Home » Why It Cost Over $55k Just To Keep My Range Rover On The Road

Why It Cost Over $55k Just To Keep My Range Rover On The Road

55k Range Rover Ts

As a long-time automotive masochist and closeted anglophile, I have always had a deep desire to one day own a Range Rover. Specifically, an L322 Range Rover. While the likes of Jeremy Clarkson and Harry Metcalfe have long lauded the L322 as the best car of all time, the vehicle also carries a reputation for running costs more akin to a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier than an SUV. Undeterred by common sense, I started my search for a low-ish-mileage example with a good history and in an attractive color combo — good, responsible, used-car purchasing criteria.

Then I got a text message that blew that plan for a sensible, low-mileage L322 to smithereens.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

A dealer friend of mine messaged me that he had just bought a one-owner, 321k-mile 2006 Range Rover HSE from a local charity auction. After asking the most important qualifying question (What color is it?), I decided I had to have it. In a brilliant stroke of tactful negotiation, I offered to double his money without seeing a single picture. I just had to find out who was crazy enough — and, more importantly, what it took — to put nearly ⅓ of a million miles on one of the least dependable cars of all time. What better way to do so than to blindly sign on the dotted line?

55k Range Rover 1

When I purchased this Tonga Green example in February, it came with a title, a death certificate, a discarded business card in the glovebox, and little else. While I usually insist on a fully documented service history for any used car, I was going to have to get creative considering the circumstances I found myself in. After an evening of internet sleuthing, I tracked down the owner’s obituary and, eventually, got in touch with his widow. She was delighted that her husband’s beloved green Rover ended up in good hands (debatable), but unfortunately, the Range Rover’s comprehensive 20-year history file had been discarded when the truck was donated to charity. A tragedy far greater than the fire at the Library of Alexandria.

55k Range Rover 4

Despite this, she put me in touch with the mechanic who had serviced this truck exclusively since it went out of warranty in 2008. While his shop’s records didn’t reach back that far, he was able to produce detailed invoices back to 2012 and 125k miles. With those invoices and the longest CarFax I’ve ever seen, I was finally able to piece together my truck’s backstory, and it’s nothing short of staggering.

55k Range Rover 13

First, we must congratulate the original owner — a paving and earth-moving contractor — for his extraordinary commute and depth of wallet to pilot this Rover the distance to the moon and nearly a third of the way back. After purchasing it new at Symes Land Rover of Pasadena, he proceeded to drive it from his home in Del Mar all the way to Rancho Cucamonga, a round-trip commute of up to 200 miles, multiple times a week, for almost two decades. An incredible feat for any car, let alone an L322.

After the equivalent of circumnavigating the globe 13 times, this full-fat Range Rover has needed 66 oil changes, 11 sets of brakes, 5 transmission fluid changes, 4 front air struts, 3 air suspension compressors, 3 radiators, 2 sets of control arms, 2 ignition switches, and an electronic steering column in a pear tree. More impressively, despite an odometer that would make a Land Cruiser blush, this Rover still sports its original engine, transmission, transfer case, differential, and rear air springs. Even the engine mounts still wear date codes from the last Bush administration.

While this particular sub-genre of L322 from 2006-2009 may be known for its durability, it still has a proclivity for consuming stacks of Benjamin Franklins like Smarties. My truck is no exception. Over the 200k miles of invoices from the previous owner, I’ve calculated that the owner squandered invested $48,975.16 in maintenance, not including consumables like tires or gasoline. That equates to 25 cents per mile in upkeep alone, nearly triple the national average!

Even though this truck has surely had more work done than I have listed (a door handle cable here, a window regulator there, etc.), any car with over 300k miles is entitled to some wear and tear. Except for a cryptic CarFax entry for a head gasket replacement at six months old (which explains why my windshield still sports a “Land Rover Newport Beach Preferred Customer” sticker), none of the invoices reflect the horror stories you usually hear about out-of-warranty Range Rover ownership.

This dedication to preventative maintenance is probably why this Range Rover has made it this far. The mechanic who worked with the original owner for over 15 years remarked that, up until his health began to fail, the owner had always maintained this truck with an open checkbook, no questions asked. Add four years of missing invoices from 2008-2012 at an average of $1,088.33, tires, a mediocre paint job of undetermined origin and age, and the original owner likely spent well over of this Rover’s original MSRP ($75,750) on upkeep alone. This man was not a martyr. He was a saint.

55k Range Rover 5

When I finally saw it in person, there was something about this Rover that exuded good juju. The paint, though riddled with orange peel, was still glossy, the air suspension went up and down, and it had a nearly fresh set of Michelins. While I had essentially signed up for the automotive equivalent of providing hospice care, this truck clearly still had plenty of life left in it. Moreover, I felt like this weathered Range Rover deserved a second chance. I handed over $1,100 of my hard-earned money and drove it home in the comforting amber glow of its check engine light.

Despite a healthy-sounding engine and a disarmingly smooth transmission, some maintenance clearly had been deferred as the owner’s health declined. Every suspension bushing in the front end was all but gone, lending to a cacophony that can best be likened to a box of metal cups being thrown on the ground whenever going over a speed bump. The brakes were nearly down to the metal, the valve covers were warped and leaky, the A/C didn’t work, and, after over 300k miles, the seats, door panels, and steering wheel might as well be considered consumables.

Fortunately, the aforementioned check engine light extinguished itself in the first week of ownership after a proper tank of premium and has yet to return. Still, my empathy for inanimate objects has cost me dearly. Since purchasing it, I have sunk over $7k into this Range Rover — an act of financial irresponsibility that should have me institutionalized.

55k Range Rover 6

So far, that eye-watering figure has gone to replacing all the worn suspension bushings, retrofitting Supercharged-model Brembo calipers along with new pads and rotors, installing new aluminum valve covers, flushing all of the fluids, and sourcing new wheels, a new interior, various trim pieces, lenses, and accessories to freshen up the old girl. Amazingly, many expensive wear items like suspension and brakes are available through FCP Euro with a lifetime warranty! Between that, a lifetime alignment from Firestone, and an oversupply of L322s in junkyards, my ongoing spend to keep this truck on the road should be minimal. Or so I hope.

55k Range Rover 8

At the time of this writing, my maintenance tracking spreadsheet tells me that, between the previous owner and myself, we’ve spent a combined $56,885.39 on this Range Rover. My share alone comes to $1.94 per mile in just maintenance. Ouch.

Is it worth it? For the first owner, objectively, probably not. Given how much he drove, there was a litany of more economical options available at the time that would’ve made much more sense. For me, it definitely isn’t worth it. For my intended use case, I should have just bought a Toyota 4Runner or Land Cruiser, and called it a day.

55k Range Rover 7

But real life isn’t so cut-and-dried. Quantifying the value of where you spend a lot of your time is a very personal equation. Yes, a Range Rover is not simple to keep on the road, but the interior of an L322 might be one of the most magnificent places to watch the miles go by. In that respect, I now truly understand why the original owner picked it for his commute. This wasn’t just his means of getting to and from work; it was his fortress of solitude. A rolling Xanadu. If I were in his shoes, or rather his loafers, I think I too would have made the same decision.

55k Range Rover 2

To me, though, this truck is so much more. It has fulfilled a dream I’ve had since I saw my first L322 as a child. I could have checked that box with any L322, but I’m a sucker for a story. This Rover’s story was just so unique that I couldn’t resist continuing it. It may not be the most practical choice, but I can’t think of a more incredible machine for date nights, road trips with friends, adventures in the great outdoors, and, ultimately, making memories.

Financially inadvisable? Surely. Worth it? Absolutely.

All photos: author

Top graphic images: author; DepositPhotos.com

Follow us on:

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
67 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William Domer
Member
William Domer
1 month ago

When you say the original owner was a saint I thought yeah: St. Idiotious

MikeInTheWoods
Member
MikeInTheWoods
1 month ago

That was a great story. I agree that cars that are maintained and driven are often in better shape then ones that have sat for decades. I bought a “high mileage” 1956 Lincoln Premier once because everything still worked. All the power adjusters, the drivetrain, brakes. It had been a Maine doctor’s car for a very long time based on the hospital parking decals on the windshield. That car knew every local road and cruised like it had it’s own autonomous driving at 50mph. You just floated along. I had to replace one headlight for $4.95 which was in stock at the local parts store. They even had oil filters that fit it.

Allen Lloyd
Allen Lloyd
1 month ago

I owned an L322 for almost a year. Every mile was wonderful. Mine was a Supercharged 2012 and dear god that engine moved the thing smoooooothly. The only car I have ever driven that matched it was a 90’s Bentley.

So why is it gone? The front transfer case broke and everything I read scared me away. That and the dealer when asked how much to fix it replied “no idea we have never done one out of warrantee.”

I miss that thing and one day I will buy a few of them so I can have one working one.

Shinynugget
Shinynugget
1 month ago

All the explanation needed was in the title.

Bags
Member
Bags
1 month ago

Our ’86 560SEL came with a big binder of maintenance history up through the first and second owners’ tenures. I was taken aback by the totals.

Now, this car was billed as the most expensive “mass produced” car of the day – anything more expensive was hand built. The original window sticker (in that binder, of course) shows $63,900 + $1500 gas guzzler tax. In 1986 dollars.

The first owner, a god among men, put 30k miles per year on the car car for the first 3 years of ownership. Clearly he needed to eat up highway miles and this was the right car for the job. It looks like he had it for a couple more years but sold it to the second owner with around 100k miles.
During that time the receipts show over $30,000 in work done. I’m sure plenty of that was done under warranty, with things like power window motors being replaced more than once. But the number is still shocking. That’s over $80k in 2026 dollars spent in a little over 4 years.

Dangly
Dangly
1 month ago

I have a friend who is a tech for the local rover shop. He told me there is no way he would ever own one. I didn’t ask for details.. I trust his hatred.

Piston Slap Yo Mama
Member
Piston Slap Yo Mama
1 month ago

Doug DeMuro famously bought a $3,000 CarMax extended warranty for the same L322 Range Rover – and put them out more than $25,000 on that particular lemon.
That was DeMuro at his best, very inspirational to see the little guy win for a change.
(Doug’s not little, it’s just a colloquialism.)

Goblin
Member
Goblin
1 month ago

Thank DeMuro for having CarMax reworking their extended warranty coverage down to something very, very different right after this.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
1 month ago

Doug also took the thing in for things that any one of us could have fixed with five minutes and a screwdriver.

RayJay
RayJay
1 month ago

The previous owner may have been a saint for keeping an open checkbook to maintain this vehicle, but he had to have been a glutton for punishment by commuting from Del Mar to Rancho Cucamonga for twenty years.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

Excuse me? The cost of the vehicle from new is 25 cents a mile and the federal government says 60 cents a mile can be deducted as the wear and tear on the average vehicle? This seems a relatively cheap vehicle to maintain. Of course gas isn’t included. Redoing the interior seems more of a restoration project than maintenance item. Seems you got a great deal since you could have made good money parting it out.
However I really enjoyed reading this as I enjoyed your writing style

Rod Millington
Member
Rod Millington
1 month ago

Excellent article, though I did get distracted partway through when I realised that you said you had 200k mi of receipts and it had the brakes replaced 11 times during those 200k mi. Then I saw you had to replace them again which makes 12 times!!

That’s < 17k mi per brake job! Hopefully the upgraded brakes resolve that…

Anonymous Person
Anonymous Person
1 month ago
Reply to  Rod Millington

My small, manual transmission 4-cyl pickups can usually go 117K between brake jobs even after the parking brake cables rust and stick.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

Well once your brakes start failing they have a lot less wear. And a second bonus you get where you are going quicker

Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
1 month ago

My Prius at 130k has yet to have its first brake job.

On the other hand, I have a Porsche that goes about three thousand miles between engine rebuilds.

T. Ferguson
T. Ferguson
1 month ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

That may be one of the most underrated aspects of hybrids – very low brake costs. We have an ES300h approaching 200k miles on the original brakes and it blows my mind. The na Avalon it replaced loved eating through brakes.

Anonymous Person
Anonymous Person
1 month ago
Reply to  T. Ferguson

Before hybrids and EVs there were manual transmissions for saving brakes.

That being said, I’m looking forward to seeing how long the brakes last on a Slate.

Axiomatik
Member
Axiomatik
1 month ago
Reply to  Rod Millington

My wife drives a Mazda CX7 that we bought new in 2011. I finally replaced the original pads at 150k miles. At that point I had had the parts on the shelf for several years, I thought it needed a brake job much earlier, and when I started, I discovered that what I had been hearing was just a pebble stuck under the dust shield, and the pads still had tons of life in them.,

MtnCamantalope
Member
MtnCamantalope
1 month ago

Had an 01 Disco for a while that I bought for peanuts with almost 200kmi on it. Regular maintenance is the key I think. People buy Hondas and Toyotas and the like and put an easy 100kmi on them while taking the owners manual’s service intervals as vague suggestions. With a Land Rover those suggestions turn into requirements, but if you follow them the trucks will get you across the Sahara.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  MtnCamantalope

If you want to go into the Sahara, take a Land Rover.

If you want to get out of the Sahara, take a Land Cruiser.

Tbird
Member
Tbird
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

Toyota will easily suffer benign neglect.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  Tbird

Which is how the Toyota war, fought in the Sahara, got it its name:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

I’ll go for a Hilux. After the desert you can go to antartica and maybe a volcano. Remember being the best when you have no competition is nothing being the best when 100s of other vehicles exist is legendary

Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

In 1922, Count Louis Zborowski, the racing driver and engineer, shipped Chitty-Bang-Bang II, a Broolkands racer and land speed record racer powered by a 19-liter Benz Zeppelín engine, rebodied as a four-seater touring car, to Algeria to lead his wife and a group of friends on an expedition across the Sahara desert.

So, horses for courses, or something like that.

Sure, now you can do that in your puny Toyotas, worrying about broken driveshafts. Chitty II solved that problem by using chain drives!

Back when men were men, and women were men too! Sounds like an amazing adventure. The six-cylinder 19-liter engine probably sounded amazing too. Think three angry John Deere Model Ds.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Sure, after a couple of French lemons paved the way for it:
In January 1922 Louis, his wife Vi, Clive Gallop and Pixi Marix together with a couple of mechanics took Chitty Bang Bang 2 and the White Mercedes across the Mediterranean for a drive into the Sahara Desert, in the tracks of Citroën‘s Kégresse-track-equipped expedition.

https://alchetron.com/Louis-Zborowski

Widgetsltd
Member
Widgetsltd
1 month ago

I was seriously tempted by one of these, once. From 2011-2014 I worked under contract to JLR at their technical training center in Irvine, California. For the first couple of years that I worked there, we had a buyback 2006 L322 Supercharged. It was a lovely metallic black with an ivory/black piping interior. It was nice to drive, and a bit different from the later 5.0L L322 Range rovers that we also had. I had the opportunity to buy it at a heavily discounted price in 2012 and was sorely tempted but declined to do so – I realized that I couldn’t really afford the thing even with me doing the repair work! The 2006 Supercharged models had a quirk in the ZF 6HP transmission that could result in failure. Land Rover did not support internal repair on those gearboxes and replacement was probably $8K in parts alone at that time.

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
1 month ago

$57,000/20 years is $2850 a year.
For maintenance on a Range Rover.
With 332K miles on it.
You’re getting off cheap.

Last edited 1 month ago by Urban Runabout
Sébastien Dutton
Member
Sébastien Dutton
1 month ago

This all makes sense to me and I fully support this endeavor. I currently own 3 JLR products and have owned many more in the past, and if there’s one thing that I’ve learned to be true it’s that upon any purchase of a preowned JLR model you can expect to immediately put $5-10k into it. Pay to play, but it’s totally worth it in my opinion. There’s nothing else like them

3WiperB
Member
3WiperB
1 month ago

I saw one of these in the local pick and pull about 10 years ago and the passenger seat and back seat were immaculate (in the same tan with black piping). I grabbed them and made them into furniture for my basement. I think I paid around $150 for the seat and back seat. The back seat was put on a wood frame and the seat had a frame and swivel wheels added to it. I attached 12v to the motors in the seat one at a time until I got it adjusted to where I wanted it. When I moved, they became my garage furniture. They are quite comfortable, and if I were a bachelor, I would probably just have them in my living room. But the wife keeps me from doing such things (probably for my own good).

AcidTonic
AcidTonic
1 month ago

Wowser. I have been in one of these and it was before I was really a car nerd and never thought it was anything special at all.

Makes daily driving my Evolutions not feel as painful, but the owners paid equivalent running costs for a much less exciting ride in my personal disputed opinion.

Church
Member
Church
1 month ago

$1.94 per mile? I just had a heart attack.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

I’m sure you pay far more per mile on the horses.

Space
Space
1 month ago

He was probably worried you wouldn’t have any finances to advise about after this.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago
Reply to  Church

Where was this I saw 25 cents

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
1 month ago

While many things in my life are defined by price, there are certain things that are surely defined by VALUE. This guy wanted value, not price point. And he saw value in his L322, without a doubt. I don’t think the amount spent is exorbitant considering what the owner clearly thought about owning this thing. I would not have seen that value. But I respect that others can and do see that here.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago
Reply to  Lockleaf

Are you new here? I’m sure everyone is impressed at the purchase price being far less than parts resale. Frankly this might be the most affordable vehicle ever at 25 cents a mile prior to doing a restoration not maintenance

SYT_Shadow
Member
SYT_Shadow
1 month ago
Reply to  Lockleaf

Absolutely. Good for him!

Some people are so worried about saving for retirement they forget to live. The owner died anyway, I’m glad he was able to enjoy commuting in this beast!

4jim
4jim
1 month ago

This is the kind of financial details that make me want to give up being a gear head. People say all the time that new cars are a waste of money.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  4jim

Its a Range Rover. What financial details did you expect?

G. K.
Member
G. K.
1 month ago

These certainly are not cheap to keep on the road. I’ve had two L322s (a 2006 Supercharged and a 2010 Supercharged), I also had an L405 (a 2020 Autobiography LWB, which I found to be not worth the effort).

The 2006, it should be noted, is an odd one-year-wonder with most of the BMW era interior from the 2003-2005 units, but with the facelifted exterior and the Jaguar mechanicals from after Ford took over. It’s not even just that the earlier interior is dated; it has some serious drawbacks. The silver paint peels easily, you have that stupid spring-loaded center cupholder that’s unobtanium in good condition…and the Terrain Response and electronic parking brake weren’t added until 2007.

Last edited 1 month ago by G. K.
Bizness Comma Nunya
Bizness Comma Nunya
1 month ago

Please tell me you own a IID GAP tool. It’s a lifesaver for all Land Rovers of this era.

I recently had the instrument cluster go out on my LR3 (super common) and found a junkyard unit that I was able to flash with the GAP tool in my driveway. I’ve also given it some other updates, and used the GAP tool to lift the air suspension a little too.

G. K.
Member
G. K.
1 month ago

I used one to retrofit adaptive cruise to a late-run LR4. I agree it’s a lifesaver.

Bizness Comma Nunya
Bizness Comma Nunya
1 month ago
Reply to  G. K.

I didn’t know you could do THAT! Welp… might need to find an LR4, and budget for a bunch of cooling parts haha.

Bizness Comma Nunya
Bizness Comma Nunya
1 month ago

Well the temps are just starting to drop so it could just be that too haha.

G. K.
Member
G. K.
1 month ago

If you want to do it you will need to find a 2015 or 2016, since the wiring harness will be there, tucked behind the bumper. You will still have to purchase the radar, the bracket, the screws, and the steering wheel switches. You will also have to make sure the radar is the correct one; iterations of the same basic radar were also used by Ford, Lincoln and Volvo…but ones without the Jaguar/Land Rover model codes are difficult to flash with the correct software.

And it is fairly primitive adaptive cruise at that.

But yes, you can do it.

Spopepro
Member
Spopepro
1 month ago

One of the unintended consequences of the Industrial Revolution has been the collapse of the economics of repairability. Interchangeable parts was supposed to make it cheap and easy, and maybe it did for a time, but that time has long passed. Now it doesn’t pay to be an artisan, a mechanic, a repair person. New manufacturing is often way cheaper than repair. We had a side discussion about automatic time pieces here a while back—a whole new seiko 4R36 movement is $100, much less than the cost of a clean and lube. Appliances are cheaper to replace than fix, if you can even find someone who will show up to fix them.

I think one of the least talked about unsustainable situations in our current world is not just that sometimes you aren’t allowed to fix things, but most of the time it’s not economical. This can’t continue indefinitely.

In any case, congrats, that’s a proper looking RR and good on you for keeping it going.

Wuffles
Wuffles
1 month ago
Reply to  Spopepro

Now it doesn’t pay to be an artisan, a mechanic, a repair person. New manufacturing is often way cheaper than repair.

We still do repair things, it’s just the economics shift to repairing high-end consumer and industrial components instead of disposable goods. The water heater in your house is indeed not worth it to repair, but there’s a whole industry of welders who work on commercial boilers and charge 4 figures an hour, because replacing the things costs millions. (There are even some psychos who don scuba gear and repair the inside of nuclear reactors- one job usually gets them their lifetime rad exposure dose, and a six-seven figure paycheck). This is kind of a bummer from a sustainability perspective yes, but on the other hand, people used to spend like 20% of their annual wages on clothes and still only owned like 5 outfits, so viva la difference?

CarEsq
Member
CarEsq
1 month ago
Reply to  Wuffles

I’ve had more than a few repairmen visits where they’ve straight up told me it would be cheaper to just buy than them do the repair and I didn’t think I’d bought low end stuff.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago
Reply to  Spopepro

Now it doesn’t pay to be an artisan, a mechanic, a repair person. New manufacturing is often way cheaper than repair

Counterpoint: It almost ALWAYS pays to DIY. I DIY all the time. It’s why I was able to fix my central A/C system for $18 and about 15 minutes of work with nothing more than hand tools and a multi meter rather than paying $$$$ + labor for a whole new system.

Its also why I was able to fix my car’s A/C system for $25 and maybe an hour of hands on labor rather than buying a new car.

Its also why I can better tell when someone is trying to sell me a bogus service. Ask your typical commuter when they last had their blinker fluid flushed and they’ll probably fork over $$$ for the job.

Sure there are jobs I don’t do, paint and body mostly. Those take tools and skills I do not have. But there are lots of other fix-it jobs that I CAN do and those are the ones that save money.

Spopepro
Member
Spopepro
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

Oh yeah. For sure. That’s why I play engineer…

Hangover Grenade
Hangover Grenade
1 month ago
Reply to  Spopepro

You can find appliances from the 1950s and 60s that are still working perfectly and will work forever with proper maintenance. You’re lucky to get 5 years out of a modern fridge or washer.

NosrednaNod
NosrednaNod
1 month ago

“ Is it worth it? For the first owner, objectively, probably not. Given how much he drove, there was a litany of more economical options available at the time that would’ve made much more sense.”

But, what he be doing now with all those savings? He clearly loved this car. That is better than saving money.

Mike G.
Member
Mike G.
1 month ago
Reply to  NosrednaNod

Agreed.

What if replaced this car every 150K miles instead of just maintaining it? That would still be two additional car purchases, probably costing way more overall assuming he didn’t go for something cheap and frugal like a Prius (which is not commonly cross-shopped with off-road capable SUVs). If he bought anything somewhat similar we are talking over six-figures in car purchases, or 2x to 3x the total outlay of $$.

If you break it down to Total Cost of Ownership over 20-years, not a bad value. Sure a Toyota would have been less, but clearly this owner didn’t want a Toyota.

My Other Car is a Tetanus Shot
Member
My Other Car is a Tetanus Shot
1 month ago
Reply to  NosrednaNod

Cost is what you pay.

Value is what you get.

Cost is an objective measure, value is a subjective one.

For most people who value vehicles in terms of utility exclusively (i.e. transportation), this is probably a poor value relative to running cost.

This guy valued his Range Rover. I think it was worth the cost for him.

Cheap Bastard
Member
Cheap Bastard
1 month ago

Or he was just another case of Stockholm syndrome.

Ultradrive
Member
Ultradrive
1 month ago
Reply to  Cheap Bastard

All of us Rover owners have it.

Tbird
Member
Tbird
1 month ago

As a serial Toyota owner the math just does not math for me.

Rolled my STi
Member
Rolled my STi
1 month ago

I think the title says why, Range Rover.

67
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x