhouette, it’s a lot harder to know.
This is the fun of online auction sites and virtual marketplaces. Eventually, some niece or nephew gets bequeathed a perfectly clean 1996 Subaru SVX, and we all get to gawk at how pristine the steering wheel is, and how the wood inserts have somehow resisted cracking for all these years. I’m definitely of the belief that cars should be driven, but there’s something appealing about having the cleanest version of a car, which is usually achieved by a car not being driven all that much relative to its age.


I thought of this as I watched the auction for a 1999 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 over at Cars & Bids. This is a rare-ish car, with fewer than 300 sold in the last year. It also has some features that make it specifically valuable, including the “Combat Wing” rear spoiler and revised headlights. I’m generally not a fan of white cars, but I think Glacier White-over-tan is the ideal spec for this car. Other than the 18-inch chrome-finished alloy wheels, it’s pretty much perfect.
If you’re not aware, the 3000GT VR-4 was, as Doug DeMuro put it when talking about a different car, peak Japanese sports car from the end of the Bubble Era.
The hard-top convertible is wild, too, and if you can’t get white-over-tan, then red-over-black is the second-best combination. These are desirable cars, both as historic objects and for drivers. This was as far into the future as Mitsubishi could look, and the combination of a turbocharged engine with all-wheel drive, active aero, and four-wheel steering feels very much like what life is like a quarter of a century later.
Also this this was capable of a sub-5-second 0-60 mph trip, thanks to the 300+ horsepower turbo V6 and excellent traction. Here’s MotorWeek‘s take:
I revise my earlier ranking of colors. I still think white-over-tan is the best, but maybe tennis ball yellow-over-black is the second best? Either way, it looks great at Roebling Road Raceway. While it doesn’t carry the same cultural appeal as an MKIV Toyota Supra or R32 GT-R, it’s a performance car you’ll enjoy driving.
What is a pristine version of one of these worth? What’s the best one worth? A red 1999 with 3,800 miles on the ODO was sold on BaT for $75,000 in 2022. Was this the nicest one? Perhaps. It also sold near the peak of bonkers pandemic pricing, so as a comparable, it’s a little hard to judge. Just to provide a huge range, there’s also a 9,000-mile Spyder SL for sale with bidding below $10,000 and a 1994 with 91,000 miles that sold earlier this month for $24,500.
Back to the 1999 I mentioned earlier, I’m not sure this is the nicest one of these in private hands. It’s maybe not the lowest mileage 3000GT in existence at 27,300 miles, but it’s possibly the best of the last model year of this vehicle. I mean, look at this thing:

There doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with this specific vehicle other than some touched-up paint and tires that are seven years old, which is to say it’s nicer than almost anything any of us on the site own.

Especially with the wing, which is taller than all but one Torchinsky, I am enamored with this car. I think that this is probably the exact one to get, and the fact that it isn’t so low in miles that it’s not drivable makes it even more appealing.
Let’s also please enjoy the interior together:

The seller, P1 Exotics, took photos that make me just want to climb into the car and never leave.
So what is this car worth? Surprisingly, it hit $58,000 and didn’t meet the reserve.

This gets into the interesting psychology of both buyers and sellers in these situations. If this is your childhood dream car, and you are of means, the upper limit is likely very high. The same is true if you had one of these and had to get rid of it for some reason.
But how do you handicap that as a seller? There are maybe a few people who fit that description for a car like this Mitsubishi. That Silhouette I referenced earlier? That’s a real car, with only 69,000 California miles on it when it was sold in March.

A super clean Dustbuster is still a Dustbuster, so the $10,000 the family got for that particular Olds seems like a high-but-fair price. That’s double the price someone got for this 23,000-mile automatic Ford Tempo GL coupe. That’s not to say that ’90s Fords can’t fetch big money; this 150-mile F-150 SVT Lightning just crossed the line at $75,000 even.

In the case of the Lightning, it’s probably both an emotional purchase and a reasonable investment. These are well-appreciated trucks, and that is almost certainly the nicest one anywhere outside of Ford’s collection. And even then, maybe it’s nicer!
Where does this leave the 3000GT VR4? Looking at the market comps, only two cars on BaT have transacted for more than $50,000 since 2016, and both were lower miles. Maybe the reserve was set at $60,000, which would put it in between the two highest sold cars on BaT. Or maybe it was set at $67,000, which is what this exact car sold for on Cars & Bids in June of last year.

Logically, we know there was one person willing to spend over $65,000 for one of these cars, but maybe not two people. Either way, there’s good news at the end of this story. The seller and the highest bidder were united after the auction and were able to come to an agreement.
I am a person who would spend silly money for the nicest Cayman Green Ford Escort GT, though thankfully I don’t have the discretionary budget to wield at the moment. What car would you want the nicest version of, and what would you be willing to pay for it?
Top photo: C&B
Awwwwyeah, peak GenX sports car lust right there. 4WS? Come on, I don’t know and could care less if it’s effective, it’s just COOL.
Best looking version. I loved all the 3000GT styles but this is just right. Shame we only got 1 year of the ’99 refresh. Plus, it was the simplest of 3000GT’s, which is a boon 30 years later.
I bought a 1996 (emerald green over tan) Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 way back in 2003. At the time I had a 1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo 5 speed but decided to test drive the Mitsubishi. The difference in acceleration was more than noticeable; the 3000GT VR-4 slammed you into your seat much harder than the Z and the launch was insane with the AWD. Ended up buying it and ran a 13.41@103.67mph my first time at the quarter mile track…my Z hadn’t gone below 13.8@102mph. Kept the Z as a daily driver. Added a simple K&N drop in filter and I ran 13.3s@103 all day long. This is a very misunderstood platform but it seems to be getting more love these days. Many people aren’t aware that Mitsubishi was targeting the Nissan Skyline GTR with the 3000, there’s a video on Best Motoring that has a ’94 Mitsubishi GTO MR (same as the VR-4 stateside it just weighs 66lbs less) beating a Nissan R32 Skyline GTR over a mile with a higher trap speed to boot. These were low 13 second cars from the factory and honestly the 3k made the FD3 Mazda RX7 TT and Z32 Nissan 300ZX TT feel a bit lacking in a straight line, and from a launch forget about it neither could close the gap. Sold mine in 2019 and still regret it.
I would spend all my silly money on a Golf mk2 G60 Rallye in a heartbeat. Also of course the Ferrari F40,but who wouldn’t.
B13 Sentra SE-R. Rust free would constitute the nicest remaining example.
Nostalgia is a drug. Who are these people spending so much money on an old car? Is 70% money laundering?
I would really enjoy having a clean 1978 Celica GT 5sp coupe!
1971 Datusn 610 Wagon in Maroon Burgundy with a white interior and manual transmission, for nostalgia reasons. I’d put in an aftermarket air conditioning system and I’d tune it a bit, upgrade brakes and suspension without altering the stance and I wouldn’t feel bad about that at all. I’d probably pay $20k for a complete rust-free one in excellent shape and I wouldn’t feel bad about that either. Except I suspect the nicest one left in the world isn’t very nice.
I constantly wrestle with this issue. My ’79 Burban is in great shape with less than 14,000 miles (no typo). It runs and drives well, but it kills me to just drive it around as I know I’m just adding miles/wear and tear. It’s so dumb, it’s a C10 and isn’t worth the big bucks that some of the squarebodies are going for but then I get annoyed at each new little scratch and dent.
I’d love a clean Buick Park Avenue Ultimate. Clean body and interior but blown motor or transmission is fine. That would be coming out anyway to freshen up. Then make it a sleeper of a car while sounding stock. Smaller pulley, rocker arms and a custom tune would go far. Of course the transmission needs to be built since it can’t reliably hold the stock power. Then some aggressive rubber to hold the power.