Home » If We Don’t Stop Them, Car UX Design Will End Up With On-Screen Steering Wheels

If We Don’t Stop Them, Car UX Design Will End Up With On-Screen Steering Wheels

Badfutureux Top

Who’s in the mood for a chilling glimpse into our possible future? You are! I mean, I assume you are. The glimpse into the future I’m talking about is one that was suggested by a story from last week, where we were scrutinizing the ideas put forth by Rivian’s Head of Software. If you didn’t get to see the story, I think it can best be summed up by saying that his ideas that a voice-controlled interface that utilizes AI agents will be the future of human/automotive interfaces were received, um, poorly.

And not just by the erudite, sexy Autopian audience, either: the People of Reddit were talking about that story, and they came to much the same conclusions, too. Nobody wants to talk to an AI agent to do things in their car. And nobody wants every damn thing to be on some interface accessible from a menu on a touchscreen. And yet it’s still happening.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

While we’re seeing some pushback, even legal-level pushback in some countries, there are still cars for sale today that require the glovebox to be opened from a touchscreen button, or HVAC vents that can only be moved by sliding your finger on a touchscreen drawing of a vent inches from the actual vent. We’re still very much in the middle of an era of automotive design and engineering that is being dominated by inane interface decisions, ones chosen because they fit into some perverse technological fetishes rather than anything that anyone actually, you know, wants.

So, with that in mind, I’d like you to join me in a little thought-experiment. Let’s just extrapolate from what we’ve been seeing already in the automotive world, and just imagine what may be coming next:

Touchscreen Control Steering

Swipetosteer
Image: GM/Cruise

Cars have been using drive-by-wire steering for well over a decade now, so this is completely possible, from a technological point of view. And I bet there’s some sick bastards who grew up vigorously masturbating to scenes of people flying starships by gliding their fingers over screens on shows like Star Trek: The Next Generation and now they have jobs designing car interfaces and you know some of them want to try this.

Just imagine it: no physical steering wheel, just an image of a wheel on a screen. And you use your finger to move the wheel, either by swiping right or left or dragging the on-screen wheel radially. It’d be awful! Just awful!

They’ll justify it by pointing out how there’s so much more legroom without the wheel, or that the car is “self-driving ready” or some other inanity. I hope if they do this they at least have a port so you can connect your Xbox controller or something to drive. Maybe even via Bluetooth, as long as you promise to make sure your controller is charged before heading out on the highway.

Toe-Touchscreen Pedal Interface

Toepedal System
Image: Tesla

Why should hands get all the fun! Let’s really be sickos here and consider this: a lower touchscreen for your feet (which will need to be bare to use, but don’t worry, that’s not actually illegal) that replaces the pedals. Now we’re really getting somewhere! The areas for the on-screen pedals will allow for slider-like control to adjust intensity, and, unlike boring old physical pedals, will have visual feedback for how much they’re being “pressed.”

And, just to keep it exciting, we’ll make the throttle slider vertical, and the brake one horizontal. Look how futuristic that looks! These should be an aftermarket option of Cybertrucks already!

Oh, and as a little Easter Egg bonus for the old folks, the high beam control could be on the screen down there, too, just like in the Before Times.

All-Voice AI Agent Command Driving

Voicethrottle
Image: Deposit Photos

What if we just take Rivian’s Chief Software guy at his word? Remember, the man stated this:

“The final north star I have is having voice [controls] become the primary means of interaction with the vehicle.” 

He pretty clearly believes that voice controls should be the “primary means of interaction” with your car. So what if we imagine what that would really be like? You could be sitting in your car, legs crossed, hands in your lap, and say

“Car, please select drive and apply the throttle to 18%.”

… and off you go. Maybe you’d say “wait, no, make it 45 mph” and the AI agent that controls your car’s LLM-based AI agent would say “Right, great idea. 45 mph sounds fantastic for this sort of driving. I’m sure everyone else in the left lane of this highway respects your careful and sedate approach to driving.

Or maybe you can tell it to brake by yelling “Slow down! Slow down!” and it can tell you something like “Slowing down seems like a great idea; I really like how you’re willing to pause your progress to see what’s happening around you. That’s one of your best qualities. So, just say the word and I’ll be happy to slow down.

And then you’ll yell “Stop stop stop we’re in a school zone there’s kids around please!

…and the AI will tell you “Sure, happy to stop. Stop what, though? Music? Navigation? Your reminders? Just let me know, and I’ll get to stopping as soon as possible.”

By this time you’re already a good 200 feet into the playground.

Touchscreen-Control Sun Visors

Visors Screencontrol
Image: Bentley

This one may be less dramatic than something like Total Voice Control, but I think it’s just as stupid and, given the fact that touchscreen-openable gloveboxes exist, unsettlingly plausible. Here’s what we’re thinking: touchscreen-controlled sun visors. You can try to flip down the visor manually, but the motor that drives it will offer a lot of resistance, and if you insist and try to force it, you’ll hear some horrible crunching sounds and end up with a floppy visor and a $2100 repair bill.

The touchscreen controls let you swipe up or down to move the visor position, or you can rely on a photocell that reads the amount of incoming light and adjusts the visors for you, though in practice this usually ends up with the visors flapping up and down all the freaking time, like a slow-motion chicken.

There’s also a toggle to open or close the vanity mirror in the visor, and you can even use a special app on your phone to have full visor angle control from anywhere in the world, anytime!

These all sound absurd, I know, but the scary thing is that, based on the developments we’ve seen so far, none of these are so outlandish that they couldn’t happen. These crazy bastards in charge of modern automotive UX have severe touchscreen and AI obsessions, and they’ll take us all down into automotive control hell if we don’t push back!

We must not let these fever dreams become reality! Fight back! We can’t give up the future to this madness!

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
112 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Albert Ferrer
Member
Albert Ferrer
1 month ago

For once Citroën’s “chanpignon brake button” might have been a forebearer of the screen actuated pedals…

https://citroenvie.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/1967-DS21-brake-buttoin.jpg

Bram Oude Elberink
Member
Bram Oude Elberink
1 month ago
Reply to  Albert Ferrer

While it is not in my DS, which is technically an ID and therefore lacks the champignon, I have driven multiple DS’s with champignon button brake buttons. They are only on/off switches the first time you operate them, once you get used to them they have a great pedal control, with included force feedback. I think the Citroën Champignons in this world are very saddened, not to say deeply offended by your comparison.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago

A decade ago if you told me touch-screen-controlled gloveboxes, air vents, sun visors–guess the two that are going to be real–I don’t think I could have with any confidence. So yeah, I assume all of this will be on the road shortly.

John McMillin
John McMillin
1 month ago

This is why I won’t own a car from circa 2017-2027 (?).

Albert Ferrer
Member
Albert Ferrer
1 month ago
Reply to  John McMillin

Actually my 2026 Clio is fine. Climate controls are entirely physical, there’s the classic Renault radio satellite controls and three chunky levers for lights, wipers and gears. The steering wheel has mechanical buttons that are retroilluminated.

Lotsofchops
Member
Lotsofchops
1 month ago

I think a lot of modern car designers dislike driving, or don’t actually drive themselves. That’s the only logical explanation for their dumb designs.

John McMillin
John McMillin
1 month ago
Reply to  Lotsofchops

On a Carmudgeon episode, the host revealed that as of a few years ago, Subaru’s chief engineers in charge of handling and audio systems didn’t own a drivers’ license or a car. It was all being done in simulation.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  John McMillin

!!!!!

Albert Ferrer
Member
Albert Ferrer
1 month ago
Reply to  John McMillin

Well the same team of engineers taking care of handling and audio systems already seems a set up set for disaster…

Lotsofchops
Member
Lotsofchops
1 month ago
Reply to  John McMillin

Man, that’s a depressing birthday present for me. Being burdened with this knowledge.

Goblin
Goblin
1 month ago

Well, it’s at least partly in your hands, no?

You do reviews, you go to events, you do official test drives – make it official (and communicate it) that you will take points away for nasty interfaces.

If needed, make a clear and unified points system, start with the max and take points away for UX idiocy.

Determine how much distraction typical UX operations should represent, and take points if it’s more than the minimum.

Ex:

HVAC – a 100% rating is:

a command (round knob or slider) that is easy to reach and find without having to take your eyes off the road, recognizable in a tactile way (ex: different knurl patterns for different knobs), for both temperature and fan.

The Mode HVAC button should be either a tactile round knob as well, or dedicated buttons that require no more than a second of looking to be found and operated.

Throw the HVAC to plus/minus buttons? Take points away. Throw them to touchscreen? Take more points away.

Same for radio, wipers (are the intermittent settings as easy to set and view on the cluster as in a HyunKia?), etc.

Space
Space
1 month ago
Reply to  Goblin

I’ll add manual door handles to the list.
This is a good idea, car reviewers for years have been influencing design. When the autopian dies reviews they should give a point scale score.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Space

I know it was a typo but my heart sank reading “when the autopian dies.”

Goblin
Goblin
1 month ago
Reply to  Space

Manual door handles are a no-brainer, they are a safety feature. That’s not even in the UX area. 10% immediate off for not having them. 5% bonus if they can be opened with gloves, and/or with a pinkie or a single finger when you’re holding a toddler in your right arm and a shopping bag in the left, and need to open the rear door to throw them both in.

ClutchAbuse
Member
ClutchAbuse
1 month ago

I have yet to get the voice assistant in my ID4 to do literally anything, forcing me to use the convoluted (two different screens for climate control? Really!?) infotainment system. It’s more than happy to pop up when anything remotely sounding like ID is said though.
Speaking of which, you know what sounds like ID? Daddy.
I have two small kids, you figure out the rest.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  ClutchAbuse

You can be one of those families where the kids call you by your first name. We all had at least one friend who did that, right?

Pru L
Pru L
1 month ago

I fear that saying this will give certain people ideas, but with the way that Elon Musk’s companies have been eating each others tails in a Gordian knot of ouroboroses, we could have a future where Tesla releases a car that requires you to have a Neurolink chip installed into your brain meats to control it. You just think really loud at the car, and the chip will direct Full Self-Driving (Supervised) to take you to your destination. Instead of one gigantic touchscreen, it’ll be a single receiver that can interface with your brain-computer, for that clean ultra-minimalist aesthetic. Also, if your passengers want to open a window or whatever, they’ll need a Neurolink chip too.

Last edited 1 month ago by Pru L
JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Pru L

You’ll also need to link your Neurolinks. I think that’s the sex of the future.

Pru L
Pru L
1 month ago
Reply to  JJ

Take the Lover’s Lane wherever you go in your Tesla with Neurolink! Still supervise FSD while getting your literal brain blown out by your passenger via shared link! Note: not responsible for blowing out brains onto windshields.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Pru L

always use protection.

Mechjaz
Member
Mechjaz
1 month ago

Y’know, I am feeling sexy and erudite. Nailed it, Torch.

Casey Blake
Casey Blake
1 month ago

But can we talk about the alternate universe where in the 1970’s Mercedes had a sub-brand with a turtle/laurel logo, which was so important that it inspired the touch screen steering wheel design?

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
1 month ago

“The road to hell is paved with good intentions”
And UX dillwads that won’t be happy till humanity loses the ability to function without AI.
And SCREENS! Damn Them!
Changed the oil in my 2010 MB this morning. Expect to keep it till all this freezes over.

Bkp
Member
Bkp
1 month ago

“slow-motion chicken” Hah! Needed a good laugh after the email bombshell from a PCB vendor pushing back a rush order by a little over a week and into we’re screwed on delivery territory.

86TVan
Member
86TVan
1 month ago

YOU LEAVE MY VAPORWARE R3 OUT OF THIS

Church
Member
Church
1 month ago
Reply to  86TVan

No, I’m more worried this week that it isn’t vaporware but something worse entirely.

Emil Minty
Emil Minty
1 month ago

I look forward to complaining about how the image of a yoke on a Tesla screen is so much harder to control than a regular wheel image.

Canopysaurus
Member
Canopysaurus
1 month ago

I want a revolution against AI in cars. The goal is nothing but human controlled cars. We can call them Nautomobiles.

Taargus Taargus
Member
Taargus Taargus
1 month ago

At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if Rivian revealed their new vehicle interface to be inspired by Mr. Garrison’s “It”.

Emil Minty
Emil Minty
1 month ago

How about Clippy instead?

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Emil Minty

isn’t AI basically people who thought Clippy was amazing and needed to be in every corner of our lives?

Spikersaurusrex
Member
Spikersaurusrex
1 month ago

Thanks, but I’ll walk.

Slower Louder
Member
Slower Louder
1 month ago

I’m thinking more Captain Picard, “all ahead full! Three degrees left rudder! Skateboarder at 2 o’clock! Evasive action! “ etc. But your chatty and asskissing AI sounds unfortunately realistic.

Emil Minty
Emil Minty
1 month ago
Reply to  Slower Louder

I’ll at least sign up for Make It So! instead of Hey Google.

Last edited 1 month ago by Emil Minty
JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Slower Louder

This is a fantastic point—–a thoughtful yet prescient idea that will make a real impact on the future of automotive development

Harvey Firebirdman
Member
Harvey Firebirdman
1 month ago

*inserts edited gif to say: “don’t you put that evil on me torchy bobby”*

Liyan Zhu
Liyan Zhu
1 month ago

I once was asked to explain basic car things to an aspiring design student from Art Center College of Design. One of the concepts that was presented to me was an iPod scroll wheel style steering wheel. We’re not far from a version of that now, except with the wheel being integrated into a screen.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Liyan Zhu

I really, really think the problem is we spent the last century having millions of people all chipping away at the same challenges and ultimately getting as close to the platonic ideal as we’re gonna get in terms of common interfaces and the like. So there’s not much left for future generations to do other than come up with idiotic “innovations” for things that already work great (ie: steering wheels).

Jerry Thomas
Jerry Thomas
1 month ago

Bring back Keeble!

Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
1 month ago

There’s also a toggle to open or close the vanity mirror in the visor, and you can even use Visor angle control by a special app on your phone to have full visor angle control from anywhere in the world, anytime!*

*Visor angle control by app requires additional subscription.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago

don’t be so cynical–they wouldn’t do that. Subscription will unlock additional degrees of movement. Plus they’ll throw in the first 3 months free at time of purchase.

MondialMatt
Member
MondialMatt
1 month ago

If there were a way to make this work, there would be a good driving game for a phone. I haven’t found one that I can control. So, yeah, worried.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

I know you are being sarcastic and I would enjoy the column aot more if I didn’t think the Rivian moron wasn’t reading it holding his device in one hand hit other device in the other masturbating to your ideas while screaming yes Alexa yes. Frankly is AI going to be able to tell the difference between commands to it vs a song on the radio or a conversation with a passenger? Will the driver in addition to control of the driving instructions also have to instruct it for the wife who wants her vanity mirror down for makeup, the HVAC control for 4 different areas of the car and the video and volume showing in the back for the rugrats? Seems needlessly suicidal to me.

Life’s short; drive fast!
Member
Life’s short; drive fast!
1 month ago

So you’re saying that one day it is going to possible to get somewhere in my car just by playing with my joystick?

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago

Yes but by that time it won’t be a joystick just a floppy dick. Oops I meant floppy disc.

OrigamiSensei
Member
OrigamiSensei
1 month ago

Seems like a good time to channel the all-time great, Lou Reed:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zWwmfQvdCI

Life’s short; drive fast!
Member
Life’s short; drive fast!
1 month ago
Reply to  OrigamiSensei
Emil Minty
Emil Minty
1 month ago

Blue Cruise and Blue Chews, baby!

Who Knows
Member
Who Knows
1 month ago

A couple things that need to be addressed:

  • the “touchscreen controlled steering” shows an interior of a Bolt, but slightly different than I’m used to. That screen sometimes freezes, or stays in backup mode for several minutes, and reboots. This is bad enough when heat and such can’t be turned on, but imagine the fun if you can’t steer for several minutes because the screen froze up.
  • Along those lines, the ergonomics of steering on a central screen seems terrible (although it does allow the passenger to take over driving duties while the driver naps on the interstate). What needs to happen is a touch sensitive seat for steering. That way, the driver’s arms can be relaxed, and they can use their butt for steering. Flex the left butt muscle to turn left, and the right butt muscle to turn right, and the seat touch sensors can pick up on the change in pressure. I honestly would like to drive a prototype with this system, just for fun. Other fun functionality could be added to the “touch butt seat” too.
1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
1 month ago
Reply to  Who Knows

Hey with AI maybe you can have a Maserati interior on the screen inside your Mazda exterior

Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
1 month ago
Reply to  Who Knows

Your second point – the ancient memory chips deep in my head that are so buried in dust that they sometimes think they’re a Game&Watch tell me that some time long ago, probably on the J——- site, Torch proposed this exact thing. Butt cheek clench steering.

Last edited 1 month ago by Twobox Designgineer
Guido Sarducci
Member
Guido Sarducci
1 month ago

I’ve seen a buttock wedge, on the rack right next to the dildos personal massagers. The wedge I saw was likely not intended for braking, other than possibly breaking your buttock.

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago

This is also an even stupider idea than the steer-by-joystick fad. Your post on why that would never work is one of my favs.

Who Knows
Member
Who Knows
1 month ago

I wonder if it would be possible to setup seat sensors to fully control a car through butt clenching- steering, braking, acceleration, all of it? Next Autopian Labs project, and take it to an autocross? Literally tight cheeking it through all the corners?

John McMillin
John McMillin
1 month ago
Reply to  Who Knows

Watch out! A large fart could put you off the road.

Who Knows
Member
Who Knows
1 month ago
Reply to  John McMillin

Lol, so the usual…

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Who Knows

This is, of course, stupid however, the natural reaction to OH SHIT I’M GONNA DIE is to pucker up that sphincter. So, I think in that sense it would actually be an improvement vs all the time it takes for the mental processing and “nerve lag” to press down on a brake pedal.

Who Knows
Member
Who Knows
1 month ago
Reply to  JJ

If the car detects the driver pooping themselves, it could just activate full emergency braking

JJ
Member
JJ
1 month ago
Reply to  Who Knows

I think, regardless of the situation, that is the correct response.

112
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x