Good morning! This week, all the vehicles I’m going to show you have exactly one thing in common: the same asking price. They’re all being offered for $3,500. Are they worth it? Well, that’s up to you, isn’t it?
Last week, I gave you a bunch of silly scenarios in which to choose a car, and we finished up on Friday with you getting to choose which one I got stuck with. I guess I shouldn’t have said that I “kinda liked” the Chevy Aveo, because apparently, that’s what the majority of you thought I deserved.


Ah well. I’d actually be fine with it; dynamically challenged as you all claim it to be – though I have a hard time believing it’s any worse than a first-generation Kia Rio or a Toyota Echo – it’s still small and manual. I’d rather try it out than be bored silly driving that Altima, which took second place.
Now then: When I first started looking for cars for today, I noticed that the first few ads that caught my eye all had the same asking price: $3,500. I took it as a sign, and I’m going to run with it, so all of this week’s choices will be that same price. Some of the pairings will make sense, and some won’t, but it will keep everything on a level playing field. We’re starting out with a couple of good ol’ V8 American trucks. Here they are.
1976 Dodge D100 – $3,500

Engine/drivetrain: 318 cubic inch (probably) OHV V8, three-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Newark, CA
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: “Runs but has an oil leak,” has been sitting
Truck naming conventions are always a little strange. Every manufacturer has its own way of designating the many different models available, which often look the same at first glance. Generally, a smaller number indicates a lower payload rating, and in the case of Dodge and GM, the first letter of the name can tell you whether a truck is 2WD or 4WD. And of course, each manufacturer has its own names for body styles and trim levels. Put it all together, and what we have here is a Dodge D100 Adventurer Utiline – a half-ton, short-wheelbase 2WD truck with a stepside bed, in mid-level trim.

Power for this stubby little truck comes from Chrysler’s LA small-block V8, which I’m guessing is probably the common 318 cubic inch version. It’s backed by a three-speed Torqueflite automatic, and it’s as good a combination as you’ll find in a ’70s truck from any manufacturer. This one has been rebuilt, but we don’t know when, and it has also been sitting for years. It runs well, but has an oil leak. Are we talking a little seepage, or the Exxon Valdez? And from where? The seller doesn’t specify. It has an aftermarket Edelbrock carb and intake, and what looks like it might be an aftermarket ignition box as well.

The seller has redone the interior seat upholstery and carpet, and it looks great – I think. The photos make it a little hard to see. Dodge offered all kinds of special edition trucks during this time, but as far as I can tell, this is just a garden-variety Adventurer, or maybe an Adventurer Sport. It’s not a Warlock or anything, though. The biggest problem I can see with the interior is that it doesn’t have air conditioning, which means those black vinyl seats are going to get mighty hot and sticky.

I don’t think the two-tone paint is original, but I bet it was done in the ’70s. My guess is that the truck was originally all black, and someone added the blue accents. It’s not in great shape, though, and you’d have my support if you wanted to redo the blue areas or repaint it entirely. It does look all right from a distance, and at least it isn’t rusty, so I guess you could just live with it.
1981 Ford Bronco – $3,500

Engine/drivetrain: 302 cubic inch OHV V8, three-speed automatic, 4WD
Location: north of Spokane, WA
Odometer reading: 90,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Ford’s original Bronco was a tiny little thing, based on its own unique chassis, but when Chevy and Dodge produced their own two-door SUVs to compete with it, they chose shortened versions of their full-size truck chassis. Ford pretty much had to follow suit to compete, so in 1978 the Bronco grew in size and joined the F-series line of trucks. That version lasted only two years, before the F-series was completely redesigned for 1980 – including a new Bronco. The larger Bronco was a hit and proved useful for all kinds of jobs, from serious off-roading trips to just a quick run to pick up some OJ. (Sorry, I had to.)

This Bronco is powered by Ford’s 302 Windsor V8, with a two-barrel carburetor and a three-speed C6 automatic transmission, driving both front and rear axles. Someone will correct me if I’m wrong, I’m sure, but I don’t think the full-size Bronco was ever sold without 4WD. I’ve certainly never seen one. It runs and drives just fine, according to the seller, and it just had its cylinder heads rebuilt not long ago.

The interior needs some help; the carpet and seat upholstery are both done for. The fake woodgrain on the dash has seen better days, too, but it had no business being there in the first place. This isn’t Grandma’s LTD. There are piles of parts strewn about the interior, which, judging by the rows of derelict trucks visible in the backgrounds of the photos, may or may not belong to this Bronco. Best to ask the seller to inventory all of it, so you know what it is.

Outside, it looks like some rust repair has been started, including some panel replacement in a few places. It’s a little strange that they would put the trim back on over primer paint, but maybe they consider it good enough and done? It has some very ’80s-looking directional aftermarket wheels on it, but those of you with OCD, don’t look too closely: the wheels are facing in different directions on both sides of the truck. Swap either the fronts or rears side for side, and everything will be facing the same way.
Trucks from the 1970s and ’80s are getting more popular all the time, and these two make a nice change from the steady parade of squarebody Chevies that everyone seems to have. On one hand, you have a cool stepside Dodge pickup, and on the other, a full-size Bronco. Both run, both have V8s and automatics, both need some work, and both are the same price. Which one is more your style?
The D100 is far less likely than the Bronco to flip over if a tire blows on the highway.
Also, the D100 seems to be in better shape, oil leaks & concerning absence of an air cleaner notwithstanding.
Easy choice today, especially since one is a Dodge and the other one is…a Ford.
Dodge did offer two-tone paint jobs in the ‘70s, but I think you’re right, I don’t believe this was one of them. Wish it was. Ford and Chevy had some beautiful two-tone trucks back then, but it wasn’t often you saw Dodges painted that way. Think most people saw Dodge as the plain Jane work truck choice (which it mostly was) of the Big Three. This one may – I say may – have gotten a quasi street truck home treatment. Still taking the Mopar because of the shorty stepside bed.
The Dodge is in better condition
The Dodge seems like a way better deal based on the photos, but I don’t care, I love the Ford Bronco. Also, I have wasted a lot of time watching people paint cars on YouTube, but it won’t be a waste if I take what I have “learned” and paint a car myself!
Don’t 78-79 Bronco’s come with a solid front axle too?
Know I’m going to be on the losing side, but I’ll go with the Bronco. Love ’em, and would be cool to do a resto on it.
Dodge. All the way.
The value play here is the Dodge. There’s just too much miscellaneous work to do on the Bronco.
That said, I’d resolve the oil leak with an engine (and tranny) swap, with something that has an AC compressor.
If I’ve got to mess with a vehicle, it might as well be an upgrade instead of merely getting it to the point of being presentable.
I owned a 1983 F-100 with this same drive train for many years, going to stick with what I know. Bronco all day.
I like them both, but you get a lot more for your money in the Dodge, so I’ll have that one.
For a brief unhappy time, I hate-owned a horrid ’88 Bronco that was still way better than this heap. Never doing that again.
The seller of that Dodge gave it a good hose-down before taking those pics. I’m betting it doesn’t present quite as well in person. Still better than that mess of a Bronco, though.
That hose down and the ambiguity of the oil leak make me nervous for the price. At least the Bronco isn’t trying to hide anything.
Running purely on the eye test today, and I’m going Dodge simply because everything that isn’t the engine is in vastly better shape. The vague “oil leak” and evidence of coolant all over the engine bay has me worried about a head gasket, but if there’s no head warpage that’s no big deal, especially with the amount of room in there. I don’t think I’d feel bad about $3500 for that. I’d instantly feel bad about $3500 for the Bronco.
Hey-Ohhh!
I guess I’m walking today.
I voted for the Dodge. I disagree with the headline – this isn’t a project truck. The interior looks great. The exterior also looks good aside from the paint on one of the fenders. The oil leak might need to be fixed depending on severity, but that shouldn’t be a big deal. This truck probably will need a few repairs once it is driven regularly again, but it is a hell of a deal at $3500.
When people don’t even take the effort to clean the junk from the passenger footwells for a photo; I always picture that they’re the type of people to be lazy about other things like basic maintenance.
How is this even a choice? I’m primarily a Ford guy but I’m definitely goin Dodge.
Same here – the Ford just looks so tired.
I want to pick the Bronco, but those floors… I’ll take the Dodge today and do a 5.7 modern Hemi swap.
I’ll take the Dodge. I always liked that era, and junkyards are ripe with the 90s version of that drivetrain, and basically drop right in for an easy power upgrade.
An 86 Bronco was my first car. The first time I ever turned a wrench (terribly) and I’d love a redemption story after selling that one on when I couldn’t fix some basic problems.
That said, think I’m going to have to go Dodge. I’ve become a MOPAR fan in the last 10 years and I’m already almost done rebuilding a (Magnum) 318, plus that Dodge is in pretty damn good shape.
The Bronco is just a wreck and if I’m honest TTB scares me, cause it’s just so weird. In my experience these days anything weird or unusual typically has weird or unusual problems and this is doubly true of Fords I’ve worked on in recent years, so that’s a firm no thank you from me.
I wanted to go for the Bronco.. but then I saw it.
The Dodge has Chevy fenders on its’ correct bed, so the fenders are far too squared-off looking (Chevy introduced new Stepside fenders with the Squarebody in ’73, Dodge used the same ones since ’53) but on the Dodge bed with its’ distinct ribs stamped into the sides.
I was thinking about voting for the Dodge until I read what you wrote.
Now I don’t think I’ll vote for either.
I’d definitely bring someone knowledgeable to make sure it’s not bitsa’d in other more critical areas but it’s not unforgiveable for the money.
Good catch.
Dodge + Chevy =
Dovy
Devy
Chodge
Chedge
Etc, etc… however, some people might go with this one:
Doody
Hmmm, a truck that looks pretty good and has a nice interior, or rolling tetanus.
C’mon. That Dodge is a very good deal for $3500, even if you have to pull the engine to replace all the seals.
The Bronco, on the other hand, is disgusting.
I have had work trucks, off roaded with, worked on Broncos of this vintage. I prefer the 78-80 with the solid front axle to the twin traction beam. I have seen them grenade on trails. I am going with the Dodge. It just looks cleaner, less to go wrong, and mostly one color.
I do not miss driving old trucks without headrests.
Picking the Dodge because I’m not sure when my last tetanus shot was.