For the better part of a decade, the Corvette rumor mill has been churning about the development of an ultimate performance variant expected to be called “Zora.” For those in the know, Zora Arkus-Duntov was the legendary chief engineer who transformed the Corvette from what might have been a short-lived Chevrolet roadster like the first-generation Ford Thunderbird into the performance icon that it eventually became. That rumored Corvette hypercar is now real, but it’s not called Zora; instead, it’s a far less interesting-sounding ZR1X — but that name is the only thing about this car that is uninteresting.
When the C8 generation Corvette was being developed in the latter half of the 2010s, it was conceived as having a range of variants, much like what we see in other high end sports like the Porsche 911, which is currently offered in more than 20 distinct varieties. The Corvette hasn’t gone quite that extreme with flavors, but the addition of the ZR1X brings the total to 10 including coupes and convertibles. Corvette marketing manager Megan Dalley described the base Stingray and the ZR1X as the bookends of the lineup with the E-Ray, Z06 and ZR1 in between.


Yes, Chevy has just debuted the top-dog of the Corvette lineup, and it’s time to get excited.

As the “pinnacle of Corvette performance,” the ZR1X uses the ZR1 as the foundation and is generally visually indistinguishable on the road. It has the same overall aerodynamic arrangement as the ZR1. That starts with the large air exit in the hood to extract all the thermal energy from the stack of heat exchangers in the nose. The same Gurney Flap on the leading edge of the top vent as well as the carbon fiber front splitter and underwing are there to contribute to downforce.

There is also the wide-body rear, featuring the added air intakes on the top and sides of the rear fenders to feed brake cooling ducts and turbos as well as the rear lip spoiler.
The main changes to the ZR1 are in the underbody, where work was done in CFD simulation and the wind tunnel to reshape the strakes and shift the center of pressure forward a bit. The overall downforce remains about the same, 1,200 lbs, but it’s a bit more biased toward the front now.
Using All The Rubber
The reason for that change goes to the powertrain revision. In the back of the ZR1X you’ll find the standard ZR1’s 1064-hp LT7 twin-turbocharged V8 with a 8-speed dual clutch transmission. The core of this dual overhead camshaft, flat-plane crankshaft V8 engine is shared with the naturally aspirated LT6 in the Z06. The 76-mm turbochargers are integrated into the exhaust manifolds to keep the distance from the ports the bare minimum for optimal response. Electronically controlled wastegates are also used to provide anti-lag by maintaining pressure in the intake manifold during dynamic driving conditions.

In order for the ZR1X to earn the “X,” Corvette engineers have added the electric motor and battery used to drive the front wheels of the Corvette E-Ray. The battery has the same 1.9-kWh gross capacity as the E-Ray’s, but about 26 percent more of the capacity is actually being used for this application. Most hybrids only use 50 percent of the overall capacity of the battery (typically somewhere around 30 to 80 percent state of charge).

Chief engineer Josh Holder wouldn’t say precisely how much of the total capacity is being used for the ZR1X but did reveal that the extra available energy allowed the team to up the power output of the front drive motor from 160-hp in the E-Ray to 186-hp, and torque from 125 lb-ft to 145 lb-ft. Total combined output is now 1,250-hp spread across all four wheels. [Ed Note: Holy mother of … -DT].

Chevrolet isn’t quoting a combined torque figure because it’s not as meaningful in an application like this because the motor and engine provide torque in different ways. The electric motor delivers torque from 0 rpm with instant response while the engine has to rev up a bit before delivering its maximum torque even with all of the sophisticated anti-lag capabilities.
Accelerating from a dead stop will get an initial response from the electric motor driving the front wheels and filling the torque hole as the engine torque builds to accelerate the rear axle. As speed and thus downforce builds, that adjusted center of pressure balance keeps the front wheels planted while accelerating.
How Absurd Is The Acceleration?

Chevrolet claims that the ZR1X can pull 1.3g of acceleration in a straight line. It can also pull over 1g laterally and longitudinally simultaneously. With the instant torque delivery of the electric motor on the front wheels and that twin-turbo V8 in the back, the ZR1X is claimed to accelerate to 60 mph in under 2 seconds and through the quarter mile in under 9 seconds.
When asked, Holder confirmed that those numbers are repeatable on an unprepared surface, not just at your local drag strip.

Acceleration is a vector that always has a direction associated with it. It can go positive to increase velocity or negative to decrease it.
Any vehicle that has upwards of 1,000-hp and a top speed of over 230 mph also needs to be able to dissipate all that kinetic energy. Having the electric motor on the front axle (which inevitably does most of the work of deceleration) allows the supercar to harness some of that energy back into the battery through regenerative braking. But since this is a hybrid with a relatively modest battery capacity, massive friction brakes are still going to be needed.
The ZR1 brake package, which is dubbed J58, already had massive 400 mm diameter carbon ceramic brake rotors made of a special material known as JT7. JT7 has longer carbon strands that are oriented radially for extra strength compared to the shorter, randomly oriented fibers in most carbon rotors. With more than 20 percent more power on tap, the engineers decided the ZR1X needed an upgraded package called J59. The new J59 front rotors have been increased in size to 420 mm, and are made of the same JT7 material as the J58.

In order to keep the new larger pads in even contact with the rotors across their full surface, you need multiple pistons clamping on both sides. Most contemporary high end performance cars utilize 6-piston front calipers and either 2 or 4 piston rears. The ZR1X has newly designed 10-piston front calipers from Alcon while the rears are 6-piston units. The rear brakes on the ZR1X actually use the same brake pads found on the front corners of the ZR1. The pad material is the same as ZR1 all around, just with more of it.
At maximum braking, the ZR1X can decelerate at 1.9g, some of the best ever achieved by a road legal car on road legal tires. This is all the sort of performance no one should be taking full advantage of on public roads, but if you take a ZR1X to the track, you can put on a helmet and HANS device and feel like IMSA Corvette drivers Antonio Garcia and Tommy Milner. The ZR1X has more than double the power of the Corvette Z06 GT3.R racer those drivers pilot.

Despite all that extra power, the ZR1X still isn’t going to be quite as fast as the race car. The race car runs on Michelin slick tires that are good for about 1.5 hours of track use. The race car also generates roughly double the downforce. Most importantly, current GT3 cars weigh about 2,600 to 2,800 lbs. The addition of the battery and front motor to the ZR1X adds 180-lbs to its curb weight, bringing the total to about 4,100-lbs — not exactly a lightweight.
Getting The Most Out Of The Hybrid System With A New Pro Mode
Of course extracting the maximum performance and drivability in a modern vehicle involves more than just bolting in a battery and motor. There’s a lot of software involved in managing all of these components so they work together seamlessly. The E-Ray could arguably be considered more of a GT car, and while it has plenty of drive modes, it’s not necessarily the best suited Corvette for a track day. That’s where the Z06, ZR1 and now ZR1X come into play.

Among the changes for the ZR1X are a new Charge+ mode. The performance traction management (PTM) system has been updated with a new Pro mode added.
Since this is a relatively modestly sized battery, this mode optimizes the way energy is recovered and discharged to ensure that performance remains consistent over an entire tank of fuel when running on the track. If the system were to just recover the maximum amount of energy from every brake application the driver might find themselves with a fully charged battery that can’t accept more energy and have to rely more on the friction brakes. There’s obviously lots of braking capability on this car, but the feel might be different.
Similarly, if all the electrical power were used every time the driver accelerates, the battery could quickly become depleted or overheated, leaving the car with only the 1,064-hp from the LT7. Not bad, but again, inconsistent. This has been the problem with using many EVs on the track, and the challenge for race series like Formula 1, IMSA and WEC hypercars and now IndyCars to overcome. Corvette engineers have tried to find a balance between the extremes that provides that consistent level of performance over an entire track session.
Of course there’s also a qualifying mode that provides the optimal power delivery over a full lap as well as a push-to-pass mode to give a quick burst when needed. The regenerative brake torque vectoring is set up to recover as much energy as possible without upsetting the front to rear balance of the car, and front axle pre-control manages the inside front brake to optimize corner exit acceleration without triggering too much understeer.
The ZR1 Was Already Absurd; This Is Just More
As with the ZR1, there are two chassis setups available, both of which have standard MagneRide dampers. The layout is the same as the ZR1, but retuned to account for the extra weight and the front drive capability. The standard configuration has the same Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires. The ZTK package uses firmer springs and tighter damping with Pilot Cup 2R tires.

The carbon aero package is standard with the ZTK suspension just like on the ZR1 and is the pathway to the 1,200-lbs of maximum downforce thanks to the large rear wing, front dive planes and other tweaks. It’s also available as an option on the standard suspension.
Cabin Improvements

In addition to the propulsion and braking improvements, as a 2026 model, the ZR1X benefits from the revamped interior that all Corvettes are getting. Chevrolet has addressed the biggest complaints that people have had with the C8, most notably the “wall.” Since launch, the C8 has had a barrier that ran up the passenger side of the center console to the dashboard; along the top edge of the wall was a long row of identical buttons for climate control and other functions.

That button row is now gone and the wall has been lowered and opened up, transforming it into a grab handle. The functions controlled by the buttons are now split between the bottom edge of the infotainment screen and a horizontal button row below the screen. This reduces the perceived separation between driver and passenger and improves functionality.
The screens have also been upgraded with the previous 8-inch center touchscreen replaced by a 12.7-inch unit while the 12-inch cluster display grows to 14-inches. There is also a new 6.6-inch touchscreen for easy access to some auxiliary controls like PTM, launch control and the G-force meter. We haven’t had a chance to try the new cabin setup in person, but it certainly looks better in the photos.
Chevrolet isn’t going to be announcing prices for the ZR1X until closer to launch which will be later this year as a 2026 model. For 2025, the E-Ray is a $38,000 step up from the base price of a Stingray with the same 495-hp V8. However, the E-Ray has the widebody configuration and a variety of other changes that add to the cost. The ZR1 currently starts at $178,195 for the coupe and the hybrid additions and brakes will probably add at least $15,000 to that price.

We wouldn’t be surprised to see the ZR1X coupe hit $200,000, with the convertible definitely going for at least the same $10,000 premium as the ZR1. $200K is nothing to scoff at, but with the performance that Chevrolet is promising for the “not a Zora” Corvette, it’s still a relative bargain compared to anything else comparable from Ferrari, Lamborghini, McLaren or Porsche. That’s also at least $100K less than the Mustang GTD! Plus you can get it in Roswell Green!
Not Zora In Name, But Zora In Spirit

The current C8 Corvette in many ways owes its very existence to Arkus-Duntov. When the Corvette debuted in 1953 it was powered (and I use that word lightly) by a 235 cubic inch inline-six-cylinder engine that produced 150 hp with a two-speed automatic transmission. In those days it was gross horsepower, which would be somewhere closer to 100-hp by today’s standards. A mighty sports car this was not.

After one more year with the “Blue Flame” six, Arkus-Duntov managed to get it replaced by Chevrolet’s brand-new small-block V8, and every Corvette built in the last 70 years has used the same basic configuration. While the malaise-era models from the early 1970s to the mid-1980s weren’t exactly fire breathers, ever since then, the Corvette has gotten progressively better.

One of Arkus-Duntov’s long-time obsessions was mid-engine Corvettes. From the original CERV-I that was more grand prix race car than road going sports car, there were at least nine built, culminating in the 1990 CERV-III. However, even after that active-suspension beast, it still took another three decades before the production model finally made the transition with the C8. Sadly, Arkus-Duntov never lived to see it, as he died in 1996.
As a racing driver and lover of both the mid-engine configuration and raw power, he would have loved this ZR1X.
Ok, one of you race car drivers or engineers please tell me – why are these rotors drilled instead of slotted? From when I did research on the topic say oh, 15 years ago, drilled rotors were basically considered form over function due to the potential for developing hairline cracks. Slotted rotors did the degassing job just as well, were less fragile, and also had more mass to soak up heat.
Why then do we keep seeing drilled rotors on cars like this? Even if the fancy new rotor materials (which seem to get fancier every year) don’t crack from being drilled, is there something about the little holes that makes them perform better than slots? Or is it still because it looks cool?
I’m sure I could go ask ChatGPT or search or something, but I’m too lazy and finding good info is getting harder and harder with the enshittification of the internet.