Sometimes, it’s good to have evergreen causes you believe in. Of course, these causes should be ones of deep, ideally global importance, causes worthy of your continual time, effort, and attention. Things that matter. That’s why I decided it was time to take a moment to clarify and expose a common fallacy used to attempt to refute a law of the universe I have chosen to champion, that the eyes of a car’s face should be the headlights, not the windshield. You know, like in Pixar’s Cars series.
Yes, this is a drum I’ve been beating since, jeez, 2011, when I first publicly called out Pixar for their reckless abandonment of headlight-eyes in favor of windshield-eyes. At the time, this view was met with a fair amount of hostility, and understandably so: Pixar is a beloved organization to a vast number of people, and any criticism of their choices can be read as an attack.


Also, Pixar’s motives and reasoning is fairly sound: they didn’t want the faces so low to the ground, to avoid the cars feeling like “snakes,” and I suppose to also hide the interior, which once you realize it may have seats and a steering wheel and other normal car fittings, then brings up all kinds of disturbing and unpleasant questions that everyone at Pixar would rather avoid, and I know because I asked once.

And, yes, I know about Celine Dephare.
Okay, but back to what I need to address today: the recurring argument that, in the Cars universe, headlights can’t be eyes because headlights have been established to be something else. Specifically, breasts.
Yes, breasts! And this all comes from this lightheartedly racy little joke that was in the first Cars movie, which features two Lightning McQueen groupies, who are female-presenting Mazda Miatas named, cleverly, Mia and Tia. In one scene, Mia and Tia flash their pop-up headlights at McQueen, referencing the act of flashing breasts at a race event, which is, of course, a longstanding and hallowed tradition. Here’s the scene:
It’s a funny little gag, I suppose, and it’s well understood to imply breast flashing (to the point that some sites seem to get weirdly worked up about it), especially because the word “headlight” has been used as slang for a woman’s breasts since the 1940s. [Ed note: I am also reminded of this scene from Dumb and Dumber – Pete] And, as I mentioned, references to this are often used to refute assertions that the headlights should, in fact, be the eyes of a car, stating that this scene confirms what car headlights true analogue is: breasts.
The problem here, though, is that this association, outside of its one-time use in the Mia and Tia gag, makes no sense. If headlights are intended to represent breasts, then that means pretty much every other non-pop-up headlight car on the road is exposing their nipples to everyone, all the time.
Sally Carerra, the Porsche-lawyer who was McQueen’s primary love interest in the movies, looks like this:

So, based on the argument that headlights are breasts, does that mean Sally there is just running around topless all the time? And, based on McQueen’s reaction to Mia and Tia, it doesn’t seem like the Cars universe culture is breast-agnostic; he had a reaction to them.
Then does that mean that, somehow, Sally decided to show up to court with her breasts out here:
Of course, it’s not just her; everyone in that courtroom has their nips out, from the cop to the judge to everyone viewing the proceedings. It’s downtown Breastadelphia, Titsylvania in there.
By the logic of the headlights-are-breasts faction, this scene shows a man-car with exposed nipples, one of which has been lost due to injury or neglect, and another wearing what appear to be fake, stick-on breasts:

Clearly, this logic does not hold up.
So, this is all just to say I stand by my belief that headlights remain the preferable anthropomorphized car-eyes, and any argument that Pixar intended to suggest that headlights are breasts outside of one throwaway gag that goes against the entire rest of the established culture and behavior of the Cars universe is inherently wrong.
So there.
But if the headlights are breasts, then what is the grill opening?
Take the Alfa Romeo Giulia for instance, what’s going on there?
Maybe if someone at Stellantis took the initiative to make panties for Alfa Romeos that would make sales pick up.
“But if the headlights are breasts, then what is the grill opening?”
OBVIOUSLY it’s the VAGINA.
Yup… all the cars in the movies have vaginas. REAL question is… for the male cars, where are their penises?
Obviously… LeBra is an S&M mask for Cars not a bra.
I’m now imagining a LeCar wearing a LeBra and it’s coming out vaguely kinky French maid-ish…
A friend had one on her New Beetle.
She tried to name the car Ringo but everyone called it The Gimp.
Whips and (tire) chains sold separately!!LMAO
Any discussion of “headlights” as slang breasts makes me think of an episode of You Can’t Do That On Television where two boys in their early teens have a magazine open to a centerfold and one of them exclaims out loud, “hey check out those headlights!”
A slightly older girl hears this and goes over to them, starting in on a lecture about not treating women as objects and stops mid sentence before saying ” – that’s a car magazine!”
The one boy says, “yeah, that’s what I was saying, check out those headlights!”
I remember watching this show, but I didn’t know Torch was a cast member.
Dredging up one throwaway gag to disprove the obviously logical conclusion that headlights should be eyes smacks of the tiresome droning about what is and isn’t (sorry) canon in the various Star Warses.
I care nothing about Star Wars, but love to needle my husband, who is a fan, that the 1978 “Star Wars Holiday Special” has to be “canon” because it introduced the character of Boba Fett. This means that Bea Arthur as bartender in the cantina where those dudes wail their Jizz is also canon. I stand firmly by this.
Somehow I had found and watched the Holiday Special online years ago, before we met, but my husband had never seen it until we dredged it up again last year or the year before. Happy Life Day everybody!
I tried to watch the Holiday Special but it was just so wretched.
The best part is that since only bootleg versions exist, the Christmas 1978 commercials are part of it, a window into a lost world of union-made underwear, fake-wood paneled Mercury station wagons and calling after 9 to save on long distance charges. Remember, “Tobor” is Robot spelled backwards!
1978 Star Wars Holiday Special Commercials — all 19 minutes of them! – YouTube
The Holiday Special including the commercials, are even better when watched through the lens of Rifftrax. ENJOY!
Oh man… I think I’d have to have some marijuana or marijuana edibles before watching that. I watched 5 minutes and I had to stop… even with the funny commentary.
Interesting how those commercials talk about quality… just as GM was about to enter its WORST years as it relates to quality.
Yep. Always take advertising with many grains of salt.
Yub nub.
Utinni!
Oh my god, you are so needlessly evil! Here, have an upvote (or rahter a smiley face thing)!
“I care nothing about Star Wars”
“Somehow I had found and watched the Holiday Special online years ago”
Yep, that’ll do it.
I guess that would make the mutant hooker for Total Recall a Tucker Torpedo.
Also Francisco Scaramanga and his superfluous papilla as the male equivalent.
Don’t forget the Tatras, from some 77 models to some 97 models (and, I suppose, all the 87 models in between).
But since we follow The Truth, both Tuckers and Tatras have these characters to choose from:
There are others on the Reddit thread I looked them up (because of course Reddit would have a thread about three eyed chracters)
Sure, but is there a Reddit thread about three-breasted characters? Don’t answer that.
:-!
Tat(r)as.
Isn’t that a little kinky?
In light of this I’m even more disturbed by the Nissan Juke.
I think the Miata twins should have popped their hoods open instead.
I would consider that equivalent to opening your chest cavity to reveal your organs. Which is also kinda hot.
Being a racecar sans headlights, Lightning therefore has no nipples?
Is there evidence of car umbilicals? Or baby car nursing?
and I guess critically, Lightning has effectively pasties over the lack of nipples spot.
How does one move to Titsylvania? Asking for a a friend, couldn’t find any flights out.
You have to go through Newark.
Actually, you fly to Vancouver Island via Victoria. Then you have to find the famous Secret Garden. After that it’s a snap to Titsylvania.
Nudewark?
Just north of Gropa Cabana.
The connecting airport is Cincinatitty.
Or Schenectitty NY
The only way is by road, you have to take just the right combination of turns through Breezewood.
Please don’t joke about that. Breezewood pa is a nightmare to navigate in a semi. Mostly because of semis
https://comb.io/UpSSzC.gif
You first have to get two Pickets to Tittsburgh.
If you can’t find Titsylvania, don’t even try to get to Clitoria.
Tou have to be driving a Vulvo?
You have two Brest connections you can take, one in France, the other in Belarus. Look it up!
It’s just north of Balltmore
There’s a great headlight gag in the Movie Top Secret!
If you haven’t seen that movie, find a way to. It’s like Airplane! but actually sillier and full of more gags. Stars a very young Val Kilmer and yes, he is the cause of the headlight gag.
And if each headlight is a breast, is each lightbulb a nipple?
We need to have a talk with Porsche…
Mutants!
The premise of the article makes no sense, since breasts are not located above the mouth.
The flashing gag is clever, though, but most people probably missed it because it went by so quickly.
Glad you got that off your chest.
And the Nissan Juke is like a mama doggo who just had puppies! Dawwwwww.
Careful what you wish for, Torch. We’re dangerously close to getting a live-action Cars remake and with the way those kinds of movies are going, they’re going to go your route and we’ll have uncanny valley cars with headlight eyes.
Then you’re just on the slippery slope to a live Cars equivalent of the Cats (2019) butthole cut…
I’ve been following Torch’s musings on the anatomy of Cars since 2011, and hope it never stops.
Ok, I came here once again to refute you based on Susie’s the Little Blue Coupe and One Cab’s Family, both from 1952, establishing precedence, but then I wandered into the seedy underbelly of the internets, a dark scary place, cartoons from the 30s. And it looks like indeed in Betty Boop the headlights are eyes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNb6tFVgBRg&t=120s&ab_channel=Mac%27sMotorCityGarage
I do not yield sir, and the headlights argument further bolsters windshield eyes are the proper placement(I mean it’s like the Cats movie, they’re all basically walking around nude too). But just noting there are examples of both.
Jason is just trying to stay abreast of the controversy. Don’t turn it into a tit-for-tat.
I’m not trying to make mountains out of molehills, just lifting my voice on separate points of view.
ctrl+f “my eyes are up here”
Phrase not found
Not to mention the other implication here – if the headlights are breasts, then all the characters’ breasts are between their eyes and mouths.
The ol’ forehead boob.
I guess it’s been a long time since you last saw a human face.
Wait…headlights are…nostrils?
Not only that, if headlights are intended to represent breasts, then those breasts are positioned above the mouth…
Maybe that’s not a mouth, but is actually a vagina…
OH GAWD!!!
The headlights are also typically between the windshield “eyes” and the grille “mouth”. Which is an unsettling thought, regardless of if they’re covered up.
See my note about the need for panties on the Alfa Romeo Giulia.
So I have to ask if the headlights are the eyes and there is no drivers what is the windshield? I know MIB had ball chineans but are the cars in a on off childrens movies ball foreheadians? You can’t reverse decades of history and try to eliminate it because of a children’s movie that doesn’t even explain it and has questionable proof. Is Disney Cars supposed to be a sexual car movie? Why weren’t they consistent? Did they just make a kids movie using cars without working the sexual implications of the cars?
It’s about time someone with some authority on the matter has spoken out about this!!! The fact that Torch hasn’t won a Pulitzer yet just shows that the entire organization is rigged!!!
https://media.tenor.com/yTxA7WgkBEUAAAAM/grandpa-abe-exit.gif
This article will now and forever be the one that I send to anyone who asks what this website is about. The perfect embodiment about everything wonderful we hold dear here. Quite frankly if a friend reads this article and doesn’t want to immediately buy a membership, I’m not sure they’re worth being friends with.
This one and the Jeep kittens.
I was really surprised to see your response to my comment a year later and I’ve been watching for the last few days to see if you would write this article. Again I’m pretty sure they only put the eyes in the windshield so they could do that flash gag. It’s bugged me from day one, too.