Home » Ford Has An Ideal Small Car It Could Sell Here Very Quickly

Ford Has An Ideal Small Car It Could Sell Here Very Quickly

Tmd Fp2 Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

This week has been strange, with the government promoting the idea that both wood-panelled station wagons and Japanese-style kei cars could suddenly be sold in the United States. That’s strange. I don’t entirely know what to make of that, but if there’s sincerely going to be a change to the rules in order to allow small cars here, I have an idea of what companies should do.

The Morning Dump is sometimes here to point out the problems, but that’s easy, right? Today, I want to be solutions-oriented. I’m going to start with what the administration is saying, and what the issues might be with what they’re saying. But then I want to talk about some products that could make it here.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Then I’ll talk about Nissan and the usual troubles with Nissan, as well as the potential for tax cuts to get more people into dealerships next year.

You Can Already Sell Small Cars And Wagons In The United States

This was covered well earlier this week, but President Trump said that he’s going to guide Transportation Secretary Duffy to make it easier to sell small cars here. Then, in the video above (or here), Sec. Duffy told CNBC’s Phil LeBeau that station wagons could make a comeback in the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Listen, the auto industry is very competitive, right?” Duffy replied. “And by the way, if we bring prices down and we get newer cars on American roads, newer cars are way safer.”

“If you’re building a car, developing a car that Joe Biden or Pete Buttigieg wanted you to build, that’s different than market demand,” he continued. “This rule will actually allow you to bring back the 1970s station wagon. Maybe a little wood paneling on the side, Phil.

It’s both important that the government regulate and guide the car market due to its critical importance, and also, historically, a bit of a nightmare when it does. This is bipartisan, too, as NAFTA was an H.W. Bush idea that Clinton ran with, and Cash 4 Clunkers was an Obama-era provision.

What’s important to note is that automakers can build small cars and sell them here, and often do. The Ford Fiesta, the Honda Fit, the Chevy Spark, and on and on. They can also build wagons whenever they want, as happened with the RS6 Avant and BMW M5 Touring.

For me, this is confusing, and I can tell the commentariat is having the same kind of cognitive dissonance meltdown. Obviously, inflation is up, and the President likely came into office at least partially on the concept that Biden took egg.

This is weird for me because, on the one hand, I want wood-panelled wagons and Autozams. On the other hand, I know that there are crash safety standards and certain EPA rules that make it harder to sell small cars here; though, in general, all of this is surmountable.

The Detroit Free Press polled the major automakers, and basically none of them would commit to actually building a car like this:

ADVERTISEMENT

When asked by the Detroit Free Press if the Dearborn-based automaker would actually consider building and selling such a vehicle in the United States, Ford spokesman Griffin Anderson sent this statement: “Nothing specific to share at this time, but as America’s largest auto producer — including F-Series, the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. for 43 years — we’re always looking for ways to give U.S. customers more choice and affordability in vehicles they love.”

GM spokeswoman Liz Winter said the Detroit-based automaker has a policy of not commenting on future products.

Stellantis spokeswoman Jodi Tinson emailed the following statement: “Stellantis is always looking for opportunities to adapt our product portfolio to meet our customers’ needs and give them the freedom to choose vehicles they want at prices they can afford.”

That’s not a “no” and Ford actually has the perfect car.

Ford Should Sell The Puma Here

Puma St 34
Photo: Matt Hardigree

This is a Ford Puma. It’s a Fiesta-based European Ford crossover built in Romania and sold in Europe. It is excellent. I drove one while I was in the UK a couple of years ago and adored it. You know who also adores this? Ford CEO Jim Farley, who said he wished it were for sale in the United States.

Now, here’s the trick to this. What the Trump White House wants is for these cars to be built in the United States, but it is actually not that big of a deal if they’re not, unless the rules are written in a specific way to keep them out of the country.

The Puma is built in the EU and therefore subject to a 15% tariff, plus some other potential tariffs for specific material content (which might be offset because Ford is also a local producer, but I’m not a Section 232 expert, so this will depend on a lot of factors that seem to change by the week). That’s not terrible, really? With the average transaction price above $50k right now, a cheap car is a cheap car, and there are always incentives and tax breaks to be had.

This is about a $28,000 car in Europe, but everything is more expensive in Europe except food, real estate, drugs, and healthcare. Could this be a sub-Bronco Sport car in the $22-25k range to compete with the Trax? That would be dope.

ADVERTISEMENT

My wild theory here, after talking to some friends, is that Ford should just import the Puma and sell it here as a cheaper car. With the OBBB and the EPA rolling back CAFE penalties and goals, there’s likely to be less of a penalty. These are safe cars and not kei small, but still smaller than what we get.

Also, it’s good. It’s a good car. Plus, Puma is a cool name. I also think Nissan could make a deal with Dacia to bring the Duster here, and Volkswagen could start selling SEATs here. Let’s get creative! There are plenty of non-kei sized cars that would probably do well here as cheaper cars.

[Ed Note: I don’t see how the Puma is going to move the needle compared to current US offerings, but I do like it. -DT]. 

Nissan Needs A Friend

250308 All New Nissan Leaf Dynamic Pictures 02
Photo credit: Nissan

The history of Nissan is a history of partnerships that just didn’t quite work out, for whatever reason. An unequal structure between Nissan and Renault was the rotten foundation on which that partnership was built, and the whole thing crumbled when Nissan had Carlos Ghosn arrested. The Honda deal was going to be another case of Nissan being subservient, which Nissan seems unwilling to accept.

According to this Automotive News report, Nissan wants a partner, but it still has some conditions:

ADVERTISEMENT

“Nissan is open for business with other automakers,” Nissan Americas product planning chief Ponz Pandikuthira told Automotive News at a media event here.

But the company has made one requirement clear in discussions with prospective mates: “It must be reciprocal. Somebody has something that we would like; we have something that they would like,” Pandikuthira said.

“We would not engage with a partner just to buy a vehicle, or platform, or piece of tech,” he continued. “That’s what makes it a long-term commitment instead of just a transaction.”

Besides some totally fine and semi-competitive EVs, Nissan also has big trucks and the Nissan Frontier. Who wants a truck?

Will Lower Tax Bills Spur The Car Market?

2026 Nissan Sentra First Drive
Photo: Sam Abuelsamid

The economy vibes are kinda bad right now. No one knows what’s going to happen. I get the sense that a lot of people are just hanging onto mediocre jobs, and jobs are hanging on to mediocre employees until something gives (which explains my staying power).

A look at the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index shows, well, things are just kinda stuck. Demand is there, but prices are a little high, so volume is ok but not great. Maybe something can fix that?

Here’s what Jeremy Robb, Interim Chief Economist at Cox Automotive, had to say:

“Like most metrics we track across the automotive landscape, wholesale prices dipped in October before showing modest improvement in November.

“As November progressed, both new and used retail sales lifted from October levels, and the longest government shutdown in history came to an end. While consumer sentiment remains subdued, early reads suggest confidence is recovering. We’re seeing good vehicle sales supported by lower APR rates, and price depreciation is trending back to normal, with values slightly higher than usual. We’re also only a month from January, when lower tax withholding rates will boost take-home pay. Once consumers feel that in their paychecks and realize their tax refunds could be substantially higher this year, we are expecting some tailwinds to hit the auto market.”

Whatever you feelings about the tax cuts, there are many consumers who will see at least modest tax savings in the near term. Will that be enough to offset tariffs? Will the increased in EVs coming off-lease lead to more people buying cheaper used electric cars?

ADVERTISEMENT

For the sake of the economy and the deficit, it would be helpful if people took that money and bought more things.

What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD

David called me from the road the other day, and he was in a town he’d never heard of, near Sacramento. I asked him: “Is it Stockton?” I guessed this because that’s the home of the best band in history, aka Pavement. Here’s them performing “Unfair,” which is premised on the idea that SoCal sucks all the water and good stuff out of Northern California. Slinging nachos like you just don’t care.

The Big Question

If you could bring back one car from the 1970s what would it be?

Top shot: Ford

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
256 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Petefm
Member
Petefm
1 month ago

The puma is M Sport’s WRC car, so I’m fully on board.

05LGT
Member
05LGT
1 month ago

1. Lancia Stratos HF Stradale.

05LGT
Member
05LGT
1 month ago
Reply to  05LGT

Oh wait, you didn’t say street legal so:
917/30 Spyder

Inthemikelane
Member
Inthemikelane
1 month ago

Bring back a car?! Ok to be something from a dead brand? I’d buy a new pre-GM Saab 93 convertible today. Such a comfortable cabin, and despite the front wheel drive, it handled and could get up and go. Small, fast, fun to drive, decent mileage, what’s not to love.

Another two that would be great are the Isuzu Impulse and Trooper. Had an Impulse and wanted a trooper.That Impulse was a solid vehicle and fun to drive.

These weren’t high-end vehicles but well made, and we need more of that.

Inthemikelane
Member
Inthemikelane
1 month ago
Reply to  Inthemikelane

Jeez I totaling missed the ‘one car from the 70’s.’ I would not bring back a single one. It isn’t called the malaise era for nothing. Looked and ran like crap. I was never around high-end vehicles, and what I saw and drove/rode were garbage.

Sivad Nayrb
Sivad Nayrb
1 month ago
Reply to  Inthemikelane

Trooper V6 was hot garbage

Space
Space
1 month ago

I’ll take a Puma, manual hybrid.

I’m not sure why some people want to defend CAFE like the Simpsons meme of someone jumping in front of the gun. CAFE was not a gift from God, it was made by men and had flaws. The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry.

Cheats McCheats
Cheats McCheats
1 month ago

From the 70’s, 72 monte carlo. Green. 383, 4 speed. I’m loving life. Or, 78 f-150, 4 speed, flat bed short wheel base. If I can go into the 80’s just a little bit. 81 Malibu. No engine, I’ll take care of that myself.

Gene1969
Gene1969
1 month ago

If I was going to bring back a car from the 70’s it would be the Jeep CJ5. It was so dangerously prone to tipping over that Jeep replaced it with the CJ7 and then the Wrangler. The CJ5 is a ride that demands attention when driving and that’s what we need right now.

Wait! I take it back!

If I am bringing back a vehicle from the Seventies, it’s going to be the Datsun 620 pickup truck. I’ll give it modern metallurgy but that’s it. Everything else is going to be OEM right down to the non-reclining bench seat and the single wall bed and tailgate. No ABS. No air bags. That will be a great experiment to see if those screaming for the return of an honest small pickup with a regular cab and long bed will put their money where their mouth is.

Last edited 1 month ago by Gene1969
Sivad Nayrb
Sivad Nayrb
1 month ago
Reply to  Gene1969

Toyota has most of what you want in the $10k truck offered in 3rd World SH countries. Dealers don’t want it because they want to sell you a $50k plus truck.

Gene1969
Gene1969
1 month ago
Reply to  Sivad Nayrb

They don’t bring it here because it won’t pass the safety regulations.

It is a nice truck though.

Last edited 1 month ago by Gene1969
Shooting Brake
Member
Shooting Brake
1 month ago

I’ve been saying Ford should sell the Puma here (USA) since it launched, would’ve been an actual decent and competitive replacement for the Fiesta/Focus instead of the awful Ecosport. Now it probably doesn’t make sense with tariffs and stuff. I don’t think the administration cares much about actually seeing small or affordable cars built here they just need talking points that make it sound like they care about the affordability crisis while they just do whatever they want rather than craft policies to bring about specific positive outcomes.

Chris D
Chris D
1 month ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

At least from the side and the back, the Puma resembles the Scion iM/Corolla iM. It’s just a little taller and longer at the back.

There is a huge market segment available for good cars under 22,000. Skoda, Dacia, rebranded Peugeots and Renaults, how about rebranded Daihatsus and Japanese-built Suzukis?

It’s ironic how the automaker spokespeople talk about how they believe in offering more choices to consumers, after having discontinued nearly every passenger car that is not an SUV. (For example: “Nothing specific to share at this time, but as America’s largest auto producer — including F-Series, the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. for 43 years — we’re always looking for ways to give U.S. customers more choice and affordability in vehicles they love.”)

There is a huge market segment available for good cars under 22,000. Skoda, Dacia, and how about rebranded “captive” Peugeots, Renaults, Daihatsus and Japanese-built Suzukis? Let the free market decide.

SlowBrownWagon
Member
SlowBrownWagon
1 month ago

1972 Vista Cruiser 455

Turn the Page
Member
Turn the Page
1 month ago

1971 Pontiac Trans Am and 1972 Buick Riviera. I owned a new 1974 Trans Am SD-455 but really liked the styling of the previous generation better. Also owned a new 1972 Riviera.

Squirrelmaster
Member
Squirrelmaster
1 month ago

1970.5 Chevy Camaro. I’m not a huge second gen fan, but the early split-bumper cars look excellent.

FleetwoodBro
Member
FleetwoodBro
1 month ago
Reply to  Squirrelmaster

That’s a great pick! I might opt for a Rockford Files Firebird, which was a Formula package with the handling stuff and big V8, but looks like an Esprit w/ no stripes or spoilers.

Squirrelmaster
Member
Squirrelmaster
1 month ago
Reply to  FleetwoodBro

Nice! That is also an excellent choice. I’m more partial to the Camaro because my grandfather had a white and blue SS 396 that I dreamt about as a kid, but I would absolutely love a 1970.5 Trans Am Ram Air IV.

Sivad Nayrb
Sivad Nayrb
1 month ago
Reply to  FleetwoodBro

The Pontiac 400ci and Oldsmobile (check your history books for Olds, kids) 403ci V8 engines used in the Firebord were a wheezy 185hp or less, based on the year Firebird Rockford used…

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
1 month ago

BMW 2002tii if I had to pick just one. But there are MANY I would buy in a heartbeat new. Nearly all European, of course.

M K
M K
1 month ago

Why would any domestic build a car or wagon when the margins are so much better on trucks/SUVs? Asking for a friend.

Last edited 1 month ago by M K
Space
Space
1 month ago
Reply to  M K

Sometimes they can corner a segment of the market and make it worthwhile. Before the Ford Maverick the tiny truck segment was empty and they made bank.

The wagon segment is empty for now and a good priced wagon could be profitable.

Sivad Nayrb
Sivad Nayrb
1 month ago
Reply to  Space

And good wagons work better than any SUV/Crossover.

GhosnInABox
GhosnInABox
1 month ago

“This is bipartisan, too, as NAFTA was an H.W. Bush idea that Clinton ran with, and Cash 4 Clunkers was an Obama-era provision.“

Bipartisan in that one party kicks the left ass cheek while the other kicks the right one.

Space
Space
1 month ago
Reply to  GhosnInABox

I’m glad someone called it out, bipartisan does not always mean good for the average person.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
1 month ago

MK1 Golf/Sirocco. If that’s too small, just send over the current Polo. Close enough.

Also, I could settle for a 924 or 928. Yes I know I said settle, but you asked for MY opinion.

Martin Witkosky
Member
Martin Witkosky
1 month ago

If you could bring back one car from the 1970s what would it be?

And that would still be relevant today? Enfield 8000 with all the benefits of modern electric motor and battery technology.

Duane Cannon
Duane Cannon
1 month ago

Lotus Elan because Emma Peel drove one.

Nick B.
Member
Nick B.
1 month ago

I’d bring back the Fiat X1/9. Small, light, mid-engined. Maybe give it a modern 3-cylinder turbo and DCT/manual options.

Gene1969
Gene1969
1 month ago
Reply to  Nick B.

Would you call it the X1/9 or Bertone?

Nick B.
Member
Nick B.
1 month ago
Reply to  Gene1969

Probably Bertone, given I’d imagine most people would recognize that better and it would help sales. If we were bringing it back, we don’t want it to be a flop.

Gene1969
Gene1969
1 month ago
Reply to  Nick B.

I think your logic.

Sivad Nayrb
Sivad Nayrb
1 month ago
Reply to  Nick B.

It would weigh 3200 lbs.

LMCorvairFan
LMCorvairFan
1 month ago

A Mazda rx3.

Greg
Member
Greg
1 month ago

0

Last edited 1 month ago by Greg
Eddie Wuncler
Eddie Wuncler
1 month ago

I think the Gen E puma as a leaf/bolt competitor might be the safer option than one using a euro built Dct and turbo 1.5 liter 3 cylinder.

Harvey Firebirdman
Member
Harvey Firebirdman
1 month ago

77 or 78 Trans Am or really an firebirds from those 2 years especially with t-tops.

Ricardo M
Member
Ricardo M
1 month ago

Resurrecting from the 70s, give me an Alfasud. An affordable, boxer-powered compact with zippy handling and great styling, but bring it to the 21st century with decent rust-proofing. Keep it under 3,000lb and give it a usable liftback, and it’ll be a perfect little fun/stylish daily driver.

Kevin Rhodes
Member
Kevin Rhodes
1 month ago
Reply to  Ricardo M

With modern rust protection, please and thank you.

Sivad Nayrb
Sivad Nayrb
1 month ago
Reply to  Kevin Rhodes

And better electricals…

Last edited 1 month ago by Sivad Nayrb
Crank Shaft
Member
Crank Shaft
1 month ago

I’m so glad Matt has a hard rock side. I admit I was a little bit worried. 🙂

Eggsalad
Eggsalad
1 month ago

I hate admitting that this administration is right about *anything*, but it’s absolutely true that CAFE caused the demise of the big American station wagon.

It’s 1974, and you want to buy a camper and tow it someplace with the family and all their gear. There’s a 99% chance you’re going to buy a big-block Ford or Chevy wagon. Then along comes CAFE, and nobody can build a big-block wagon within the rules. But trucks can get worse MPG. So everybody trades off their 454 Impala wagon for a 454 Suburban. And that’s where this all began.

As for the 1970s station wagon that *I* would buy again, make mine a Volvo 245.

*Jason*
*Jason*
1 month ago
Reply to  Eggsalad

The difference between a wagon and SUV is ground clearance. Lift a 1978 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser like my parents had 1.2 inches and it is a SUV.

Crank Shaft
Member
*Jason*
*Jason*
1 month ago
Reply to  Crank Shaft

You might need to shorten the front a rear a bit too. This is how the vast majority of wagons become crossovers:

(b) An automobile capable of off-highway operation, as indicated by the fact that it:

(1)

(i) Has 4-wheel drive; or

(ii) Is rated at more than 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight; and

(2) Has at least four of the following characteristics calculated when the automobile is at curb weight, on a level surface, with the front wheels parallel to the automobile’s longitudinal centerline, and the tires inflated to the manufacturer’s recommended pressure—

(i) Approach angle of not less than 28 degrees.

(ii) Breakover angle of not less than 14 degrees.

(iii) Departure angle of not less than 20 degrees.

(iv) Running clearance of not less than 20 centimeters.

(v) Front and rear axle clearances of not less than 18 centimeters each.

Chris D
Chris D
1 month ago
Reply to  Crank Shaft

It also needs plastic cladding around the wheel wells.

Noahwayout
Member
Noahwayout
1 month ago

My wife and I rented a Ford Puma in Italy a couple years ago with the mild-hybrid 1.0 Ecoboost and a manual transmission. It was completely cracking to drive and had enough power even in the Apennine Mountains. It returned fantastic mileage, was quite comfortable, and the auto-start stop was completely imperceptible. We didn’t even realize that it was shutting off at stops until we had been driving it for a few days – it was the first time that I realized that this technology could actually be good.

We’d buy one of these in a heartbeat. Ford, If you’re reading this, for the love of god offer it in fun colors.

Last edited 1 month ago by Noahwayout
BassAckwardsRacing
Member
BassAckwardsRacing
1 month ago
Reply to  Noahwayout

And without the $599 surcharge…

256
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x