Home » Chrysler Was Featured At The Most Exclusive Car Show In The World And Boy Was It Depressing

Chrysler Was Featured At The Most Exclusive Car Show In The World And Boy Was It Depressing

Whathappened Chrysler Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Every year at the Pebble Beach Concurs D’Elegance, they select a few marques to feature in their own special classes. Often, they’re legendary names like Pierce-Arrow or Bentley or Adler or Saturn. Sometimes they choose a brand to commemorate something, like how they did this year for Chrysler, in honor of their centennial. This is a huge honor, and pretty much any brand should feel the warmth and glow of such an accolade, and, ideally, would be able to leverage that to their brand’s current lineup. At least, that’s how it should be.

But that’s not the case with Chrysler. That’s because Chrysler is very literally a shell of its former self, void not just of glory and cultural impact, but also of cars themselves, since modern Chrysler’s lineup is just one car, and that car is a minivan.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Oh, sure, they claim they have three cars, but it’s really just one minivan, in three trim levels:

Chrysler2025 Lineup2
Image: Chrysler

Of course, there’s nothing wrong with minivans, or even the Pacifica, which is a genuinely good minivan! At least it was, nine and a half years ago, when I drove it last, during the release event Chrysler held. That’s the current Chrysler lineup, everybody. One solitary minivan that’s just about a decade old.

Up until 2023, they had two cars, the other being the still-handsome Chrysler 300, which, at the time of its retirement, was 19 years old. Well, there was an update in 2011, but it wasn’t exactly a new car by any stretch. Still, at least the 300 had some presence and style, even if it was an aging survivor of the Daimler-Chrysler years. But it’s been gone for two years now.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, as you may imagine, as we walked along the manicured grass of Pebble Beach, being pushed aside by wealthy people, their expensively-lotion’d palms feeling warm and smooth against your face as they shove, it was hard not to look at these jewels from Chrysler’s past, all shiny and arrayed beautifully on the green, and not compare them to the state of Chrysler as it stands today.

In fact, David and I did just that, and committed it to video:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by The Autopian (@theautopian)

Maybe it feels like we’re being cruel, but the sad truth is that I feel like I had forgotten about Chrysler until I was confronted with cars like this beautiful butter-colored Airflow:

Airflow
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

Back when it came out in 1934, the Airflow was revolutionary. It was the first full-sized American car to really use a streamlined design, and, while not a full unibody, did use some unibody elements in its construction. It was a revolution technically and in design, and also upheld Chrysler’s high standards of luxury. It was also something of a colossal failure, but a noble one, as its focus on aerodynamics would be proven correct in pretty much all modern cars.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a risk, a bold, interesting risk, and the sort of thing that I cannot imagine modern Chrysler doing.

Img 7651 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

I saw Chrysler Imperials, which reminded me that once Chrysler was a rival to the most prominent luxury makes in America, Cadillac and Lincoln, and could go head-to-head with European contenders when it came to pure luxury. Chrysler briefly spun off Imperial into its own brand, but it was always known to be part of Chrysler.

Imperialad 5
Image: Chrysler

Chrysler had so many luxurious options back in the day: the LeBarons and New Yorkers, massive barges of air-conditioning and comfort that telegraphed your power and status for a five-block radius, penetrating the poured concrete of buildings.

Cs Imperial
Image: Chrysler
Img 7758 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

The cars chosen for Pebble included a number of stunning mid-century Chrysler show cars, like the Ghia-designed car that would eventually become the Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia, the D’Elegance:

…and this similar Ghia design, the Chrysler Special:

ADVERTISEMENT
Img 7763 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

Beautiful cars! Beautiful Chryslers. And Chrysler of the past would sometimes actually realize in production form bold designs like this, even into fairly recent times. Remember, the Chrysler Crossfire wasn’t so very long ago, being introduced in 2004, and it was a bold styling exercise:

Chrysler Crossfire
Image: Chrysler

And that small, two-seat sportscar with dramatic, sorta-retro, sorta-not styling existed alongside sensible and comfortable minivans and sedans and wagons and other cars.

Chrysler Pacifica 2004 Hd 51e77de91bdba14abf4d3d722479c0f1cd0628c24
Image: Chrysler

Chrysler was always an up-market brand, but one that had the breadth and reach and ability to cover a pretty huge spectrum of car types and niches.

Img 7761 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

So, what happened to Chrysler? It’s absolutely seen some rough times, almost going out of business in the 1980s, but it clawed its way back, and even if the cars it was producing then weren’t exactly stellar – because, let’s be honest, they weren’t – Chrysler at least still seemed to try, to have some fight left in it, and was willing to do what it took to make the best of the K-Car-based hand it was dealt, and try to emphasize technology like turbochargers and Texas Instruments voice-synthesis chips to make their New Yorkers talk to you, trying to convince you that doors were jars.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chrysler didn’t give up, is my point here, and even when times were tough they knew who they were – or at least who they wanted to be – and they did all they could to achieve that.

Cs Chryslerspace Nyer
Image: Chrysler

But now? Chrysler feels like it’s given up. It feels like a company glumly plopping out a nearly ten-year-old minivan, without much real hope or ideas for the future. Oh, sure, they had that Halcyon concept car last year, but that really just made the brand feel more lost, and have you heard anything about it since then? Plans for production of even some kind of watered-down production version? No, you haven’t.

Image: Chrysler

Chrysler once actually tried things, bold things, difficult things. They made the PT Cruiser, a retro design that was just fun, because fun is fun, and it was pretty affordable, too. They had their series of cab-forward “Cloud Cars” that tried some interesting styling and packaging concepts, they had minivans, of course, and also two different four-seat convertibles and a two-seat convertible, all at once! That’s an impressive and interesting selection of vehicles!

And now? One minivan.

Modern Chrysler feels like it’s just killing time until Stellantis decides to pull the plug. And maybe, before I went to Pebble Beach, I could have been okay with that grim outcome, because I’d hardly given Chrysler any thought.

ADVERTISEMENT
Img 7760 Large
Photo: Jason Torchinsky

But now that I’m reminded of what they once were, how they once reacted to the times, the sorts of cars they once made, the image they held of themselves, now that all of that has been percolating in my gelatinous mind, now I’m kind of pissed.

This beautiful array of classic Chryslers was both a celebration of a brand hitting the century mark and a wake-up call to that very brand. Chrysler, I hope you had some people walking the green at Pebble this year. I hope they looked at all of those incredible cars. And I hope they felt a pain in the pit of their stomachs, a pain that I hope turns into some kind of resolve to smack around some people at Stellantis and remind them that Chrysler is worth saving.

Don’t go down this easy, Chrysler. Jam that one aging minivan of yours into gear and get your assess moving again. It’s time. Wake up.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
76 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MikeInTheWoods
Member
MikeInTheWoods
2 months ago

Jason can we have a follow up article where we look at the global Stellantis portfolio and badge engineer some future Chryslers?
My Grandmother always bought Chryslers once she got to retirement. She always wanted an Imperial. She got a K-car New Yorker and then some subsequent crappy 90’s Chryslers. They were all handed down to my Uncle, so I saw them regularly during the holidays for decades. My parents bought an XJ new from the Chrysler/Jeep stealership and although I was about 12, I remember all the details. They refused the Rusty Jones undercoating package since they were smart. I thought it was so novel to turn around in the back seat and you could see into the trunk area! Now it’s the opposite with sedans being the minority versus SUV. Thanks for the memories Torch!

FiveOhNo
FiveOhNo
2 months ago

Oh this makes me sad. I used to be a HUGE Mopar fan. My first car was a Plymouth Sundance Duster with the Mitsubishi 3.0V6. I swapped in a fully-built 2.2L turbo out of an ’89 Dodge Shadow Turbo. Dang thing ran 12s and took first place in its class at NOPI car shows.

Since then, I owned a bunch of other Chrysler products: Rams, Avengers, even a Sebring convertible (which hated me; I should tell stories). But I own zero Chrysler products now. The brands have all lost their way, unless you are a very specific demographic who wants a 700-horsepower SUV that looks like it’s a relic from 1998 otherwise.

My daily driver is a Hyundai Kona N, because it reminds me of that rowdy little turbo Duster from decades ago. :-/

Avalanche Tremor
Member
Avalanche Tremor
2 months ago

I assume they’re furiously working on a FWD transaxle that can handle 700HP so they can give the people what they want and save the brand: Chrysler Pacifica Jailbreak

William Domer
Member
William Domer
2 months ago

How difficult would it be to federalize some of the European stuff? And what about Opel? Come on stelantis. I’ll take my Citroen with a Chrysler nameplate any time.

William Domer
Member
William Domer
2 months ago
Reply to  William Domer

Opel Corsa. Opel Grandland. Astra. These are pretty cool and would instantly help chrysler

PalmPiloteer
PalmPiloteer
2 months ago

My grandad drove New Yorkers. My dad had a 300. I would love to see them rise from the ashes but it’s not looking good.

Bob
Member
Bob
2 months ago

Badges tell us who you think you are, or at least who you want us to think you are.

This is the badge, combining elegance and reference, that adorned the rear end of those “bold” Crossfires and the original 300s, with their “presence and style:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Chrysler_300C_badge_%285163724061%29.jpg/1600px-Chrysler_300C_badge_%285163724061%29.jpg?20150310141906

This is the badge Chrysler uses now, a dollar knock-off of Aston Martin’s:

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/IrQAAOSwXh5gPmAb/s-l1600.webp

That about covers things for me.

Rapgomi
Member
Rapgomi
2 months ago

My father told me that when he was a teenager in the 1930s, the hallmark of male style was “A white gardenia and Chrysler New Yorker”. And once he had the means, that was what he drove.

He considered the C-body 1978 to be the last real Chrysler New Yorker. After that he switched to Lincoln Town Cars.

Lot_49
Member
Lot_49
2 months ago

Got my first driver’s license in a 1960 Chrysler 4-door hardtop with magnificent fins. It barely fit in the garage and the dash looked like something out of a space ship.

https://momentcar.com/images/chrysler-new-yorker-1960-4.jpg

So I am sad to see the brand die this slow death, but it’s a rough fit with Fiat.

76
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x