There’s no rule saying that just because you have a plain white or silver car that it needs to stay that way. You can jazz it up with stripes, or add a second paint color, and have something that looks really striking. Today we’re going to look at two vehicles that have had such treatments.
We looked at two classic six-cylinder coupes yesterday, and it sounds like it was a hard choice for some of you. The rust and general shoddiness of the BMW turned some of you off, but from the sound of it, for a lot of you that Corvair was just too damn charming to pass up. It won by a decent margin.
I think I agree. I’ve always admired the BMW 6 Series, and that example doesn’t scare me, but when it’s up against a nice Corvair like that, for a thousand dollars less, it’s a much harder sell. Like a lot of you, I’d prefer the second generation Corvair, but I don’t think you’re going to find one of those in that shape for four grand.

As hard as I try to find cars in good colors, I have had my share of boring ones. I’ve had several silver cars, and a couple of white ones, and one Corolla that was kinda the color of dirt. (I’m sure you know the color I mean.) In several cases, I’ve thought about adding stripes, or painting them, but I never followed through on it. I admire the sellers of these two cars for taking it upon themselves to spice these two up. Let’s check them out.
1988 Toyota Van LE – $5,895

Engine/drivetrain: 2.0-liter OHC inline 4, four-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Olympia, WA
Odometer reading: 179,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Japanese vehicles often have more interesting names in their home market than here in the US. I’m not sure why we don’t get the cool names; some marketing person thinks they won’t work, I guess. But it is kind of a shame. In 1984, Toyota started importing its TownAce line of cab-over-engine vans, but instead of calling it the TownAce, we got the spectacularly descriptive name of “Toyota Van.”

Much like the old Ford Econoline and Dodge A-series vans, the Toyota Van houses its engine in a lump between the front seats. Access for maintenance is via a panel under the driver’s seat; the seat and panel lift up out of the way so you can get to the oil filler, oil and transmission dipsticks, radiator cap – and that’s about it. Anything more serious requires some more surgery to the interior. It’s not fun. Luckily, the Van’s 2.0 liter four-cylinder engine is just about bulletproof. This one runs and drives just fine, according to the seller, even with nearly 200,000 miles on it.

I don’t know why we don’t get any photos of the driver’s area. The seller says the interior is “almost perfect;” why not let us see all of it? The back seat area looks great. I hope the front looks just as good, but not showing it makes it seem like they’re hiding something.

The combination of the red, orange, and yellow stripes and the aftermarket wheels really make this van look cool – and in my opinion, that’s not easy to do with these things. I’ve never been much of a fan, but this one works for me. It shouldn’t have any rust on it, being in the Pacific Northwest, and I don’t see any damage except one ding in the tailgate.
1992 Geo Tracker – $5,500

Engine/drivetrain: 1.6-liter OHC inline 4, five-speed manual, RWD
Location: El Mirage, AZ
Odometer reading: 55,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Little soft-top SUVs are another one of those vehicles that are sorely missing from the market these days. Back in the 1990s, there were a bunch: the Jeep Wrangler, the Isuzu Amigo, the first-generation Kia Sportage, the first-generation Toyota RAV4, and of course, the Suzuki Sidekick, and its badge-engineered twin, the Geo Tracker. They were inexpensive, fun, playful vehicles that sold well, so why doesn’t anybody sell them anymore? Sure, you can still get a Wrangler, or a two-door Ford Bronco, but they’re not exactly cheap, or small, and they take themselves too seriously. This Tracker doesn’t take itself seriously at all, and that makes it way cooler.

Power for this little bundle of joy comes from a Suzuki-built 1.6-liter four, backed by a five-speed manual gearbox. Don’t let the chunky tires fool you, though; this Tracker is strictly 2WD. It runs and drives well, and has a new battery. It also has air conditioning, which was just recently converted to R134a refrigerant, and works great.

Someone has been to Mexico, it looks like. This Tracker’s red and white vinyl interior looks for all the world like a south-of-the-border custom job. I like it, personally; it’s a hell of a lot more interesting than the standard Geo dark gray. They were thorough, too: Not only are the front seats done, but the back seat and door panels are as well. The carpeted dash cover sort of ruins the effect, though.

The theme continues outside, with a two-tone paint job and a matching spare tire cover. Now that’s commitment. I think it needs a third color dividing the red and white, though; at the moment, it looks a bit Marlboro-like. The convertible top is new, the seller says, so you don’t have to worry about leaks.
Personalizing a car to suit your own tastes can sometimes ruin it for other people, but I applaud the boldness shown by these two. They’re a lot more interesting looking than they would have been as just plain silver and white. And they’re both cool and reliable vehicles. It seemed like a nice way to send you into the weekend. What’s your pick?






I want both.
I own an 84 Toyota Van, so this was an absolute no brainer for me.
With respect to the name, TownAce, MasterAce, LiteAce, Model F, and Tarago were all used in other markets. The story I subscribe to is Toyota wanted to use “Van Wagon”, but VW said it was too close to Wonder Wagon, so that got nixed. Lots of areas do still call it Van Wagon (window sticker, title, insurance docs, some parts websites, etc.), so that original name seems to have stuck around a little. Of course they also just called their truck “Truck” in the 80s, so maybe it is what it is.
They did try to use “Wonder Wagon” in some advertising at least.
The OG moonbus van! Can’t pass this up, especially in that kind of condition – you’d be the talk of any Radwood with this.
I think the obvious choice is that the Van gets purchased and used as an Autopian merch van at every Radwood
Luv me some minivan! I have an irrational attraction to these Toyota cabover vans. Safety, maintenance and low center of gravity be damned!
Parents almost bought one when they were new and 20 years later I couldn’t talk a neighbor out of his 4WD manual one.
I’ll go with the convertible SUV. The Toyota Van is pretty great in its own way though.
Van, but this was actually a tough choice — maybe if that that Tracker was more period-accurate…
Said nobody ever. Until now.
Sigh. Van.
Cool van vs 2wd tracker. Easy choice for the van.
The van is to cool to pass up while on the other hand the Geo is ummm how do I put it nicely modified to someone else’s vision of what they think looks nice while to me it just looks tacky as hell.
I respect that take. Tough call for me because I think the Geo looks awesome, but I freely admit that I’m tacky as hell.
Oh man, no bad choice today. I went back and forth. The stripes on that Toyota are so well done, they look like they could be factory, and I love those wheels.
I don’t love the wheels on the Tracker, but they are era correct at least. It’s definitely out there, but I went with it because it’s just so fun and weird. I want to take my kids for ice cream in that.
Trackers didn’t have plain gray seats, they were covered in glorious neon accents. This one is terrible. Van please, although I wish it was a manual; a lot of these were.
I only have one hot wheels car on my desk. It is the 1986 Toyota Van with an incredibly similar decal stripe package. Although the hot wheels van is an awesome shade of beige with a brown bumper. It’s from the series “HW J-IMPORTS” #6/10.
I also drove the Suzuki variant of the Tracker for a number of years – the Grand Vitara.
Both of these choices are hitting me right in the feels.
However, I gotta choose, so I’m going for the Toyota Van because as Doug Demuro might say, this van is ALL quirks and features.
I have that Hot Wheels on MY desk!* My buddy gave it to me after I shared the link to Brian Scotto’s story about spec Previa racing on TST. (I shared a link in my comment below).
Also, agree on the Toyota Van being made of quirks and features. Those days of Toyota were awesome!
*In addition to the Toyota Van, I have an AE86, a Lotus 49 (in Gold Leaf livery), and a Williams FW46 at my desk. One of these things is definitely NOT like the others…
For some reason the Chilton manual for the 83-90 Cressida also had the Van.
It looks too cool to pass up. I wonder why the Tracker is only RWD. Why bother…
No wrong choice, I think.
Tips on the Van if you do buy it: Make sure the engine gets a chance to warm up before you shut it down or you will eventually be dealing with oil-starvation issues in the valve-train. And when the A/C packs it in, well, it’s gone, man. Yeah, a competent shop can resurrect it, but an actually decent shop will tell you not to bother.
Beyond that, they are great vehicles. Were I to hit the lottery, I’d open a shop that did nothing but resurrect them (and maybe Transporters). It would be a money-loser, but, hey, lottery money.
I had a Tracker like that (but hardtop and four wheel drive). One frosty morning it nearly killed me by spinning on an Interstate bridge at 65 mph.
Van, please.
Why not both?
Why not Zoidberg?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
This is the correct answer. Having this fleet is a statement. A statement that tells normal people to stay away, and lets car people know you’re one of them.
That Van is awesome, I never see these anymore. Easy vote.
If that Tracker was against anything else it would have got my vote, alas it’s against the delightfully goofy Toyota Van.
On a side note, I’ve loved the idea of spec endurance racing Toyota Previas as described by Brian Scotto https://youtu.be/N6-uJLSYSVA?si=iJkNDKVtawwZeF1f&t=3020 (it goes on until 58:29, I started a bit early to give the full context of the conversation) It sounds like an amazingly stupid time with your buddies. Get on it Autopians!
I’ve always thought the Tracker looked like fun, and this one’s pretty cheap. I like the exterior colors but not really a fan of the interior.
As an old Toyota guy that van and heritage-style stripes looks like a fun winter beater. My aunt had one similar when I was a teen in the early 80s, I remember it being a manual. I’d add another Toyota to my stable (have two ATM.)
I voted Van, but if I could somehow get a package deal for both at, say, ten grand? I’d take it.
I’ve had that version of the Tracker, and it was great! I even drove it halfway across the country while pulling a small trailer! My oldest kid learned to drive in it, and we eventually sold it with almost 200k miles on it with the original clutch and rear brakes still in it! I loved that little trucklet, and would own that one in a heartbeat. But since I’ve already experienced it, that’s why I voted Van.
I loved my Tracker. Only difference from this one was it was 4WD. Amazing in snow, 35 MPG all day, took some serious abuse without much of a problem.
The Tracker is amazing and would be a win any other time, but that Van is just too perfect to pass on. I wholly agree on this being a perfect time for the “why not both?” meme…