Recently, an Audi made a trip up the Furka Pass in Switzerland. Nothing hugely exceptional there, except for the fact that it ran on “Solar gasoline,” a phrase that reads like “gluten-free Wheaties” or “cruelty-free fur” in that it seems implausible at face value. You can’t simply pull gasoline out of the sun’s rays, but you can use sunlight to power the production process of synthetic gasoline. A company called Synhelion is already doing it, and here’s how it works.
First off, you need a feedstock of some sort. That’s crude oil in the case of traditional gasoline, but Swiss cleantech company Synhelion starts with biogenic waste, a fancy catch-all for food scraps, leaves, all the bits from farming you don’t want in your food, sawdust, and even, um, fecal matter. It’s organic waste, or stuff you’d find in a compost pile, and Synhelion sits on it until little microorganisms digest it, producing biogas that’s a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide. This biogas is then the feedstock for everything else in the process, and that’s where sunlight comes in.


To turn biogas into hydrogen and carbon monoxide, you’d need water and a ton of heat. Somewhere north of 2,012 degrees Fahrenheit, which is enough to melt aluminum, or facilitate cremation. That’s where heliostats come in, clever moving mirrors that track the sun and reflect its light toward a concentrated point. In this case, the concentrated point is a solar receiver, and excess heat energy is stored in thermal banks so Synhelion can keep making synthetic fuel long after the sun goes down. From there, a reactor uses that heat to turn the biogas and water into synthetic gas, which can then be further synthesized into drop-in gasoline, diesel, and AvGas.

It’s a hugely different process than Porsche’s carbon-capture synthetic fuel, but it yields similar results—ready-to-use gasoline that’s greener than bringing sequestered carbon up to the surface. It’s worth noting that Porsche’s process is greener as it uses carbon dioxide that’s already in the air meaning it’s truly net-neutral, but Synhelion’s process isn’t that far off. After all, anaerobic digestion of biogenic waste is something that normally happens as part of the compost process, so why not capture the byproducts and use them to make fuel to power the sort of old cars we drive on sunny weekends?

Cars like this 1985 Audi Sport Quattro, which just became the first car to run on this “solar gasoline.” As the fuel is a direct drop-in replacement fuel that looks and burns like normal gasoline without any of the weird side effects you’d get from, say, ethanol, this Group B homologation special required no modifications whatsoever. The resulting drive seems remarkably unremarkable, good news for the prospect of bunging some in the tank of your fun car and going for a rip.

It feels safe to bet that over the next century, the combustion engine as we know it won’t die, but the fuel for it might change in certain parts of the world. Sixty years ago, most new cars ran on gasoline containing tetraethyllead. Thirty years ago, it was likely that your gasoline contained methyl tert-butyl ether as its sole anti-knock additive rather than any ethanol. Today, fuel containing 15 percent ethanol by volume is growing more and more common in America. It’s possible that in 50 years, fuel will change even more, and it’s reassuring to see synthetic fuels gaining traction so we can keep occasionally driving the machines we love.
Top graphic image: Synhelion
Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.
“so why not capture the byproducts and use them to make fuel to power the sort of old cars we drive on sunny weekends?”
Because commercial and military aviation needs that liquid fuel more than you do and their pockets are a lot deeper than yours.
So first off a solar tower that lights things on fire is totally metal. Pretty dope that it is hot enough to react methane and carbon dioxide without a catalyst.
They load biologically produced methane into this thing and use it to make synthetic crude oil through a Fischer-Tropsch process. This process can either be adjusted to make more diesel and aviation fuel or gasoline. Diesel and aviation fuel are worth more so that it what they are focusing on, but the synthetic crude produced still contains a small amount of gasoline. Hence the stunt.
The Fischer-Tropsch process has been around since it was used to fuel Nazi tanks with synthetic crude from coal. I am guessing solar gasoline is better branding than Panzer gas.
That VW “unpimp ze auto” guy but now he’s going “FILL UP ZE AUTO MIT PANZERKAMPFWAGENBENZIN!“
That was Peter Stormare of Coen Brothers fame 🙂
“Unpimp ze auto or vee cut off your Johnson”
I would not call synthetic fuel a drop in replacement for classic refined fuel.
Synthetic fuel is better in quite a lot of ways than ‘classic fuel’.
These are normally synthesized from waste gasses such as methane and propane from refineries. So only the source of the gas molecules is different here. They contain non of the carcinogenic cyclic molecules and only a handful of different ones. There are non of the short molecules that make the fuel go stale so it has a very long shelf life. There are non of the long molecules that are difficult to burn and normally end up unburnt in the exhaust. They do not attract water. They do not attack rubber or plastic. Octane is just a matter of choice…
I am a big fan. Now just lower the price a bit.
(Synth fuel is required by law here for professional off road engines such as lawnmowers and is around €5/L.)
Out of curiosity, how much more expensive is that than normal fuel where you live?
That is so cool. I currently work for a company making biogaz from landfills. The technology works and the company is booming. It’s economically viable too.
It’d be awesome to see this tech powering old cool rides.
what in the heck is the fuel made from when I push the E85 button at Texaco?
85% ethanol 14.XX% gasoline and some impurities.
corn ethanol and “gasoline additives” which is mostly c5+ condensate that gets removed from natural gas before it goes in the pipeline
…and the ethanol is just natural gas that’s been run through a sophisticated multi-step greenwashing process.
???
atmospheric CO2 -> plant -> fermentation -> Ethanol-> atmospheric CO2
Where is the CH4?
CH4 -> NH3 -> dirt -> corn -> fermentation -> ethanol
Most of the energy to make that fermentable sugar comes from the NH3 not the chlorophyll. Wish they’d at least process the corn stover into methanol or butanol.
Let us say 23646 BTU in natural gas to produce a pound of nitrogen and 76100 BTU per gallon of ethanol. The energy contained in one gallon of ethanol is the same as 3.2 pounds of nitrogen fertilizer.
To grow 200 bushel corn requires 180 pounds of nitrogen fertilizer added. These 180 pounds of nitrogen are equivalent to 56.25 gallons of ethanol.
Corn produces 2.9 gallons per bushel, so to produce 580 gallons requires nitrogen fertilizer equivalent to 56.25 gallons. About 10% of the energy output is required as ammonia input. Not ‘most’.
There is a German company VERBIO that runs corn ethanol plants while also producing biomethane from the corn stover. They bought out a plant in South Bend, Indiana to convert to their process. The downside to this process is that the microbes eating the corn stover need fertilizer too, so the distillers dried grain byproduct from the fermenter is also fed to the biodigester. They sell a fertilizer amendment from the compost but the animal feed gets used up.
To grow 200 bushel corn requires 180 pounds of nitrogen fertilizer added. These 180 pounds of nitrogen are equivalent to 56.25 gallons of ethanol.
To grow corn using business as usual methods. There are other ways which can use less Haber ammonia with still good results and perhaps better profitability:
https://greencover.com/case-study-200-bu-corn-with-no-nitrogen/
For my own garden I am really into the Bokashi method right now. Got mulberries and weeds fermenting in 5 gallon buckets with lids. The ProBio balance plus innoculant that I use has purple non-sulfur bacteria in addition to lactic acid bacteria and yeast.
200 bushels per acre is going to be the average this year, but the average yield is for losers. The yield contest winner is over 600 bu/acre, and if you are not first you are last.
You could do all of those thing from your link, and then still add 180 pounds through an irrigation system with an automated fertilizer schedule based on the results from a tissue sample. Hit 400 easy.
It’s just one example of how one might get more with less. I’m sure there are many, many more things to try to get more corn with less synthetic fertilizer.
There are many commercial products already available in the biologics category to do this. I like Pivot Bio as one of the newest. They have got Bill Gates’ money and have a product called Proven 40 for corn that you can buy right now. The soil microbes that you spray have been genetically modified specifically to get more corn with less synthetic fertilizer.
If that’s true, I’m glad to be wrong.
Natural gas is also used in the processing, but the market leaders have all installed combined heat and power turbines by now. They still use a lot of natural gas to run the distillation column and the byproduct grain dryers but sell lots electricity to the grid while powering the rest of their own operations.
Ethanol removes no nitrogen from the cycle though. Nitrogen is removed in the silage and brewers grains which can then be returned to the soil.
If that waste is fed to animals their waste makes for better fertilizer but some of the nitrogen will go into those animals in which case the original methane is making animals, not ethanol.
How that energy is distributed among the cycles is TBD but its not as simple as saying all the energy of the methane is used to make ethanol.
I think (but not sure) Jay Leno said something about ICE cars being like horses. Once horses dominated transportation and work in the cities and country and now are hobbies. If we can get cars to be something we do for fun and not constant transportation sign me up for the home fuel creation device and I will weekend warrior with my home made gas.
Totally. It would absolutely fit the gearhead ethos to be able to say “yeah, I refine my own fuel.” I can only imagine the web 4.0 arguments about the proper ingredients and ratios for moar power.
Porsche’s “Sport Chrono” fuels will sell for three times normal “solar fuels’ (even though it’s the same stuff), and there’ll be a secondary market for the used tins the stuff came in.
Sometime in the future…
“Hey honey, I’m gonna be a little late. I just ran out of gas, so I gotta walk over to the Taco Bell down the street, pinch a loaf and get back on the road.”
I’m curious if making fuel in this manner is environmentally friendlier (and perhaps less costly) than mining rare Earth metals for EV batteries.
Extra points awarded for this company using a Quattro, BTW.
R99 (renewable diesel) is available out in Cali, and a few spots in Oregon and Washington. Wish it would make it’s way out here to MN. From what I’ve read on it, it sounds like there’s really no downside. Much higher cetane rating than standard pump diesel, so it burns much cleaner with less emissions and less soot for the DPF to deal with. Higher lubricity, so your fuel system lasts longer. Lower cloud point, so it doesn’t gel as easily.
Lots of Happy Cows plus lots of Sunlight means lots of milk, tasty cheeseburgers, suede driving loafers and shitty fuel.
Wat.jpg
The bonus with Group B cars is they help evoke additional “waste product” from spectators and drivers alike.
It’s probably as close to breaking the law of the conservation of energy as we’ll ever get.
Well, at least it’s not corn.