When you think of Baja bugs, what’s the first place you think of? Michigan, in the middle of February, right? Yeah, OK, not so much. But that’s exactly what I have for you today. Neither one has very much Volkswagen left in it, but they both look the part.
Yesterday we looked at a customized van and a ruined Mercedes. Unsurprisingly, even for nearly twice the price, the van took an easy win. That Mercedes-turned-El-Camino (or “Das Straße” as someone suggested) just looks wrong, poorly-done, and like a giant headache to sort out. The van just needs a paint job, if you’re not into the whole patina thing.
I do like patina, but I don’t think it’s the way to go for a custom van. This thing wants to be shiny, and it wants a borderline-offensive mural on the side. And personally, I’m not too fond of the shag carpet either. Tearing it out and replacing it with Pergo, like so many houses from the ’70s have had done, sounds a lot more hygienic.

There is possibly no more frivolous vehicle than a dune buggy. It’s a lightweight vehicle designed to go fast across sand for no other reason than that the sand is there. It’s a pure form of motoring joy, a car that only exists to be fun. Most dune buggies can trace their roots to the Volkswagen Beetle, and the simplest form is just a Beetle with all the extra stuff removed from the corners to make room for bigger tires – the fabled “Baja bug.” The two we’re going to look at today maintain the appearance of a Beetle, but under the skin there’s nothing Volkswagen about them. Let’s take a look.
2002 Volkswagen New Beetle, sort of – $26,000

Engine/drivetrain: 2.2 -liter DOHC inline 4, four-speed manual, RWD
Location: Midland, MI
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: “Ready to race over any terrain”
The Volkswagen New Beetle, introduced in 1998, doesn’t really have anything in common with the original except its name and a passing resemblance. It’s based on the Golf platform, with the drivetrain in the front, and built on a unibody structure – exactly the wrong setup for turning it into a Baja bug. But that didn’t stop the intrepid builder of this car. What we have here appears to be a New Beetle unibody center section with a custom tube frame and roll cage built into it.

The engine isn’t in the front anymore, and it isn’t a VW engine, either. It’s a GM Ecotec 2.2-liter inline four, mated to a Beetle-style transaxle driving the rear wheels. It has custom long-travel suspension and four-wheel disc brakes. The seller says it was “built right” and runs great.

There isn’t much New Beetle left inside; all I can see that looks original is the inside door handle. Instead, we get racing seats with five-point harnesses, bare aluminum floors, and a bank of purposeful-looking toggle switches. It’s probably not the most comfortable thing ever, but this isn’t a “cruise to the ice cream shop” sort of car. It’s more of a “get in, sit down, shut up, and hang on” sort of car.

I wouldn’t have thought the New Beetle shape would work this well as a Baja bug, but this thing looks pretty cool. The rear fenders are entirely gone, replaced with thin aluminum flanges. The whole front clip looks like a plastic or fiberglass piece, so this must be a common enough thing to do that someone is making parts to do it. And I think I see a license plate frame on the back, which would mean this thing is street-legal. Probably still titled as a 2002 Beetle, too.
2015 Polaris RZR XP 1000 with 1969 VW body – $12,000

Engine/drivetrain: 1.0-liter DOHC inline 2, CVT automatic, 4WD
Location: St. Johns, MI
Odometer reading: 7,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Traditional dune buggies have taken a back seat recently to side-by-sides, small utility vehicles which were originally intended for work, but have morphed into off-road toys. Side-by-sides aren’t built for road use, but in some places you can register them for the street if you make a few modifications. This Polaris RZR has been modified so it can be used on the road like a car – and in a ghoulish twist, it wears the skin of an old car, too.

The RZR is powered by a 999 cc twin, driving all four wheels through a CVT, which makes it easy to drive. Just throw it in gear and mash the pedal down. Maybe too easy, actually; I had no idea until I looked it up that these things are rocking over a hundred horsepower. I would have guessed more like 50-60. The seller says it’s “all sorts of fun,” and I believe it.

There isn’t much to the interior of a side-by-side, but of course it has cup holders. That’s not one of the requirements to make it street-legal, but a windshield, a horn, a rearview mirror, seat belts, and lights are. Note the giant “oh shit” handle in front of the passenger seat; if that’s how your passenger is supposed to stay in place, then I think seat belts are a much better idea.

Only parts of the Beetle shell fit onto the RZR’s roll cage: the cowl/windshield, doors, and door sills are about all that made the cut. The front end looks like a fiberglass piece from an old Baja bug kit, the sort of thing JC Whitney used to sell. And the whole thing is coated in truck bedliner. It’s durable, I suppose, but I’d rather have seen shiny paint on it.
My guess is that neither one of these has a heater, which makes them essentially useless this time of year. The temperature here in central Michigan has been hovering in the teens for a couple of weeks now. But come summertime, you could have a lot of fun with either of them. One is a purpose-built machine created from unlikely source material, and the other is a fairly standard side-by-side wearing a classic Baja bug body. Which one seems like a better modern take on the old formula?









I’m going for the cheaper one. Both of these are in Crack Pipe pricing territory to me.
At least the cheaper one looks like it was used for actual offroad use. The New Beetle one looks like it’s for someone with money who wants to do Baja Bug Cosplay but never actually goes offroad with it.
Sorry I’m thinking Drug Boat and hope the military blows them up. But with no one on board
Yesterday was neither, today is both.
Man you are so turned around on this your user name should be Angry boB
I know the RZR is the logical pick, but I just love the presence of the New Beetle build.
How overpriced batman! I took the Rzr
Twice the price and twice the motor does not mean twice the fun.
I am concerned by the diving board engine on the new beetle, and while I do think they made the RZR look more fun I have no interest in a vehicle that can’t be driven on the road legally. I picked the new beetle today, but I don’t want it, I would much prefer a cheap jeep or something like that.
The yellow one is rad, I just wish the engine was tucked into the body a little better.
Impressed by that Beetle build. Still don’t want it. I can picture calling the owner anytime it needs work (probably always.) Needs a swing axle or brakes, what do I tell the Parts Store guy?
I’ll take neither for $1000 Alex. The Beetle is too modified and heaven forbid something break and you have to de-engineer something to fix it. The RZR, that’s too close to new RZR money, or at least a low mile used one
Well if they were asking $1,000 I’d probably feel more inclined to buy them. It is closer to what they are worth
Zero interest in these. Both prices seem insane, but the New Beetle wins by being less fraudulent. Would I buy it at $26K? No. At $10K? No. At $5K? No.
7000 miles is pretty used up for a RZR, especially one where they still want half of MSRP or more, so it’s a reluctant vote for the “Beetle” today even though the idea of paying $26,000 for that thing makes me ill.
This is where I am at as well. I have had a ton of fun in a similar (sans Beetle body) RZR, and it was starting to show significant signs of wear at 3000 miles. The yellow one is stupidly overpriced, but it is somehow the better pick in today’s selection of “which is the least-bad buy”.
In a choice between 2 bad choices sometimes you just have to chose the cheapest. It’s like would you rather lose your toes or your foot. There is no good answer
The only thing either of these vehicles is good for is freaking out a valet.
There needs to be a NONE OF THE ABOVE button on today’s vote, because I would hit that repeatedly and with vigor.
“Built right?” No, I can’t say that it was. Starting with the wrong chassis and making it less bad doesn’t quite rise to the level of “right.”
Razor chassis with Type 1 bodywork? <sigh> If I wanted to throw money at a Razor, I’d just buy a Razor. I can find them locally that haven’t been janked into this weird amalgamation.
Hard pass both ways. I’ll walk.
I fear what tomorrow brings for SBSD, but In a good way. Today’s picks follow yesterday’s theme: Neither’s nice at half the price. It might be a week of “What? Why? How much? No!”
I’m still here for it. Lately I’m just window shopping FB Marketplace anyway. Finding abominations like these is where the fun is.
Now, where did I put my bug spray?
Underrated comment right here. It deserves COTD consideration.
The New Beetle looks like an impressive build done right, but the end result is about the same as the RZR at twice the cost. And I’m not even sure it would actually be more fun on the sand – that is the RZR’s native habitat and it’s darn good at it.
RZR and save $14,000 toward beers or back surgery, whichever is more necessary after a day of hooning.
Why does this SBSD feel like a Presidential election? It’s a matter of which is the lesser of two evils…
The old Giant Douche vs Turd Sandwich.
If I have to take a choice, it’s the New Brotle. It’s registered, at least, and not based on a souped up Gator. But if I really wanted a Baja, I’d look for one with a aircooled engine and torsion suspension. And probably pay less than either of these.
The New Beetle is cooler, but the RZR is by certainly the more cost effective option by a long shot. Hmmmm…. harder to decide than I thought.
I’m going with the actual beetle (sort of?) with the wild drivetrain just for the audacity of the thing. I bet it’s a friggin blast to hoon around.
My SOP for “neither” days is to just pick the cheaper of the two, though I think the RZR wins on more than just price here.
I was sure I was going to pick the RZR, but once I learned the Beetle was really a tube buggy underneath, that gets my pick for at least being interesting and not just a bunch of added steel over a side-by-side.
I want to like the New Beetle, but that rear overhang looks like a wheelie prone bastard.
Plus I can probably hang a small plow on the front of the RZR for snow removal. I’ve got enough layers to stay warm.
Wheelie prone bastard sounds like fun to me!
Not when trying to plow snow.
Yeah, but the New Beetle version has a more substantial cabin, and you could put weight on the front.
Maybe a plow will keep the nose down for my “Reasonable” use case, then I can go whip shitties in empty parking lots!
Being a wheelie prone bastard is likely the point! Looks like fun to me.
LOL at the idea of either these being on the road. The variance in what’s allowed on the road state-by-state is wild. Also, both overpriced. That Baja could be worth the money if you could actually race it. The Polaris is is not improved with the slapped on body.
Neither but I would pick the car. I have an irrational dislike of SxSs.
Your dislike is totally rational.
They are all over the off road parks and trails. It reminds me of skiing in the early 90s when snowboards were all over and annoying the skiers.
I’m not a big fan of them either. The epithet “trail lice” probably didn’t come about as a term of endearment.
Ha Ha Ha. Nope.