Who’s in the mood for a chilling glimpse into our possible future? You are! I mean, I assume you are. The glimpse into the future I’m talking about is one that was suggested by a story from last week, where we were scrutinizing the ideas put forth by Rivian’s Head of Software. If you didn’t get to see the story, I think it can best be summed up by saying that his ideas that a voice-controlled interface that utilizes AI agents will be the future of human/automotive interfaces were received, um, poorly.
And not just by the erudite, sexy Autopian audience, either: the People of Reddit were talking about that story, and they came to much the same conclusions, too. Nobody wants to talk to an AI agent to do things in their car. And nobody wants every damn thing to be on some interface accessible from a menu on a touchscreen. And yet it’s still happening.
While we’re seeing some pushback, even legal-level pushback in some countries, there are still cars for sale today that require the glovebox to be opened from a touchscreen button, or HVAC vents that can only be moved by sliding your finger on a touchscreen drawing of a vent inches from the actual vent. We’re still very much in the middle of an era of automotive design and engineering that is being dominated by inane interface decisions, ones chosen because they fit into some perverse technological fetishes rather than anything that anyone actually, you know, wants.
So, with that in mind, I’d like you to join me in a little thought-experiment. Let’s just extrapolate from what we’ve been seeing already in the automotive world, and just imagine what may be coming next:
Touchscreen Control Steering

Cars have been using drive-by-wire steering for well over a decade now, so this is completely possible, from a technological point of view. And I bet there’s some sick bastards who grew up vigorously masturbating to scenes of people flying starships by gliding their fingers over screens on shows like Star Trek: The Next Generation and now they have jobs designing car interfaces and you know some of them want to try this.
Just imagine it: no physical steering wheel, just an image of a wheel on a screen. And you use your finger to move the wheel, either by swiping right or left or dragging the on-screen wheel radially. It’d be awful! Just awful!
They’ll justify it by pointing out how there’s so much more legroom without the wheel, or that the car is “self-driving ready” or some other inanity. I hope if they do this they at least have a port so you can connect your Xbox controller or something to drive. Maybe even via Bluetooth, as long as you promise to make sure your controller is charged before heading out on the highway.
Toe-Touchscreen Pedal Interface

Why should hands get all the fun! Let’s really be sickos here and consider this: a lower touchscreen for your feet (which will need to be bare to use, but don’t worry, that’s not actually illegal) that replaces the pedals. Now we’re really getting somewhere! The areas for the on-screen pedals will allow for slider-like control to adjust intensity, and, unlike boring old physical pedals, will have visual feedback for how much they’re being “pressed.”
And, just to keep it exciting, we’ll make the throttle slider vertical, and the brake one horizontal. Look how futuristic that looks! These should be an aftermarket option of Cybertrucks already!
Oh, and as a little Easter Egg bonus for the old folks, the high beam control could be on the screen down there, too, just like in the Before Times.
All-Voice AI Agent Command Driving

What if we just take Rivian’s Chief Software guy at his word? Remember, the man stated this:
“The final north star I have is having voice [controls] become the primary means of interaction with the vehicle.”
He pretty clearly believes that voice controls should be the “primary means of interaction” with your car. So what if we imagine what that would really be like? You could be sitting in your car, legs crossed, hands in your lap, and say
“Car, please select drive and apply the throttle to 18%.”
… and off you go. Maybe you’d say “wait, no, make it 45 mph” and the AI agent that controls your car’s LLM-based AI agent would say “Right, great idea. 45 mph sounds fantastic for this sort of driving. I’m sure everyone else in the left lane of this highway respects your careful and sedate approach to driving.”
Or maybe you can tell it to brake by yelling “Slow down! Slow down!” and it can tell you something like “Slowing down seems like a great idea; I really like how you’re willing to pause your progress to see what’s happening around you. That’s one of your best qualities. So, just say the word and I’ll be happy to slow down.”
And then you’ll yell “Stop stop stop we’re in a school zone there’s kids around please!”
…and the AI will tell you “Sure, happy to stop. Stop what, though? Music? Navigation? Your reminders? Just let me know, and I’ll get to stopping as soon as possible.”
By this time you’re already a good 200 feet into the playground.
Touchscreen-Control Sun Visors

This one may be less dramatic than something like Total Voice Control, but I think it’s just as stupid and, given the fact that touchscreen-openable gloveboxes exist, unsettlingly plausible. Here’s what we’re thinking: touchscreen-controlled sun visors. You can try to flip down the visor manually, but the motor that drives it will offer a lot of resistance, and if you insist and try to force it, you’ll hear some horrible crunching sounds and end up with a floppy visor and a $2100 repair bill.
The touchscreen controls let you swipe up or down to move the visor position, or you can rely on a photocell that reads the amount of incoming light and adjusts the visors for you, though in practice this usually ends up with the visors flapping up and down all the freaking time, like a slow-motion chicken.
There’s also a toggle to open or close the vanity mirror in the visor, and you can even use a special app on your phone to have full visor angle control from anywhere in the world, anytime!
These all sound absurd, I know, but the scary thing is that, based on the developments we’ve seen so far, none of these are so outlandish that they couldn’t happen. These crazy bastards in charge of modern automotive UX have severe touchscreen and AI obsessions, and they’ll take us all down into automotive control hell if we don’t push back!
We must not let these fever dreams become reality! Fight back! We can’t give up the future to this madness!









For once Citroën’s “chanpignon brake button” might have been a forebearer of the screen actuated pedals…
https://citroenvie.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/1967-DS21-brake-buttoin.jpg
While it is not in my DS, which is technically an ID and therefore lacks the champignon, I have driven multiple DS’s with champignon button brake buttons. They are only on/off switches the first time you operate them, once you get used to them they have a great pedal control, with included force feedback. I think the Citroën Champignons in this world are very saddened, not to say deeply offended by your comparison.
A decade ago if you told me touch-screen-controlled gloveboxes, air vents, sun visors–guess the two that are going to be real–I don’t think I could have with any confidence. So yeah, I assume all of this will be on the road shortly.
This is why I won’t own a car from circa 2017-2027 (?).
Actually my 2026 Clio is fine. Climate controls are entirely physical, there’s the classic Renault radio satellite controls and three chunky levers for lights, wipers and gears. The steering wheel has mechanical buttons that are retroilluminated.
I think a lot of modern car designers dislike driving, or don’t actually drive themselves. That’s the only logical explanation for their dumb designs.
On a Carmudgeon episode, the host revealed that as of a few years ago, Subaru’s chief engineers in charge of handling and audio systems didn’t own a drivers’ license or a car. It was all being done in simulation.
!!!!!
Well the same team of engineers taking care of handling and audio systems already seems a set up set for disaster…
Man, that’s a depressing birthday present for me. Being burdened with this knowledge.
Well, it’s at least partly in your hands, no?
You do reviews, you go to events, you do official test drives – make it official (and communicate it) that you will take points away for nasty interfaces.
If needed, make a clear and unified points system, start with the max and take points away for UX idiocy.
Determine how much distraction typical UX operations should represent, and take points if it’s more than the minimum.
Ex:
HVAC – a 100% rating is:
a command (round knob or slider) that is easy to reach and find without having to take your eyes off the road, recognizable in a tactile way (ex: different knurl patterns for different knobs), for both temperature and fan.
The Mode HVAC button should be either a tactile round knob as well, or dedicated buttons that require no more than a second of looking to be found and operated.
Throw the HVAC to plus/minus buttons? Take points away. Throw them to touchscreen? Take more points away.
Same for radio, wipers (are the intermittent settings as easy to set and view on the cluster as in a HyunKia?), etc.
I’ll add manual door handles to the list.
This is a good idea, car reviewers for years have been influencing design. When the autopian dies reviews they should give a point scale score.
I know it was a typo but my heart sank reading “when the autopian dies.”
Manual door handles are a no-brainer, they are a safety feature. That’s not even in the UX area. 10% immediate off for not having them. 5% bonus if they can be opened with gloves, and/or with a pinkie or a single finger when you’re holding a toddler in your right arm and a shopping bag in the left, and need to open the rear door to throw them both in.
I have yet to get the voice assistant in my ID4 to do literally anything, forcing me to use the convoluted (two different screens for climate control? Really!?) infotainment system. It’s more than happy to pop up when anything remotely sounding like ID is said though.
Speaking of which, you know what sounds like ID? Daddy.
I have two small kids, you figure out the rest.
You can be one of those families where the kids call you by your first name. We all had at least one friend who did that, right?
I fear that saying this will give certain people ideas, but with the way that Elon Musk’s companies have been eating each others tails in a Gordian knot of ouroboroses, we could have a future where Tesla releases a car that requires you to have a Neurolink chip installed into your brain meats to control it. You just think really loud at the car, and the chip will direct Full Self-Driving (Supervised) to take you to your destination. Instead of one gigantic touchscreen, it’ll be a single receiver that can interface with your brain-computer, for that clean ultra-minimalist aesthetic. Also, if your passengers want to open a window or whatever, they’ll need a Neurolink chip too.
You’ll also need to link your Neurolinks. I think that’s the sex of the future.
Take the Lover’s Lane wherever you go in your Tesla with Neurolink! Still supervise FSD while getting your literal brain blown out by your passenger via shared link! Note: not responsible for blowing out brains onto windshields.
always use protection.
Y’know, I am feeling sexy and erudite. Nailed it, Torch.
But can we talk about the alternate universe where in the 1970’s Mercedes had a sub-brand with a turtle/laurel logo, which was so important that it inspired the touch screen steering wheel design?
“The road to hell is paved with good intentions”
And UX dillwads that won’t be happy till humanity loses the ability to function without AI.
And SCREENS! Damn Them!
Changed the oil in my 2010 MB this morning. Expect to keep it till all this freezes over.
“slow-motion chicken” Hah! Needed a good laugh after the email bombshell from a PCB vendor pushing back a rush order by a little over a week and into we’re screwed on delivery territory.
YOU LEAVE MY VAPORWARE R3 OUT OF THIS
No, I’m more worried this week that it isn’t vaporware but something worse entirely.
I look forward to complaining about how the image of a yoke on a Tesla screen is so much harder to control than a regular wheel image.
I want a revolution against AI in cars. The goal is nothing but human controlled cars. We can call them Nautomobiles.
At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if Rivian revealed their new vehicle interface to be inspired by Mr. Garrison’s “It”.
How about Clippy instead?
isn’t AI basically people who thought Clippy was amazing and needed to be in every corner of our lives?
Thanks, but I’ll walk.
I’m thinking more Captain Picard, “all ahead full! Three degrees left rudder! Skateboarder at 2 o’clock! Evasive action! “ etc. But your chatty and asskissing AI sounds unfortunately realistic.
I’ll at least sign up for Make It So! instead of Hey Google.
This is a fantastic point—–a thoughtful yet prescient idea that will make a real impact on the future of automotive development
*inserts edited gif to say: “don’t you put that evil on me torchy bobby”*
I once was asked to explain basic car things to an aspiring design student from Art Center College of Design. One of the concepts that was presented to me was an iPod scroll wheel style steering wheel. We’re not far from a version of that now, except with the wheel being integrated into a screen.
I really, really think the problem is we spent the last century having millions of people all chipping away at the same challenges and ultimately getting as close to the platonic ideal as we’re gonna get in terms of common interfaces and the like. So there’s not much left for future generations to do other than come up with idiotic “innovations” for things that already work great (ie: steering wheels).
Bring back Keeble!
*Visor angle control by app requires additional subscription.
don’t be so cynical–they wouldn’t do that. Subscription will unlock additional degrees of movement. Plus they’ll throw in the first 3 months free at time of purchase.
If there were a way to make this work, there would be a good driving game for a phone. I haven’t found one that I can control. So, yeah, worried.
I know you are being sarcastic and I would enjoy the column aot more if I didn’t think the Rivian moron wasn’t reading it holding his device in one hand hit other device in the other masturbating to your ideas while screaming yes Alexa yes. Frankly is AI going to be able to tell the difference between commands to it vs a song on the radio or a conversation with a passenger? Will the driver in addition to control of the driving instructions also have to instruct it for the wife who wants her vanity mirror down for makeup, the HVAC control for 4 different areas of the car and the video and volume showing in the back for the rugrats? Seems needlessly suicidal to me.
So you’re saying that one day it is going to possible to get somewhere in my car just by playing with my joystick?
Yes but by that time it won’t be a joystick just a floppy dick. Oops I meant floppy disc.
Seems like a good time to channel the all-time great, Lou Reed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zWwmfQvdCI
Or Michael Franks…
https://youtu.be/At-zn9mPyNs?si=aOkVjybfMmtt7bM7
Blue Cruise and Blue Chews, baby!
A couple things that need to be addressed:
Hey with AI maybe you can have a Maserati interior on the screen inside your Mazda exterior
Your second point – the ancient memory chips deep in my head that are so buried in dust that they sometimes think they’re a Game&Watch tell me that some time long ago, probably on the J——- site, Torch proposed this exact thing. Butt cheek clench steering.
It was a buttock wedge, for braking! But good memory!
I’ve seen a buttock wedge, on the rack right next to the
dildospersonal massagers. The wedge I saw was likely not intended for braking, other than possibly breaking your buttock.This is also an even stupider idea than the steer-by-joystick fad. Your post on why that would never work is one of my favs.
I wonder if it would be possible to setup seat sensors to fully control a car through butt clenching- steering, braking, acceleration, all of it? Next Autopian Labs project, and take it to an autocross? Literally tight cheeking it through all the corners?
Watch out! A large fart could put you off the road.
Lol, so the usual…
This is, of course, stupid however, the natural reaction to OH SHIT I’M GONNA DIE is to pucker up that sphincter. So, I think in that sense it would actually be an improvement vs all the time it takes for the mental processing and “nerve lag” to press down on a brake pedal.
If the car detects the driver pooping themselves, it could just activate full emergency braking
I think, regardless of the situation, that is the correct response.