If I ask you what the first true “coupe utility” pickup based on a Big Three family station wagon was, you’ll probably say it was the Chevrolet El Camino. That’s what I always thought, and I just assumed the identical-formula Ranchero was merely Ford glomming onto the idea, hoping to get a piece of the action that was being ejoyed by Chevy’s slick concoction.
Wrong! The Ford Ranchero predated the first El Camino by several years with the concept of a half-car, half-pickup that didn’t sacrifice style for utility. A few weeks back, I looked at a modern-day interpretation of Chevy’s “coupe ute” on an EV chassis, and a few Blue Oval fans let me know that Ford should get some equal time for this exercise. I’m happy to do it!


All Work And All Play At Once
Some of you Autopians will correctly state that the idea of a car-based pickup was something that went back to the days of Ford Model Ts, and that in Australia such “utes” were a commonplace sighting for decades ahead of the Ranchero and later El Camino. That’s all true, but those early examples almost always put substance over style in their execution; they were built simply because it was the easiest way to get a mock pickup truck. No thought was put into making a glamorous party-in-front-business-in-back machine.

That changed with the Ranchero. Introduced for 1957, our Mercedes Streeter had this to say about it:
When Ford unveiled the Ranchero in December 1956, the F-Series was in its third generation. Ford marketed the Ranchero as being more than a car while also being more than a truck. The premise was that the Ranchero was a glamorous car and a hard-working truck all in the same package. Ford also noted that the Ranchero’s over half-ton payload was more than some of the trucks on the market at the time. In fact, the trucklet even bested the half-ton F-Series by about 50 pounds of payload. The Ranchero appeared to be the best of both worlds. It was low-slung, allowing both easier bed loading and better handling. Ford also boasted about the Ranchero’s car-like looks, which meant it could be welcome places a work truck couldn’t. Today, Ford calls the Ranchero its first compact pickup.
The first Ranchero was based on the 116-inch wheelbase Ranch Wagon and Courier Sedan Delivery. The trucklet featured a reinforced bed and at launch, the smallest engine available was a 223 cubic inch six-cylinder making 144 HP while the largest was a 292 cubic inch V8 making 212 HP.

Like the Ranchero, the El Camino that debuted in 1959 was based on Chevy’s standard-sized car. However, Ford then made the odd choice for 1960 by putting the second-generation Ranchero onto the Falcon platform, creating a much smaller product that was arguably barely a coupe ute at all (and it was initially called “Falcon Ranchero”).

It got even stranger for the third generation Ranchero, which in 1966 featured a front clip from the Falcon and then switched to the sheet metal of the Fairlane the following year! Otherwise, they were exactly the same car, or truck, or whatever you want to call it.


Fourth through seventh generation Rancheros that followed were all based on the mid-sized Torino, essentially putting them head-to-head with the El Camino which had shifted to the Malibu wagon chassis when it reappeared after a four-year hiatus in 1964.


By the mid-seventies that Ranchero was getting more flabby and flashy, especially the models that shared the front end with the Starsky & Hutch era Torinos:

The final example was built in 1979 when the Torino-based LTD II ended production, by which time it was larger than the “full sized” Panther LTD sold alongside it.


The El Camino outlived the Ranchero by eight years, and Ford’s outsourced attempt at a Fox-body-based new coupe ute called the Durango (which Mercedes Streeter wrote about) was short-lived.
With all of these different shapes and sizes of Ranchero over a two-decade span, you’d think it would be hard for me to choose just one as an inspiration for a modern redux. Actually, it took me about three milliseconds to make the decision, and I think you’ll agree why.
Cobra Under The Hood And Yer Dawg In The Bed
To many, the year 1970 was the pure high-water mark of American muscle cars; the styling was better than ever and power was at its peak in the golden hour before the fuel crisis, rising insurance rates and emissions controls quickly sunset the whole genre. Since these muscle machines were typically based on mid-sized Big Three sedans, it was easy to use go-faster bits from things like the Chevelle SS454 to make hot versions of the El Camino. For Ford, it was the legendary Torino GT that lent its provenance and name to the ultimate Ranchero that our Mercedes Streeter wrote about some time ago.

Based on car brochures, you’d think that everyone in the seventies was either hang gliding, hot air ballooning or scuba diving:

Ford’s fifth generation Ranchero GT could be had with the ultimate drivetrain of a 370 horsepower 429 Super Cobra Jet V8 and even a four-speed manual transmission, though reportedly on about 12 buyers actually checked all of those boxes (this yellow example obviously isn’t one of them). Even with lesser motors and ostensibly less weight than the sedan, you’d imagine that this GT was a force to be reckoned with.

It’s also quite attractive; the Torino on which it’s based was reportedly one of the favorite-styled cars that Lee Iacocca said he’d ever worked on. Arguably, it’s even more fetching than the El Camino of the same time frame, but with those covered headlights and swooping fenders it’s not a “nice” appearance: it’s just a terrifying and sinister looking vehicle. I still have no idea why those smooth dog dish hubcaps on early seventies performance Fords look so damn good.

You could get the 1970 Ranchero in other flavors as well if the GT was a bet too much greasy kid stuff for your equestrian tastes:

There’s no question that this fifth generation Ranchero will inspire our 2026 version, and there’s one family-sized station-wagon-like Ford with the acceleration to do the GT name proud that we can base it on: the Mustang Mach-E.
Get Ready For Ranch-Aero
Based on an earlier post I did, Chevy’s electric Blazer might have made a good current El Camino. The concept was pretty well received from you readers, but most were skeptical of my bizarre way of letting it expand from the full-sized pickup bed to four-seater. Many were afraid that the mechanism would be a trouble- and leak-prone disaster. I think I have a better way to get more passengers in my revived Ranchero.

I’ve also already explored how the Mach-E might have been a good candidate for a modern-day fifth-gen Torino, but I never really delved into the Ranchero.

Let’s take a Mach-E and stretch the wheelbase, adding length and overhang in back to give us a decent sized bed. Sweeping “B” pillars sit behind the unmodified Mach-E front doors, with black trim blending the bed sides up to the small spoiler above the rear window. I’m hoping those black areas behind the front doors could be real glass windows and not the fake ones that people seem to despise.

Let’s see an animation of the changes to a Mach-E to make our new coupe ute:
How could I not mention the optional “GT” graphics with black low-glare hood and, more importantly, the sinister full-width grille from the 1970 Ranchero? We could incorporate exposed LED lights into it but where would the fun be there? Electric powered headlight doors, people!
In back, the lights flanking the tailgate are reminiscent of the crescent-shaped Torino-wagon units on Rancheros from the fourth generation forward.
You can see in the animation how the length and wheelbase have changed to give us what amounts to a Real Pickup Bed.
That extra length? What could go below it? Is that more room for extra batteries or even a range-extending motor? I’m just putting it out there.
Three Seats To The Wind
We already know that without a rear seat our Ranchero will have a good-sized pickup bed, but two seats really limits your market for any vehicle. My answer for how to get extra passenger space was inspired by an insightful post from our Thomas Hundal about how EV’s lack of transmission tunnel means you could easily bring back front bench seating in modern cars. I’m not sure about a full bench, but our Ranchero might have a “normal” driver’s seat and then a wider two passenger bench seat, similar to what Matra did with their three-across Bagheera and Murena sports coupes.

It’s a brilliant idea where instead of adding a terrible “2+2” rear seat where maybe one person can realistically sit sideway, just have that third person sit up front in a rather normal manner. You’d be Spirit-airlines-tight with big adults, but the ability to take three occupants in a pinch is a world apart from a two seater.

The splits needed to make three independent seats would be too much for the width of the Ranchero, so we’ll make a two person “bench” next to the separate driver’s seat. A fold-down armrest acts as a reasonably comfortable backrest for the middle perch, which also gets a little headrest. Cupholders from the no-longer-there console now slide out from under the center seat. That armrest might have storage area in it.
Here’s an animation of the Mach-E interior changing to a Ranchero cabin:
Let’s take a look at the Mach-E dashboard below. We wouldn’t need to make any major changes from the Ranchero since there’s already wide-open space in the center below the central screen.

That’s good news since I’d think the Ranchero would still be a rather low volume proposition that you’d hate to tool up a new instrument panel for. Below you can see the Ranchero interior with two-person bench on the right, and all of the leg room in front of it (naturally some kind of shield to keep things from the passenger’s side floor off of the gas pedal). Optionally, we’d offer some kind of phone holders/wireless chargers since the console is gone now.

I’m not sure if an airbag is required for a center front seat passenger but if bench front seat cars got popular, I have a feeling that it might be. What I’ve done is added a surface-mounted box onto the middle of the main screen that incorporates that airbag as well as the hazard flasher and parking brake control that will be displaced from the Mach-E’s now-no-longer-existing console.
The big benefit of a Mach-E based Ranchero would be the frunk – imagine a coupe ute with a real weatherproof trunk! Of course, the heat pump on the latest Mach Es is reducing luggage space if they can’t relocate it, but it’s still space that the big old gas-powered models didn’t have for luggage or, you know, shrimp of unknown origin or age.

Also, considering that this Ranchero would be built off of a Mach-E in the same way that old Rancheros were formed from Torino wagons and El Caminos from Malibu estates, this new model would also feature those earlier model’s “smugglers bins” that use the footwells of the no-longer-there back seat for hidden indoor storage behind the front seats. Without the driveshaft tunnel of the old Ranchero, that space would run the full width of the cabin, in effect creating another “trunk space”.


If you really do need four- to five-passenger seating capacity and don’t care about a decent-sized bed, the Maverick would still be the Ford compact truck to choose. Still, if you’re looking to take the EV plunge and your values and needs are more cargo- and style-based, this Ranchero would be an excellent option that nobody else could give you. Unless GM would make my El Camino redux, that is.
Is The Compact Sport Truck The New Sports Car?
Is there room for a coupe ute in today’s market? They were never big sellers when they were discontinued forty years ago, so why should they succeed now? I still don’t think it would match the success of a Maverick by any means, but this new Ranchero could possibly resonate with more buyers than it did back in the day.
First, the “frunk” and big “smuggler’s trunk” was something those old Rancheros never had. Also, trucks are much more accepted now than they were back then; you’ll have an easier time selling a pickup to the public now than any sports car. Honestly, in terms of image and performance capabilities, would this new Ranchero be the modern equivalent of a sports machine? Neck snapping GMC Syclone-like acceleration, decent handling and occasional extra seating could make it a practical yet stylish young person’s “lifestyle” vehicle or a midlife crisis car for the modern fortysomething.
Come on, Ford. It’s time to take back the niche category you created almost seven decades ago. Do you have to wait for a new El Camino to goad you into doing it?
A few years ago, down the road, there was a person who collected and resold older, unusual vehicles. A MID 1980’S El Camino was there for a few months, based on the downsized Malibu. It was perfectly sized with a full sized bed area larger than the Maverick and probably give the two door Ranger a run for which was larger. Perfect all around vehicle for oldster like me where heavy loads will not be carried.
In regard to the wishful Ranchero proposed in this article, why is the default always an an all electric or hybrid power train? I am not anti nor pro any single type of power train as all have useful niches, pros and cons. Hybrid has great appeal to me as recycles spent energy and is usable anywhere a regular ICE vehicle can go. But a simple, tough 4 cylinder engine should be the base version for a lower price (no turbo!), at least in theory, well at least my theory, although now manual transmissions are extra cost options available only on the higher trim levels. Up is down and night is day, dogs and cats sleeping together, what ya gonna do?
And transmission tunnels did not prevent standard bench seats in almost all vehicles back before front drive trans axles were still just a gleam in an American designer’s eye.
Love it! This is what the cybertruck should have been.
Isn’t this what the rumored $30k Ford electric is going to be (except with 4 doors)?
I think that one is supposed to be more of a bare-bones Slate kind of thing
Bishop, you’ve done it again! This modern Ranchero would be the perfect vehicle for a lot of empty nesters like myself. I love the front end, the color, the styling, the laser stripe, everything about it. Sign me up!!! I want the display model, please.
A gentle breeze carries a whisper “if you build it, they will come”
FYI: Ford applied to register RANCHERO as a trademark for vehicles on August 5. This article may be more of a prediction than wishful thinking (also, they’ve applied to register RS500, BOSS, and F-150 THUNDER; hopefully signs of rad things to come).
You keep on working your influencer magic by putting these excellent ideas out in the world and just maybe we’ll get the car we US ute fans have been looking for since the 80s. My old Rampage would approve.
This has my huevos feeling mighty Ranchero
And no fried huevos headlights
Yet another article relevant to me. In 2 weeks I will be picking up what was basically the experimental replacement for the Ranchero as a project.
Tell me more…
Tell us you didnt find a Durango Futura..
🙂
Cant wait to see it
What this could REALLY do is take the place of the regular cab F150.
Think about it. Who mostly buys the single cab pickup? Fleets and customizers. They could basically build two versions: strippers and the hot rod version shown here.
Too bad they don’t have that lil Courier pickup they used to make in Brazil. That would be perfect.
Of course, Ford is so insecure and jealous because they have to protect the F150 at all costs 🙁
I’m just here for the frunkenshrimp.
Is this the way to the Shrimp Ranch?
More cocktail sauce and gradient stripes please.
Is the wrong that I love the gradient laser stripe? Manages to be cool in a way that still says “fun”, in contrast to today’s cool = menacing zeitgeist. Ford absolutely needs to bring this back…would spruce up crossovers even.
The shrimp disaster photo bothers me to no end.
I’m going to reconsider my universe. Your Ranchero, btw, looks neat!
I was instantly ready to hate anything related to this as I’ve always thought the whole car-truck thing looked silly. BUT>>>> Holy hell I would buy this in a heartbeat! Show it to Ford!
I love it. If we can only convince people they really do not need 3 rows of seating for their single broodling.
This would be a RAD daily driver for me!
Went to all this trouble and didn’t have the decency to photoshop on some actual door handles 😉
Only way I’m buying a car without door handles or with electric door handles is if the doors are easily removable and you’re legally allowed to drive without them, then I’m removing them first thing.
I may not even make it out the dealer’s lot without removing them.
Given the packaging you can do with EVs, maybe a bed trunk at the rear like the Ridgeline?
I think I mentioned that, but I’d rather put a range extender there!
Ooh, I approve.
This is an excellent idea. A range extender might actually give it a fighting chance of winning over buyers.
Unironically: Why not both?
Take the Ford 1.5L Ecoboost, build a self contained generator style chassis for it with a fuel tank, cooling system, exhaust, etc.
The idea being you have 3 drivetrain options from the factory, but the assembly line produces all the same car.
1.) Standard Range BEV with extra storage
2.) Extended Range BEV with extra battery pack
3.) Extended Range BEV with ICE Generator unit.
Having the generator unit serviced would be as simple as taking an engine hoist and pulling it out. Then you can drive your BEV as a BEV while it gets serviced, or perhaps they can give you a loaner one while it gets serviced. In theory it also allows for different generator types (diesel, ethanol, natural gas, etc.) provided they fit the dimensions, and as battery tech improves you can put much more energy dense extra battery packs.
Genius!
I want something like this. This is why I kicked $50 to Slate Auto.
I’m still irked they didn’t give it a 6ft bed.
I agree and understand. I also know it’s vaporware until it’s not. But I’m looking to dip my toes into a useful EV.
This is the automotive equivalent of a mullet. Ford Mullet.
Ford E-Mullet or Ford Mulletchero