Police chases are, statistically, extremely dangerous. According to a study published by the New York State Attorney General’s office in June, 30 percent of pursuits nationwide end in a crash, and nine percent result in some level of injury, whether that be to the suspect, the police, or a bystander. So departments have increasingly adopted “grappler” tools to end chases before tragedy strikes. One Michigan driver learned the hard way how much damage can be done if you try to flee after being grappled —especially if your car has a torsion beam rear end.
The Grappler Police Bumper made waves on its debut in 2018 as a safer, more straightforward way to end police pursuits without endangering bystanders or involved parties. It’s a device deployed from the front of a police car’s bumper that holds out a nylon net. All a user has to do is touch the net to the rear wheel of the car in front, and the nylon gets entangled in the wheel. One piece of the nylon stays attached to the cruiser, allowing the officer to, in essence, “rope in” the captured car by slamming on the brakes, bringing both vehicles to a stop. The device’s inventor, Leonard Stock, told Fox 10 Phoenix in 2023 that he came up with the idea in a dream.


Unsurprisingly, use of the Grappler has spread across the country to dozens of law enforcement agencies. One such agency is the Livonia Police Department in Michigan, which used the tool to great effect on Thursday against a second-generation Chevy Cruze stolen out of Dearborn. Video from onboard the pursuing cop car shows a textbook capture on Interstate 96, but the driver of the Cruze couldn’t seem to accept defeat. Instead, they tried three times to tug their way out of the nylon. On the third tug, disaster struck. Watch for yourself:
In a statement published to Facebook, the department said it called on the assistance of the Michigan State Police to help them out with the fleeing Cruze, which had allegedly been identified as stolen. Here’s what else the agency had to say:
In this case, after being stopped, the driver repeatedly attempted to break free by reversing and then accelerating forward. However, the Grappler held firm and because of the driver’s own actions, the vehicle’s rear axle was ripped off, permanently disabling the car. This is not typical with Grappler deployments and was solely the result of the driver’s reckless attempts to escape.
The 27-year-old male driver from Brighton, along with two female passengers, a 32-year-old from Wayne and a 31-year-old from Livonia, were all arrested and taken into custody without further incident. Thankfully, no injuries were reported.
What Exactly Happened Here?
The Chevy Cruze uses a torsion beam rear suspension. Also known as a twist beam, it’s a common piece of design in modern, front-wheel drive economy cars that uses a transversely positioned metal beam to hold the wheels, tires, and brakes to the car, via just two mounting points on a set of trailing arms linked by the twist beam. Like most other modern suspension designs, the suspension includes a shock and spring per wheel (the former is bolted to the body, and the latter sits pressed between the body and the torsion beam spring perch).

Torsion beams are generally panned by enthusiasts, as they can’t provide the same articulation or refinement as a true independent suspension. But they have exceptional benefits. Torsion beams are simple to work on and cheap to produce, which is why you see them on so many everyday, low-cost cars. And they still provide some level of wheel independence, as the beam can twist when one wheel encounters a bump, so as not to upset the other (hence the “torsion” in torsion beam). But because the semi-independent suspension is only bolted down in two spots (plus the shocks, though those are much weaker attachments), they are particularly susceptible to being ripped out when encountering a Grappler tool. At least, when the driver really forces the issue.
That’s exactly what happened here. On that third tug, the Grappler held onto the left wheel, which stayed attached to the hub, which was connected to the trailing arm, which was connected to the torsion beam that connected to the other trailing arm and wheel. Ultimately, the two lowly bolts holding the suspension to the unibody sheared away, and everything else attached to the beam, including the shocks, the brakes, and the right wheel—came with it. The springs, meanwhile, were never formally attached to the car in the first place—just held in place by pressure (OK, there might have been some very basic hold-down clamps). So when the torsion beam was ripped out, the springs simply left the chat. If you watch closely in the above video, you can actually see one of the springs roll into frame on the pavement.

Here’s a top-down view of the Cruze’s torsion beam design, with a detailed explanation of each part and what went wrong, put together by the incredible David Tracy. The two connection points are actually held to the car via metal brackets, which stayed connected to the car, at least partially, going by the photo published by the Michigan State Police.
[Ed Note: I should add that some Cruze’s rear torsion beams featured a Watt’s Link, but I doubt this one did. -DT].Â
The lesson here? If you get grappled while trying to flee police in a car equipped with a torsion beam, don’t try to break free. You won’t just lose a tire, you’ll lose the entire rear end of your car.
Top photo: Michigan State Police and Livonia Police Department
“Stand by for justice!“
Curt Henderson
The in-depth explanation/deep dive is why I’m a member here. When I posted this in the discord, I couldn’t figure out how this would pull the whole axle off, but it’s clear with that provided vehicle.
The lesson learned should be not to run from the police in the first place or probably not to steal a car to get yourself into that situation. We’ve had a lot of deaths and injuries of innocent bystanders this summer in my area from police chases of stolen vehicles, even after the chase has been stopped for safety reasons. I hope this technology is available to more departments.
The other thing can happen too… I saw a guy in an F-350 (single, not dually) get snagged by one of these. When that happened, he first rammed the cop car going in reverse, then smashed the gas and ripped the front end of the cruiser in half.
I saw the video a couple years back, and now I wanna go find the link to share here.
It can definitely go wrong……for both parties
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMeycPDZE5Q
Note to self: Don’t get rough with Chevy Cruze if rear axle is hung up on something
This car thief may not have had Guns or Roses but he certainly had some Axel Woes
He ain’t going to Paradise City, I tell you.
This is why I advocate the use of Jewish Space Lasers to stop fleeing vehicles.
Very little debris gets left on the road.
And what does remain can be cleaned up with a broom and dustpan…
I wonder how powerful/heavily built a vehicle one would need to have in order to actually either break the nylon strap or drag the police cruiser against its brakes?
No specific reason for wondering of course….
Something with a big displacement V10 would be a good starting point. Not sure where one would get one of those though…
I was assuming four driven wheels as an absolute necessity.
Even if my car had towing capacity, it would just be a lot of tire smoke.
F-350 will rip the grappler and most of the front end off of the cruiser if done correctly.
yeah, even the SRT-10 Ram was only RWD
Someone’s going to figure out a place to mount a cutting blade that would have a good chance of cutting the strap.
I do love the light atop the blue cruiser. Seems so retro.
I went back to watch after seeing your comment, expecting to see a fat light bar… but no, this was way better! That single round light definitely looks retro, love it!
Michigan State Police always had the single red light. So when they modernized with LED, they went with rotating LEDs! It’s really weird, but totally unique.
You can see those lights from airplanes at cruising altitude.
I think Michiganders call them Cherry Toppers, but I don’t know if that refers to the light, the car, the state police or the entire package.
I’ve always called them Gumball Machines 🙂
They are INCREDIBLY bright when you are close to them indoors.
And the sideways sign mounted on the hood.
Nitpicking: there’s no band of whitespace between the second-to-last photo and the text. Someone needs more coffee methinks. 😉
I like how the fleeing motorist backed up even further for his final attempt to break free, like a kid getting ready to jump a particularly big puddle or something. Cruzes are kind of mediocre cars, though the idea that you could buy one as a hatchback with a diesel was unusual/appealing (at least to me, but I’m odd).
Also, the Cruze is FWD… so, couldn’t the driver keep going for a bit even without the rear axle and wheels? I mean, provided that the sudden extraction didn’t tear out a fuel line or something?
Like in “A View to a Kill”? I think you probably could as long as the fuel shut off safety wasn’t triggered by the impact of losing the rear end. What might be fun there would be if he drove it for a while (without crashing somehow) and ground the rear down until it reached the fuel tank.
Yah, though I only recall that Bond film now that you mention it. I was just remembering the variety of video clips that I’ve seen over the years of cars still propelling themselves after losing their rear halves… more than a few. I assume most cars have their gas tanks in back, so these are only running til they’re out of fuel or catch fire, but this Cruze was intact except for the rear axle/suspension/wheels. I don’t know exactly where the gas tank of a Cruze is situated, but if it’s not dragging on the ground, it ought to be able to keep going until it is.
I would think it’s ahead of the axle, so it would take a while to grind down and it might be intact after the axle was removed. Were I a junk yard owner and this ended up in my junk yard, I’d definitely try seeing if I could drive it.
Someone has been watching Matt’s Off-Road Recovery on YouTube. Just another yank and…well…maybe not this time.
I do appreciate that each time he tried a little bit more run.
And as soon as the staties recognized what he was doing, they backed up and gave him all the room he needed to hang himself!
Doesn’t completely destroying someone’s stolen car defeat the purpose of trying to catch it in the first place?
It was going to be an insurance write-off anyway.
The main purpose is to catch the thief; recovering the car is secondary.
Like blowing up a bridge to catch a bank robber!
And / or stopping the thief from driving recklessly to prevent endangering others.
The fuzz didn’t destroy it, the driver did:
This is not typical with Grappler deployments and was solely the result of the driver’s reckless attempts to escape.
I think the real question is “doesn’t destroying the car you’re driving defeat the purpose of stealing it in the first place,” but nobody ever reckons on getting caught.
Textbook lesson in… Cruze control.
I’ll show myself out.
This is still the safest way to disable the vehicle, imo. Even with the massive damage, there’s little chance of anyone actually getting injured in any significant way.
Safer still would be to just let him go and not have dozens of vehicles hauling ass down a highway at God knows how fast.
So he can run into an innocent bystander?