Every year at the Pebble Beach Concurs D’Elegance, they select a few marques to feature in their own special classes. Often, they’re legendary names like Pierce-Arrow or Bentley or Adler or Saturn. Sometimes they choose a brand to commemorate something, like how they did this year for Chrysler, in honor of their centennial. This is a huge honor, and pretty much any brand should feel the warmth and glow of such an accolade, and, ideally, would be able to leverage that to their brand’s current lineup. At least, that’s how it should be.
But that’s not the case with Chrysler. That’s because Chrysler is very literally a shell of its former self, void not just of glory and cultural impact, but also of cars themselves, since modern Chrysler’s lineup is just one car, and that car is a minivan.



Oh, sure, they claim they have three cars, but it’s really just one minivan, in three trim levels:
Of course, there’s nothing wrong with minivans, or even the Pacifica, which is a genuinely good minivan! At least it was, nine and a half years ago, when I drove it last, during the release event Chrysler held. That’s the current Chrysler lineup, everybody. One solitary minivan that’s just about a decade old.
Up until 2023, they had two cars, the other being the still-handsome Chrysler 300, which, at the time of its retirement, was 19 years old. Well, there was an update in 2011, but it wasn’t exactly a new car by any stretch. Still, at least the 300 had some presence and style, even if it was an aging survivor of the Daimler-Chrysler years. But it’s been gone for two years now.
So, as you may imagine, as we walked along the manicured grass of Pebble Beach, being pushed aside by wealthy people, their expensively-lotion’d palms feeling warm and smooth against your face as they shove, it was hard not to look at these jewels from Chrysler’s past, all shiny and arrayed beautifully on the green, and not compare them to the state of Chrysler as it stands today.
In fact, David and I did just that, and committed it to video:
Maybe it feels like we’re being cruel, but the sad truth is that I feel like I had forgotten about Chrysler until I was confronted with cars like this beautiful butter-colored Airflow:

Back when it came out in 1934, the Airflow was revolutionary. It was the first full-sized American car to really use a streamlined design, and, while not a full unibody, did use some unibody elements in its construction. It was a revolution technically and in design, and also upheld Chrysler’s high standards of luxury. It was also something of a colossal failure, but a noble one, as its focus on aerodynamics would be proven correct in pretty much all modern cars.
It was a risk, a bold, interesting risk, and the sort of thing that I cannot imagine modern Chrysler doing.

I saw Chrysler Imperials, which reminded me that once Chrysler was a rival to the most prominent luxury makes in America, Cadillac and Lincoln, and could go head-to-head with European contenders when it came to pure luxury. Chrysler briefly spun off Imperial into its own brand, but it was always known to be part of Chrysler.

Chrysler had so many luxurious options back in the day: the LeBarons and New Yorkers, massive barges of air-conditioning and comfort that telegraphed your power and status for a five-block radius, penetrating the poured concrete of buildings.


The cars chosen for Pebble included a number of stunning mid-century Chrysler show cars, like the Ghia-designed car that would eventually become the Volkswagen Karmann-Ghia, the D’Elegance:
…and this similar Ghia design, the Chrysler Special:

Beautiful cars! Beautiful Chryslers. And Chrysler of the past would sometimes actually realize in production form bold designs like this, even into fairly recent times. Remember, the Chrysler Crossfire wasn’t so very long ago, being introduced in 2004, and it was a bold styling exercise:

And that small, two-seat sportscar with dramatic, sorta-retro, sorta-not styling existed alongside sensible and comfortable minivans and sedans and wagons and other cars.

Chrysler was always an up-market brand, but one that had the breadth and reach and ability to cover a pretty huge spectrum of car types and niches.

So, what happened to Chrysler? It’s absolutely seen some rough times, almost going out of business in the 1980s, but it clawed its way back, and even if the cars it was producing then weren’t exactly stellar – because, let’s be honest, they weren’t – Chrysler at least still seemed to try, to have some fight left in it, and was willing to do what it took to make the best of the K-Car-based hand it was dealt, and try to emphasize technology like turbochargers and Texas Instruments voice-synthesis chips to make their New Yorkers talk to you, trying to convince you that doors were jars.
Chrysler didn’t give up, is my point here, and even when times were tough they knew who they were – or at least who they wanted to be – and they did all they could to achieve that.

But now? Chrysler feels like it’s given up. It feels like a company glumly plopping out a nearly ten-year-old minivan, without much real hope or ideas for the future. Oh, sure, they had that Halcyon concept car last year, but that really just made the brand feel more lost, and have you heard anything about it since then? Plans for production of even some kind of watered-down production version? No, you haven’t.

Chrysler once actually tried things, bold things, difficult things. They made the PT Cruiser, a retro design that was just fun, because fun is fun, and it was pretty affordable, too. They had their series of cab-forward “Cloud Cars” that tried some interesting styling and packaging concepts, they had minivans, of course, and also two different four-seat convertibles and a two-seat convertible, all at once! That’s an impressive and interesting selection of vehicles!
And now? One minivan.
Modern Chrysler feels like it’s just killing time until Stellantis decides to pull the plug. And maybe, before I went to Pebble Beach, I could have been okay with that grim outcome, because I’d hardly given Chrysler any thought.

But now that I’m reminded of what they once were, how they once reacted to the times, the sorts of cars they once made, the image they held of themselves, now that all of that has been percolating in my gelatinous mind, now I’m kind of pissed.
This beautiful array of classic Chryslers was both a celebration of a brand hitting the century mark and a wake-up call to that very brand. Chrysler, I hope you had some people walking the green at Pebble this year. I hope they looked at all of those incredible cars. And I hope they felt a pain in the pit of their stomachs, a pain that I hope turns into some kind of resolve to smack around some people at Stellantis and remind them that Chrysler is worth saving.
Don’t go down this easy, Chrysler. Jam that one aging minivan of yours into gear and get your assess moving again. It’s time. Wake up.
Stelantis has run its American brands as if it were a private equity firm: buy on leverage, extract as much cash as possible while starving the acquisition of development and funding, then dump the acquisition after sucking it dry. See Sears and Kmart for examples of this strategy. It truly is sad, and could have been avoided.
I love reading your pieces, Jason, but this one was really special and reads like you couldn’t type fast enough to let out your passion. I think I read it all the way through holding my breath.
The K cars get a horrible bad rap, but they weren’t all bad. The Chrysler New Yoker and LeBaron actually had really good attention to details in the interior. They were like 3/4 sized luxo-barges. There was a good dozen years when you could buy one of these Chryslers for $2500 with 45k and owned by one retiree owner.
The K derivatives could be pretty sweet – the Laser and Daytona are still pretty cool.
Cheers Jason, and way to stick the landing!!
PT Cruiser, sure, but don’t forget the Plymouth Prowler, a production car by a major automaker that featured…an open wheel design.
Yeah I know the lack of the right engine/transmission let us down, but we should take a moment to appreciate the crazy cool of that suspension. It’s right up there in my book with GM’s decision to sell a mid engined 2 seater in the 80s.
Will Chrysler even be around in 2027? Sad !
I really like the Crossfire. Yeah, I know it was based on a Merc, but that doesn’t change my opinion of it.
Also, in that second-to-last pic, it appears there is a 300 wagon/estate on the far left. Naturally, they all have Euro plates attached, because fuck the USA, apparently. Which reminds me, Dodge should bring back the Magnum.
I’m sure that Christine Feuell is going to save the day. She’s only been at the helm for 4 years now. Any day now… /s
I grew up in a Chrysler family and I feel that sadness too. Dad had a 74 Dart Sport, an 80 Cordoba, and an 87 Fifth Av for his last three cars. I learned to drive on the Cordoba and then owned a 70 Newport, a 76 Monaco, and a 79 Diplomat. I later co-owned my wife’s 97 Intrepid.
The Intrepid did have some issues, and by the time we traded it Cerberus was in charge and the product started to suck compared to Japanese competitors. I wrote them off and haven’t looked back.
That was a rather bittersweet trip down memory lane. I seem to remember reading that once the Chrysler engineers discovered most cars at the time were more aerodynamic moving backwards than forwards, they went and reversed the body on a vehicle in order to drive around town as a “teaser” that were working on something new.
Time to bring back the 300 with a hybrid system and the Hemi. Call it the “300HH”. Make sure it can smoke tires, yet maintain cabin silence. Maybe I can talk The Old Man into buying one.
They even followed up the K-car success with some popular cars being discussed in the peak 90’s comments like the Concorde, Neon, and Cirrus.
At one point my 6’5″ uncle was putting 45-50k miles a year on his cars and loved the first gen Intrepid / Concorde so much he had his worn out beater handed down to my cousin, a current daily driver, two “future” daily drivers in reserve.
Except Chrysler never really competed with Lincoln or Cadillac.
Chrysler was competitive with Buick and high-range Mercurys.
Imperial was the Lincoln/Cadillac competitor.
Imperial was only a Chrysler model at the very beginning and the very end.
What happened to Chrysler?
The same thing that happened to Mercury and Buick (and Oldsmobile…)
Calling the minivan 3 models really isn’t much different from the 1970’s when the same big sedans/coupes were sold as Newport, New Yorker and 300.
Big Chrysler fan here. Well said, Jason!
When you discontinue more products than you launch, this is sort of what happens. FCA under-invested for years, and Stellantis has chosen to dump models and not introduce replacements until several years later, if at all
This always makes me wonder what the executives at Chrysler do all day long…. nothing??
Debate the merits of the Pacifica CrossCab.
BUILD IT! Make or rebadge literally any other car at this point.
I bet you could chop off the back half and make a pickup out of it. Between that and the CrossCab, assuming you get a voyager, plug in, and Pacifica trim out of each, BAM: 9 car line-up.
There are Chrysler executives anymore?
More like a handful of brand-managers which are eternally hamstrung by the executives and accountants of Stellantis.
They are still trying to find more “efficiencies”, which is a bit difficult because any more downsizing of their offerings would result in instant unemployment.
Yeah. I have to imagine their leadership is as hollowed out as their line up.
Sending out resumes.
I reckon all they need to do is rebadge the Peugeot 2008, 3008 and 5008 as Chryslers and voila you have a three SUV lineup that look quite smart and attractive and ought to be competitive. I know there’s the tariff thing, but the secret is the Peugeots aren’t that expensive, but feel quite premium, if Chrysler wants to be the premium brand it won’t really matter that theres a tariff on them as they would probably be priced where they should be.
Meh. Easier to slap those names on more Pacificas.
I can’t believe they haven’t done this. Peugeot currently has hybrid and gasoline ICE versions of all these cars and they are excellent vehicles.
Absolutely agree with this! I was in Ireland earlier this summer and 3008s and 5008s kept catching my eye. They are really attractive and have some great colors including a dark teal which is *chef’s kiss*.
Tariffs aren’t ideal but the alternative at this point is to keep selling minivans to people like my parents who are 75 years old and have been buying Chrysler Corp-DaimlerChrysler-Chrysler LLC-Chrysler Group LLC-Fiat Chrysler Automobiles since the early 90’s because they are creatures of habit and would never consider a Sienna or Carnival.
While i’m only familiar in any way with one of those, and that only by photos, the general premise here is correct. To get back on their feet in a hurry, they need some badge engineering for sure. I agree those would likely be a great start. Slap together a fancy Durango, even if its less fancy than a Grand Wagoneer, do a better job than the freaking Aspen (Garbage Durango with horrible facelift). Offer it at a lower stance than the Durango maybe, with all the engine options. Get back to the real presence that the 300 had.
I been tooting this horn for years.