Home » How The Cadillac Escalade Proved GM Could Learn From Its Mistakes

How The Cadillac Escalade Proved GM Could Learn From Its Mistakes

Cadillac Escalade 2000 Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

Several decades ago, Cadillac made the decision to hastily rebadge a mainstream GM product as its own cooking as a sudden reaction to new competition, resulting in a machine that looked an awful lot like a less expensive model. In profile, it was almost identical to its mainstream equivalent, and it even launched with the same powertrain as its more common brethren. Can you guess how the market reacted? Yeah, it turned the Escalade into a cultural phenomenon that’s now arguably bigger than the Cadillac brand itself. Wait, you didn’t think I was talking about the Cimarron, did you?

It’s weird to think that the iconic Cadillac Escalade launched using more-or-less the same formula as the infamous Cimarron, but a few critical choices helped make it not just a success, but Cadillac’s largest modern cultural touchpoint. Did General Motors learn from its mistakes? I reckon it did.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Welcome back to GM Hit Or Miss, where we zoom in on the chaos of General Motors’ pre-bankruptcy product planning strategy of throw-everything-at-the-wall-and-see-what-sticks to see what stuck to the wall like a wad of epoxy and what’s simply made a mess on the floor.

Return Of The ‘Lac

Cadillac Escalade
Photo credit: Cadillac

Back in 1997, GM had a problem, and that problem was called the Lincoln Navigator. The full-size SUV market was heating up, and the Navigator was a shot across Cadillac’s bow. We’re talking about a full-size luxury SUV with available rear air suspension, automatic four-wheel-drive, leather, wood, a substantially different appearance than its Ford Expedition sibling, and that all-important Lincoln badge. Cadillac had nothing, and 1998 was shaping up to be a rough year for GM’s luxury brand, one of the rare times it would actually lose the domestic luxury sales crown to Lincoln due to the sheer success of the Navigator.

Cadillac Escalade
Photo credit: Cadillac

General Motors didn’t have time, but it was working on the GMC Yukon Denali, a leather-lined, plastic-clad variant of its full-size SUV. With a Cadillac grille, extra wood and leather, standard OnStar telematics, and new center caps, the first Cadillac Escalade was born posthaste, and it didn’t exactly make the most graceful impression on the press. It came dead-last in a five-SUV Car And Driver comparison test, with the magazine writing “pass the dramamine” about its ride quality and this about its cabin:

ADVERTISEMENT
The interior also came in for criticism. The Escalade doesn’t have an automatic climate-control feature, and despite the Zebrano wood trim, it dashboard looked sublux compared with the competition. The buttons and switches of the power-seat controls, mounted on the seat base, lacked tactile differentia­tion and were difficult to operate with the door closed. Thus, several drivers found themselves activating the seat heaters while attempting other adjustments. Hot pants in the high desert. Olé!

Guess what? The public didn’t hugely care that the platform dated back to the 1980s, or that it didn’t have automatic climate control, or that body control was largely theoretical. More than 50,000 first-generation Escalades made it to driveways across America, and thanks in part to a complete redesign after just two model years on the market, the Escalade continues to be America’s first word in luxury SUVs, laying cultural waste to the Lincoln Navigator. It paid off, but a similar gamble worked out very differently for Cadillac less than two decades prior.

Missing The Mark

Cadillac Cimarron
Photo credit: Cadillac

Back in the early 1980s, as everything was getting downsized, GM had a brainwave: What if it took its incoming corporate compact car, ritzed it up, and badged it as a Cadillac to compete with compact luxury cars from Europe? It’s a sensible idea, but the execution of such a product had enough issues that its name is now infamous. I’m speaking, of course, about the Cadillac Cimarron. Originally, pre-launch reception of Cadillac’s take on the Chevrolet Cavalier was mixed-to-positive. Some people were actually excited for it, not the least of which were dealers wishing for a gas crunch option. As Popular Mechanics wrote in January of 1981:

The Cimarron was developed in response to Cadillac dealers who were hit hard by the turn-around toward small cars in the latest fuel crunch. The dealers wanted a small, fuel-efficient car like the BMW, and they wanted it fast. The crash program of development that followed has been called the fastest move of its type ever at GM, made possible in large measure by the generous use of predeveloped J-car systems.

At the time, the concept of an American competitor to the BMW 3 Series was obvious. The fuel crises of the 1970s were right at the front of drivers’ minds, and the smallest thing Cadillac offered at the time was the Seville. A predominantly V8-powered sedan clocking more than 200 inches stem-to-stern was a world away from the 177.5-inch, four-cylinder 3 Series of the time, and there was loads of room to expand the Cadillac lineup.

Cadillac Cimarron Interior
Photo credit: Cadillac

Sure, the Chevrolet Cavalier wasn’t the most refined car of the early 1980s, and Cadillac swooping in at the eleventh hour meant that the Cimarron had to make do with much of the same coachwork as its more affordable brethren, but initial reviews were actually positive. Here’s what historically Detroit-skeptic Car And Driver had to say when it tested a 1982 Cimarron:

With a little polishing here and there, the Cimarron could actually make it as a world-class small sedan. (Not even Audi gets everything right the first time around.) But even as is, the Cimarron is a pretty nice piece of work. And for a Cadillac—well, it’s just plain amazing.

Unfortunately, despite selling a respectable 132,499 units over its lifespan, the Cimarron quickly became a punchline. It was so commonly derided that when Car And Driver did a story on the Europe-only Cadillac BLS, the magazine noted that top Cadillac product man John Howell kept a picture of a Cimarron in his office captioned “Lest we forget.” So why did it fail but the Yukon-based Escalade succeeded? Both were rather hastily rebadged mainstream products presented to an upscale audience, but while one is now often regarded as a punchline, the other is an even bigger name than the brand that makes it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Pros Of Getting In Early

Cadillac Cimarron
Photo credit: Cadillac

In theory, a small luxury car was the right direction for Cadillac in the early 1980s. However, part of the problem was that the Cimarron was trying to appeal to a base already set in their ways. By the time it launched in 1981, it was up against some stiff competition. A BMW 320i customer wasn’t likely to set foot in a Cadillac showroom, and Cadillac buyers historically weren’t drawn to small cars. As a result, the Cimarron fought an uphill battle from day one, a battle it ultimately lost. It likely didn’t help that throughout its production run, it always kinda looked like a Cavalier.

In contrast, when the Escalade launched in 1998, the luxury SUV market in America consisted of just a handful of models, all of which were relatively crude. The closest equivalent to a full-size luxury sedan in technology and performance was the P38 Range Rover, but beyond that, the Lexus LX 450 was a rebadged Toyota Land Cruiser, the Lincoln Navigator was somewhat obviously a re-worked Ford Expedition, and the original Mercedes-Benz ML was really a midsize body-on-frame SUV and a closer competitor to the Land Rover Discovery than it was to the Range Rover.

Cadillac Escalade
Photo credit: Cadillac

When it came to the really big machines in the segment, they were all fairly crude, and the benchmark really was just leather, woodgrain, and chrome. It didn’t really matter that the first-generation Escalade was just a hastily rebranded Yukon Denali built as an impulsive reaction to the Lincoln Navigator because the benchmark in the segment really wasn’t high. Cadillac just had to get its foot in the door and go from there, because the SUV boom would do much of the work.

See, the rules of cool had changed because we were looking at completely different buyer demographics. Back in the early 1980s, the sort of person buying an expensive, well-appointed compact sedan likely had suspiciously white teeth and a degree they were proud of. For the yuppie set, sophistication was the law of consumption, from European sport sedans to designer clothing to classical music. A stock market crash in 1987 took some of the sheen off of spending big, but only for so long.

By the late 1990s, conspicuous consumption was back, but it was totally different this time around. Instead of signalling to the world taste alongside affluence, the mission now was to be as showy as possible. Discreet watches were out, diamonds were in, McMansions were the move, and the currents of the extreme era fuelled aggressive displays of wealth. In this context, the Escalade was cool, and the quick-to-arrive sequel cemented the model’s status.

ADVERTISEMENT
Cadillac Escalade 2002
Photo credit: Cadillac

The 2002 Escalade, launched early in 2001, looked substantially different to a Yukon or a Tahoe, rode on the then-new GMT800 platform, offered plenty of toys, and was flashy and upscale enough to attract the sort of clientele that would thrust it into the spotlight. The resulting appearances on red carpets and “MTV Cribs” episodes turned the Escalade into an enduring cultural phenomenon that continues to generate big sales and profits.

Cadillac Escalade
Photo credit: Cadillac

The Escalade is obviously a hit, and it shows that General Motors was, in fact, capable of learning. It got in early on an emerging segment with no obvious hierarchy, quickly went to work on substantial visual and mechanical improvement, and played to the culture of the time. This expensive SUV may have launched with the same formula as the Cimarron, but by learning from the past, GM didn’t end up repeating it.

Top graphic credit: Cadillac

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mazzaratti5
Mazzaratti5
29 minutes ago

“…the magazine writing ‘pass the dramamine’ about its ride quality and this about its cabin:”

Missing quote here? Or did it not load correctly in my browser? I want to know what they thought about the cabin!!

SageWestyTulsa
SageWestyTulsa
1 hour ago

Oh boy. So, this time two years back, I was in the market for a replacement for my high-mile ’03 Suburban. As a father of three with a house in the suburbs, and the sorts of hobbies that require occasional use of a tandem-axle trailer, the GMT800 platform has proven itself irreplaceable over the last two decades. This would be number seven for me. Could I pony up for a newer-model GM truck? Sure. Will I? Absolutely not. Between the craptastic overall design and poor build quality of the 900s, and the well-known AFM, main bearing, and transmission problems that have plagued every generation post-2006, I’m just not willing to roll the dice.

Anyhow, my mission was to find (and likely overpay for) another low-mile ’05-’06 Suburban, but this time with captain’s chairs in the middle row because the bench got to be a pain. I looked, and looked, and looked—I was willing to travel a long way for the right truck. And looked some more, finding only wretched high-mile shitboxes, or very clean low-mile trucks without the options I was looking for. And that’s when it showed up on marketplace, only a hundred-odd miles away. A minty 2005 Escalade ESV in black, with only 88k miles on the clock. It had some fairly ghastly aftermarket black 20s (with brand-new Michelins!) and a truly tacky gold pinstripe down both sides, but otherwise it had everything I wanted, and that 6.0 was a bonus as far as I was concerned. As someone raised in a household that imbued us with a strong sense of frugality and a Puritanical devotion to “the base model,” I never, ever saw myself in an Escalade. But I also figured beggars can’t be choosers in the current market, and at least the windows were tinted nice and dark. I paid the man his money and drove it home.

Two years on, I absolutely love this truck. It does everything I need it to, it starts without fail, and it’s supremely comfortable on the highway. There’s plenty of room for the kids, their friends, and their stuff, and it tows like a beast. It’s currently showing just over 113k on the clock, and believe it or not it gets slightly better fuel mileage than the 2WD 5.3 Suburban it replaced. I peeled the pinstriping off the same day I brought it home, and the wheels have since been swapped out for a set of 22s(!) off a current-gen Escalade (I know, I don’t know who I’ve become).

And sometimes, when I’m alone, I crank up Jay Z and pretend like it’s 2005 again. It’s glorious.

Last edited 51 minutes ago by SageWestyTulsa
WaitWaitOkNow
WaitWaitOkNow
15 minutes ago
Reply to  SageWestyTulsa

I applaud this. You sound like you’re truly appreciating what you have and all the fun baggage it comes with. Sail on!

Squirrelmaster
Squirrelmaster
2 hours ago

I remember when I rode in a first gen Escalade back in 2001 or so. I daily drove a GMT400 pickup at the time and didn’t expect much of a difference, but I was honestly surprised by how much better the Escalade seemed inside and out. Sure, you could still plainly see the roots, but it still felt special. The first gen Navigator did too, but really only if you bought the one with the DOHC 5.4L instead of the SOHC 5.4L that was shared with the Expedition.

The World of Vee
The World of Vee
3 hours ago

I am not an SUV guy but I LOVE the Escalade and am considering an Escalade V to replace my E63 wagon and the love affair started back in 98 with the first gen. Other than the extremely ugly 3rd gen I think all of the escalades have otherwise been lookers, even if the 1st gen is a rebadged Yukon Denali.

Shame finding a survivor is basically impossible because in those press photos the damn thing looks so good I’d consider one today.

Eggsalad
Eggsalad
4 hours ago

By the mid- to late-1990’s, Cadillac was in real trouble. The folks who had previously thought highly of the brand were either literally dying, or moving on to other luxury brands. The Escalade may have literally saved Cadillac. There were several years in this era (IIRC) that the SUV outsold all of the sedan models *combined*. I bet they were hugely profitable as well, because other GM divisions had already paid most of the development costs. Remember that under the skin of an Escalade is a $16,000 Silverado 1500.

The Mark
The Mark
4 hours ago

So, in a way, we have Lincoln to blame for what has become a Nimitz-class showcase of poor taste and tackiness.

SageWestyTulsa
SageWestyTulsa
55 minutes ago
Reply to  The Mark

As an accidental Escalade owner, I find this hilarious and also spot-on.

Ignatius J. Reilly
Ignatius J. Reilly
5 hours ago

The Escalade wasn’t GM learning, and therefore, making predictions that turned out to be accurate. It is more of an example of GM doing the same thing over and over and randomly being right occasionally.

GM didn’t know that SUVs would be the only format being sold a few years later. It just happened to be that Cadillac had a customer base that only wanted luxo-barges, and repeating the same lazy badge-engineered version of product development just happened to work with a Tahoe better than a Cavalier.

Nlpnt
Nlpnt
5 hours ago

So, a Cadillac version of the Chevy Vega to compete with the BMW 2002 in 1971 would’ve been a credible foot in the door?

KevinB
KevinB
4 hours ago
Reply to  Nlpnt

It wouldn’t have been so farfetched if GM had put their minds to it and kept the bean counters out of it. I always though the Cimmaron was totally half-assed. Had they introduced it with a 5-speed, OHC 2.0-liter engine, fuel injection, used a unique dash and gauges, and changed the roofline so it wasn’t obvious it was a run of the mill J-Body, it would have stood a chance. Add 4-wheel disk brakes and a limited slip transaxle and they would have had true BMW killer.

Nlpnt
Nlpnt
1 hour ago
Reply to  KevinB

FWIU the Cimarron wasn’t scaled back by bean-counters so much as rushed into production at the behest of division management and dealers. Why it was only ever refined from there, mostly in ways not visible to casual observers, instead of short-cycling it in favor of a better-differentiated program based on the N body coming in for ’85 or ’86 is another matter.

TJ Heiser
TJ Heiser
1 hour ago
Reply to  Nlpnt

How about a Cadillac version of the Cosworth Vega? Now that would have been a contender to BMW.

Maryland J
Maryland J
5 hours ago

Lest we forget?

The BLS was a Saab 9-3, ritzed it up, and badged as a Cadillac to compete with compact luxury cars like the BMW 3 series and Mercedes C-Class.

That Cimarron photo wasn’t just ironic. It was instructional.

OldDrunkenSailor
OldDrunkenSailor
5 hours ago
Reply to  Maryland J

Having cross-shopped the 2003 Saab 9-3 against the Cadillac CTS of the same year when both were new, let’s not forget that the both the 9-3 and BLS were better than anything that Caddy was putting out at the time.

Luscious Jackson
Luscious Jackson
2 hours ago

As a former owner of a 2003 Saab 9-3 (Linear), the reality is that GM pushed that model out way too early. The amount of warranty work was incredible. It was half baked – nice when it wasn’t in the shop.

KevinB
KevinB
4 hours ago
Reply to  Maryland J

It was also a Chevy Malibu.

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
6 hours ago

The Escalade is proof people will pay for the badge if you market it right.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
6 hours ago

What separated the Escalade apart from other luxury SUV’s was the barn doors 😀

Yeah, I always liked the barn doors. Too bad the Escalade was only available with the in the first gen. Of course, GM ould kill the barn doors altogether later on 🙁

I like the first-gen Escalade more than I should.

Too bad we never got the BLS

19
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x