Home » Chrysler Was Featured At The Most Exclusive Car Show In The World And Boy Was It Depressing

Chrysler Was Featured At The Most Exclusive Car Show In The World And Boy Was It Depressing

Whathappened Chrysler Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Every year at the Pebble Beach Concurs D’Elegance, they select a few marques to feature in their own special classes. Often, they’re legendary names like Pierce-Arrow or Bentley or Adler or Saturn. Sometimes they choose a brand to commemorate something, like how they did this year for Chrysler, in honor of their centennial. This is a huge honor, and pretty much any brand should feel the warmth and glow of such an accolade, and, ideally, would be able to leverage that to their brand’s current lineup. At least, that’s how it should be.

But that’s not the case with Chrysler. That’s because Chrysler is very literally a shell of its former self, void not just of glory and cultural impact, but also of cars themselves, since modern Chrysler’s lineup is just one car, and that car is a minivan.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom
Chrysler2025 Lineup2
Image: Chrysler

Oh, sure, they claim they have three cars, but it’s really just one minivan, in three trim levels:

Of course, there’s nothing wrong with minivans, or even the Pacifica, which is a genuinely good minivan! At least it was, nine and a half years ago, when I drove it last, during the release event Chrysler held. That’s the current Chrysler lineup, everybody. One solitary minivan that’s just about a decade old.

Up until 2023, they had two cars, the other being the still-handsome Chrysler 300, which, at the time of its retirement, was 19 years old. Well, there was an update in 2011, but it wasn’t exactly a new car by any stretch. Still, at least the 300 had some presence and style, even if it was an aging survivor of the Daimler-Chrysler years. But it’s been gone for two years now.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, as you may imagine, as we walked along the manicured grass of Pebble Beach, being pushed aside by wealthy people, their expensively-lotion’d palms feeling warm and smooth against your face as they shove, it was hard not to look at these jewels from Chrysler’s past, all shiny and arrayed beautifully on the green, and not compare them to the state of Chrysler as it stands today.

In fact, David and I did just that, and committed it to video:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by The Autopian (@theautopian)

Maybe it feels like we’re being cruel, but the sad truth is that I feel like I had forgotten about Chrysler until I was confronted with cars like this beautiful butter-colored Airflow:

Airflow
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

Back when it came out in 1934, the Airflow was revolutionary. It was the first full-sized American car to really use a streamlined design, and, while not a full unibody, did use some unibody elements in its construction. It was a revolution technically and in design, and also upheld Chrysler’s high standards of luxury. It was also something of a colossal failure, but a noble one, as its focus on aerodynamics would be proven correct in pretty much all modern cars.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a risk, a bold, interesting risk, and the sort of thing that I cannot imagine modern Chrysler doing.

Img 7651 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

I saw Chrysler Imperials, which reminded me that once Chrysler was a rival to the most prominent luxury makes in America, Cadillac and Lincoln, and could go head-to-head with European contenders when it came to pure luxury. Chrysler briefly spun off Imperial into its own brand, but it was always known to be part of Chrysler.

Imperialad 5
Image: Chrysler

Chrysler had so many luxurious options back in the day: the LeBarons and New Yorkers, massive barges of air-conditioning and comfort that telegraphed your power and status for a five-block radius, penetrating the poured concrete of buildings.

Cs Imperial
Image: Chrysler
Img 7758 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

The cars chosen for Pebble included a number of stunning mid-century Chrysler show cars, like the Ghia-designed car that would eventually become the Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia, the D’Elegance:

…and this similar Ghia design, the Chrysler Special:

ADVERTISEMENT
Img 7763 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

Beautiful cars! Beautiful Chryslers. And Chrysler of the past would sometimes actually realize in production form bold designs like this, even into fairly recent times. Remember, the Chrysler Crossfire wasn’t so very long ago, being introduced in 2004, and it was a bold styling exercise:

Chrysler Crossfire
Image: Chrysler

And that small, two-seat sportscar with dramatic, sorta-retro, sorta-not styling existed alongside sensible and comfortable minivans and sedans and wagons and other cars.

Chrysler Pacifica 2004 Hd 51e77de91bdba14abf4d3d722479c0f1cd0628c24
Image: Chrysler

Chrysler was always an up-market brand, but one that had the breadth and reach and ability to cover a pretty huge spectrum of car types and niches.

Img 7761 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

So, what happened to Chrysler? It’s absolutely seen some rough times, almost going out of business in the 1980s, but it clawed its way back, and even if the cars it was producing then weren’t exactly stellar – because, let’s be honest, they weren’t – Chrysler at least still seemed to try, to have some fight left in it, and was willing to do what it took to make the best of the K-Car-based hand it was dealt, and try to emphasize technology like turbochargers and Texas Instruments voice-synthesis chips to make their New Yorkers talk to you, trying to convince you that doors were jars.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chrysler didn’t give up, is my point here, and even when times were tough they knew who they were – or at least who they wanted to be – and they did all they could to achieve that.

Cs Chryslerspace Nyer
Image: Chrysler

But now? Chrysler feels like it’s given up. It feels like a company glumly plopping out a nearly ten-year-old minivan, without much real hope or ideas for the future. Oh, sure, they had that Halcyon concept car last year, but that really just made the brand feel more lost, and have you heard anything about it since then? Plans for production of even some kind of watered-down production version? No, you haven’t.

Image: Chrysler

Chrysler once actually tried things, bold things, difficult things. They made the PT Cruiser, a retro design that was just fun, because fun is fun, and it was pretty affordable, too. They had their series of cab-forward “Cloud Cars” that tried some interesting styling and packaging concepts, they had minivans, of course, and also two different four-seat convertibles and a two-seat convertible, all at once! That’s an impressive and interesting selection of vehicles!

And now? One minivan.

Modern Chrysler feels like it’s just killing time until Stellantis decides to pull the plug. And maybe, before I went to Pebble Beach, I could have been okay with that grim outcome, because I’d hardly given Chrysler any thought.

ADVERTISEMENT
Img 7760 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

But now that I’m reminded of what they once were, how they once reacted to the times, the sorts of cars they once made, the image they held of themselves, now that all of that has been percolating in my gelatinous mind, now I’m kind of pissed.

This beautiful array of classic Chryslers was both a celebration of a brand hitting the century mark and a wake-up call to that very brand. Chrysler, I hope you had some people walking the green at Pebble this year. I hope they looked at all of those incredible cars. And I hope they felt a pain in the pit of their stomachs, a pain that I hope turns into some kind of resolve to smack around some people at Stellantis and remind them that Chrysler is worth saving.

Don’t go down this easy, Chrysler. Jam that one aging minivan of yours into gear and get your assess moving again. It’s time. Wake up.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Timothy Swanson
Timothy Swanson
10 minutes ago

Stelantis has run its American brands as if it were a private equity firm: buy on leverage, extract as much cash as possible while starving the acquisition of development and funding, then dump the acquisition after sucking it dry. See Sears and Kmart for examples of this strategy. It truly is sad, and could have been avoided.

SonOfLP500
SonOfLP500
1 hour ago

I love reading your pieces, Jason, but this one was really special and reads like you couldn’t type fast enough to let out your passion. I think I read it all the way through holding my breath.

Jesse Lee
Jesse Lee
1 hour ago

The K cars get a horrible bad rap, but they weren’t all bad. The Chrysler New Yoker and LeBaron actually had really good attention to details in the interior. They were like 3/4 sized luxo-barges. There was a good dozen years when you could buy one of these Chryslers for $2500 with 45k and owned by one retiree owner.

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
15 minutes ago
Reply to  Jesse Lee

The K derivatives could be pretty sweet – the Laser and Daytona are still pretty cool.

Ishkabibbel
Ishkabibbel
2 hours ago

Cheers Jason, and way to stick the landing!!

Jack Trade
Jack Trade
2 hours ago

PT Cruiser, sure, but don’t forget the Plymouth Prowler, a production car by a major automaker that featured…an open wheel design.

Yeah I know the lack of the right engine/transmission let us down, but we should take a moment to appreciate the crazy cool of that suspension. It’s right up there in my book with GM’s decision to sell a mid engined 2 seater in the 80s.

CTSVmkeLS6
CTSVmkeLS6
2 hours ago

Will Chrysler even be around in 2027? Sad !

Mr E
Mr E
3 hours ago

I really like the Crossfire. Yeah, I know it was based on a Merc, but that doesn’t change my opinion of it.

Also, in that second-to-last pic, it appears there is a 300 wagon/estate on the far left. Naturally, they all have Euro plates attached, because fuck the USA, apparently. Which reminds me, Dodge should bring back the Magnum.

TheHairyNug
TheHairyNug
3 hours ago

I’m sure that Christine Feuell is going to save the day. She’s only been at the helm for 4 years now. Any day now… /s

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
3 hours ago

I grew up in a Chrysler family and I feel that sadness too. Dad had a 74 Dart Sport, an 80 Cordoba, and an 87 Fifth Av for his last three cars. I learned to drive on the Cordoba and then owned a 70 Newport, a 76 Monaco, and a 79 Diplomat. I later co-owned my wife’s 97 Intrepid.
The Intrepid did have some issues, and by the time we traded it Cerberus was in charge and the product started to suck compared to Japanese competitors. I wrote them off and haven’t looked back.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Michael Beranek
Boulevard_Yachtsman
Boulevard_Yachtsman
3 hours ago

That was a rather bittersweet trip down memory lane. I seem to remember reading that once the Chrysler engineers discovered most cars at the time were more aerodynamic moving backwards than forwards, they went and reversed the body on a vehicle in order to drive around town as a “teaser” that were working on something new.

Time to bring back the 300 with a hybrid system and the Hemi. Call it the “300HH”. Make sure it can smoke tires, yet maintain cabin silence. Maybe I can talk The Old Man into buying one.

ShifterCar
ShifterCar
4 hours ago

They even followed up the K-car success with some popular cars being discussed in the peak 90’s comments like the Concorde, Neon, and Cirrus.
At one point my 6’5″ uncle was putting 45-50k miles a year on his cars and loved the first gen Intrepid / Concorde so much he had his worn out beater handed down to my cousin, a current daily driver, two “future” daily drivers in reserve.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
4 hours ago

Except Chrysler never really competed with Lincoln or Cadillac.

Chrysler was competitive with Buick and high-range Mercurys.
Imperial was the Lincoln/Cadillac competitor.
Imperial was only a Chrysler model at the very beginning and the very end.

What happened to Chrysler?
The same thing that happened to Mercury and Buick (and Oldsmobile…)

Calling the minivan 3 models really isn’t much different from the 1970’s when the same big sedans/coupes were sold as Newport, New Yorker and 300.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Urban Runabout
Stephen Walter Gossin
Stephen Walter Gossin
4 hours ago

Big Chrysler fan here. Well said, Jason!

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
4 hours ago

When you discontinue more products than you launch, this is sort of what happens. FCA under-invested for years, and Stellantis has chosen to dump models and not introduce replacements until several years later, if at all

George Danvers
George Danvers
4 hours ago

This always makes me wonder what the executives at Chrysler do all day long…. nothing??

JJ
JJ
4 hours ago
Reply to  George Danvers

Debate the merits of the Pacifica CrossCab.

ShifterCar
ShifterCar
4 hours ago
Reply to  JJ

BUILD IT! Make or rebadge literally any other car at this point.

JJ
JJ
3 hours ago
Reply to  ShifterCar

I bet you could chop off the back half and make a pickup out of it. Between that and the CrossCab, assuming you get a voyager, plug in, and Pacifica trim out of each, BAM: 9 car line-up.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
4 hours ago
Reply to  George Danvers

There are Chrysler executives anymore?

More like a handful of brand-managers which are eternally hamstrung by the executives and accountants of Stellantis.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Urban Runabout
Chris D
Chris D
1 hour ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

They are still trying to find more “efficiencies”, which is a bit difficult because any more downsizing of their offerings would result in instant unemployment.

JJ
JJ
1 hour ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Yeah. I have to imagine their leadership is as hollowed out as their line up.

Jesse Lee
Jesse Lee
1 hour ago
Reply to  George Danvers

Sending out resumes.

David Radich
David Radich
5 hours ago

I reckon all they need to do is rebadge the Peugeot 2008, 3008 and 5008 as Chryslers and voila you have a three SUV lineup that look quite smart and attractive and ought to be competitive. I know there’s the tariff thing, but the secret is the Peugeots aren’t that expensive, but feel quite premium, if Chrysler wants to be the premium brand it won’t really matter that theres a tariff on them as they would probably be priced where they should be.

JJ
JJ
4 hours ago
Reply to  David Radich

Meh. Easier to slap those names on more Pacificas.

FleetwoodBro
FleetwoodBro
4 hours ago
Reply to  David Radich

I can’t believe they haven’t done this. Peugeot currently has hybrid and gasoline ICE versions of all these cars and they are excellent vehicles.

ShifterCar
ShifterCar
4 hours ago
Reply to  David Radich

Absolutely agree with this! I was in Ireland earlier this summer and 3008s and 5008s kept catching my eye. They are really attractive and have some great colors including a dark teal which is *chef’s kiss*.
Tariffs aren’t ideal but the alternative at this point is to keep selling minivans to people like my parents who are 75 years old and have been buying Chrysler Corp-DaimlerChrysler-Chrysler LLC-Chrysler Group LLC-Fiat Chrysler Automobiles since the early 90’s because they are creatures of habit and would never consider a Sienna or Carnival.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
4 hours ago
Reply to  David Radich

While i’m only familiar in any way with one of those, and that only by photos, the general premise here is correct. To get back on their feet in a hurry, they need some badge engineering for sure. I agree those would likely be a great start. Slap together a fancy Durango, even if its less fancy than a Grand Wagoneer, do a better job than the freaking Aspen (Garbage Durango with horrible facelift). Offer it at a lower stance than the Durango maybe, with all the engine options. Get back to the real presence that the 300 had.

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
3 hours ago
Reply to  David Radich

I been tooting this horn for years.

29
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x