The small car is seemingly an endangered species. Crossover SUVs dominate much of the world, and even once beloved small car nameplates have become chunky crossovers. It’s a big deal when an automaker comes out with a tiny car concept, and small car fans have something to cheer about. The Mazda Vision X-Compact looks fantastic on the outside (see also: the Vision X Coupe), and on the inside, this new concept car recognizes that enthusiasts don’t like screens – but replaces them with something even worse. More on that in a bit.
Mazda revealed its Vision X-Compact at the Japan Mobility Show yesterday, and car enthusiasts have understandably fallen deeply in love. At only 12.5 feet long, this cutie is only a tad larger than a Japanese Kei car and over a foot shorter than a Mazda 3. Back in the day, as in the 2010s, we used to call these “city cars,” and America used to have such awesome examples as the Honda Fit, the Ford Fiesta, and the Mazda 2. In fact, this concept car is five inches shorter than a U.S. market 2011 Mazda 2. Great!
There’s so much going right for this car, from an adorable application of Mazda’s still sexy design language to its gorgeous Soul Red paint. I even love how Mazda bucked trends and deleted the giant infotainment screens that fill cars. Then it all falls apart because Mazda’s vision for the future of car tech is just ugh. Which I’ll get to, I promise.
Crossover City Car

The Vision X-Compact is a design study, and if you were wondering what the “X” is supposed to mean, well, Mazda says it means “cross.” So, this is supposed to be a bit of a crossover city car. It does sort of have the proportions of a crossover, and I do like the idea of pumping some crossover traits into a city car. It’s nice to have a high-riding seat in a runabout! “Is it an EV, PHEV, or ICE?” Mazda doesn’t say.
No matter what might power it, I am in absolute love with this design. I adore it so much that, if Mazda had announced the Vision X-Compact as a production car available with a manual transmission, I’d be seriously considering buying my first new car purchase in nearly a decade. The Vision X-Compact is a continuation of Mazda’s brilliant and timeless Kodo “Soul of Motion” design language. For more than a decade, Mazdas have largely avoided the sharp creases and jagged edges of their competitors and instead featured smooth, flowing lines.

Something I love about Mazda’s Kodo design philosophy is how it plays with paint. A Kodo Mazda in Soul Red has such beautiful depth that you don’t really see with any other car on the road in Mazda’s price brackets. It’s also awesome that Mazdas still largely look kind and happy in a world where angry grilles come from the factory with almost everyone else.
This is a properly small car, too. Its wheelbase is only 99 inches, which is about eight inches shorter than a Mazda 3’s wheelbase and only an inch longer than the old Mazda 2’s. I’m also a sucker for the glass roof and Volvo-like taillights. I have no notes and no real complaints about the design.

The interior also has a lot going for it, too. Look at that, Mazda deleted the entire infotainment system! That’s great! I can forgive the car for not having any buttons or visible controls. It is a design study, after all, not a prototype.
That said, I do wish that designers did something a bit more exciting inside than a flat, entirely featureless dashboard. Somehow, the interior design of the X-Compact is so simplistic that a Tesla Model 3’s interior looks busy in comparison. I think the lack of a giant tablet should have been an excuse to make something striking.

The only screens in this cockpit are the tiny instrument cluster and your phone, which would sit right next to the instrument cluster. Alright, so how would this car work without buttons or screens? I’m sorry you asked.
Wait, What?
Let’s just jump right into it with Mazda’s blurb about the car:
The MAZDA VISION X-COMPACT is a model designed to deepen the bond between people and cars through the fusion of a human sensory digital model and empathetic AI. Acting like a close companion, it is capable of engaging in natural conversation and suggesting destinations, helping expand the driver’s world. This represents Mazda’s vision for the future of smart mobility, where vehicles and people form an emotional connection, much like a friend.

Mazda says elsewhere that the AI is supposed to help drivers form a “heartfelt relationship” with their car. Mazda designer Kaisei Takahashi clarified what this means, and it’s something, from Autoblog:
“Picture this: you are behind the wheel, but you are not alone. There is a warm presence, not intrusive, just aware. It might say, ‘Hey, remember that cafe you mentioned last week? There is a fun back road that will get us there. Way more interesting than this highway.’”
“In the future, a Mazda vehicle will be a companion that makes every journey richer. Like spending time with a friend, it will invite dimension, variety, satisfaction, and a feeling of being understood.”
Apparently, the AI is also programmed to give you words of encouragement like “Ooh, nice merge!” or “Blind spot, left side.”

We are living in an era where the buzzword “AI” cannot be avoided anymore. AI is everywhere, from your email client to once-simple tools like schedulers and reminders. There are AIs to write blog posts, there are AIs to research any topic, there are AI girlfriends, and, of course, there’s AI “art.” It’s everywhere, and as we have written now numerous times in the past, AI has gone from being a genuinely useful tool to reduce busywork to stealing the work of artists and pumping out misinformation and disinformation at an alarming rate. You can’t even use AI for anything informative or educational since it’s just going to lie to you most of the time.
But I get why AI is bleeding into cars. People use AI every day, and Chinese car buyers are loving their car AIs, so here we are. I admit, maybe I’m a bit of that person yelling at a cloud meme.
Mazda, you had me in the first half. This concept car is undeniably gorgeous, and a really small car would be so fun. But I don’t want any of those AI gimmicks in my next car. I don’t need my car to be my girlfriend or boyfriend. I don’t want an Internet-connected car watching me and listening to me. I don’t want an AI to attempt and fail to give me a good driving route. Finding great roads yourself is one of the great parts about driving!

So Close, Mazda
Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the deletion of the big central tablet, but I’d take a giant tablet over AI any day, any time.
Sadly, and thankfully, this is only a design study, and Mazda is not going to put an AI boyfriend into your car just yet. Though Mazda does say this is its vision for the future. I’m going to hope that the future is very far out. I suppose the car is sort of unrealistic, anyway. If small cars were a hot market, beloved nameplates like the Honda Fit would still be around.
Still, if Mazda kicked the AI buzzwords to the curb and put this into production, I think I’d be one of the dozen or so people who would buy the X-Compact. It’s just so cute and so awesome. Keep up the great design work, Mazda.





Know the wall before punching!
A dozen or more of long time friends were staying at a hotel for a wedding. I had my sparring bud since 16 pinned against a wall, and wanted a resounding thud right next to his head. krsplat! recessed my pinky knuckle. The drywall/wallpaper was all the same, and I checked my throw to not go through, but happened to find the spot with a concrete column. He had medical training (dental) so he splinted with a toothbrush.
… you missed the other ‘city car’ – the Chevrolet Spark…
I saw a lot of Sparks around – usually easy to spot with their bright/unique colors.
I really wanted a Sonic RS, though.
It’s great, except for the AI nonsense of course. I like small cars and I like Mazdas (still hoping to find a decently priced 2020 Toyota Yaris iA nee Mazda 2 hatchback eventually).
Import a Mazda2 from Puerto Rico. No need to swap the wide-mouth iA face.
Though the Mazda nose is prettier, the open-mouthed 2020 Toyota mouth isn’t a deal breaker to me.
A very brief google suggests that it is possible to register a NEW Puerto Rican Mazda into California, but I’m not sure how easy it would be to get all the physical paperwork required to register the car here. Here’s a brief outline of the requirements:
Yes, a new car from Puerto Rico can be imported and registered in California, but it must meet U.S. safety and emissions standards. You will need to provide necessary documentation and ensure compliance with regulations set by agencies like the EPA and DOT.
Importing a New Car from Puerto Rico to CaliforniaEligibility for ImportA new car from Puerto Rico can be imported to California, but it must meet specific requirements. The vehicle must comply with U.S. safety and emissions standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT).
Required DocumentationTo register the vehicle in California, you will need the following documents:
Registration ProcessOnce the vehicle arrives in California, you must complete the registration process at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). This includes:
Additional Considerations
By following these guidelines, you can successfully import and register a new car from Puerto Rico in California.
More significantly, a quick glance at Mazda’s Puerto Rican website shows that they don’t sell the Mazda 2 there anymore, just like in the rest of the U.S.:
https://www.mazdapr.com
So, it’d be a matter of buying a used Yaris hatch (still, just the 2020 model year was offered with a hatch here, so maybe in PR as well?) and the whole importation/registration/transport rigamarole/expense would be a lot of trouble to go to just for the nicer, original Mazda nose.
There was that 160Kmile 2020 Yaris hatch I linked to earlier, but it’s not particularly well priced, and the dealership seems quite sketchy. There aren’t many 2020 hatches around, but they must come up once in a while I suppose. If I could snag a decent one at a good price, I’d probably just jump on it and figure out which of my current cars to sell afterwards.
I can’t speak to CA, but there’s a few articles (like this one from the old lighting site) and discussions on forums describing how to do it.
It’s built to NHTSA standards since it’s for PR, and it’s mechanically identical to the Yaris iA AFAIK, so it should meet emissions requirements for most if not all states.
Yes, the 2 has been discontinued, but it’s still possible to import them. However many prospective owners likely balk at the cost of transport, especially given the price point of the vehicle. A few years ago when I looked into it it was almost the same price to just do a Mazda conversion on an iA as it was to ship a new 2 to the mainland.
Yah, I’d assume it might even cost less (and be way less paperwork) to just import a Mazda 2 nose from overseas and bolt it onto a US-spec hatch. But again: I’d not bother.
ATM, I’m not really shopping hard for a 2020 Mazda 2 hatch for sale near me in Los Angeles. I’m also sort of considering lightly used (less than 10 years, which is practically new by my standards) Mazda crossovers (CX-30, -5, and -9) any of which would probably work fine for me too.
With that said, if a 2020 Toyota Yaris (iA) hatch at a good price does cross my path (I’m flexible re: either of the two trim levels, color, etc…) I’m ready/willing to pay cash for it in full right now. I should probably set up some alerts at car shopping sites, but I’m a procrastinator.
The ai concept seems like it would do better in Asia. Maybe some of the people that have either lost the ability to think or never had it would like it. My first thought was it was a car for the older people in Japan they have been trying to build robots and ai things to combat loneliness. The Chinese have really been leaning into that too but it would seem for different reasons.
No fracking toasters in cars.
Multiple hell yeahs! for the BG reference
So say we all!
So say we all.
OK, I’m 61.. I kinda love this idea, but I also love that my wife and I like making AndroidAuto say potty words. As a New Englander I look forward to when turning on my blinker my car says “Geez!! look out for that ##%^ on the left!”
Yeah, no AI in a car for me.
When I’m alone in my car, it’s my venting box (in more ways than one). I scream about customers, managers and coworkers that have pissed me off. I complain about my family members (never my wife of course, just in case she see this). I sing too loudly, cuss, swear, curse, laugh at jokes I shouldn’t and see if I can fart along with the bass line of almost any song on the radio.
A little red car in my possession would have hoof print tire patterns and a barbed tail inside of a month.
I would have to take it once a month off to a Priest for an exorcism.
Note to self: Replace seat covers after buying used car from Hoser68
Shoot, if I’m doing it right, you need to replace the headliner.
hahaha
86 the AI and I would be one of the dozens (dozens I tell you!) that would want this car. In PHEV or BEV guise I could even deal with the lack of a manual transmission.
When I read Mazda’s PR horse shit about the AI part, I threw up in my mouth a little bit.
The first car I’m driving that suggests a destination is gonna get suggested into a concrete wall.
I hope the good folks at Mazda read this article and the comments section.
(Hey, Mazda, the NA MX-5 was awesome with computerized nothing except the spark timing, take some inspiration from that!)
It’s a concept. I don’t think a modern car without a big tablet in the center of the dash won’t sell well. If it does go into production, changes will be made.
Yeah, this is just a concept that panders to the buzzwords that are currently popular among futurists and investors. I don’t understand why Mercedes is so angry.
I think I would have been more okay with it if Mazda hadn’t said that this is their vision for the future. I know that, since it’s a concept, we’ll never see this. But the idea that this is the future? Hard pass.
I think if you read between the lines, Mazda is saying, “This is our vision of the NE MX-5 Miata’s interior.”
This could be a really neat hook for a lot of people, to be honest. But I cannot stress enough that there needs to be an “offline” option. Maybe a small, simple knob/switch bank on the dash that flips open to reveal the controls.
I love the idea of a car that can act like your friend, but sometimes the best thing about friends is that they are there IF and WHEN you need them, not with you everywhere you go.
People are known to absolutely love backseat drivers.
Sooo can I be like Captain Picard? ‘Computer, engage left turn signals.’
That might work in the 24th century but today’s AI has a better than 50/50 chance of firing a full spread of photon torpedoes into the Camry in front of you.
Eh, they deserved it.
So, that’s how they get dents in the back bumper!
“Commander R-AI-ker, engage!”
“firing a full spread of photon torpedoes into the Camry in front of you.”
That may be the nerdiest way of saying it’ll flash the high beams I’ve ever heard.
First thing I thought reading this article was this car wants me to ask it for “tea, earl grey, hot”.
“Computer: Warp 8 – Engage”
“Setting Cruise Control to Eighty Miles Per Hour. Enjoy your drive!”
If this technology were any good, race cars would be using it.
Part of driving is paying attention and reacting very quickly to changing situations. If you decide to change lanes, ask the computer to turn on the signal, then realize that you shouldn’t change lanes, you then have to ask the computer to turn the signal off. That can be done instantaneously by using the turn lever stalk.
Imagine if you had to ask the computer to hit the brakes to avoid an accident, or ask it to turn the steering wheel. Everything that a driver needs to do can be done just fine without some half-baked personality getting in the middle of everything.
I have absolutely no need for artificial intelligence.
I already deal with people on a daily basis, and there’s a lot more artificiality compared to actual intelligence.
I will believe in Artificial Intelligence when I start seeing humans displaying less natural stupidity.
Any Species that thinks a warning label that says “do not insert into any orifices” on a box of Crayons isn’t capable of making artificial intelligence.
Although I think we are likely capable of creating a singularity. As our naturally stupid selves attempt to make AI, but actually achieve AS (Artificial Stupidity), it’s just a matter of time before we and our AS overlords become so dense we create a black hole.
Exactly, and this is why I believe in the Great Filter part of the Fermi Paradox. We’ll most certainly destroy ourselves (accidentally or on purpose, doesn’t matter) well before we get to the stage where we can explore the cosmos and find other ‘intelligent’ life. Shit, those other civilizations probably already destroyed themselves too!
It’s official. Whoever design these features do not understand how driving, or humans, work.
My wall has a hole the size of my wrist right now
When VC stops paying for all of our stupid AI chatbots, then we’ll find out what the real value of this stuff is. My strong suspicion is that it will prove absurdly expensive for what it is.
That said, I don’t blame Mazda for this. The business world wants AI and if you don’t deliver _something_, whether it makes sense or not, you’re going to get fired. I’m literally going through that at my current company right now.
The only AI I’d want talking to me when I drive has to sound like Majel Barrett-Roddenberry and speak in a detached, clinical manner.
Now you got me thinking about how much fun it would be having Lwaxanna Troi as my copilot and I’m kinda into the idea…
“I don’t want to turn left, I want to go straight ahead to that Andorian birthday party because Odo is there and I want to hit on him and also I AM THE HOLDER OF THE RINGS OF RIX or whatever.”
Holder of the Sacred Chalice of Rix, heir to the Holy Rings of Betazed
Ha, all that AI voice interface means deaf people (like me) are SOL, not that I mind, lol.
AI can’t go away quickly enough, good grief. Yeah, some people have compared AI to asbestos in that asbestos was put in everything everywhere and now we’re dealing with the consequences of asbestos abatement and mitigaton for the next few decades or more and now we’re seeing something similar with AI being shoved into everything everywhere the same way they used to shove asbestos into schoolhouse walls, lol, so it could take years or decades to eliminate all traces of AI…
We’ll see how we look back at it, but that seems like a good comparison.
As an insulator and heat barrier, asbestos is really fucking good. Like, hard to beat with modern technologies good. Was it necessary in drywall compound and linoleum tiles? IDK, but now we’re left with the mess to clean up.
AI is really good at certain tasks, but….
Why does it look like it’s crying? I wouldn’t want to be stuck having a conversation with this.
“Tell me why you are so sad Marvin. It’s a long trip. We have all day.”
Nice HHGTTG reference.
I see what you’re saying, but I see it more that it has the “cat eye” look, specifically – amusingly for a city car – a cheetah, where the line surrounding the eyes follows the nose/snout/muzzle to the ends of the mouth. This doesn’t go the ends of the “mouth” but otherwise follows the idea.
I wonder how much of this idea for a car to also be your AI companion is a result of the so-called ‘epidemic of loneliness’ that is sweeping across Japan, or how much of it comes from the minds of lonely engineers and designers? I follow a few Japanese Salarymen channels on YT and their existence certainly seems bleak and lonely.
One thing I do know, I don’t need another entity trying to yap at me while I am driving.
The car is beautiful, but do it without the AI. Artificial general intelligence is only at a mock-up concept stage at this time, they won’t find any working AI to put in the car.
That side profile gives me stronk Honda N600/ Fiat 500 vibes.
Me: Let’s go to the Tail of the Dragon again!
AI Mazda: Here’s a map to Mordor.
Me: I’m talking about the one in North Carolina.
AI Mazda: I’m afraid there’s no Mordor in North Carolina. Shall I plot a course to Montauk instead?
Me: Montauk is in New York.
AI Mazda: Plotting a course to New York.
Me: No. We’re going to the Tail of the Dragon in North Carolina.
AI Mazda: Plotting a course to Mordor.
Me: No. Jesus.
AI Mazda: Plotting a course to Nazareth.
Me: Carmax. Let’s go to Carmax.
If I wanted to hear “careful!” or “Watch out” when I’m driving, I’d just bring my wife.
“It’s 35”
“Shouldn’t you slow down?”
“Watch that asshole in the Cyberkuk”
Imagine, if you will:
Getting pulled over, cop walks up.
“Do you know how fast you were going?”
“Yes offic..”
“Not you, the car! Tell me how fast this guy was going!”
“Regrettably we were going 10MPH over the speed limit”
“Thought so. Enjoy the ticket”
But officer it was the CAR that was speeding. I’m not “driving”, I’m traveling.