Home » Which Leftover Is A Better Treat? 1984 Cadillac Seville vs 1996 Honda Accord

Which Leftover Is A Better Treat? 1984 Cadillac Seville vs 1996 Honda Accord

Sbsd 3 25 2026

As some of you already guessed, my poorly-formed plan for the week was to bombard you with Ford Tempos, putting a different one up against something weird every day. But consider yourselves lucky; I have run out of things to say about the stupid things, so I’m abandoning that plan. Instead, I’m going to make you choose between the would-be competitors to those other two Tempos.

Yesterday, we looked at arguably the best Tempo ever built, and the most notorious Renault ever sold here. Kudos to the twenty-four percent of you who voted for the Fuego; you’re my kind of weird. The Tempo is almost certainly the better car, but the Fuego is the more noble choice.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I owned a ’92 Ford Tempo for a couple of years, and it actually wasn’t a bad car. I had pretty good luck with it, then I sold it to my brother, who had considerably worse luck. I still don’t think he has entirely forgiven me for that car. Mostly what it was, though, was painfully, relentlessly dull. A V6 and a five-speed would probably wake it up some, but I don’t care enough about it to find out. I’ll take the Fuego, get it running, and sell it on to some other hopeless romantic, and then be able to say I once owned a French car.

Screenshot From 2026 03 24 17 14 00

That’s the thing about choosing cars for this column: there has to be a hook. A car can’t just be old and worn-out; it has to be old and worn-out in an interesting way. It can’t just be a bad car; it has to be legendarily catastrophic. And bonus points if it’s funny-looking, either by design or condition. There are plenty of old cheap used cars on the market that would make far better transportation than the ones I show you, but they’re boring. I don’t want to write about them, and you don’t want to read about them. So we’ll skip any further explorations of Ford’s exercise in mediocrity, and look at some cars more worthy of the title “shitbox.”

1984 Cadillac Seville – $2,500

646177487 1435909687996783 4800211512566322595 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Engine/drivetrain: 4.1-liter OHV V8, four-speed automatic, FWD

Location: Coldwater, MI

Odometer reading: 39,000 miles (probably rolled over)

Operational status: Runs and drives

The original Seville was Cadillac’s first attempt at downsizing its cars. And really, the first Seville was pretty good; it had decent styling, a good list of features, and a powerful (for the time) Oldsmobile V8 under the hood. In typical GM fashion, however, the second generation ruined pretty much all of that.

643870753 922605980472246 5926234115061089760 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

The second-generation Seville switched to front-wheel drive, using the Oldsmobile Toronado’s architecture. In place of the Oldsmobile V8, however, it used either a 368 cubic inch version of Cadillac’s own V8, or the much-maligned Oldsmobile diesel V8. In 1981, the situation got even worse when the 368 became the variable-displacement V8-6-4. Luckily, that mistake only lasted a year, after which it was replaced by the “High Technology” 4.1-liter V8, which is what this one has. The HT4100, as it became known, has its own host of problems, but the seller says this one runs and drives, at least. The odometer reads 39,000, which may be original, and it may not be.

646450724 1882900869058026 5693393807697009903 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

It’s a bit of a mess inside. The leather is torn, and the dashboard is cracked. The headliner and rear deck are all torn up, too. I think there’s an overhead console that is dangling by its wires. And part of the underside of the dash looks disassembled. Basically, it’s hosed.

646376687 26417993907794362 1573863513883610968 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

It’s not much better outside. The paint is coming off in sheets, it has a cracked taillight, and the grille is missing. As if the Seville’s “bustleback” trunk style wasn’t ugly enough, someone decided to stick an aftermarket Continental kit on it. Oh, and it’s a Michigan car, so it’s probably rusty underneath, too.

1996 Honda Accord EX – $2,950

00n0n 3os9s8ulwga 0t20ci 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Engine/drivetrain: 2.2-liter OHC inline 4, four-speed automatic, FWD

Location: Portland, OR

Odometer reading: 293,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

People repaint cars for all sorts of reasons. Maybe it’s damage repair, or maybe it’s just because they wanted to change the color. Sometimes, though, you wonder what the owner was thinking. Who looks at a bottle of Pepto-Bismol and thinks, “That color would look great on my Honda”?

00v0v 1vcju2kpjp2 0t20ci 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

The fifth-generation Honda Accord is a hell of a car, maybe the best of the breed, actually. It has a 2.2-liter four-cylinder that makes enough power, it has all the comfort and convenience stuff you could want without being gimmicky, and it’s incredibly reliable. This one has almost 300,000 miles on it, and it still runs great, according to the seller.

00w0w 5hpvv9t6pyg 0t20ci 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

We don’t get any photos of the front seats, only the rear. The rear seats are in good condition, but that’s not really an indication; lots of cars spend their lives with no one riding in the back. At 293,000 miles, I get the feeling that the driver’s seat, at least, is in pretty bad shape.

00j0j B8pk3bm5apw 0t20ci 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

If you can get past the lurid color and the stupid clear lights, it’s actually not in terrible shape outside. The wheels are probably not to everyone’s taste either, but personally, I don’t hate them. And since it’s a Portland car, it probably isn’t rusty. It does, however, have a salvage title for an undisclosed reason. It could have been in an accident, or it could be a theft recovery.

I don’t know that either of these is any better than yet another Tempo; I just know I couldn’t write about another of those damn cars, and I’m pretty sure you all didn’t want to read about another one either. Instead, you have a ratty Caddy and a pink Accord to choose from. I make no apologies.

 

 

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
108 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Aaron Headly
Member
Aaron Headly
3 days ago

I hated the bustle-butt Caddys when they were new, and I still do.

Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
3 days ago

Too bad about the taillights and headlights on the Honda.
Its a little pricy, the paint doesn’t bother me. Some Tractor Supply paint and a foam roller, and nobody’s going to think you are a Mary Kay lady.

Chris D
Chris D
3 days ago

Both are three wheels into the junkyard already. That Caddy isn’t even a 200 dollar car.
The Honda needs paint, new wheels, new taillight lenses and 100,000 fewer miles on it. If I have to choose, then my vote goes to the Honda, because at least it can be salvaged. Both are povertymobiles for druggie burnouts in their current conditions, and would get pulled over on a regular basis for looking very suspicious.
The Honda will go more than twice as far on a gallon of fuel as well, so there is that.
If you want to be the loser driving the ugliest car on the road, just buy either one of these.

Argentine Utop
Member
Argentine Utop
3 days ago

Easiest vote ever. Repaint the Accord and you have a cheap, reasonable Honda.
Spend a stupid amount of money on the Caddy and you end up with a clapped-together Seville, awful and problematic.

Timothy Swanson
Timothy Swanson
3 days ago

Neither of these cars would be useful even as shelter if I became homeless. I’m surprised anyone had the lack of self esteem to even market these. It takes talent to find shitboxes this bad, though, so some credit there..

LarsVargas
Member
LarsVargas
3 days ago

HT4100 is an automatic no from me, even if it’s made it this far.

If that Seville was in better shape overall, I would consider it and then swap in a better Cadillac Engine

Dodsworth
Member
Dodsworth
3 days ago

The Caddy is the epitome of butt-ugly. Time hasn’t changed that. I’ll take the pinkie-hippo Accord.

Mouse
Member
Mouse
3 days ago

I’d take the Accord and rattle can it over the Seville.
Also methinks whoever owned that in the past sold Avon.

Mouse
Member
Mouse
3 days ago
Reply to  Mouse

Or alternate plan to the rattle can: make the Accord look like a Kirby-mobile.

DONALD FOLEY
Member
DONALD FOLEY
3 days ago
Reply to  Mouse

Mary Kay

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
3 days ago

I’ll take the Accord and actually, I do mind the pink. First stop, a paint shop. I’ve had six Honda products over the years, and they’ve all been very good or better. That poor Seville. A Kandidate for Kars for Kids if I ever saw one.

Stephen Reed
Member
Stephen Reed
3 days ago

The Accord would be a good winter beater… the less said about that Cadillac the better.

Christopher Derrick
Member
Christopher Derrick
3 days ago

Voted Accord because I’m colorblind and nothing at all makes me think that Caddy is worth more than scrap value.

108
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x